Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-16T17:00:04.647Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Application of ICELS Systems for Radiocarbon Dating

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 July 2016

Konrad Tudyka*
Affiliation:
Dept. of Radioisotopes, Institute of Physics, Silesian University of Technology, Krzywoustego 2, 44-100 Gliwice, Poland.
Anna Pazdur
Affiliation:
Dept. of Radioisotopes, Institute of Physics, Silesian University of Technology, Krzywoustego 2, 44-100 Gliwice, Poland.
Páll Theodórsson
Affiliation:
Science Institute, University of Iceland, Dunhaga 3, IS-107 Reykjavik, Iceland.
Adam Michczyński
Affiliation:
Dept. of Radioisotopes, Institute of Physics, Silesian University of Technology, Krzywoustego 2, 44-100 Gliwice, Poland.
Jacek Pawlyta
Affiliation:
Dept. of Radioisotopes, Institute of Physics, Silesian University of Technology, Krzywoustego 2, 44-100 Gliwice, Poland.
*
Corresponding author. Email: [email protected].
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Liquid scintillation counting (LSC) for radiocarbon dating is a less expensive method than accelerator mass spectrometry (AMS), provides a high degree of accuracy, and is less prone to contamination due to the larger sample sizes. However, to obtain high precision, a long counting time is needed. The Gliwice Radiocarbon Laboratory is seeking to obtain an increased counting capacity with 2–3 mL benzene samples than we presently can achieve with our 2 Quantulus systems. We are therefore investigating the possibility of using a simple, single-phototube LS system (ICELS) for dating samples younger than 5000 yr. We present the first results of this investigation, including the measurement of 3 VIRI and 3 FIRI intercomparison samples.

Type
Methods and Developments
Copyright
Copyright © The American Journal of Science 

References

Kojola, H, Polach, H, Nurmi, J, Oikari, T, Soini, E. 1984. High-resolution low-level liquid scintillation beta-spectrometer. The International Journal of Applied Radiation and Isotopes 35(10):949–52.Google Scholar
Pazdur, A, Fogman, M, Michczyński, A, Pawlyta, J. 2000. Comparison of the radiocarbon dating methods used in the Gliwice radiocarbon laboratory. Geochronometria 18:913.Google Scholar
Pazdur, A, Fogman, M, Michczyński, A, Pawlyta, J. 2003. Precision of 14C dating in Gliwice Radiocarbon Laboratory FIRI programme. Geochronometria 22:2740.Google Scholar
Pearson, GW. 1983. The development of high precision 14C measurement and its application to archaeological time-scale problems [PhD thesis]. The Queen's University of Belfast.Google Scholar
Scott, EM. 2003. The Third International Radiocarbon Intercomparison (TIRI) and the Fourth International Radiocarbon Intercomparison (FIRI). Radiocarbon 45(2):135408.Google Scholar
Scott, EM, Cook, GT, Naysmith, P, Bryant, C, O'Donnell, D. 2007. A report on Phase 1 of the 5th International Radiocarbon Intercomparison (VIRI). Radiocarbon 49(2):409–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Theodórsson, P. 1991. Gas proportional versus liquid scintillation counting, radiometric versus AMS dating. Radiocarbon 33(1):913.Google Scholar
Theodórsson, P. 2005. A simple, extremely stable single-tube liquid scintillation system for radiocarbon dating. Radiocarbon 47(1):8997.Google Scholar
Theodórsson, P, Gudjónsson, GI. 2009. Ultra-stable single-phototube liquid scintillation system for radiocarbon dating. In: Eikenberg, J, Jäggi, M, Beer, H, Baehrle, H, editors. LSC 2008, Advances in Liquid Scintillation Spectrometry. Proceedings of the 2008 International Liquid Scintillation Conference. Tucson: Radiocarbon. p 253–60.Google Scholar
Theodórsson, P, Ingvarsdóttir, S, Gudjonsson, GI. 2003. Balanced window method in 14C liquid scintillation counting. Radiocarbon 45(1):113–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar