Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T09:37:42.857Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Anthropogenic Radiocarbon in the Eastern Irish Sea and Scottish Coastal Waters

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 July 2016

F. H. Begg ,
G. T. Cook ,
M. S. Baxter ,
E. M. Scott  and
Martin McCartney
F. H. Begg
Affiliation:
Scottish Universities Research and Reactor Centre, East Kilbride, G75 0QU Scotland
G. T. Cook
Affiliation:
Scottish Universities Research and Reactor Centre, East Kilbride, G75 0QU Scotland
M. S. Baxter
Affiliation:
IAEA International Laboratory of Marine Radioactivity, Principality of Monaco, MC 98000
E. M. Scott
Affiliation:
Department of Statistics, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, G12 8QQ Scotland
Martin McCartney
Affiliation:
Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food, Directorate of Fisheries Research, Pakefield Road, Lowestoft, Suffolk NR33 0HT England
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

14C is produced as an activation product in nuclear reactors, and may be discharged to both the atmosphere and the marine environment during nuclear fuel reprocessing. In the UK, 14C is discharged, under license, into the Eastern Irish Sea by the British Nuclear Fuels plc (BNFL) reprocessing plant at Sellafield, Cumbria, northwest England, and is then transported into Scottish coastal waters. We analyzed intertidal biota samples to determine the effect of these discharges. The specific activities of 14C found in these samples indicate that the uptake and bioaccumulation of 14C is dependent on the type of organism and its feeding behavior. Measured 14C concentrations in mussels (Mytilus edulis) were higher than those in winkles (Littorina littorea), which were greater than those found in seaweed (Fucus spp.); maximum observed activities were ca. 7, 5 and 3.5 times the accepted current ambient level of 260 Bq kg−1 C, respectively. Annual Nori (Porphyra umbilicalis) samples were analyzed for their 137Cs, 241Am and 14C contents; both the 137Cs and 241Am results correlated well with published Sellafield discharge data (r = 0.877 and 0.918, respectively), whereas there was no significant correlation between measured 14C activities and the discharge record, indicating increased complexity in the chemical and biological behavior of 14C or some discrepancy in the estimated discharge records.

Type
III. Global 14C Production and Variation
Information
Radiocarbon , Volume 34 , Issue 3: Proceedings of the 14th International Radiocarbon Conference , 1992 , pp. 707 - 716
Copyright
Copyright © The American Journal of Science 

References

Barker, H. 1953 Radiocarbon dating: Large-scale preparation of acetylene from organic material. Nature 172: 631–632.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barker, H., Burleigh, R. and Meeks, N. 1969 New method for the combustion of samples for radiocarbon dating. Nature 221: 49–50.Google Scholar
Begg, F. H., Baxter, M. S., Cook, G. T., Scott, E. M. and McCartney, M. 1991 Anthropogenic 14C as a tracer in western U.K. coastal waters. In Kershaw, P. J. and Woodhead, D. S., eds., Radionuclides in the Study of Marine Processes. London, Elsevier Applied Science: 52–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beninson, D. J. 1984 Production, release and means of control of C-14 in heavy water reactors. Report to IAEA's Coordinated Research Programme on Carbon-14 from Nuclear Facilities. Vienna, IAEA, Contract 3247/R2/CF.Google Scholar
British Nuclear Fuels plc 1985 Annual report on radioactive discharges and monitoring of the environment 1984.Google Scholar
Davis, W. Jr. 1979 Carbon-14 production in nuclear reactors. In Carter, A. A. and Kahn, B., eds., Management of Low-Level Radioactive Waste. Oxford, Pergamon Press: 151–191.Google Scholar
Dickson, R. R. and Boelens, R. G. V., eds. 1988 The status of current knowledge of anthropogenic influences in the Irish Sea. International Council for the Exploration of the Sea (Denmark). Co-operative Research Report 155.Google Scholar
Fowler, T. W., Clark, R. L., Gruhlke, J. M. and Russel, J. L. 1976 Public health considerations of carbon-14 discharges from the light-water-cooled nuclear power industry. US Environmental Protection Agency Report. ORP-TAD-76-3. Springfield, Virginia, NTIS.Google Scholar
IAEA 1989 IAEA Bulletin 31 (1) Quarterly Journal of the IAEA, Vienna.Google Scholar
Killough, G. G. and Rohwer, P. S. 1978 A new look at the dosimetry of 14C released to the atmosphere as carbon dioxide. Health Physics 34: 141–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kunz, C. O. 1985 14C discharges at three light water reactors. Health Physics 49: 25–35.Google Scholar
Kunz, C. O., Mahoney, W. E. and Miller, T. W. 1974 Carbon-14 gaseous effluent from pressurised water reactors. In Population Exposures, Proceedings of the 8th Midyear Topical Symposium of the Health Physics Society. US Atomic Energy Commission Report CONF-4018. Springfield, Virginia, NTIS: 229–234.Google Scholar
Kunz, C. O., Mahoney, W. E. and Miller, T. W. 1975 Carbon-14 gaseous effluents from boiling water reactors. Transactions of the American Nuclear Society 21: 91–92.Google Scholar
Lassey, K. R., Manning, M. R. and O'Brien, B. J. 1988 Assessment of the inventory of carbon-14 in the oceans: An overview. In Inventories of Selected Radionuclides in the Oceans. IAEA, Vienna, IAEA-TECDOC-481.Google Scholar
Mackenzie, A. B., Scott, R. D. and Williams, T. M. 1987 Mechanisms of northwards dispersal of Sellafield waste. Nature 329: 42–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Magno, P. J., Nelson, C. B. and Ellet, W. H. 1975 A consideration of the significance of C-14 discharges from the nuclear power industry. In First, M. W., ed., Proceedings of the 13th AEC Air Cleaning Conference. US Atomic Energy Commission Report CONF-740807. Springfield, Virginia, NTIS: 1047–1055.Google Scholar
McCartney, M. (ms.) 1987 Global and local effects of 14C discharges from the nuclear fuel cycle. , University of Glasgow.Google Scholar
McCartney, M., Baxter, M. S., McKay, K. and Scott, E. M. 1986 Global and local effects of 14C discharges from the nuclear fuel cycle. In Stuiver, M. and Kra, R. S., eds., Proceedings of the 12th International 14C Conference. Radiocarbon 28(2A): 634–643.Google Scholar
McCartney, M., Baxter, M. S. and Scott, E. M. 1988a Carbon-14 discharges from the nuclear fuel cycle: 1. Global effects. Journal of Environmental Radioactivity 8: 143–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCartney, M., Baxter, M. S. and Scott, E. M. 1988b Carbon-14 discharges from the nuclear fuel cycle: 2. Local effects. Journal of Environmental Radioactivity 8: 157–171.Google Scholar
McDonald, P., Cook, G. T., Baxter, M. S. and Thomson, J. C. 1990 Radionuclide transfer from Sellafield to South-West Scotland. Journal of Environmental Radioactivity 12(3): 285–298.Google Scholar
Moghissi, A. A. and Carter, M. W. 1977 Global Impact of carbon-14 from nuclear reactors. In Proceedings of the 4th International Congress of the International Radiation Protection Association. Paris, France: 949–951.Google Scholar
NCRP 1985 Carbon-14 in the environment. Recommendations of the National Council on Radiation Protection and Measures. NCRP Report 81.Google Scholar
Pierson, D. H. 1988 Artificial radioactivity in Cumbria: summary of an assessment by measurement and modelling. Journal of Environmental Radioactivity 6: 61–75.Google Scholar
Suess, H. E. 1953 Natural radiocarbon and the rate of exchange of carbon dioxide between the atmosphere and the sea. In Aldrich, W., ed., Proceedings of the 1st Conference on Nuclear Processes in Geologic Settings. Chicago, University of Chicago Press: 52–56.Google Scholar
Suess, H. E. 1955 Radiocarbon concentration in modern wood. Science 122: 415.Google Scholar
Tanaka, N., Monaghan, M. C. and Rye, D. M. 1986 Contribution of metabolic carbon to mollusc and barnacle shell carbonate. Nature 320: 520–523.Google Scholar
Taylor, D. M., Moroni, J. P., Snihs, J.-O. and Richmond, C. R. 1990 The metabolism of 3H and 14C with special reference to radiation protection. Radiation Protection Dosimetry 30(2): 87–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar