Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-fbnjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T06:05:15.911Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Another Way of Early Pottery Distribution in Eastern Europe? Case Study of the Pezmog 4 Site, European Far Northeast

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 February 2016

Victor N Karmanov ,
Natalia E Zaretskaya  and
Alexander V Volokitin
Victor N Karmanov*
Affiliation:
Institute of Language, Literature and History of Komi Science Center, Ural Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences, Kommunisticheskaya St., 26; 167982, Syktyvkar, Republic of Komi, Russian Federation
Natalia E Zaretskaya
Affiliation:
Geological Institute, Russian Academy of Sciences, Pyzhevsky Per., 7, 119017, Moscow, Russia
Alexander V Volokitin
Affiliation:
Institute of Language, Literature and History of Komi Science Center, Ural Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences, Kommunisticheskaya St., 26; 167982, Syktyvkar, Republic of Komi, Russian Federation
*
2. Corresponding author. Email: [email protected].
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A case study of the Neolithic comb ceramic site Pezmog 4 of the Kama culture presents a situation when results of radiocarbon dating change long-existing concepts concerning the development of archaeological events. Until the early 2000s, the chronology of the Kama culture, distributed mainly in the Kama and Vychegda River basins, has been based on comparative-typological analysis. Estimates of the age of this culture changed from the 3rd millennium BC in the 1950s to the 1st half of the 4th millennium BC by the 1990s. Research concerning the Pezmog 4 site in the central Vychegda River basin in 1999–2002 has abruptly changed this chronological understanding. The data obtained put the age of the early stage of Kama culture within the time range 5750–5620 cal BC and allowed us to propose the existence of another way of early pottery distribution in the forest zone of eastern Europe at the beginning of the 6th millennium BC. This innovation probably penetrated from the trans-Ural region.

Type
Eurasian Archaeology
Information
Radiocarbon , Volume 56 , Issue 2 , 2014 , pp. 733 - 741
Copyright
Copyright © 2014 by the Arizona Board of Regents on behalf of the University of Arizona 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bader, ON. 1963. Drevneishaia istoriya Prikam'ya [The most ancient history of the Kama region]. Moscow: Nauka. 156 p.Google Scholar
Bader, ON. 1978. Hronologicheskie ramki neolita Prikam'ia i metody' ikh ustanovleniia [Chronology of Neolithic of the Kama region and methods of its determination]. Kratkie soobshcheniia instituta arkheologii AN SSSR 153:72–4.Google Scholar
Bonsall, C, Cook, G, Manson, JL, Sanderson, D. 2002. Direct dating of Neolithic pottery: progress and prospects. Documenta Praehistorica 29:47–59.Google Scholar
Bronk Ramsey, C. 1995 Radiocarbon calibration and analysis of stratigraphy: the OxCal program. Radiocarbon 37(2):425–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bronk Ramsey, C. 2001. Development of the radiocarbon calibration program. Radiocarbon 43(2A):355–63.Google Scholar
Burov, GM. 1967. Drevnii Sindor (iz istorii plemen Evropeiskogo Severo-Vostoka v VII tysiacheletii do n.e. – I tysyacheletii n.e.) [Ancient Sindor (History of Tribes of European Northeast in VII m. BC – I m. AD)]. Moscow: Nauka. 220 p.Google Scholar
Burov, GM. 1986. Krainii Severo-Vostok Evropy v epohu mezolita, neolita i rannego metalla [Far Northeast of Europe in Mesolithic, Neolithic and Palaeometal]. Summary of PhD thesis. Novosibirsk. 18 p.Google Scholar
Delqué Količ, E. 1995. Direct radiocarbon dating of pottery: selective heat treatment to retrieve smoke-derived carbon. Radiocarbon 37(2):275–84.Google Scholar
Engovatova, AV. 2000. Hronologiya epohi neolita Volgo-Okskogo Mezhdurech'ya [Chronology of Neolithic of Volga-Oka interfluve]. In: Hronologiya neolita Vostochnoi Evropy. Tezisy dokladov mezhdunarodnoi konferentsii, posviashchennoi pamyati NN. Gurinoi. Sankt-Peterburg, 27 noyabrya – 2 dekabrya 2000 g. Saint Petersburg: Institut Istorii Material'noy kultury RAN. p 94.Google Scholar
Evin, J, Gabasio, M, Lefevre, JC. 1989. Preparation techniques for radiocarbon dating of potsherds. Radiocarbon 31(3):276–83.Google Scholar
Gabasio, M, Evin, J, Arnal, GB, Andrieux, P. 1986. Origins of carbon in potsherds. Radiocarbon 28(2A):711–8.Google Scholar
Gomes, DC, Vega, O. 1999. Dating organic temper of ceramics by AMS: sample preparation and carbon evaluation. Radiocarbon 41(3):315–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halikov, AH. 1969. Drevniaia istoriya Srednego Povolzh'ya [Ancient history of the Volga region]. Moscow: Nauka. 395 p. In Russian.Google Scholar
Hedges, REM, Tiemei, C, Housley, RA. 1992. Results and methods in the radiocarbon dating of pottery. Radiocarbon 34(3):906–15.Google Scholar
Karmanov, VN. 2008. Neolit Evropei'skogo Severo-Vostoka [Neolithic of European Northeast]. Syktyvkar: Komi nauchnyi centr. 226 p.Google Scholar
Karmanov, VN, Zaretskaya, NE, Lychagiha, EL. 2012. Neolithic dispersal in Far Northeast Europe: ways and chronology. Radiocarbon 54(3):331–9.Google Scholar
Kosinskaya, LL. 1991. Neoliticheskaia stoianka Kochmas na nizhnei' Vy'chegde [The Neolithic site Kochmas in the Lower Course of Vychegda river]. In: Neoliticheskie pamiatniki Urala. Sverdlovsk: UrO AN SSSR. p 4–20.Google Scholar
Kosinskaya, LL. 1997. Neolit [Neolithic]. In: Arheologiya Respubliki Komi. Moscow: DiK. p 146–213.Google Scholar
Kostylyova, EL. 1994. Ranneneoliticheskaia verkhnevolzhskaia kul'tura [The Early Neolithic Verhnevolzhskaya culture]. In: Tverskoi arkheologicheskii sbornik 1. Tver'. p 53–8.Google Scholar
Kovaliukh, N, Skrypkin, V. 2007. Radiocarbon dating of the archaeological pottery by liquid scintillation technique. In: Proceedings of the Conference “Radiocarbon in Archaeological and Palaeoecological Studies.” Moscow: SpB. p 120–5.Google Scholar
Loginova, ES. 1989. Poseleniya epohi neolita na Srednei Vychegde [Neolithic settlements in the Middle course of Vychegda river]. In: Materialy VI mezhdunarodnogo kongressa finno-ugrovedov. Volume 1. Moscow. p 66. In Russian.Google Scholar
Lychagina, EL. 2011. Chronology and periodization of the Neolithic in the Upper and Middle Kama region. Archaeology, Ethnology and Anthropology of Eurasia 39(1):28–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mel'nichuk, AF, Bordinskikh, GA, Mokrushin, VP, Degtiareva, MI, Lychagina, EL. 2001. Novye pozdnemezoliticheskie i ranneneoliticheskie pamiatniki v verkhnem i srednem Prikam'e [New Late Mesolithic and Early Neolithic sites at the Upper and Middle courses of Kama river]. In: Arkheologiia i etnografiia Srednego Priural'ya 1. Berezniki: Permskii gos. p 142–62.Google Scholar
O'Malley, JM, Kuzmin, YV, Burr, GS, Donahue, DJ, Jull, AJT. 1999. Direct radiocarbon AMS dating of the earliest pottery from the Russian Far East and Transbaikal. Memoires de la Societe Prehistorique Francaise 26:19–24.Google Scholar
Reimer, PJ, Baillie, MGL, Bard, E, Bayliss, A, Beck, JW, Bertrand, JH, Blackwell, PG, Buck, CE, Burr, GS, Cutler, KB, Damon, PE, Edwards, RL, Fairbanks, RG, Friedrich, M, Guilderson, TP, Hogg, AG, Hughen, KA, Kromer, B, McCormac, G, Manning, S, Bronk Ramsey, C, Reimer, RW, Remmele, S, Southon, JR, Stuiver, M, Talamo, S, Taylor, FW, van der Plicht, J, Weyhenmeyer, CE. 2004. IntCal04 terrestrial radiocarbon age calibration, 0–26 cal kyr BP. Radiocarbon 460(3):1029–58.Google Scholar
Reimer, PJ, Baillie, MGL, Bard, E, Bayliss, A, Beck, JW, Blackwell, PG, Bronk Ramsey, C, Buck, CE, Burr, GS, Edwards, RL, Friedrich, M, Grootes, PM, Guilderson, TP, Hajdas, I, Heaton, TJ, Hogg, AG, Hughen, KA, Kaiser, KF, Kromer, B, McCormac, FG, Manning, SW, Reimer, RW, Richards, DA, Southon, JR, Talamo, S, Turney, CSM, van der Plicht, J, Weyhenmeyer, CE. 2009. IntCal09 and Marine09 radiocarbon age calibration curves, 0–50,000 years cal BP. Radiocarbon 51(4):1111–50.Google Scholar
Vereshagina, IV. 2010. Mezolit i neolit krai'nego evropei'skogo Severo-Vostoka [Mesolithic and Neolithic of Far European Northeast]. Saint Petersburg: Peter-burgskoe Vostokovedenie. 232 p.Google Scholar
Volokitin, AV, Karmanov, VN. 2004. Rannii neolit Evropeiskogo Severo-Vostoka [Early Neolithic of European Northeast]. Rossiiskaya Arkheologiya 2:5–14. In Russian with English abstract.Google Scholar
Volokitin, AV, Karmanov, VN, Marchenko, TI, Duryagina, DA. 1998. Pezmog IV – novyi pamyatnik grebenchatogo neolita na Vychegde [Pezmog IV – New Site of Comb Neolithic at Vychegda river]. In: Severnoe Priural'e v epohu kamnya i metalla (Materialy po arheologii Evropeiskogo Severo-Vostoka 15). Syktyvkar: Komi nauchnyi centr. p 31–40.Google Scholar
Zaitseva, G, Skripkin, V, Kovaliukh, N, Possnert, G, Dolukhanov, P, Vybornov, A. 2009. Radiocarbon dating of Neolithic pottery. Radiocarbon 51(2):795–801.Google Scholar
Zakh, VA. 2009. Hronostratigrafiia neolita i rannego metalla lesnogo Tobolo-Ishim'ya [Chronostratigraphy of Neolithic of Tobol-Ishim region]. Novosibirsk: Nauka. 320 p.Google Scholar
Zaretskaya, NE. 2005. Radiouglerodnaya i kalendarnaya khronologiia mnogosloi'ny‘kh torfianikovy'kh poselenii’ Volgo-Okskogo mezhdurech'ia [Radiocarbon and calendar chronology of multilayer peat sites within the Upper Volga]. In: Zhilin, MG, editor. Stone Age of the Eastern Europe and Trans-Ural Forest Zone. Moscow: Academia. p 113–29. In Russian.Google Scholar
Zaretskaya, NE, Zhilin, MG, Karmanov, VN, Uspenskaia, ON. 2005. Radiocarbon dating of wetland archeological sites. Geochronometria 24:117–32.Google Scholar
Zaretskaya, NE, Hartz, S, Terberger, T, Savchenko, SN, Zhilin, MG. 2012. Radiocarbon chronology of the Shigir and Gorbunovo archaeological bog sites, Middle Urals, Russia. Radiocarbon 54(3):783–94.Google Scholar