Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-17T22:22:19.598Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

An Assessment of Laboratory Contamination at the Isotrace Radiocarbon Facility

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 July 2016

D M Gurfinkel
D M Gurfinkel*
Affiliation:
Collegium Archaeometricum, c/o Department of Metallurgy and Materials Science, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario Canada, M5S 1A4
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

An assessment of the contamination contribution of various sample preparation procedures used at the Isotrace Radiocarbon Facility, University of Toronto, is described. Samples of geologic material, millions of years old, or samples derived therefrom, were tested because these would presumably contain only dead carbon. Results showed, however, that 14C contamination could be detected in several samples, complicating the contamination assessment. Best estimates of the contamination contribution from sample preparation were reported as: cracking: <0.17% modern, acetylene synthesis: <0.25% modern, combustion: <0.39% modern, and handling: <0.54% modern. These estimates were reported as upper limits because they likely represented 14C derived from two sources: sample preparation and the sample itself.

Type
Research Article
Information
Radiocarbon , Volume 29 , Issue 3 , 1987 , pp. 335 - 346
Copyright
Copyright © The American Journal of Science 

References

ASM Committee on pickling of iron and steel, 1964, Pickling of iron and steel in Lyman, T, ed, Metals handbook, 8th ed: Metals Parks, Ohio, Am Soc Metals, p 346–356.Google Scholar
Beukens, R P, Gurfinkel, D M and Lee, H W, 1986, Progress at the Isotrace radiocarbon facility, in Stuiver, M and Kra, R S, eds, Internatl 14C conf, 12th, Proc: Radiocarbon, v 28, no. 2A, p 229–236.Google Scholar
Beukens, R P and Lee, H W, 1981, The production of small carbon samples by RF dissociation of acetylene, in Kutschera, W, ed, Symposium on accelerator mass spectrometry, 2nd, Proc: Argonne Natl Lab, p 416–425.Google Scholar
Gillespie, R and Hedges, R E M, 1984, Laboratory contamination in radiocarbon accelerator mass spectrometry: Nuclear Instruments & Methods Phys Research, Sec B, v 233, no. 2, p 294–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kieser, W E, Beukens, R P, Kilius, L R, Lee, H W and Litherland, A E, 1986, Isotrace radiocarbon analysis: equipment and procedures: Nuclear Instruments & Methods, v B15, p 718–721.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lepley, R H, 1978, Calcium compounds (calcium carbonate), in Grayson, M, ed, Encyclopedia of chemical technology, v 4, 3rd ed: New York, John Wiley and Sons, p 427–432.Google Scholar
Lowdon, J A, Wilmeth, R and Blake, W Jr, 1969, Geological Survey of Canada radiocarbon dates III: Radiocarbon, v 11, no. 1, p 22–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mausteller, J W, Tepper, F and Rodgers, S J, 1967, Alkali metal handling and systems operating techniques: New York, Gordon and Breach.Google Scholar
Polach, H, Gower, J and Fraser, I, 1973, Synthesis of high purity benzene for radiocarbon dating, in Rafter, TA and Grant-Taylor, T, eds, Internatl 14C conf, 8th, Proc: Wellington, New Zealand, Royal Soc New Zealand, p B36–B49.Google Scholar
Radnell, C J, and Muller, A B, 1980, Memory effects in the production of benzene for radiocarbon dating, in Stuiver, M and Kra, R S, eds, Internatl 14C conf, 10th, Proc: Radiocarbon, v 22, no. 2, p 479–486.Google Scholar
Shine, N B, 1978, Carbides (calcium carbide), in Grayson, M, ed, Encyclopedia of chemical technology, v 4, 3rd ed: New York, John Wiley and Sons, p 505–519.Google Scholar