Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-04T21:34:39.569Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

AMS Radiocarbon Dates from Three Shellmounds in the San Francisco Bay Area, California, USA

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 July 2016

Tsim D Schneider*
Affiliation:
Archaeological Research Facility, University of California, 2251 College Building, Berkeley, California 94720-1076, USA. Email: [email protected].
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

This paper presents a set of accelerator mass spectrometry (AMS) radiocarbon dates obtained from various archaeological samples collected from 3 shellmounds—CA-MRN-114, CA-MRN-115, and CA-MRN-328—within China Camp State Park, Marin County, California, USA.

Type
Date Lists
Copyright
Copyright © 2011 The Arizona Board of Regents on behalf of the University of Arizona 

References

REFERENCES

Brienes, M. 1983. China Camp and the San Francisco Bay Shrimp Fishery. Sacramento: Office of Interpretive Services, California Department of Parks and Recreation. 162 p.Google Scholar
Bronk Ramsey, C. 2009. Bayesian analysis of radiocarbon dates. Radiocarbon 51(1):337–60.Google Scholar
Highley, TL. 1995. Comparative durability of untreated wood in use above ground. International Biodeterioration and Biodegradation 35(4):409–19.Google Scholar
Ingram, BL, Southon, JR. 1996. Reservoir ages in eastern Pacific coastal and estuarine waters. Radiocarbon 38(3):573–82.Google Scholar
Libby, WF. 1955. Radiocarbon Dating. 2nd edition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. 175 p.Google Scholar
Meighan, CW. 1953. Preliminary excavations at the Thomas Site, Marin County. Reports of the University of California Archaeological Survey 19:114. Berkeley: University of California.Google Scholar
Morrell, JJ, Miller, DJ, Schneider, PF. 1999. Service Life of Treated and Untreated Fence Posts: 1996 Post Farm Report. Research Contribution 26, Forest Research Laboratory, Oregon State University. 24 p.Google Scholar
Nelson, NC. 1907. San Francisco Bay Mounds. University of California Archaeological Survey Manuscripts 349. Berkeley: Phoebe A Hearst Museum of Anthropology, University of California.Google Scholar
Schiffer, MB. 1986. Radiocarbon dating and the “old wood” problem: the case of the Hohokam chronology. Journal of Archaeological Science 13(1):1330.Google Scholar
Schneider, TD. 2010. Placing refuge: shell mounds and the archaeology of colonial encounters in the San Francisco Bay Area, California [PhD dissertation]. Berkeley: University of California. 281 p.Google Scholar
Trieu Gahr, DA. 2006. From architects to ancestors: the life cycle of plank houses. In: Sobel, E, Trieu Gahr, DA, Ames, KM, editors. Household Archaeology on the Northwest Coast. International Monographs in Prehistory, Archaeological Series 16. Ann Arbor: International Monographs in Prehistory. p 5779.Google Scholar
Vogel, JC, Fuls, A, Visser, E, Becker, B. 1993. Pretoria calibration curve for short-lived samples, 1930–3350 BC. Radiocarbon 35(1):7385.Google Scholar