Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T07:59:47.175Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

AMS Dating of Pollen Concentrates—A Methodological Study of Late Quaternary Sediments from South Westland, New Zealand

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 July 2016

Marcus J Vandergoes*
Affiliation:
Climate Change Institute, University of Maine, Orono, Maine 04469, USA.
Christine A Prior
Affiliation:
Rafter Radiocarbon Laboratory, Institute of Geological and Nuclear Sciences Ltd, Lower Hutt, New Zealand.
*
Corresponding author. Email: [email protected].
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

A simple method for preparing pollen concentrates for 14C AMS dating is applied to organic and inorganic deposits from a peat bog in south Westland, New Zealand, from which preliminary AMS dating indicated age inversions and severe younger carbon contamination problems. The AMS ages of the pollen concentrates provided consistently older age estimates for each sample than ages derived from their respective organic residue or combined pollen and organic residue fractions. It is likely that the younger age estimates of the organic residue fractions result from the incorporation of younger plant material into the sample and possible contamination from younger humic acids percolating through the site.

Type
Soils and Sediments
Copyright
Copyright © The Arizona Board of Regents on behalf of the University of Arizona 

References

Almond, PC. 1996. Loess, soil stratigraphy and the Aokautere Ash on late Pleistocene surfaces in south Westland: interpretation and correlation with the glacial stratigraphy. Quaternary International 32/33: 163–76.Google Scholar
Almond, PC, Moar, NT, Lian, OB. 2001. Reinterpretation of the glacial chronology of south Westland, New Zealand. New Zealand Journal of Geology and Geophysics 44:115.Google Scholar
Bowman, S. 1990. Radiocarbon Dating. London: British Museum Publications and Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Brown, TA, Nelson, DE, Mathewes, RW, Vogel, JS, Southon, JR. 1989. Radiocarbon dating of pollen by accelerator mass spectrometry. Quaternary Research 32: 205–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, TA, Farwell, GW, Grootes, PM, Schmidt, FH. 1992. Radiocarbon AMS dating of pollen extracted from peat samples. Radiocarbon 34(3):550–6.Google Scholar
Chinn, TJ, Whitehouse, IE. 1980. Glacier snow line variations. Proceedings of the Riederalp Workshop, September 1978. International Association of Hydrological Sciences Publication 126:219–28. Wallingford: IAHS Press.Google Scholar
Faegri, K, Iversen, J. 1989. 4th edition. Textbook of Pollen Analysis. London: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Garnier, BJ. 1958. The Climate of New Zealand. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
Grant-Taylor, TL, Rafter, TA. 1971. New Zealand radiocarbon age measurements–6. New Zealand Journal of Geology and Geophysics 14:364402.Google Scholar
Hammond, AP, Goh, KM, Tonkin, PJ, Manning, MR. 1991. Chemical pretreatments for improving the radiocarbon dates of peats and organic silts in a gley podzol environment: Grahams Terrace, north Westland. New Zealand Journal of Geology and Geophysics 34:191–4.Google Scholar
Head, MJ, Zhou, WJ. 2000. Evaluation of NaOH leaching techniques to extract humic acids from palaeosols. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research B 172:434–9.Google Scholar
Horrocks, M, Deng, Y, Nichol, SL, Shane, PA, Ogden, J. 2002. A palaeoenvironmental record of natural and human change from the Auckland isthmus, New Zealand, during the late Holocene. Journal of the Royal Society of New Zealand 32:337–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Long, A, Davis, OK, Delanois, J. 1992. Separation and 14C dating of pure pollen from lake sediments: nanofossil AMS dating. Radiocarbon 34(3):557–60.Google Scholar
Mensing, SA, Southon, JR. 1999. A simple method to separate pollen for AMS radiocarbon dating and its application to lacustrine and marine sediments. Radiocarbon 41(1):18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moar, NT, Suggate, RP. 1979. Contributions to the Quaternary history of the New Zealand flora. 8: interglacial and glacial vegetation in the Westport District, South Island. New Zealand Journal of Botany 17:361–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moar, NT, Suggate, RP. 1996. Vegetation history from the Kaihinu (last) interglacial to the present, West Coast, South Island, New Zealand. Quaternary Science Reviews 15:521–47.Google Scholar
New Zealand Meteorological Service. 1983. Summaries of Climatological Observations to 1980. Miscellaneous Publication No. 177. Wellington: New Zealand Meteorological Service.Google Scholar
Prior, CA, Chester, PI. 2001. Precision radiocarbon dating of a late Holocene vegetation history. In: Jones, M, Sheppard, P, editors. Australasian Connections and New Directions: Proceedings of the 7th Australasian Archaeometry Conference. Auckland: University of Auckland. p 285–94.Google Scholar
Regnéll, J. 1992. Preparing concentrates for AMS dating—a methodological study from a hard-water lake in southern Sweden. Boreas 21:373–7.Google Scholar
Regnéll, J, Everitt, E. 1996. Preparative centrifugation—a new method for preparing pollen concentrates suitable for radiocarbon dating by AMS. Vegetation History and Archaeobotany 5:201–5.Google Scholar
Richardson, F, Hall, VA. 1994. Pollen concentrate preparation from highly organic Holocene peat and lake deposits for AMS dating. Radiocarbon 36(3):407–12.Google Scholar
Stuiver, M, Reimer, PJ, Bard, E, Beck, JW, Burr, GS, Hughen, KA, Kromer, B, McCormac, FG, van der Plicht, J, Spurk, M. 1998. INTCAL98 radiocarbon age calibration, 24,000–0 cal B P. Radiocarbon 40(3):1041–83.Google Scholar
Warren, G. 1967. Sheet 17 Hokitika Geological Map of New Zealand 1: 1:250 000. Wellington: New Zealand Geological Survey.Google Scholar