Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T09:30:40.508Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

AMS Dating Mammoth Bones: Comparison with Conventional Dating

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 July 2016

Yurij K Vasil'chuk ,
Alla C Vasil'chuk ,
Austin Long ,
A J T Jull  and
D J Donahue
Yurij K Vasil'chuk*
Affiliation:
Geology and Geography Department, Lomonosov's Moscow University, Vorob'yovy Hills, 118899, Moscow, Russia
Alla C Vasil'chuk
Affiliation:
Geology and Geography Department, Lomonosov's Moscow University, Vorob'yovy Hills, 118899, Moscow, Russia
Austin Long
Affiliation:
Department of Geosciences, University of Arizona, Gould-Simpson 208, Tucson, Arizona 85721-0077, USA
A J T Jull
Affiliation:
NSF-Arizona AMS Laboratory, University of Arizona, 1118 East Fourth Street, Tucson, Arizona 85721-0081, USA
D J Donahue
Affiliation:
NSF-Arizona AMS Laboratory, University of Arizona, 1118 East Fourth Street, Tucson, Arizona 85721-0081, USA
*
Corresponding author. Email: [email protected].
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Fossilized Siberian mammoth remains are important indicators of environmental change in the Late Pleistocene. The NSF-Arizona AMS Laboratory radiocarbon results on amino acid separations compare well with mammoth bone collagen from the same specimens treated by HCl and dated by beta counting (the Russian Academy Geological Institute Radiocarbon Laboratory). Neither laboratory was aware of the other's dates for these comparisons. The results coincide very closely (a difference of 50–800 yr), and demonstrate that AMS dating provides a very good perspective for applications of past mammoth population studies.

Type
Articles
Information
Radiocarbon , Volume 42 , Issue 2 , 2000 , pp. 281 - 284
Copyright
Copyright © 2000 by the Arizona Board of Regents on behalf of the University of Arizona 

References

Arslanov, KhA, Svezhentsev, YuS. 1993. An improved method for radiocarbon dating fossil bones. Radiocarbon 35(3):387–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lister, AM. 1993. Mammoths in miniature. Nature 362(6418):288–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Long, A, Sher, A, Vartanyan, S. 1994. Holocene mammoths dates. Nature 369(6479):364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pfizenmayer, EW. 1926. Mammutleichen und Urwaldmenschen in Nordost Sibirien. Leipzig (341 s. + 118 abb. + 3k; in German).Google Scholar
Shilo, N, Lozkin, A, Titov, E, Yu, Shumilov. 1993. Kirgilyakhsky mammoth. Palaeogeographycal aspect. Moscow, Nauka: 214 p (in Russian).Google Scholar
VYe, Sokolov, editor. Yuribeisky mammoth. 1982. Moscow: Nauka. 160 p (in Russian).Google Scholar
Stuart, AJ. 1991. Mammalian extinctions in the Late Pleistocene of northern Eurasia and North America. Biological Reviews 66:453–562.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sulerzhitsky, LD. 1995. Features of radiocarbon chronology of the mammoths (Mammutus primigenius) of Siberia and North-Eastern Europe. In: Proceedings of the Zoological Institute, St. Petersburg. Studies of Pleistocene and Recent Mammals 263:163–83 (in Russian).Google Scholar
Sulerzhitsky, LD. 1997. Features of radiocarbon chronology of the mammoths of Siberia and North-Eastern Europe, as basis for Human colonization. In: Velichko, A, Soffer, O, editors. Human colonization of Earth. The global hominids settling . Moscow: The Geography Institute of the Russian Academy of Sciences. p 184–200 (in Russian).Google Scholar
Sulerzhitsky, LD, Romanenko, FA. 1997. Age and distribution of the “mammoth” fauna of the polar region of Asia (radiocarbon dating results). Earth Cryosphere 1(4):12–9 (in Russian).Google Scholar
Vasil'chuk, YuK. 1992. Oxygen isotope composition of ground ice (application to paleogeocryological reconstructions). Two volumes. Moscow: Theoretical Problems Department, Russian Academy of Sciences and Moscow University. Vol 1: 420 p, Vol 2: 264 p (in Russian).Google Scholar
Vasil'chuk, YuK, Punning, J-M, Vasil'chuk, AC. 1997. Radiocarbon ages of mammoths in Northern Eurasia: implications for population development and Late Quaternary environment. Radiocarbon 39(1):1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vasil'chuk, YuK, Vasil'chuk, AC. 1995. Ice-wedge formation in Northern Asia during the Holocene. Permafrost and Periglacial Processes 6(3):273–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vasil'chuk, YuK, Vasil'chuk, AC. 1997. Radiocarbon dating and oxygen isotope variations in Late Pleistocene syngenetic ice-wedges, Northern Siberia. Permafrost and Periglacial Processes 8(3):335–45.3.0.CO;2-V>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vasil'chuk, YuK, Vasil'chuk, AC. 1998. 14C and 18O in Siberian syngenetic ice-wedge complexes. Radiocarbon 40(2):883–93.Google Scholar