Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T00:24:25.892Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

ALTERNATIVE RADIOCARBON AGE-DEPTH MODEL FROM LAKE BAIKAL SEDIMENT: IMPLICATION FOR PAST HYDROLOGICAL CHANGES FOR LAST GLACIAL TO THE HOLOCENE

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 September 2023

Fumiko Watanabe Nara Open the ORCID record for Fumiko Watanabe Nara [Opens in a new window] ,
Takahiro Watanabe ,
Bryan C Lougheed Open the ORCID record for Bryan C Lougheed [Opens in a new window]  and
Stephen Obrochta
Fumiko Watanabe Nara*
Affiliation:
Graduate School of Environmental Science, Nagoya University, Furo-cho, Chikusa, Nagoya, 464-8601, Japan Low Level Radioactivity Laboratory, Institute of Nature and Environmental Technology, Kanazawa University, O 24, Wake, Nomi, Ishikawa 923-1224, Japan Faculty of Liberal Arts and Science, Chukyo University, 101-2 Yagoto Honmachi, Showa, Nagoya, 466-8666, Japan
Takahiro Watanabe
Affiliation:
Tono Geoscience Center, Japan Atomic Energy Agency, Joringi, Izumi-cho, Toki, 509-5102, Japan
Bryan C Lougheed
Affiliation:
Department of Earth Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
Stephen Obrochta
Affiliation:
Graduate School of International Resource Science, Akita University, Akita, Japan
*
*Corresponding author. Email: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We present an alternative radiocarbon (14C) age-depth model using IntCal20 to calibrate new accelerator mass spectrometry (AMS) data applied to a Lake Baikal sediment core (VER99G12) in southern Siberia. 14C dating showed that the core extends to 31 ka. To take into account uncertainties in 14C age and sedimentation depth in the core, a new age-depth modeling routine, undatable, was used in this study. Undatable revealed that significant changes in sedimentation rate correspond to global climate events, either warm or cold, which periods are likely close to the timing of the occurrence of the Meltwater pulses (MWP) at 19 and 14 ka, and the Last glacial Maximum (LGM) at 21–20 ka. Since the Selenga River accounts for 50% of the total river inflow to Lake Baikal, we interpret that these changes in sedimentation rate could be signals of significant changes in Selenga River discharge to the lake, which is expected to be affected by global climate change. Based on pollen analysis, it is highly probable that the sudden influx of the Selenga River to Lake Baikal, particularly at 19 ka, was due to the thawing of permafrost water through the Selenga River, which had developed in the region. Total organic carbon content and mean grain size increases concurrent with sedimentation rate, suggesting river inflow increased available nutrients for biological activity. Our results indicate that hydrological changes corresponding to MWP events can be observed in continental areas of the Northern Hemisphere.

Keywords

melt water pulsesedimentation ratesSelenga RiverUndatable age modeling
Type
Conference Paper
Information
Radiocarbon , First View , pp. 1 - 18
Check for updates
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of University of Arizona

INTRODUCTION

Lake Baikal, which is located in the south Siberian region (Figure 1), is the world’s oldest (at least 30Ma) and deepest (1648 m) lake with the largest water volume (23,000 km3), which represents ∼20% of the total unfrozen freshwater on the earth. Because long, continuous past environmental records (Kashiwaya et al. Reference Kashiwaya, Ochiai, Sakai and Kawai2001) in the south Siberian region are preserved at its basin, numerous studies using lake sediment cores from Lake Baikal have been carried out to understand the past climate and environmental histories in the south Siberian region (Colman et al. Reference Colman, Peck, Karabanov, Carter, Bradbury, King and Williams1995; Horiuchi et al. Reference Horiuchi, Minoura, Hoshino, Oda, Nakamura and Kawai2000; Kashiwaya et al. Reference Kashiwaya, Ochiai, Sakai and Kawai2001; Karabanov et al. Reference Karabanov, Williams, Kuzmin, Sideleva, Khursevich, Prokopenko, Solotchina, Tkachenko, Fedenya and Kerber2004; Prokopenko et al. Reference Prokopenko, Hinnov, Williams and Kuzmin2006; Shichi et al. Reference Shichi, Kawamuro, Takahara, Hase, Maki and Miyoshi2007, Reference Shichi, Takahara, Hase, Watanabe, Nara, Nakamura, Tani and Kawai2013; Tani et al. Reference Tani, Nara, Soma, Soma, Itoh, Matsumoto, Tanaka and Kawai2009). The inseparable linkage to the global climate changes and orbital climate forcing, such as glacial and inter glacial climate cycles and the Milankovitch cycles, respectively, have been revealed (Colman et al. Reference Colman, Peck, Karabanov, Carter, Bradbury, King and Williams1995; Kashiwaya et al. Reference Kashiwaya, Ochiai, Sakai and Kawai2001; Ochiai and Kashiwaya Reference Ochiai and Kashiwaya2003, Reference Ochiai and Kashiwaya2005; Prokopenko et al. Reference Prokopenko, Hinnov, Williams and Kuzmin2006). Therefore, Lake Baikal has been regarded as an iconic site in the Siberian region for scientific study (Arzhannikov et al. Reference Arzhannikov, Ivanov, Arzhannikova, Demonterova, Jansen, Preusser, Kamenetsky and Kamenetsky2018).

Figure 1 Map showing (A) the Eurasian continent, (B) Lake Baikal and its watershed and (C) Lake Baikal and the sampling site of the core VER99G12. The maps of Lake Baikal and its watershed were created with reference to Kuzumin et al. (Reference Kuzumin, Williams and Kawai2000). Lake Baikal is located at middle latitudes of the Eurasian continent (51.5–55.8°N, 103.7–109.0°E) and stores the largest volume of freshwater on Earth.

To reconstruct the paleoenvironmental changes using a lacustrine sediment core, the establishments of a precise age model is essential. Approaches for Lake Baikal age-depth models, especially for the late Quaternary period, are based on radioactive nuclides, such as 10Be, 14C, 137Cs, 210Pb, 237Am, and U/Th (Horiuchi et al. Reference Horiuchi, Matsuzaki, Kobayashi, Goldberg and Shibata2003; Chebykin et al. Reference Chebykin, Goldberg, Kulikova, Zhuchenko, Stepanova and Malopevnaya2007; Watanabe et al. Reference Watanabe, Nakamura, Nara, Kakegawa, Nishimura, Shimokawara, Matsunaka, Senda and Kawai2009a; Nara et al. Reference Nara, Watanabe, Nakamura, Kakegawa, Katamura, Shichi, Takahara, Imai and Kawai2010; Swann et al. Reference Swann, Mackay, Vologina, Jones, Panizzo, Leng, Sloane, Snelling and Sturm2018), paleomagnetic records (Antipin et al. Reference Antipin, Afonina, Badalov, Bezrukova, Bukharov, Bychinsky, Dmitriev, Dorofeeva, Duchkov and Esipko2001; Demory et al. Reference Demory, Nowaczyk, Witt and Oberhänsli2005), and orbital tuning (Ochiai and Kashiwaya Reference Ochiai and Kashiwaya2005). Among of them, radiocarbon (14C) age models have been widely applied to determine the deposition age of the Lake Baikal sediment during the last glacial to the Holocene (Colman et al. Reference Colman, Jones, Rubin, King, Peck and Orem1996; Horiuchi et al. Reference Horiuchi, Minoura, Hoshino, Oda, Nakamura and Kawai2000; Prokopenko et al. Reference Prokopenko, Karabanov, Williams, Kuzmin, Khursevich and Gvozdkov2001; Soma et al. Reference Soma, Tani, Soma, Mitake, Kurihara, Hashomoto, Watanabe and Nakamura2006; Nara et al. Reference Nara, Watanabe, Kakegawa, Minoura, Imai, Fagel, Horiuchi, Nakamura and Kawai2014). Lake Baikal sediments lack biogenic and authigenic carbonate for 14C measurement, as well as the plant macrofossils, leading to 14C dating approaches based on using total organic carbon (TOC).

The first reported 14C age-depth model of the Lake Baikal sediment cores (Colman et al. Reference Colman, Jones, Rubin, King, Peck and Orem1996) showed the 14C age-depth profiles measured by accelerator mass spectrometer (AMS) at two iconic sampling sites from Academician Ridge and Buguldeika Saddle (Figure 1C). These sites are topographically high and divided the basins into the Northern and the Central Basins for Academician Ridge, and into the Central and Southern Basin for Buguldeika Saddle (Figure 1C). Colman et al. (Reference Colman, Jones, Rubin, King, Peck and Orem1996) concluded that the reservoir effect is limited to about 1000 ± 500 14C yr for these sites, because of the most of organic carbon in Lake Baikal is autochthonous. The 14C age-depth profiles at these sites described the constant linear sedimentation rates of about 4 cm/kyr and 14 cm/kyr from Academician Ridge and Buguldeika Saddle, respectively (Colman et al. Reference Colman, Jones, Rubin, King, Peck and Orem1996). Further intensive study with high temporal resolution 14C analysis from three Lake Baikal sediment cores at Academician Ridge was conducted by Watanabe et al. (Reference Watanabe, Nakamura, Nara, Kakegawa, Nishimura, Shimokawara, Matsunaka, Senda and Kawai2009a) to develop a precise 14C age model of TOC. Their work revealed the known 14C activity plateau at the Younger Dryas (YD)/Preboreal (PB) boundary, which resulted from the changes in the atmospheric radiocarbon concentration during the cooling period. This 14C plateau allowed for the application of radiocarbon wiggle-match dating, providing an estimation of the reservoir effect of ∼2100 14C yr for the site at Academician Ridge. Since 14C ages of TOC in the lacustrine sediments can be influenced by the lake reservoir effect, the hard-water effect, and the effect of the terrestrial organic matter (Watanabe et al. Reference Watanabe, Nakamura, Nara, Kakegawa, Nishimura, Shimokawara, Matsunaka, Senda and Kawai2009a), it is very important to consider their effects on the 14C ages of TOC in order to obtain and accurate 14C age-depth model from the Academician Ridge sediment core.

Nara et al. (Reference Nara, Watanabe, Nakamura, Kakegawa, Katamura, Shichi, Takahara, Imai and Kawai2010) previously showed a calibrated 14C age-depth profile measured from TOC and pollen grains from core VER99G12 which was retrieved from Buguldeika saddle and spanned for the past 33 cal kyr BP (Figure 1C). Although changes in the organic carbon source at the corresponding periods would also alter the 14C age, the 14C ages of pollen and total lipids were not significantly different from those of TOC in the core VER99G12 (Table 1; Watanabe et al. Reference Watanabe, Nakamura, Nara, Kakegawa, Nishimura, Shimokawara, Matsunaka, Senda and Kawai2009a; Nara et al. Reference Nara, Watanabe, Nakamura, Kakegawa, Katamura, Shichi, Takahara, Imai and Kawai2010), suggesting that TOC is a suitable material for 14C dating in this case. Furthermore, it is reported that TOC and total nitrogen were significantly positively correlated with zero intercept throughout the core, meaning that TOC was negligibly contributed by allochthonous sources such as lignin and cellulose (Nara et al. Reference Nara, Watanabe, Kakegawa, Minoura, Imai, Fagel, Horiuchi, Nakamura and Kawai2014). These results indicate the significant reservoir effect on TOC in the core VER99G12 would be negligible.

Table 1 Conventional 14C ages and calibrated ages of TOC, total lipids, and pollen fractions from the core VER99G12 from Lake Baikal.

In this study, we present additional 14C of TOC results (20 samples) from the VER99G12 to establish the alternative 14C age model for the core VER99G12 based on IntCal20 (Reimer et al. Reference Reimer, Austin, Bard, Bayliss, Blackwell, Bronk Ramsey, Butzin, Cheng, Edwards and Friedrich2020), especially for the climate transition period from the Last Glacial Maximum to the onset of the Holocene (20.8–11.7 ka; Ishiwa et al. Reference Ishiwa, Yokoyama, Miyairi, Obrochta, Sasaki, Kitamura, Suzuki, Ikehara, Ikehara and Kimoto2016), using Undatable age model approach. The routine Undatable uses a deterministic approach to fold the sampling distance into total uncertainty and is designed to efficiently model age-depth relationships using an iterative procedure to explore multiple model settings. Undatable has previously been successfully to establishing accurate age-depth models for marine and lacustrine sedimentary achieves (Obrochta et al. Reference Obrochta, Yokoyama, Yoshimoto, Yamamoto, Miyairi, Nagano, Nakamura, Tsunematsu, Lamair and Hubert-Ferrari2018; Lougheed and Obrochta Reference Lougheed and Obrochta2019; Waelbroeck et al. Reference Waelbroeck, Lougheed, Vazquez Riveiros, Missiaen, Pedro, Dokken, Hajdas, Wacker, Abbott and Dumoulin2019). Recent refinements in the calibrations curve (Reimer et al. Reference Reimer, Austin, Bard, Bayliss, Blackwell, Bronk Ramsey, Butzin, Cheng, Edwards and Friedrich2020) that have been made available since the last publication of the age model of the VER99G12 (Nara et al. Reference Nara, Watanabe, Nakamura, Kakegawa, Katamura, Shichi, Takahara, Imai and Kawai2010) reveal that the sedimentation processes on the Buguldeika saddle in Lake Baikal have been strongly influenced by the global climate events, resulting in the rapid changes in the sedimentation rate of the core.

STUDY AREA AND SEDIMENT SAMPLES

The location of Lake Baikal in Eurasian continent, the Lake Baikal watershed and the sampling site of the core VER99G12 are shown in a map in Figure 1. Owing to this large watershed, more than 80% of the water entering the lake comes from rivers (Osipov and Khlystov Reference Osipov and Khlystov2010); and less than 2% is contributed by precipitation on the lake surface. The sediment core sample in this study (VER99G12; 52º31'36"N, 106º09'08"E) was extracted from the Buguldeika saddle in Lake Baikal, which is geomorphologically separated from the central and southern basins. The sediment core sample was mainly formed by deposition materials from Selenga River (Kuzumin et al. Reference Kuzumin, Williams and Kawai2000), which provides the largest inflow to Lake Baikal (ca. 50% of the total river input) (Osipov and Khlystov Reference Osipov and Khlystov2010). Therefore, the VER99G12 core records the climate and environmental changes not only in the Lake Baikal water column but also in its watershed, including the semi-arid region in Mongolia (Figure 1B). A number of paleoenvironmental studies using the core VER99G12 have been carried out (Soma et al. Reference Soma, Tani, Soma, Mitake, Kurihara, Hashomoto, Watanabe and Nakamura2006; Nara et al. Reference Nara, Watanabe, Nakamura, Kakegawa, Katamura, Shichi, Takahara, Imai and Kawai2010; Shichi et al. Reference Shichi, Takahara, Hase, Watanabe, Nara, Nakamura, Tani and Kawai2013; Nara et al. Reference Nara, Watanabe, Kakegawa, Minoura, Imai, Fagel, Horiuchi, Nakamura and Kawai2014; Katsuta et al. Reference Katsuta, Ikeda, Shibata, Saito-Kokubu, Murakami, Tani, Takano, Nakamura, Tanaka and Naito2018). These studies confirmed that the core VER99G12 is an excellent archive for understanding biological and hydrological changes in the south Siberian region caused by global climate changes, such as the last glacial to the post glacial change.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Radiocarbon Measurements

The bulk sediment samples, retrieved from the core VER99G12 (Table 1) for the 14C measurements, were aliquoted into individual glass vials and stored in a freezer at −20ºC until the time of analysis. Samples were treated with 1.2 N-HCl to remove any carbonates. All the treated 14C samples were combusted at 850ºC for 6 hr in evacuated tubes with CuO and Ag wire. The resulting CO2 was collected and purified in a vacuum line and reduced to graphite using an iron catalyst and hydrogen at 650ºC for 6 hr. The 14C measurements were performed by an accelerator mass spectrometer (JAEA-AMS-TONO-5MV; 15SDH-2, National Electrostatics Corporation) in the TONO Geoscience Center, Japan Atomic Energy Agency. Calibration to calendar ages for the 14C ages were performed using MatCal (Lougheed and Obrochta Reference Lougheed and Obrochta2016) and the IntCal20 calibration curve (Reimer et al. Reference Reimer, Austin, Bard, Bayliss, Blackwell, Bronk Ramsey, Butzin, Cheng, Edwards and Friedrich2020). Although the 14C age-depth model of the VER99G12 core has been previously inferred from the previous IntCal datasets (Nara et al. Reference Nara, Watanabe, Nakamura, Kakegawa, Katamura, Shichi, Takahara, Imai and Kawai2010; Katsuta et al. Reference Katsuta, Ikeda, Shibata, Saito-Kokubu, Murakami, Tani, Takano, Nakamura, Tanaka and Naito2018), we recalibrated the 14C age of the core based on the updated IntCal20 dataset (Reimer et al. Reference Reimer, Austin, Bard, Bayliss, Blackwell, Bronk Ramsey, Butzin, Cheng, Edwards and Friedrich2020; see Table 1).

Age Model Construction Using Undatable

Age modeling using Undatable was established following the previously reported studies in Lougheed and Obrochta (Reference Lougheed and Obrochta2019) and Obrochta et al. (Reference Obrochta, Yokoyama, Yoshimoto, Yamamoto, Miyairi, Nagano, Nakamura, Tsunematsu, Lamair and Hubert-Ferrari2018). Undatable was developed out of a need to handle datasets with both high age-depth scatter and a disturbed depth scale by being less optimistic regarding uncertainty than the typical Bayesian models. The initial version was developed to model age in highly expanded cores from the Baltic Sea (Obrochta et al. Reference Obrochta, Andrén, Fazekas, Lougheed, Snowball, Yokoyama, Miyairi, Kondo, Kotilainen and Hyttinen2017), was further modified to model coral growth rates (Webster et al. Reference Webster, Braga, Humblet, Potts, Iryu, Yokoyama, Fujita, Bourillot, Esat and Fallon2018), and further refined by Obrochta et al. (Reference Obrochta, Yokoyama, Yoshimoto, Yamamoto, Miyairi, Nagano, Nakamura, Tsunematsu, Lamair and Hubert-Ferrari2018). Lougheed and Obrochta (Reference Lougheed and Obrochta2019) then substantially optimized the routine to be currently the most efficient model (to our knowledge) available for determining age in geological archives. Model parameters were 105 simulations, 0.1 sedimentation rate uncertainty factor, and 30% bootstrapping, excluding intervals with dates in stratigraphic order in the upper ∼1 m, at ∼170 cm and below ∼300 cm. Although the reservoir effect by older carbon on total organic carbon date for the Buguldeika saddle in Lake Baikal could be significantly small (Nara et al. Reference Nara, Watanabe, Kakegawa, Minoura, Imai, Fagel, Horiuchi, Nakamura and Kawai2014), we used 380 14C yr for the reservoir effect in Undatable to establish the age model because of its water residence time (Shimaraev et al. Reference Shimaraev, Granin and Zhdanov1993).

RESULTS

All 14C data of the core VER99G12 are summarized in Table 1. The depth profiles of combined all calibrated age data of the core VER99G12 alongside Undatable were shown in Figure 2. The 14C age of the bottom layer (461–460 cm) was determined as ∼31,000 cal years BP (Table 1), which spans the marine isotope stage 3. The calibrated age depth profiles show the linear sedimentation rates (ca. 13.3 cm/kyr) with the high correlation coefficient through the core (R2 = 0.974) through the core (Figure 2B). Nevertheless, the high-time-resolution 14C dating from 300 to 100 cm depth in the core VER99G12 (Figure 2C) studied here showed notable fluctuations at the layer from 260 to 120 cm depth.

Figure 2 Calibrated age model for the core VER99G12. (A) Undatable age model of core VER99G12, (B)Vertical distributions of calibrated ages for core VER99G12, and (C) limited to a sediment depth of 100–300 m of calibrated ages for core VER99G12. The dashed line in Figure 2B is a regression line for the calibrated age through the core. Correlation coefficient between the calibrated age and the depth through the core was calculated in 0.974. Dark and light shading in calendar age probability density functions (PDFs), indicates the calibrated 68.2% and 95.4% age ranges, respectively. The modeled median age and 95.4% range are indicated by the red solid and black dashed lines, receptively. The shaded density cloud reflects the 1 to 99th percentile range.

The set of assumptions built in to an age-depth model affects the resulting estimate of uncertainty. While Bacon (Blaauw and Christen Reference Blaauw and Christen2011) treats age-depth determinations that are not in stratigraphic order as outliers that should not contribute to uncertainty, Undatable includes information from such determinations by increasing age-depth model uncertainty, particularly if bootstrapping (i.e., the number of dates to randomly exclude from a single Monte Carlo iteration), is relatively high. Reworking and bioturbation in marine and lacustrine settings mixes older and younger sediment, which, combined with sampling resolution, can lead to apparent age-depth reversals and increasing uncertainty. Undatable also increases uncertainty at sediment rate inflection points because the depth of the change in rate is dependent on the depth and number of age determinations.

Thus, we find the uncertainty produced by Undatable to be more appropriate to our setting, because it incorporates uncertainty due to both age-depth reversals as well as inflections in sedimentation rate. Figure 3 shows Bacon and Undatable age models run with parameters producing very similar median modeled ages. The primary difference is the increased uncertainty in the Undatable model near the large changes in sedimentation rate, which we believe is most appropriate given the nature of the data.

Figure 3 VER99G12 age models produced with Undatable (left panel; using parameters described in the Methods) and Bacon (center panel; accumulation mean shape: 50 and 1.5, respectively; memory mean and strength: 0.5 and 10, respectively). Both produce similar median modeled ages, but Undatable produces wider uncertainty (right panel) near sedimentation rate inflections that are characterized by scatter in age-depth determinations (shaded region).

DISCUSSION

Rapid Changes of Sedimentation Rates Corresponding the MWPs

The variation of the sedimentation rate of core VER99G12, is characterized by striking increases at 19.5, 18.3, 13.5, 10.2, and 9.5 ka (Figure 4), which are corresponding to the age reversal layers (Table 1). Apparent age reversals were observed in these layers, corresponding to ca. 19, 14, and 11.5 ka. Such age reversals at the same periods (ca. 19 and 14 ka) have been reported in the sediment core from Qinghai Lake (Zhou et al. Reference Zhou, Liu, Wang, An, Cheng, Zhu and Burr2016). Zhou et al. (Reference Zhou, Liu, Wang, An, Cheng, Zhu and Burr2016) pointed out that old organic radiocarbon inputs to the Qinghai Lake sediment core at ca. 19 and 14 cal kyr BP could be caused by significant inputs of the meltwater from the glaciers around Qinghai Lake.

Figure 4 The profiles of sedimentation rate with calibrated age in the core VER99G12. The periods of global climate events for the Last Glacial Maximum, the MWP events and Younger Dryas event were highlighted in blue and yellow bars.

These significant increases in the sedimentation rates at 18.3 and 13.5 ka in the core VER99G12 happen just after the remarkable climatic warming events associated with the millennia of deglacial global sea level rise of 120 m in maximum (Yokoyama and Esat Reference Yokoyama and Esat2011). These sea level rises were caused by the large volume meltwater input to the oceans at 19 ka (meltwater pulse; MWP-1A0; Yokoyama et al. Reference Yokoyama, Lambeck, De Deckker, Johnston and Fifield2000; Clark et al. Reference Clark, McCabe, Mix and Weaver2004; Yokoyama and Esat Reference Yokoyama and Esat2011) and 14.2–13.7 ka (MWP-1A; Deschamps et al. Reference Deschamps, Durand, Bard, Hamelin, Camoin, Thomas, Henderson, Okuno and Yokoyama2012). On the other hand, the rapid change in the sedimentation rate at 9.5 ka in the core VER99G12 was ca. 2000 years younger than the MWP-1B at 11.5 ka (Bard et al. Reference Bard, Hamelin and Delanghe-Sabatier2010; Figure 4). Since the sampling site of the core VER99G12 was faced to the Selenga River inflow (Figure 1B and 1C), the deposition materials in the core VER99G12 could be strongly influenced from the Selenga River input (Kuzumin et al. Reference Kuzumin, Williams and Kawai2000). Since Lake Baikal has large lake watershed (Figure 1B) and the Selenga River inflow has ca. 50% of the total river input, the lake level has been mainly controlled by the Selenga River inflow and the evaporation at the warm and cold climate stage, respectively (Urabe et al. Reference Urabe, Tateishi, Inouchi, Matsuoka, Inoue, Dmytriev and Khlystov2004; Osipov and Khlystov Reference Osipov and Khlystov2010). Seismic and geophysical analysis have revealed drastic lake-level changes repeatedly at the climate transition between the last glacial and the post-glacial period (Urabe et al. Reference Urabe, Tateishi, Inouchi, Matsuoka, Inoue, Dmytriev and Khlystov2004; Nara et al. Reference Nara, Watanabe, Kakegawa, Minoura, Imai, Fagel, Horiuchi, Nakamura and Kawai2014). The lake level of Lake Baikal at MIS2 was estimated at 11–15 lower than present level (Urabe et al. Reference Urabe, Tateishi, Inouchi, Matsuoka, Inoue, Dmytriev and Khlystov2004). However, the detection of pollen in core VER99G12 during MIS2 means that the Selenga River inflow did not cease (Shichi et al. Reference Shichi, Takahara, Hase, Watanabe, Nara, Nakamura, Tani and Kawai2013). Based on the pollen analysis (Shichi et al. Reference Shichi, Takahara, Hase, Watanabe, Nara, Nakamura, Tani and Kawai2013), tundra steppe vegetation was established in the Lake Baikal watershed around 18.5 ka during the first MWP period. This means that the vegetation in the Lake Baikal watershed at 18.5 ka was characterized by the expansion of permafrost and dominance of grassland. In contrast, during the second phase of rapid sedimentation at 13.5 ka witnessed the growth of aquatic vegetation such as spruce, alder and willow along streams in the Baikal Lake lowlands (Shichi et al. Reference Shichi, Takahara, Hase, Watanabe, Nara, Nakamura, Tani and Kawai2013) indicating a wet climate condition attributed to increased precipitation. Therefore, the rapid sedimentation rate at 13.5 ka was influenced not only by inflow water resulting from the permafrost thawing but also from precipitation in the Lake Baikal watershed.

During MIS2, the major inflow through the Selenga River to Lake Baikal was the melt water from the local glacier around the lake, although the precipitation was 25–50% lower than modern-day precipitation (Osipov and Khlystov Reference Osipov and Khlystov2010). Today, permafrost expands over the whole Lake Baikal watershed and thermokarst lakes have developed in the modern Lake Baikal watershed, indicating repeated permafrost thawing during the glacial period (Törnqvist et al. Reference Törnqvist, Jarsjö, Pietroń, Bring, Rogberg, Asokan and Destouni2014). A recent study showed the dominance of icesheets in Scandinavia and North America as a source of meltwater during MWP-1A, rather than from those of the Antarctic (Lin et al. Reference Lin, Hibbert, Whitehouse, Woodroffe, Purcell, Shennan and Bradley2021). Also, significant increase in river water inflow to Qinghai Lake in China at the MWP events have been reported (Zhou et al. Reference Zhou, Liu, Wang, An, Cheng, Zhu and Burr2016). Our result suggested the observation for the change in the hydrological systems corresponding with the MWP events should be applicable to the lake with a significant melting glacier around the lake.

Re-Evaluating the Biological Activity in Lake Baikal for 31 ka with the Alternative Age-Depth Model

Based on the alternative age-depth model of core VER99G12 using Undatable, we reformed the age profiles of total organic carbon (TOC) and the mean grain size (MGS) from the core VER99G12, which represent for the biological activity and the hydrological change, respectively (Figure 5; Nara et al. Reference Nara, Watanabe, Kakegawa, Minoura, Imai, Fagel, Horiuchi, Nakamura and Kawai2014). Biological activity in Lake Baikal for the last 32 ka inferred from TOC variations showed the synchronous variation with the summer isolation at 51°N on the whole (Figure 5). But also, the TOC profile of VER99G12 has small fluctuations as superimposed variations. Corresponding with the periods of increase in the sedimentation rates at 18.0 and 13.5 ka, the positive peaks of TOC concentration are also observed (Figure 5D). As well as TOC variation, despite of the sparse profile, the MGS variation from the Lake Baikal sediment core shows temporal increases at the above periods, which result from the high flux of the Selenga River input into the Lake Baikal (Figure 5C). The significant inflow of the Selenga River into the lake brings a significant nutrient load into the lake, resulting in the large biological activity in Lake Baikal (Nara et al. Reference Nara, Watanabe, Kakegawa, Minoura, Imai, Fagel, Horiuchi, Nakamura and Kawai2014). As well as warm periods, the temporal decreases in TOC of the core were observed at the LGM and YD (Figure 5). Therefore, the variations of biological activity and the grain size agree with the significant input of the Selenga River water into the lake at after the MWPs. These results mean that the alternative 14C age calculated by IntCal20 with the Undatable age model for the core VER99G12 can be used to exploit the new findings of the environmental and biological changes in the Eurasian continental area inferred from the lake sediment core corresponding with the global climate changes.

Figure 5 The comparison of the core VER99G12 records with other climate records. (A) δ18O record from NGRIP ice core (blue; Rasmussen et al. Reference Rasmussen, Bigler, Blockley, Blunier, Buchardt, Clausen, Cvijanovic, Dahl-Jensen, Johnsen and Fischer2014)); (B) δ18O records from Sanbao and Hulu cave stalagmite (orange and red, respectively; Wang et al. Reference Wang, Cheng, Edwards, He, Kong, An, Wu, Kelly, Dykoski and Li2005, Reference Wang, Cheng, Edwards, An, Wu, Shen and Dorale2001); (C) mean grain size and (D) TOC from the core VER99G12 in Lake Baikal (black and green, respectively, data from Nara et al. Reference Nara, Watanabe, Kakegawa, Minoura, Imai, Fagel, Horiuchi, Nakamura and Kawai2014); (E) July 51°N integrated irradiation for summer (JJA; day of year 152–243) (red; calculated following Lougheed (Reference Lougheed2022) using the orbital parameters of Laskar et al. (Reference Laskar, Robutel, Joutel, Gastineau, Correia and Levrard2004) and solar constant of 1361 Wm–2).

SUMMARY

The rapid changes in the sedimentation rate corresponding with the global climate events, such as the MWPs, are observed from the Lake Baikal sediment core. The striking increase in the sedimentation rate were recorded at 18.3 and 13.5 ka, which are just after the periods of the MWP events. The signal of the melting glacier around the lake at 18.3 and 13.5 ka manifested as these rapid increases in the sedimentation rates. These sedimentation rate changes at 18.3 and 13.5 ka from the core VER99G12 were distinct variations comparing with other sediment cores from the Academician Ridge in Lake Baikal. The topographical feature of the Buguldeika Saddle, which is the sampling site of this study, manifested the change of inflow volume of Selenga River into the lake. The concurrent increases in TOC and the MGS at the 18.3 and 13.5 ka also support our interpretation that the high load of the nutrient for the biological activity to the lake caused by the high input of the river water at these periods.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

Editor-in-Chief A. J. T. Jull, Associate Editor Y. Kuzmin, and three anonymous reviewers are acknowledged for their helpful comments on the work, which helped to improve our manuscript. We would like to express our gratitude to Dr. Yunus Baykal for his help in constructing the age model using Bacon. The authors thank the staff of the TONO geoscience center, JAEA, for the sample preparation and 14C measurements. Special thanks to Dr. Takayuki Omori at Tokyo University and the member of the Chronological Research Group at the Institute for Space–Earth Environmental Research in Nagoya University for their valuable suggestions and comments. We also gratefully acknowledge the Russian and Japanese participants for collecting the VER99G12 sediment core in the summer of 1999. This study was partly supported by JSPS KAKENHI Grant-in-Aid for Young Scientists (B) Grant Number 2674002, and for (C) Grant Number 22K12356 and for F.N.

Footnotes

Selected Papers from the 24th Radiocarbon and 10th Radiocarbon & Archaeology International Conferences, Zurich, Switzerland, 11–16 Sept. 2022.

References

REFERENCES

Antipin, V, Afonina, T, Badalov, O, Bezrukova, E, Bukharov, A, Bychinsky, V, Dmitriev, AA, Dorofeeva, R, Duchkov, A, Esipko, O, et al. 2001. The new bdp-98 600-m drill core from Lake Baikal: a key Late Cenozoic sedimentary section in continental Asia. Quaternary International 80–81:19–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arzhannikov, SG, Ivanov, AV, Arzhannikova, AV, Demonterova, EI, Jansen, JD, Preusser, F, Kamenetsky, VS, Kamenetsky, MB. 2018. Catastrophic events in the quaternary outflow history of Lake Baikal. Earth-Science Reviews 177:76–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bard, E, Hamelin, B, Delanghe-Sabatier, D. 2010. Deglacial meltwater pulse 1b and younger dryas sea levels revisited with boreholes at Tahiti. Science 327(5970):1235–1237.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Blaauw, M, Christen, JA. 2011. Flexible paleoclimate age-depth models using an autoregressive gamma process. Bayesian Analysis 6(3):457–474.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chebykin, EP, Goldberg, EL, Kulikova, NS, Zhuchenko, NA, Stepanova, OG, Malopevnaya, YA. 2007. A method for determination of the isotopic composition of authigenic uranium in baikal bottom sediments. Russian Geology and Geophysics 48(6):468–477.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, PU, McCabe, AM, Mix, AC, Weaver, AJ. 2004. Rapid rise of sea level 19,000 years ago and its global implications. Science 304(5674):1141–1144.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Colman, SM, Jones, GA, Rubin, M, King, JW, Peck, JA, Orem, WH. 1996. AMS radiocarbon analyses from Lake Baikal, Siberia: challenges of dating sediments from a large, oligotrophic lake. Quaternary Science Reviews 15(7):669–684.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Colman, SM, Peck, JA, Karabanov, EB, Carter, SJ, Bradbury, JP, King, JW, Williams, DF. 1995. Continental climate response to orbital forcing from biogenic silica records in Lake Baikal. Nature 378(6559):769–771.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Demory, F, Nowaczyk, NR, Witt, A, Oberhänsli, H. 2005. High-resolution magnetostratigraphy of Late Quaternary sediments from Lake Baikal, Siberia: timing of intracontinental paleoclimatic responses. Global and Planetary Change 46(1):167–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deschamps, P, Durand, N, Bard, E, Hamelin, B, Camoin, G, Thomas, AL, Henderson, GM, Okuno, J, Yokoyama, Y. 2012. Ice-sheet collapse and sea-level rise at the bolling warming 14,600 years ago. Nature 483(7391):559–564.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Horiuchi, K, Matsuzaki, H, Kobayashi, K, Goldberg, EL, Shibata, Y. 2003. 10Be record and magnetostratigraphy of a miocene section from Lake Baikal: re-examination of the age model and its implication for climatic changes in continental Asia. Geophysical Research Letters 30(12).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horiuchi, K, Minoura, K, Hoshino, K, Oda, T, Nakamura, T, Kawai, T. 2000. Palaeoenvironmental history of Lake Baikal during the last 23000 years. Palaeogeography Palaeoclimatology Palaeoecology 157(1–2):95–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ishiwa, T, Yokoyama, Y, Miyairi, Y, Obrochta, S, Sasaki, T, Kitamura, A, Suzuki, A, Ikehara, M, Ikehara, K, Kimoto, K, et al. 2016. Reappraisal of sea-level lowstand during the Last Glacial Maximum observed in the Bonaparte Gulf sediments, northwestern Australia. Quaternary International 397:373–379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karabanov, E, Williams, D, Kuzmin, M, Sideleva, V, Khursevich, G, Prokopenko, A, Solotchina, E, Tkachenko, L, Fedenya, S, Kerber, E, et al. 2004. Ecological collapse of Lake Baikal and lake hovsgol ecosystems during the last glacial and consequences for aquatic species diversity. Palaeogeography Palaeoclimatology Palaeoecology 209(1–4):227–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kashiwaya, K, Ochiai, S, Sakai, H, Kawai, T. 2001. Orbit-related long-term climate cycles revealed in a 12-myr continental record from Lake Baikal. Nature 410(6824):71–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Katsuta, N, Ikeda, H, Shibata, K, Saito-Kokubu, Y, Murakami, T, Tani, Y, Takano, M, Nakamura, T, Tanaka, A, Naito, S, et al. 2018. Hydrological and climate changes in southeast siberia over the last 33 kyr. Global Planet Change 164:11–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuzumin, MI, Williams, DF, Kawai, T. 2000. Lake Baikal: a mirror in time and space for understanding global change processes. Tokyo: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Laskar, J, Robutel, P, Joutel, F, Gastineau, M, Correia, ACM, Levrard, B. 2004. A long-term numerical solution for the insolation quantities of the Earth. Astronomy & Astrophysics 428:261–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lin, Y, Hibbert, FD, Whitehouse, PL, Woodroffe, SA, Purcell, A, Shennan, I, Bradley, SL. 2021. A reconciled solution of meltwater Pulse 1a sources using sea-level fingerprinting. Nature Communications 12(1):2015.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lougheed, BC. 2022. Orbital, the Box – an Interactive Educational Tool for In-depth Understanding of Astronomical Climate Forcing. Open Quaternary. 8, 10. https://doi.org/10.5334/oq.100 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lougheed, BC, Obrochta, SP. 2016. MatCal: open source Bayesian 14C age calibration in MATLAB. Journal of Open Research Software. 4, e42. https://doi.org/10.5334/jors.130 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lougheed, BC, Obrochta, SP. 2019. A rapid, deterministic age-depth modeling routine for geological sequences with inherent depth uncertainty. Paleoceanography and Paleoclimatology 34(1):122–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nara, FW, Watanabe, T, Kakegawa, T, Minoura, K, Imai, A, Fagel, N, Horiuchi, K, Nakamura, T, Kawai, T. 2014. Biological nitrate utilization in south Siberian lakes (Baikal and Hovsgol) during the last glacial period: The influence of climate change on primary productivity. Quaternary Science Reviews 90:69–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nara, FW, Watanabe, T, Nakamura, T, Kakegawa, T, Katamura, F, Shichi, K, Takahara, H, Imai, A, Kawai, T. 2010. Radiocarbon and stable carbon isotope ratio data from a 4.7-m-long sediment core of Lake Baikal (southern Siberia, Russia). Radiocarbon 52(3):1449–1457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Obrochta, S, Andrén, T, Fazekas, S, Lougheed, BC, Snowball, I, Yokoyama, Y, Miyairi, Y, Kondo, R, Kotilainen, A, Hyttinen, O. 2017. The undatables: quantifying uncertainty in a highly expanded Late Glacial—Holocene sediment sequence recovered from the deepest Baltic Sea basin—IODP Site M0063. Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems 18:858–871.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Obrochta, SP, Yokoyama, Y, Yoshimoto, M, Yamamoto, S, Miyairi, Y, Nagano, G, Nakamura, A, Tsunematsu, K, Lamair, L, Hubert-Ferrari, A, et al. 2018. Mt. Fuji Holocene eruption history reconstructed from proximal lake sediments and high-density radiocarbon dating. Quaternary Science Reviews 200:395–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ochiai, S, Kashiwaya, K. 2003. Hydro-geomorphological changes and sedimentation processes printed in sediments from Lake Baikal. Long continental records from Lake Baikal. Springer Japan. p. 297–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ochiai, S, Kashiwaya, K. 2005. Climato-hydrological environment inferred from Lake Baikal sediments based on an automatic orbitally tuned age model. Journal of Paleolimnology 33(3):303–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Osipov, EY, Khlystov, OM. 2010. Glaciers and meltwater flux to Lake Baikal during the last glacial maximum. Palaeogeography Palaeoclimatology Palaeoecology 294(1–2):4–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prokopenko, AA, Hinnov, LA, Williams, DF, Kuzmin, MI. 2006. Orbital forcing of continental climate during the pleistocene: A complete astronomically tuned climatic record from Lake Baikal, se siberia. Quaternary Science Reviews 25(23–24):3431–3457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prokopenko, AA, Karabanov, EB, Williams, DF, Kuzmin, MI, Khursevich, GK, Gvozdkov, AA. 2001. The detailed record of climatic events during the past 75,000yrs BP from the Lake Baikal drill core bdp-93-2. Quaternary International 80–81:59–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rasmussen, SO, Bigler, M, Blockley, SP, Blunier, T, Buchardt, SL, Clausen, HB, Cvijanovic, I, Dahl-Jensen, D, Johnsen, SJ, Fischer, H, et al. 2014. A stratigraphic framework for abrupt climatic changes during the last glacial period based on three synchronized greenland ice-core records: refining and extending the intimate event stratigraphy. Quaternary Science Reviews 106:14–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reimer, PJ, Austin, WEN, Bard, E, Bayliss, A, Blackwell, PG, Bronk Ramsey, C, Butzin, M, Cheng, H, Edwards, RL, Friedrich, M, et al. 2020. The IntCal20 Northern Hemisphere radiocarbon age calibration curve (0–55 cal kyr BP). Radiocarbon 62(4):725–757.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shichi, K, Kawamuro, K, Takahara, H, Hase, Y, Maki, T, Miyoshi, N. 2007. Climate and vegetation changes around Lake Baikal during the last 350,000 years. Palaeogeography Palaeoclimatology Palaeoecology 248(3–4):357–375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shichi, K, Takahara, H, Hase, Y, Watanabe, T, Nara, FW, Nakamura, T, Tani, Y, Kawai, T. 2013. Vegetation response in the southern Lake Baikal region to abrupt climate events over the past 33calkyr. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology 375(Supplement C):70–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shimaraev, MN, Granin, NG, Zhdanov, AA. 1993. Deep ventilation of Lake Baikal waters due to spring thermal bars. Limnology and Oceanography 38(5):1068–1072.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Soma, Y, Tani, Y, Soma, M, Mitake, H, Kurihara, R, Hashomoto, S, Watanabe, T, Nakamura, T. 2006. Sedimentary steryl chlorin esters (sces) and other photosynthetic pigments as indicators of paleolimnological change over the last 28,000 years from the Buguldeika saddle of Lake Baikal. Journal of Paleolimnology 37(2):163–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swann, GEA, Mackay, AW, Vologina, E, Jones, MD, Panizzo, VN, Leng, MJ, Sloane, HJ, Snelling, AM, Sturm, M. 2018. Lake Baikal isotope records of holocene central asian precipitation. Quaternary Science Reviews 189:210–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tani, Y, Nara, F, Soma, Y, Soma, M, Itoh, N, Matsumoto, GI, Tanaka, A, Kawai, T. 2009. Phytoplankton assemblage in the plio-pleistocene record of Lake Baikal as indicated by sedimentary steryl chlorin esters. Quaternary International 205(1):126–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Törnqvist, R, Jarsjö, J, Pietroń, J, Bring, A, Rogberg, P, Asokan, SM, Destouni, G. 2014. Evolution of the hydro-climate system in the Lake Baikal basin. Journal of Hydrology 519:1953–1962.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Urabe, A, Tateishi, M, Inouchi, Y, Matsuoka, H, Inoue, T, Dmytriev, A, Khlystov, OM. 2004. Lake-level changes during the past 100,000 years at Lake Baikal, southern Siberia. Quaternary Research 62(2):214–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waelbroeck, C, Lougheed, BC, Vazquez Riveiros, N, Missiaen, L, Pedro, J, Dokken, T, Hajdas, I, Wacker, L, Abbott, P, Dumoulin, J-P, et al. 2019. Consistently dated atlantic sediment cores over the last 40 thousand years. Scientific Data 6(1):165.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wang, Y, Cheng, H, Edwards, RL, He, Y, Kong, X, An, Z, Wu, J, Kelly, MJ, Dykoski, CA, Li, X. 2005. The holocene asian monsoon: links to solar changes and North Atlantic climate. Science 308(5723):854–857.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wang, YJ, Cheng, H, Edwards, RL, An, ZS, Wu, JY, Shen, CC, Dorale, JA. 2001. A high-resolution absolute-dated late pleistocene monsoon record from hulu cave, china. Science 294(5550):2345–2348.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Watanabe, T, Nakamura, T, Kawai, T. 2007. Radiocarbon dating of sediments from large continental lakes (Lakes Baikal, Hovsgol and Erhel). Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section B: Beam Interactions with Materials and Atoms 259(1):565–570.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watanabe, T, Nakamura, T, Nara, FW, Kakegawa, T, Nishimura, M, Shimokawara, M, Matsunaka, T, Senda, R, Kawai, T. 2009a. A new age model for the sediment cores from academician ridge (Lake Baikal) based on high-time-resolution AMS 14C data sets over the last 30 kyr: paleoclimatic and environmental implications. Earth and Planetary Science Letters 286(3–4):347–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watanabe, T, Nakamura, T, Watanabe Nara, F, Kakegawa, T, Horiuchi, K, Senda, R, Oda, T, Nishimura, M, Inoue Matsumoto, G, Kawai, T. 2009b. High-time resolution AMS 14C data sets for Lake Baikal and Lake Hovsgol sediment cores: changes in radiocarbon age and sedimentation rates during the transition from the last glacial to the Holocene. Quaternary International 205:12–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Webster, JM, Braga, JC, Humblet, M, Potts, DC, Iryu, Y, Yokoyama, Y, Fujita, K, Bourillot, R, Esat, TM, Fallon, S, et al. 2018. Response of the Great Barrier Reef to sea-level and environmental changes over the past 30,000 years. Nature Geoscience 11:426–432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yokoyama, Y, Esat, TM. 2011. Global climate and sea level enduring variability and rapid fluctuations over the past 150,000 years. Oceanography 24(2):54–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yokoyama, Y, Lambeck, K, De Deckker, P, Johnston, P, Fifield, LK. 2000. Timing of the last glacial maximum from observed sea-level minima. Nature 406(6797):713–716.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zhou, W, Liu, T, Wang, H, An, Z, Cheng, P, Zhu, Y, Burr, GS. 2016. Geological record of meltwater events at qinghai lake, china from the past 40 ka. Quaternary Science Reviews 149:279–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Figure 0

Figure 1 Map showing (A) the Eurasian continent, (B) Lake Baikal and its watershed and (C) Lake Baikal and the sampling site of the core VER99G12. The maps of Lake Baikal and its watershed were created with reference to Kuzumin et al. (2000). Lake Baikal is located at middle latitudes of the Eurasian continent (51.5–55.8°N, 103.7–109.0°E) and stores the largest volume of freshwater on Earth.

Figure 1

Table 1 Conventional 14C ages and calibrated ages of TOC, total lipids, and pollen fractions from the core VER99G12 from Lake Baikal.

Figure 2

Figure 2 Calibrated age model for the core VER99G12. (A) Undatable age model of core VER99G12, (B)Vertical distributions of calibrated ages for core VER99G12, and (C) limited to a sediment depth of 100–300 m of calibrated ages for core VER99G12. The dashed line in Figure 2B is a regression line for the calibrated age through the core. Correlation coefficient between the calibrated age and the depth through the core was calculated in 0.974. Dark and light shading in calendar age probability density functions (PDFs), indicates the calibrated 68.2% and 95.4% age ranges, respectively. The modeled median age and 95.4% range are indicated by the red solid and black dashed lines, receptively. The shaded density cloud reflects the 1 to 99th percentile range.

Figure 3

Figure 3 VER99G12 age models produced with Undatable (left panel; using parameters described in the Methods) and Bacon (center panel; accumulation mean shape: 50 and 1.5, respectively; memory mean and strength: 0.5 and 10, respectively). Both produce similar median modeled ages, but Undatable produces wider uncertainty (right panel) near sedimentation rate inflections that are characterized by scatter in age-depth determinations (shaded region).

Figure 4

Figure 4 The profiles of sedimentation rate with calibrated age in the core VER99G12. The periods of global climate events for the Last Glacial Maximum, the MWP events and Younger Dryas event were highlighted in blue and yellow bars.

Figure 5

Figure 5 The comparison of the core VER99G12 records with other climate records. (A) δ18O record from NGRIP ice core (blue; Rasmussen et al. 2014)); (B) δ18O records from Sanbao and Hulu cave stalagmite (orange and red, respectively; Wang et al. 2005, 2001); (C) mean grain size and (D) TOC from the core VER99G12 in Lake Baikal (black and green, respectively, data from Nara et al. 2014); (E) July 51°N integrated irradiation for summer (JJA; day of year 152–243) (red; calculated following Lougheed (2022) using the orbital parameters of Laskar et al. (2004) and solar constant of 1361 Wm–2).