Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T08:31:45.388Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Age Structure of Holocene Coastal Sediments: Gulf of Carpentaria, Australia

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 July 2016

E G Rhodes ,
H A Polach ,
B G Thom  and
S R Wilson
E G Rhodes
Affiliation:
Research School of Pacific Studies, Australian National University, Canberra
H A Polach
Affiliation:
Research School of Pacific Studies, Australian National University, Canberra
B G Thom
Affiliation:
Research School of Pacific Studies, Australian National University, Canberra
S R Wilson
Affiliation:
Research School of Pacific Studies, Australian National University, Canberra
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Shells in beach-ridge and chenier Holocene deposits from the Gulf of Carpentaria, Queensland, have been dated by radiocarbon. Possible contamination of carbonate by post-depositional diagenetic processes, isotopic fractionation, ocean reservoir environmental effect, and association of biological age of sample material with depositional event have been examined in order to validate dating of samples from this environment. A numerical methodology used for comparing ‘groups’ of 14C dates strongly supports morphostratigraphic evidence that time discontinuities occur within both chenier and beach-ridge sequences. Four episodes are recognized in each area, all younger than ca 5800 years ago, the time when sea level reached its postglacial maximum in the Gulf of Carpentaria. To some extent, these episodes are out of phase, reflecting different modes of strandline accumulation.

Type
Quaternary
Information
Radiocarbon , Volume 22 , Issue 3: Heidelberg , 1980 , pp. 718 - 727
Copyright
Copyright © The American Journal of Science

References

Bloom, A L, Broecker, W S, Chappell, J, Matthews, R S, and Mesolella, K J, 1974, Quaternary sea level fluctuations on a tectonic coast: new Th230/U234 dates from the Huon Peninsula New Guinea: Quaternary Research, v 4, p 185–205.Google Scholar
Chappell, John, Broecker, W S, Polach, H A, and Thom, B G, 1974, Problems of dating Upper Pleistocene sea levels from coral reef areas, in Internatl coral reef symposium, 2nd, Proc: Brisbane, v 2, p 563–571.Google Scholar
Chappell, John and Polach, Henry A, 1972, Some effects of partial recrystallization of C14 dating Late Pleistocene corals and molluscs: Quaternary Research, v 2, p 244–252.Google Scholar
Clark, R M, 1975, A calibration curve for radiocarbon dates: Antiquity, v 49, p 251–266.Google Scholar
Cook, P J and Mayo, W, 1977, Sedimentology and Holocene history of a tropical estuary (Broad Sound, Queensland): Australian Dept Natl Development, BMR Bull 170, 206 p.Google Scholar
Cook, P J and Polach, H A, 1973, A chenier sequence at Broad Sound, Queensland, and evidence against a Holocene high sea level: Marine Geology, v 14, p 253–268.Google Scholar
Currie, L A and Polach, H A, 1980, Exploratory analysis of the international radiocarbon cross-calibration data: Consensus values and interlaboratory error; Preliminary note, in Stuiver, Minze and Kra, Renee, eds, Internatl radiocarbon conf, 10th, Proc: Radiocarbon, v 22, no. 3, p 933–935.Google Scholar
Gillespie, R and Polach, H A, 1979, The suitability of marine shells for radiocarbon dating of Australian prehistory, in Berger, Rainer and Suess, H E, eds, Radiocarbon dating, Internatl conf on radiocarbon dating, 9th, Proc: Berkeley/Los Angeles, Univ California Press, p 404–421.Google Scholar
Mangerud, Jan and Gulliksen, Steinar, 1975, Apparent radiocarbon ages of recent marine shells from Norway, Spitsbergen, and Arctic Canada: Quaternary Research, v 5, p 263–273.Google Scholar
Olsson, I U, 1959, Uppsala natural radiocarbon measurements I: Am Jour Sci, Radiocarbon Supp, v 1, p 87–102.Google Scholar
Olsson, I U and Blake, Weston Jr., 1962, Problems of radiocarbon dating of raised beaches, based on experience in Spitsbergen: Saertrykk av Norsk Geogr Tidsskr, v 18, no. 1/2, p 1–18.Google Scholar
Olsson, I U and Eriksson, Gösta K, 1965, Remarks on C14 dating of shell material in sea sediments: Prog in Oceanography, v 3, p 253–266.Google Scholar
Olsson, I U, Giksu, Y, and Stenberg, A, 1968, Further investigations of storing and treatment of foraminifera and molluscs for C14 dating: Geol Foren I Stockholm Forh, v 90, p 417–426.Google Scholar
4 Both samples are composed of 100 percent calcite, but ANU-2059 was recovered from a 2.5m deep excavation, while ANU-2060 was collected beneath an adjacent swale, which was subsequently found to be subject to freshwater ponding during the wet season. This may be the cause of its contamination by younger carbon.Google Scholar
Polach, H A, 1972, Cross checking of NBS oxalic acid and secondary laboratory radiocarbon dating standards, in Rafter, T A and Grant-Taylor, T, eds, Internatl conf on radiocarbon dating, 8th, Proc: Wellington, Royal soc New Zealand, v 2, p 688717.Google Scholar
Polach, H A 1976, Radiocarbon dating as a research tool in archaeology; hopes and limitations, in Barnard, Noel, ed, Symposium on scientific methods of research in the study of ancient Chinese bronzes and southeast Asian metal and other archaeological methods, Proc: Natl Gallery Victoria, Melbourne, p 255–298.Google Scholar
Polach, H A 1979, Correlation of 14C activity of NBS oxalic acid with Arizona 1850 wood and ANU sucrose standards, in Berger, Rainer and Suess, H E, eds, Radiocarbon dating, Internatl conf on radiocarbon dating, 9th, Proc: Berkeley/Los Angeles, Univ California Press, p 115–124.Google Scholar
Polach, H A and Golson, J, 1966, Collection of specimens for radiocarbon dating and interpretation of results: Australian Inst Aboriginal Studies, manual no. 2, 42 p.Google Scholar
Rafter, T A, Jansen, H S, Lockerbie, L, and Trotter, M M, 1972, New Zealand radiocarbon reference standards, in Rafter, T A and Grant-Taylor, T, eds, Internatl conf on radiocarbon dating, 8th, Proc: Wellington, Royal Soc New Zealand, v 2, p 625–675.Google Scholar
Scott, A J and Knott, M, 1974, A cluster analysis method for grouping means in the analysis of variance: Biometrics, v 30, p 507–512.Google Scholar
Stuiver, Minze and Polach, H A, 1977, Discussion: Reporting of 14C data: Radiocarbon, v 19, p 355–363.Google Scholar
Thom, B G, 1973, The dilemma of high interstadial sea levels during the last glaciation: Prog in Geography, v 5, p 170–246.Google Scholar
Thom, B G, Polach, H A, and Bowman, G M, 1978, Holocene age structure of coastal sand barriers in New South Wales, Australia: Dept of Geography, Faculty of Military Studies, Univ New South Wales, Duntroon, ACT, Australia, 86 p.Google Scholar
Ward, G K and Wilson, S R, 1976, Procedures for comparing and combining radiocarbon age determinations: a critique: Archaeometry, v 20, p 355–363.Google Scholar
Wilson, S R and Ward, G K, in press, Evaluation and clustering of radiocarbon age determinations; procedures and paradigms: Archaeometry, in press.Google Scholar