Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-16T21:17:25.211Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Age Discrepancies with the Radiocarbon Dating of Sagebrush (Artemisia Tridentata Nutt.)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 July 2016

Phil R Geib*
Affiliation:
Department of Anthropology, University of New Mexico, MSC01-1040, 1 University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, New Mexico 87131-0001, USA. Email: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

When ancient hearths at open archaeological sites do not yield carbonized annual plant remains or other high-quality samples, wood charcoal is commonly used for radiocarbon dating. Sagebrush (Artemisia tridentata Nutt.), a shrub frequently used for fuel across much of the western United States, seems a potentially better candidate for 14C dating than tree wood since the possibility for significant age discrepancy might be less. A comparison of multiple assays from single features reveals that sagebrush can overestimate age more than even tree wood charcoal. A plausible cause of this appears to be persistence of the shrub on the ground surface for an extended interval after death, such that use as fuel almost invariably occurs hundreds of years after fixation of carbon. The potential for age discrepancy may decrease as population density increases because the demand for fuel wood would have resulted in a more rapid turnover of the fuel biomass. This is not true for Archaic period foragers of western North America when population levels were likely quite low and residential mobility quite high.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © 2008 by the Arizona Board of Regents on behalf of the University of Arizona 

References

Biondi, F, Strachan, SDJ, Mensing, S, Piovesan, G. 2007. Radiocarbon analysis confirms the annual nature of sagebrush growth rings. Radiocarbon 49(3):1231–40.Google Scholar
Bronk Ramsey, C. 1995. Radiocarbon calibration and analysis of stratigraphy: the OxCal program. Radiocarbon 37(2):425–30.Google Scholar
Bronk Ramsey, C. 2001. Development of the radiocarbon program. Radiocarbon 43(2A):355–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bungart, PB, Collette, J, Spurr, S. 2004. A better road ahead: archaeological excavations along Navajo Route 21 near White Mesa, Arizona [report]. Navajo Nation Archaeology Department Report No. 01–237 [manuscript on file]. Navajo Nation Historic Preservation Department, Window Rock, Arizona, USA.Google Scholar
Cawker, KB. 1980. Evidence of climatic control from population age structure of Artemisia tridentata Nutt. in southern British Columbia. Journal of Biogeography 7:237–48Google Scholar
Ferguson, CW. 1964. Annual Rings in Big Sagebrush: Artemisia tridentata. Papers of the Laboratory of Tree-Ring Research, No. 1. Tucson: University of Arizona Press. 95 p.Google Scholar
Geib, PR. 2007a. Summary and interpretation of Archaic remains. In: Geib, PR, Spurr, K, editors. Prehistory of the northern Kayenta Anasazi region: archaeological excavations along the Navajo Mountain road (N16) [report], Navajo Nation Archaeology Department Report No. 02–48, Window Rock, Arizona, USA.Google Scholar
Geib, PR. 2007b. The first Kayentan farmers: summary and interpretation of Basketmaker II remains. In: Geib, PR, Spurr, K, editors. Prehistory of the northern Kayenta Anasazi region: archaeological excavations along the Navajo Mountain road (N16) [report]. Navajo Nation Archaeology Department Report No. 02–48, Window Rock, Arizona, USA.Google Scholar
Geib, PR, Spurr, K. 2000. The Basketmaker II-III transition on the Rainbow Plateau. In: Reed, PF, editor. Foundations of Anasazi Culture: The Basketmaker-Pueblo Transition. Salt Lake City: University of Utah Press. p 175200.Google Scholar
Geib, PR, Spurr, K. 2007. Prehistory of the northern Kayenta Anasazi region: archaeological excavations along the Navajo Mountain road (N16) [report]. Navajo Nation Archaeology Department Report No. 02–48, Window Rock, Arizona, USA.Google Scholar
Perryman, BL, Maier, AM, Hild, AL, Olson, RA. 2001. Demographic characteristics of 3 Artemisia tridentata Nutt. subspecies. Journal of Range Management 54(2):166–70.Google Scholar
Schiffer, MB. 1986. Radiocarbon dating and the “old wood” problem: the case of the Hohokam chronology. Journal of Archaeological Science 13(1):1330.Google Scholar
Schurr, MA, Gregory, DA. 2002. Fluoride dating of faunal materials by ion-selective electrode: high resolution relative dating at an Early Agricultural Period site in the Tucson Basin. American Antiquity 67(2):281–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smiley, FE. 1985. The chronometrics of early agricultural sites in northeastern Arizona: approaches to the interpretation of radiocarbon dates [PhD dissertation]. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan. University Microfilms.Google Scholar
Smiley, FE. 1998a. Wood and radiocarbon dating: interpretive frameworks and techniques. In: Smiley, FE, Ahlstrom, RVN. Archaeological Chronometry: Radiocarbon and Tree-Ring Models and Applications from Black Mesa, Arizona. Center for Archaeological Investigations Occasional Paper No. 16. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University. p 2548.Google Scholar
Smiley, FE. 1998b. Old wood: assessing age overestimation. In: Smiley, FE, Ahlstrom, RVN. Archaeological Chronometry: Radiocarbon and Tree-Ring Models and Applications from Black Mesa, Arizona. Center for Archaeological Investigations Occasional Paper No. 16. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University. p 4964.Google Scholar
Smiley, FE. 1998c. Applying radiocarbon models: Lolomai Phase chronometry on Black Mesa. In: Smiley, FE, Ahlstrom, RVN. Archaeological Chronometry: Radiocarbon and Tree-Ring Models and Applications from Black Mesa, Arizona. Center for Archaeological Investigations Occasional Paper No. 16. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University. p 99134.Google Scholar