Hostname: page-component-599cfd5f84-9hh9z Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-07T05:35:59.541Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Accuracy and Reproducibility of 14C Measurements at the Leibniz-Labor, Kiel: A First Response to Lull et al., “When 14C Dates Fall Beyond the Limits of Uncertainty: An Assessment of Anomalies in Western Mediterranean Bronze Age 14C Series”

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 February 2016

John Meadows ,
Matthias Hüls  and
Ralph Schneider
John Meadows
Affiliation:
Centre for Baltic and Scandinavian Archaeology, Stiftung Schleswig-Holsteinische Landesmuseen Schloss Gottorf, Schleswig, Germany Leibniz Laboratory for Radiometric Dating and Isotope Research, Christian-Albrechts University Kiel, Germany
Matthias Hüls*
Affiliation:
Leibniz Laboratory for Radiometric Dating and Isotope Research, Christian-Albrechts University Kiel, Germany
Ralph Schneider
Affiliation:
Leibniz Laboratory for Radiometric Dating and Isotope Research, Christian-Albrechts University Kiel, Germany
*
3. Corresponding author. Email: [email protected].
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Articles
Information
Radiocarbon , Volume 57 , Issue 5 , 2015 , pp. 1041 - 1047
Copyright
Copyright © 2015 The Arizona Board of Regents on behalf of the University of Arizona 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bronk Ramsey, C. 1995. Radiocarbon calibration and analysis of stratigraphy: the OxCal program. Radiocarbon 37(2):425–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bronk Ramsey, C, Higham, T, Bowles, A, Hedges, R. 2004. Improvements to the pretreatment of bone at Oxford. Radiocarbon 46(1):155–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grootes, PM, Nadeau, M-J, Rieck, A. 2004. 14C AMS at the Leibniz-Labor: radiocarbon dating and isotope research. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research B 223–224:55–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Longin, R. 1971. New method of collagen extraction for radiocarbon dating. Nature 230(5291):241–2.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lull, V, Micó, R, Rihuete-Herrada, C, Risch, R. 2015. When 14C dates fall beyond the limits of uncertainty: an assessment of anomalies in western Mediterranean Bronze Age 14C series. Radiocarbon 57(5):1029–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scott, EM, Cook, GT, Naysmith, P, Bryant, C, O'Donnell, D. 2007. A report on phase 1 of the 5th International Radiocarbon Intercomparison (VIRI). Radiocarbon 49(2):409–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scott, EM, Cook, GT, Naysmith, P. 2010a. A report on phase 2 of the Fifth International Radiocarbon Intercomparison (VIRI). Radiocarbon 52(3):846–58.Google Scholar
Scott, EM, Cook, G, Naysmith, P. 2010b. The Fifth International Radiocarbon Intercomparison (VIRI): an assessment of laboratory performance in stage 3. Radiocarbon 52(3):859–65.Google Scholar
Ward, GK, Wilson, SR. 1978. Procedures for comparing and combining radiocarbon age determinations: a critique. Archaeometry 20(1):19–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar