Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T08:59:46.585Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

When Dental Enamel is Put to the Acid Test: Pretreatment Effects and Radiocarbon Dating

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 August 2016

Rachel J A Hopkins ,
Christophe Snoeck  and
Thomas F G Higham
Rachel J A Hopkins*
Affiliation:
University of Oxford, Research Laboratory for Archaeology and the History of Art (RLAHA), Dyson Perrins Building, South Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3QY, UK
Christophe Snoeck
Affiliation:
Analytical, Environmental & Geo-Chemistry, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, ESSC-WE-VUB, Pleinlaan 2, 1050 Brussels, Belgium
Thomas F G Higham
Affiliation:
University of Oxford, Research Laboratory for Archaeology and the History of Art (RLAHA), Dyson Perrins Building, South Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3QY, UK
*
*Corresponding author. Email: [email protected].
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The influence of hydrochloric acid pretreatment on F14C and radiocarbon dates from dental enamel was investigated. Samples from modern equine incisors, a Roman cattle molar, and a Paleolithic woolly rhino molar were sampled and subsequently divided into five fractions. Each fraction was pretreated with a different acid solution, analyzed with Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), and accelerator mass spectrometry (AMS) 14C dated at the Oxford Radiocarbon Accelerator Unit (ORAU). When compared to a control date (e.g. dentine collagen), better results were observed when increased concentrations of hydrochloric acid solution were used in the chemical pretreatment. This pilot study suggests that decontamination of younger samples may be possible. However, for more fossilized samples with a high level of contamination (e.g. from the European Paleolithic), acid pretreatment under the conditions used in this study does not remove all contamination.

Keywords

radiocarbon datingpretreatmentexperimentdiagenesis
Type
Research Article
Information
Radiocarbon , Volume 58 , Issue 4 , December 2016 , pp. 893 - 904
Copyright
© 2016 by the Arizona Board of Regents on behalf of the University of Arizona 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Balter, V, Zazzo, A. 2014. Bone and enamel diagenesis: from the crystal to the environment a tribute to Jean-François Saliège. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology 416:1–3.Google Scholar
Balter, V, Saliège, J-F, Bocherens, H, Person, A. 2002. Evidence of physico-chemical and isotopic modifications in archaeological bones during controlled acid etching. Archaeometry 44(3):329–336.Google Scholar
Beech, M, Mashkour, M, Hüls, M, Zazzo, A. 2009. Prehistoric camels in southeastern Arabia, the discovery of a new site in Abu Dhabi’s western region, United Arab Emirates. Proceedings of the Seminar for Arabian Studies 39:17–30.Google Scholar
Berger, R, Horney, AG, Libby, WF. 1964. Radiocarbon dating of bone and shell from their organic components. Science 144(3621):999–1001.Google Scholar
Brock, F, Higham, TFG, Ditchfield, P, Bronk Ramsey, C. 2010. Current pretreatment methods for AMS radiocarbon dating at the Oxford Radiocarbon Accelerator Unit (ORAU). Radiocarbon 52(1):103–112.Google Scholar
Bronk Ramsey, C. 2009. Bayesian analysis of radiocarbon dates. Radiocarbon 51(1):337–360.Google Scholar
Bronk Ramsey, C, Higham, TFG, Leach, P. 2004. Towards high-precision AMS: progress and limitations. Radiocarbon 46(1):17–24.Google Scholar
Cherkinsky, A. 2009. Can we get a good radiocarbon age from “bad bone”? Determining the reliability of radiocarbon age from bioapatite. Radiocarbon 51(2):647–655.Google Scholar
Fraser, RA, Grün, R, Privat, K, Gagan, MK. 2008. Stable-isotope microprofiling of wombat tooth enamel records seasonal changes in vegetation and environmental conditions in eastern Australia. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology 269(12):66–77.Google Scholar
Haas, H, Banewicz, J. 1980. Radiocarbon dating of bone apatite using thermal release of CO2 . Radiocarbon 22(2):537–544.Google Scholar
Hassan, AA, Termine, JD, Haynes, CV Jr. 1977. Mineralogical studies on bone apatite and their implications for radiocarbon dating. Radiocarbon 19(3):364–374.Google Scholar
Haynes, V. 1968. Radiocarbon: analysis of inorganic carbon of fossil bone and enamel. Science 161(3842):687–688.Google Scholar
Hedges, REM, Law, IE. 1989. The radiocarbon dating of bone. Applied Geochemistry 4:249–253.Google Scholar
Hedges, REM, Lee-Thorp, JA, Tuorss, NC. 1995. Is tooth enamel carbonate a suitable material for radiocarbon dating? Radiocarbon 37(2):285–290.Google Scholar
Higham, TFG, Jacobi, RM, Bronk Ramsey, C. 2006. AMS radiocarbon dating of ancient bone using ultrafiltration. Radiocarbon 48(2):179–195.Google Scholar
Hua, Q, Barbetti, M, Rakowski, AZ. 2013. Atmospheric radiocarbon for the period 1950–2010. Radiocarbon 55(4):2059–2072.Google Scholar
Koch, PL, Tuross, N, Fogel, ML. 1997. The effects of sample treatment and diagenesis on the isotopic integrity of carbonate in biogenic hydroxylapatite. Journal of Archaeological Science 24(5):417–429.Google Scholar
Krueger, HW. 1991. Exchange of carbon with biological apatite. Journal of Archaeological Science 18(3):355–361.Google Scholar
Lanting, JN, Aerts-Bijma, AT, van der Plicht, J. 2001. Dating of cremated bones. Radiocarbon 43(2A):249–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lebon, M, Zazzo, A, Reiche, I. 2014. Screening in situ bone and teeth preservation by ATR-FTIR mapping. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology 416:110–1119.Google Scholar
Lee-Thorp, JA, van der Merwe, NJ. 1991. Aspects of the chemistry of modern and fossil biological apatites. Journal of Archaeological Science 18:343–354.Google Scholar
LeGeros, RZ. 1991. Calcium Phosphates in Oral Biology and Medicine, Monographs in Oral Science 15. Basel: Karger.Google Scholar
LeGeros, RZ, LeGeros, JP. 1983. Carbonate analyses of synthetic, mineral and biological apatites. Journal of Dental Research 62(2):259.Google Scholar
LeGeros, RZ, Trautz, OR, Klein, E, LeGeros, JP. 1969. Two types of carbonate substitution in the apatite structure. Experientia 25(1):5–7.Google Scholar
LeGeros, RZ, Balmain, N, Bonel, G. 1986. Structure and composition of the mineral phase of periosteal bone. Journal of Chemical Research, Synopses 1:8–9.Google Scholar
Long, A, Wilson, AT, Ernst, RD, Gore, BH, Hare, PE. 1989. AMS radiocarbon dating of bones at Arizona. Radiocarbon 31(3):231–238.Google Scholar
Longin, R. 1971. New methods of collagen extraction for radiocarbon dating. Nature 230(5291):241–242.Google Scholar
Marom, A, McCullagh, JSO, Higham, TFG, Sinitsyn, AA, Hedges, REM. 2012. Single amino acid radiocarbon dating of Upper Paleolithic modern humans. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 109(18):6878–6881.Google Scholar
Naysmith, P, Scott, EM, Cook, GT, Heinemeier, J, van der Plicht, J, Van Strydonck, M, Bronk Ramsey, C, Grootes, PM, Freeman, ST. 2007. A cremated bone intercomparison study. Radiocarbon 49(2):403–408.Google Scholar
Olson, EA, Broecker, WS. 1961. Lamont natural radiocarbon measurements VII. Radiocarbon 3:141–175.Google Scholar
Pinhasi, R, Nioradze, M, Tushabramishvili, N, Lordkipanidze, D, Pleurdeau, D, Moncel, MH, Adler, DS, Stringer, C, Higham, TFG. 2012. New chronology for the Middle Palaeolithic of the southern Caucasus suggests early demise of Neanderthals in this region. Journal of Human Evolution 63(6):770–780.Google Scholar
R Core Team. 2015. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. http://www.R-project.org/.Google Scholar
Reimer, PJ, Bard, E, Bayliss, A, Beck, JW, Blackwell, PG, Bronk Ramsey, C, Buck, CE, Cheng, H, Edwards, RL, Friedrich, M, Grootes, PM, Guilderson, TP, Haflidason, H, Hajdas, I, Hatté, C, Heaton, TJ, Hoffmann, DL, Hogg, AG, Hughen, KA, Kaiser, KF, Kromer, B, Manning, SW, Niu, M, Reimer, RW, Richards, DA, Scott, EM, Southon, JR, Staff, RA, Turney, CSM, van der Plicht, J. 2013. IntCal13 and Marine13 radiocarbon age calibration curves 0–50,000 years cal BP. Radiocarbon 55(4):1869–1887.Google Scholar
Rice, JA. 2007. Mathematical Statistics and Data Analysis. 3rd edition. London: Brooks/Cole.Google Scholar
Rink, JW, Schwarcz, HP. 1995. Tests for diagenesis in tooth enamel: ESR dating signals and carbonate contents. Journal of Archaeological Science 22(2):251–255.Google Scholar
Roche, D, Ségalen, L, Balan, E, Delattre, S. 2010. Preservation assessment of Miocene-Pliocene tooth enamel from Tugen Hills (Kenyan Rift Valley) through FTIR, chemical and stable-isotope analyses. Journal of Archaeological Science 37(7):1690–1699.Google Scholar
Saliège, JF, Person, A, Paris, F. 1995. Preservation of C/ C original ratio and 14C dating of the mineral fraction of human bones from Saharan tombs, Niger. Journal of Archaeological Science 22(2):301–312.Google Scholar
Sereno, PC, Garcea, EAA, Jousse, H, Stojanowski, CM, Saliège, J-F, Maga, A, Ide, OA, Knudson, KJ, Mercuri, AM, Stafford, TW Jr, Kaye, TG, Giraudi, C, N’Siala, IM, Cocca, E, Moots, HM, Dutheil, DB, Stivers, JP. 2008. Lakeside cemeteries in the Sahara: 5000 years of Holocene population and environmental change. PLoS ONE 3(8):e2995.Google Scholar
Skinner, HC. 2005. Minerology of Bone. London: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Snoeck, C, Lee-Thorp, JA, Schulting, RJ. 2014. From bone to ash: compositional and structural changes in burned modern and archaeological bone. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology 416:55–68.Google Scholar
Sponheimer, M, Lee-Thorp, JA. 1999. Alteration of enamel carbonate environments during fossilization. Journal of Archaeological Science 26(2):143–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Surovell, G. 2000. Radiocarbon dating of bone apatite by step heating. Geoarchaeology 15(6):591–608.Google Scholar
Sydney-Zax, M, Mayer, I, Deutsch, D. 1991. Carbonate content in developing human and bovine enamel. Journal of Dental Research 70(5):913–916.Google Scholar
Van Strydonck, M, Boudin, M, De Mulder, G. 2009. 14C dating of cremated bones: the issue of sample contamination. Radiocarbon 51(2):553–568.Google Scholar
Weiner, S, Bar-Yosef, O. 1990. States of preservation of bones from prehistoric sites in the Near East: a survey. Journal of Archaeological Science 17(2):187–196.Google Scholar
Zazzo, A. 2014. Bone and enamel carbonate diagenesis: a radiocarbon prospective. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology 416:168–178.Google Scholar
Zazzo, A, Saliège, J-F. 2011. Radiocarbon dating of biological apatites: a review. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology 310(1–2):52–61.Google Scholar