Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T02:49:27.289Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Update on the Absolute Chronology of the Migration period in Central Europe (375–568 AD): new data from Maria ponsee, Lower Austria

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 August 2019

Jakub Kaizer ,
Eva Maria Wild ,
Peter Stadler ,
Maria Teschler-Nicola  and
Peter Steier
Jakub Kaizer*
Affiliation:
Faculty of Mathematics, Physics and Informatics, Comenius University, 84248 Bratislava, Slovakia
Eva Maria Wild
Affiliation:
Fakultät für Physik - Isotopenforschung und Kernphysik, VERA-Laboratory, Universität Wien, Währinger Strasse 17, A-1090 Vienna, Austria
Peter Stadler
Affiliation:
Prähistorische Abteilung, Naturhistorisches Museum, Burgring 7, A-1010 Vienna, Austria
Maria Teschler-Nicola
Affiliation:
Anthropologische Abteilung, Naturhistorisches Museum, Burgring 7, A-1010 Vienna, Austria Department für evolutionäre Anthropologie, Universität Wien, Althanstrasse 14, A-1090 Vienna, Austria
Peter Steier
Affiliation:
Fakultät für Physik - Isotopenforschung und Kernphysik, VERA-Laboratory, Universität Wien, Währinger Strasse 17, A-1090 Vienna, Austria
*
*Corresponding author. Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The Danube region in Central Europe was one of the areas where several cultures appeared before moving further or being defeated during the Migration Period in the middle of the first millennium AD. The Lombards, who crossed the Danube in 505 AD, settled in the “Tullnerfeld” where the Maria Ponsee graveyard was excavated in 1965–1972. From the historical evidence about the temporal and spatial migration of the Lombards, it was concluded that the graveyard was in use between 505 and 568 AD by three groups of migrants. We processed and dated a new set of 23 bones, found in the Maria Ponsee site. The determined 14C dates fit well in the expected time interval, though discrimination between the grave groups could not be obtained. The dates were added to the chronological sequence, recording the Migration Period in Central Europe. The sequence lead to a good correlation of the modelled and historical data (Amodel = 87.6%). The results show differentiations of the respective tribes in the pre-Lombardic period. However, transitions between the Lombard phases were rather ambiguous, indicating that the Lombards set up new settlements while only partially abandoning the already inhabited ones before 546 AD.

Keywords

bone14C AMSchronological sequenceLombardsMaria Ponsee
Type
Conference Paper
Information
Radiocarbon , Volume 61 , Issue 6: Radiocarbon 2018 Conference Proceedings Trondheim, Norway, June 17–22, 2018 Part 2 of 2 , December 2019 , pp. 1653 - 1662
Copyright
© 2019 by the Arizona Board of Regents on behalf of the University of Arizona 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Selected Papers from the 23rd International Radiocarbon Conference, Trondheim, Norway, 17–22 June, 2018

References

REFERENCES

Adler, H. 1966. Maria Ponsee. Fundberichte aus Österreich 9:26–30.Google Scholar
Adler, H. 1972. Maria Ponsee. Fundberichte aus Österreich 11:120–1.Google Scholar
Barta, P, Štolc, S. 2007. HBCO correction: Its impact on archaeological absolute dating. Radiocarbon 49(2):465–472.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bronk Ramsey, C. 2009. Bayesian analysis of radiocarbon dates. Radiocarbon 51(1):337–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bronk Ramsey, C, Lee, S. 2013. Recent and planned developments of the program OxCal. Radiocarbon 55(2–3):720–730.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bystrický, P. 2008. Sťahovanie národov (454–568). Bratislava: Slovenská akadémia vied.Google Scholar
Friesinger, H, Adler, H. 1979. Die Zeit der Völkerwanderungen in Niederösterreich. St. Pölten – Wien: Niederösterreichisches Pressehaus.Google Scholar
Geyh, MA. 2001. Bomb radiocarbon dating of animal tissues and hair. Radiocarbon 43(2B):723–730.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hedges, REM, van Klinken, GJ. 1992. A review of current approaches in the pre-treatment of bone for radiocarbon dating by AMS. Radiocarbon 34(3):279–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karlsberg, AJ. 2006. Statistical modelling for robust and flexible chronology building [PhD thesis]. University of Sheffield.Google Scholar
Kováčová, L. 2014. Analysis of selected aspects at burial grounds of Langobards (Lombards) on the Middle Danube. Musaica 28:75–96.Google Scholar
Klement, L-L. 2014. Palaeodemographic and palaeopathological study of the Lombard-time burial ground from Maria Ponsee, Lower Austria [MSc thesis]. Univesity Mainz.Google Scholar
Lauermann, E, Adler, H. 2008. Die Langobardenforschung im norddanubischen Niederösterreich und im Tullnerfeld. In: Bemmann, J, Schmauder, M, editors. Kulturwandel in Mitteleuropa. Langobarden – Awaren – Slawen. Bonn: Rudolf Habelt. p. 299–308.Google Scholar
Lee, S, Bronk Ramsey, C. 2012. Development and application of the trapezoidal model for archaeological chronologies. Radiocarbon 54(1):107–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Longin, R. 1971. New method of collagen extraction for radiocarbon dating. Nature 230:241–242.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Marti, R. 2010. Langobarden. In: Historisches Lexikon der Schweiz (1998–2012). Available at: http://www.hls-dhs-dss.ch/textes/d/D8029.php.Google Scholar
Peters, E, editor. 1974. Paul the Deacon – History of Lombards. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
Philippsen, B. 2013. The fresh water reservoir effect in radiocarbon dating. Heritage Science 1(1):1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Piotrowska, N, Goslar, T. 2002. Preparation of bone samples in the Gliwice Radiocarbon Laboratory for AMS radiocarbon dating. Isotopes in Environmental and Health Studies 38(4):267–275.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Priester, K. 2004. Geschichte der Langobarden: Gesellschaft - Kultur - Alltagsleben. Stuttgart: Theiss.Google Scholar
Reimer, PJ, Bard, E, Bayliss, A, Beck, JW, Blackwell, PG, Bronk Ramsey, C, Grootes, PM, Guilderson, TP, Haflidason, H, Hajdas, I, Hatté, C, Heaton, TJ, Hoffmann, DL, Hogg, AG, Hughen, KA, Kaiser, KF, Kromer, B, Manning, SW, Niu, M, Reimer, RW, Richards, DA, Scott, EM, Southon, JR, Staff, RA, Turney, CSM, van der Plicht, J. 2013. IntCal13 and Marine13 radiocarbon age calibration curves 0–50,000 years cal BP. Radiocarbon 55(4):1869–1887.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rumpelmayr, K. 2012. Reconstructing diet by stable isotope analysis (δ13C and δ15N): two case studies from Bronze Age and Early medieval Lower Austria [PhD thesis]. University of Vienna.Google Scholar
Sauer, F. 2007. Zur Geschichte der Awaren. In: Die Archaeologischen Grabungen auf der Trasse der Sl. Fundstelle Vösendorf Laxenburgerstrasse, Bad Vöslau. Wien: ASFiNAG. p. 28–53.Google Scholar
Stadler, P, Friesinger, H, Kutschera, W, Priller, A, Steier, P, Wild, EM. 2003. Ein Beitrag zur Absolutchronologie der Langobarden aufgrund von 14C-Datierungen und ein Versuch zur Datierung der Beraubung langobardischer Gräber. Archaeologica Austriaca 87:265–278.Google Scholar
Stadler, P, Friesinger, H, Kutschera, W, Lauermann, E, Rácz, Z, Tejra, J, Wild, EM, Zeman, T. 2008. Kann man die Zuordnung zu den verschiedenen (ethnischen) Gruppen der Völkerwanderungszeit mittels naturwissenschaftlicher Datierungsmethoden verbessern? Beiträge zur Ur- und Frühgeschichte Mitteleuropas 50:157–183.Google Scholar
Stadler, P. 2015. Quantitative methods with image database Montelius and software package WinSerion for archaeologists: examples of different analyses. p. 160, 136f. Version from 14.06.2015.Google Scholar
Steier, P, Dellinger, F, Kutschera, W, Priller, A, Rom, W, Wild, EM. 2004. Pushing the precision limit of 14C AMS. Radiocarbon 46(1):5–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Klinken, GJ. 1999. Bone quality indicators for palaeodietary and radiocarbon measurements. Journal of Archaeological Science 26:687–695.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vogel, JS, Southon, JR, Nelson, DE, Brown, TA. 1984. Performance of catalytically condensed carbon for use in accelerator mass spectrometry. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research B 5(2):289–293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wild, EM, Golser, R, Hille, P, Kutschera, W, Priller, A, Puchegger, S, Rom, W, Steier, P, Vycudilik, W. 1998. First 14C results from archaeological and forensic studies at the Vienna Environmental Research Accelerator. Radiocarbon 40(1):273–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wild, EM, Arlamovsky, KA, Golser, R, Kutschera, W, Priller, A, Puchegger, S, Rom, W, Steier, P, Vycudilik, W. 2000. 14C dating with the bomb peak: an application to forensic medicine. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research B 172(1–4):944–950.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wild, EM, Guillen, S, Kutschera, W, Seidler, H, Steier, P. 2007. Radiocarbon dating of the Peruvian Chachapoya/Inca site at the Laguna de los Condores. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research B 259(1):378–383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wild, EM, Neugebauer-Maresch, C, Einwögerer, T, Stadler, P, Steier, P, Brock, F. 2008. 14C dating of the upper paleolithic site at Krems-Hundssteig in Lower Austria. Radiocarbon 50(1):1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Kaizer et al. supplementary material

Kaizer et al. supplementary material 1
Download Kaizer et al. supplementary material(File)
File 1.1 MB
Supplementary material: File

Kaizer et al. supplementary material

Kaizer et al. supplementary material 2
Download Kaizer et al. supplementary material(File)
File 16.8 KB