Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T12:45:12.144Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Organic Matter of Cultural Layers as a Material for Radiocarbon Dating

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 December 2017

E Zazovskaya*
Affiliation:
Institute of Geography, Russian Academy of Sciences, Laboratory of Radiocarbon Dating & Electronic Microscopy, Department of Soil Geography & Evolution, Moscow, Russia
V Shishkov
Affiliation:
Institute of Geography, Russian Academy of Sciences, Laboratory of Radiocarbon Dating & Electronic Microscopy, Department of Soil Geography & Evolution, Moscow, Russia
A Dolgikh
Affiliation:
Institute of Geography, Russian Academy of Sciences, Laboratory of Radiocarbon Dating & Electronic Microscopy, Department of Soil Geography & Evolution, Moscow, Russia The Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia, Department of Science and Innovation Policy, Moscow, Russia
A Alexndrovskiy
Affiliation:
Institute of Geography, Russian Academy of Sciences, Laboratory of Radiocarbon Dating & Electronic Microscopy, Department of Soil Geography & Evolution, Moscow, Russia
V Skripkin
Affiliation:
Institute of Environmental Geochemistry, National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, Department of Nuclear Geochemistry and Сhemical Сosmology, Kiev, Ukraine
O Chichagova
Affiliation:
Institute of Geography, Russian Academy of Sciences, Laboratory of Radiocarbon Dating & Electronic Microscopy, Department of Soil Geography & Evolution, Moscow, Russia
*
*Corresponding author. Email: [email protected].

Abstract

This article focuses on radiocarbon (14C) dating of the organic matter (OM) of natural-anthropogenic objects—the cultural layers (CLs) of archaeological sites. Using examples from three ancient sites located within the European part of Russia, in southern taiga and forest-steppe natural zones, we demonstrate approaches to the interpretation of 14C dating of OM derived from the organomineral material of the CLs studied. We use the term “archaeological humus” as defined as the OM formed within the CL from “anthropogenic matter” (i.e., organic residues that were produced during the past human occupation of the site) without or with negligible contribution of OM inherited from pre-anthropogenic stages of pedogenesis. The archaeological humus is formed within closed or semi-closed systems by the processes of humification and physical stabilization of OM. The use of hierarchical (from macro- to submicro-) morphological investigations at one of the sites (Gnezdovo) combined with 14C dating allowed conclusions to be drawn about the age of formation of different OM components in CLs.

Type
Method Development
Copyright
© 2017 by the Arizona Board of Regents on behalf of the University of Arizona 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Selected Papers from the 8th Radiocarbon & Archaeology Symposium, Edinburgh, UK, 27 June–1 July 2016.

References

REFERENCES

Afanasyev, GE, Zotko, MP, Korobov, DS. 1999. First steps of “Space Archaeology” (deciphering of the Mayats Settlement). Rossiyskaya Arkheologya 2:106123. In Russian.Google Scholar
Alexandrovskaya, EI, Alexandrovskiy, AL, Gaidukov, PG, Krenke, NA. 2001. Woodland, meadow, field and town layout: evidence from analyses of the earliest cultural deposits and buried soils in Novgorod. The British Museum, Occasional Paper 141:1521.Google Scholar
Alexandrovskiy, AL, Dolgikh, AV, Alexandrovskaya, EI. 2012a. Pedogenetic features of habitation deposits in ancient towns of European Russia and their alteration under different natural conditions. Boletin de la Sociedad Geologica Mexicana 64(1):7177.Google Scholar
Alexandrovskiy, AL, Voronin, KV, Dolgikh, AV, Kovalukh, NN, Skripkin, VV, Glavatskaya, EV. 2012b. Radiocarbon age for the cultural layer of the neolithic-bronze age settlement Pesochnoe-1 (Lake Nero, Russia). Radiocarbon 54(3–4):589597.Google Scholar
Alexandrovsky, AL, Dolgikh, AV, Skripkin, VV. 2013. Archaeological humus as an object of 14C dating. 14C and Archaeology 7th International Symposium. Book of abstracts. Ghent. p 91–2.Google Scholar
Arzhantseva, IA, Turova, IV, Bronnikova, MA, Zazovskaya, EP. 2001. Alan settlements of the first millenium in the Kislovodsk Basin: the conditions for their development and functioning, paleolandscape reconstructions of the life support systems. In: One Land, Many Landscapes. Oxford BAR Series 987:115124.Google Scholar
Bronnikova, MA, Panin, AV, Sheremetskaya, ED. 2012. History of the Late Holocene alluvial sedimentation, pedogenesis and colonisation of river floodplains in the upper Dnieper basin. In: Geomorphic Processes and Geoarchaeology: from Landscape Archaeology to Archaeotourism International Conference. Extended abstracts. p 48–51.Google Scholar
Bronnikova, MA, Zazovskaya, EP, Bobrov, AA. 2003. Local landscape evolution related to human impact of an Early Medieval pre-urban center in the Upper Dnieper Region (center of the Russian Plain): an interdisciplinary experience. Revista Mexicana de Geologicas 20(3):245262.Google Scholar
Christensen, BT. 1987. Decomposability of organic matter in particle size fractions from field soils with straw incorporation. Soil Biol. and Bioch. 19:439–25.Google Scholar
Dolgikh, AV, Alexandrovskiy, AL. 2010. Soils and cultural layer in Velikii Novgorod. Eurasian Soil Science 43:477487.Google Scholar
Fedeneva, IN, Dergacheva, MI. 2003. Paleosols and basis of environmental reconstructions in Altai mountainous areas. Quaternary International 106–107:89101.Google Scholar
Gaudinski, JB, Dawson, TE, Quideau, S, Schuur, EAG, Roden, JS, Trumbore, SE, Sandquist, DR, Oh, SW, Wasylishen, RE. 2005. Comparative analysis of cellulose preparation techniques for use with 13C, 14C, and 18O isotopic measurements. Analytical Chemistry 77(22):72127224.Google Scholar
Gaudinski, JV, Trumbore, SE, Davidson, EA, Zheng, S. 2000. Soil carbon cycling in a temperate forest: radiocarbon-based estimates of residence times, sequestration rates and partitioning of fluxes. Biogeochemistry 51:3369.Google Scholar
Goldberg, P, Macphail, RI. 2006. Practical and Theoretical Geoarchacology. Oxford: Malden.Google Scholar
Holliday, VT, editor. 1992. Soils in Archaeology: Landscape Evolution and Human Occupation. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Press. 254 p.Google Scholar
Iakimenko, O, Trofimov, S, Stepanov, A, Vorontsova, E. 2001. Organic matter in buried soils of archaeological complex as compared to background soils. In: Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Soil and Archaeology. Budapest, 30 May–3 June 2001. p 71–4.Google Scholar
Ivanov, IV, Khokhlova, OS, Galitskii, VV, Chichagova, OA, Zazovskaya, EP. 2012. Radiocarbon pollution and self-purification of humus in chernozems of the East-European plain in 1900–2008. Eurasian Soil Science 45(8):802810.Google Scholar
Ivanova, AE, Marfenina, OE, Kislova, EE, Zazovskaya, EP. 2006. Mycological characteristics of the cultural layer of a Medieval settlement on soddy calcareous soils. Pochvovedenie 39(1):5361.Google Scholar
Kaidanova, OV. 1991. Geochemistry of the cultural layers of ancient cities. In. Ecogeochemical Analysis of Technogenic Pollution. Moscow: Research Institute of Mineralogy, Geochemistry, and Crystal Chemistry of Rare Elements. p 126133. In Russian.Google Scholar
Limbrey, S. 1975. Soil Science and Archaeology. London: Academic Press. 384 p.Google Scholar
Marfenina, OE, Gorbatovskaya, EV, Gorlenko, MV. 2001. Mycological characterization of the occupation deposits in excavated medieval Russian settlements. Microbiology 70(6):738742.Google Scholar
Marfenina, OE, Ivanova, AE, Kislova, EE. 2005. The comparison of mycological properties of anthropogenically transformed soils of medieval urban centers and modern urban soils. In: SUITMA abstracts book. November 17–25, 2005, Cairo, Egypt. p 89–91.Google Scholar
Murasheva, VV, Bronnikova, MA, Panin, AV. 2012. Landscape-dependant functional zoning of the early medieval Gnezdovo settlement on the upper Dnieper river floodplain. In: Geomorphic Processes and Geoarchaeology: from Landscape Archaeology to Archaeotourism. International conference, extended abstracts. p 197–200.Google Scholar
Panin, А, Bronnikova, M, Filippov, V, Sheremetskaya, E. 2012. Geomorphology and Late Valdai (Vistulian)—Holocene history of the Upper Dnieper River valley. In: Geoarchaeological Issues of the Upper Dnieper–Western Dvina River Region (Western Russia): Fieldtrip Guide. p 10–20.Google Scholar
Pushkina, T, Eniosova, N, Murasheva, V. 2012. Gnezdovo archaeological complex: history of research and general characteristic. In: Geoarchaeological Issues of the Upper Dnieper–Western Dvina River Region (Western Russia): Fieldtrip Guide. p 4–10.Google Scholar
Reimer, PJ, Bard, E, Bayliss, A, Beck, JW, Blackwell, PG, Ramsey, CB, Buck, C, Cheng, H, Edwards, RL, Friedrich, M, Grootes, PM, Guilderson, TP, Haflidason, H, Hajdas, I, Hatté, C, Heaton, TJ, Hoffmann, DL, Hogg, AG, Hughen, KA, Kaiser, KF, Kromer, B, Manning, SW, Niu, M, Reimer, RW, Richards, DA, Scott, EM, Southon, JR, Staff, RA, Turney, CSM, van der Plicht, J. 2013. IntCal13 and Marine13 radiocarbon age calibration curves 0–50,000 years cal BP. Radiocarbon 55(4):18691887.Google Scholar
Sedov, SN, Zazovskaya, EP, Bronnikova, MA, Kazdim, AA, Rosov, SYu. 1999. Late Holocene man-induced environmental change in Central Russian Plain: paleopedological evidences from early medieval archaeological site. Climatic change: paleopedological and soil rock magnetic approaches. Chinese Science Bulletin, ISPCC 44:159165.Google Scholar
Sycheva, SA. 1994. Soil geomorfological aspects of the formation of the cultural layer of ancient settlements. Eurasian Soil Science 3:2833.Google Scholar
Sycheva, SA. 1999. Cultural layer as the geographical object. Izv. Ross. Akad. Nauk, Ser. Geogr. 6:1321. In Russian.Google Scholar
Sycheva, SA, Uzyanov, AA, Chichagova, OA. 2005. Correlation of archaeological and radiocarbon age of cultural layers Early Slavic monuments Kursk Seim river region. In: Lipking YA, editor. Archeology of the Kursk Region. Kursk. p 4649. In Russian.Google Scholar
Tikhova, VD, Shakirov, MM, Fadeeva, VP, Dergacheva, MI, Kallas, EV, Orlova, LA. 2001. Elemental content and functional group analysis of humic acids in fossilized soils of different ages. Russian Journal of Applied Chemistry 74(8):13801384. In Russian.Google Scholar
Trofimov, SYa, Yakimenko, OS, Sedov, SN, Dorofeeva, EI, Gorshkova, EI, Zazovskaya, EP, Oleinik, SA, Demin, VV. 2004. Composition and properties of organic matter in the soils of ancient Slavic settlements in the Forest Zone. Eurasian Soil Science 37(9):927936.Google Scholar
Trumbore, S. 2000. Age of soil organic matter and soil respiration: radiocarbon constraints on belowground C dynamics. Ecological Applications 10(2):399411.Google Scholar
Vorob’eva, LA. 2006. Theory and Practice of the Chemical Analysis of Soils. Moscow: GEOS. 400 p. In Russian.Google Scholar
Yanin, V. 2001. Novgorod and medieval archaeology. Novgorod: the archaeology of a Russian medieval city and its hinterland. British Museum Occasional Paper 141:1114.Google Scholar
Zazovskaya, EP, Bronnikova, MA. 2001. Cultural layers of medieval towns as a result of pedoanthropogenic irreversible change in soil system of urban environment. Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Soils and Archaeology. p 89–92.Google Scholar