Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T02:23:22.007Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Comparative Dendrochronological and 14C Dating of 15th Century Russian Icon

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 February 2016

Konstantin Voronin ,
Andrey Dolgikh ,
Vladimir Matskovsky ,
Alexander Cherkinsky ,
Vadim Skripkin  and
Alexander Alexandrovskiy
Konstantin Voronin
Affiliation:
Stolichnoe Archaeological Bureau, Moscow, Russia Institute of Archaeology, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia
Andrey Dolgikh*
Affiliation:
Institute of Geography, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia
Vladimir Matskovsky
Affiliation:
Institute of Geography, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia
Alexander Cherkinsky
Affiliation:
Center for Applied Isotope Studies, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, USA
Vadim Skripkin
Affiliation:
Kiev Radiocarbon Laboratory, Institute of Environmental Geochemistry NAS, Kiev, Ukraine
Alexander Alexandrovskiy
Affiliation:
Institute of Geography, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia
*
Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected].
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A 15th century Russian icon from the Novgorod region was analyzed using both dendrochronological and radiocarbon methods [liquid scintillation counting (LSC) and accelerator mass spectrometry (AMS)]. This orthodox icon represents the Mother of God (Dexiokratusa). Fine art experts attribute the icon to between the late 14th to the early 15th centuries. The last complete tree ring was dated to AD 1409. There are indications that the trees were cut down during the summer of AD 1410. Taking into account the time for seasoning (about 8 months), the icon would have been painted in AD 1411. Wiggle-matching of the six AMS samples failed. Two of six AMS dates correspond to dendrochronological dates, while four of the six AMS dates showed differences with the dendrochronological dates by 5–39 yr. This discrepancy raises the issue of a possible regional offset from the calibration curve for the 13th century AD in NW Russia.

Type
Articles
Information
Radiocarbon , Volume 57 , Issue 1 , 2015 , pp. 173 - 182
Copyright
Copyright © 2015 by the Arizona Board of Regents on behalf of the University of Arizona 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bronk Ramsey, C. 2009. Bayesian analysis of radiocarbon dates. Radiocarbon 51(1):337–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bronk Ramsey, C, van der Plicht, J, Weninger, B. 2001. ‘Wiggle matching’ radiocarbon dates. Radiocarbon 43(2A):381–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cybis. 2006. CooRecorder manual [WWW document]. http://www.cybis.se/forfun/dendro/helpcoorecorder7/index.htm.Google Scholar
Gregush, P. 1963. Identification of gymnosperm wood by microscopic characteristics (Opredelitel' drevediny golosemennykh po mikroskopicheslim priznakam). Moscow: MSU. In Russian.Google Scholar
Holmes, RL. 1983. Computer-assisted quality control in tree-ring dating and measurement. Tree-Ring Bulletin 44:69–75.Google Scholar
Kolchin, BA. 1963. Dendrochronology of Novgorod. In: Materials and Research of Archaeology of USSR 117. In Russian.Google Scholar
Kolchin, BA, Khoroshev, AS, Yanin, VL. 1981. The Property of a 12th Century Novgorod Artist. Moscow: Nauka. In Russian.Google Scholar
Kovalyukh, N, van der Plicht, J, Possnert, G, Skripkin, V, Chlenova, L. 2001. Dating of ancient icons from Kiev art collections. Radiocarbon 43(2B):1065–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nedashkovsky, LF. 2004. Uvek: The Golden Horde City and Its Periphery. BAR International Series 1222. Oxford: Archaeopress.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Park, WK, Kim, Y, Jeong, AR, Kim, SK, Oh, JA, Park, SY, Choi, S, Park, G, Seo, JW. 2010. Tree-ring dating and AMS wiggle-matching of wooden statues at Neunggasa temple in South Korea. Radiocarbon 52(3):924–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reimer, PJ, Baillie, MGL, Bard, E, Bayliss, A, Beck, JW, Bertrand, CJH, Blackwell, PG, Buck, CE, Burr, GS, Cutler, KB, Damon, PE, Edwards, RL, Fairbanks, RG, Friedrich, M, Guilderson, TP, Hogg, AG, Hughen, KA, Kromer, B, McCormac, G, Manning, S, Bronk Ramsey, C, Reimer, RW, Remmele, S, Southon, JR, Stuiver, M, Talamo, S, Taylor, FW, van der Plicht, J, Weyhenmeyer, CE. 2004. IntCal04 terrestrial radiocarbon age calibration, 0–26 cal kyr BP. Radiocarbon 46(3):1029–58.Google Scholar
Reimer, PJ, Baillie, MGL, Bard, E, Bayliss, A, Beck, JW, Blackwell, PG, Bronk Ramsey, C, Buck, CE, Burr, GS, Edwards, RL, Friedrich, M, Grootes, PM, Guilderson, TP, Hajdas, I, Heaton, TJ, Hogg, AG, Hughen, KA, Kaiser, KF, Kromer, B, McCormac, FG, Manning, SW, Reimer, RW, Richards, DA, Southon, JR, Talamo, S, Turney, CSM, van der Plicht, J, Weyhenmeyer, CE. 2009. IntCal09 and Marine09 radiocarbon age calibration curves, 0–50,000 years cal BP. Radiocarbon 51(4):1111–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rinn, F. 1996. TSAP. Version 3.0. Reference Manual. Computer Program for Time Series Analysis and Presentation. Heidelberg: RINNTECH.Google Scholar
Rybina, EA. 2001a. The birch-bark letters the domestic economy of Medieval Novgorod. In: Brisbane, M, Gaimster, D, editors. Novgorod: The Archaeology of a Russian Medieval City and Its Hinterland. London: The British Museum Occasional Paper 141. p 127–32.Google Scholar
Rybina, EA. 2001b. Trade in Medieval Novgorod. Historical and Archaeological Essays. Novgorod: Veliky.Google Scholar
Sarabyanov, VD, Smirnova, ES. 2007. History of Old Russian Painting. Moscow: PSTGU. In Russian.Google Scholar
Skripkin, V, Kovaliukh, N. 1998. Recent developments in the procedures used at the SSCER laboratory for the preparation of lithium carbide. Radiocarbon 40(1):211–4.Google Scholar
Solomina, ON, Matskovskii, VV, Zhukov, RS. 2011. The Vologda and Solovki dendrochronological “chronicles” as a source of information about the climate conditions of the last millennium. Doklady Earth Sciences 439(2):1104–9.Google Scholar
Tarabardina, OA. 2001. Dendrochronology in Novgorod: its history and current programme of research. In: Brisbane, M, Gaimster, D, editors. Novgorod: The Archaeology of a Russian Medieval City and Its Hinterland. London: The British Museum Occasional Paper 141. p 47–50.Google Scholar
Vogel, JS, Southon, JR, Nelson, DE, Brown, TA. 1984. Performance of catalytically condensed carbon for use in accelerator mass spectrometry. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research B 5(2):289–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yanin, VL. 2004. The Medieval Novgorod. Moscow: Nauka. In Russian.Google Scholar