Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T10:50:37.389Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Assessing the Blank Carbon Contribution, Isotope Mass Balance, and Kinetic Isotope Fractionation of the Ramped Pyrolysis/Oxidation Instrument at NOSAMS

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 March 2017

Jordon D Hemingway ,
Valier V Galy ,
Alan R Gagnon ,
Katherine E Grant ,
Sarah Z Rosengard ,
Guillaume Soulet ,
Prosper K Zigah  and
Ann P McNichol
Jordon D Hemingway*
Affiliation:
Department of Marine Chemistry and Geochemistry, Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution, 266 Woods Hole Road, Woods Hole, MA 02543, USA Massachusetts Institute of Technology – Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution Joint Program in Oceanography and Applied Ocean Science and Engineering, 77 Massachusetts Avenue, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA
Valier V Galy
Affiliation:
Department of Marine Chemistry and Geochemistry, Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution, 266 Woods Hole Road, Woods Hole, MA 02543, USA
Alan R Gagnon
Affiliation:
Department of Geology and Geophysics, Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution, 266 Woods Hole Road, Woods Hole, MA 02543, USA
Katherine E Grant
Affiliation:
Department of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA
Sarah Z Rosengard
Affiliation:
Department of Marine Chemistry and Geochemistry, Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution, 266 Woods Hole Road, Woods Hole, MA 02543, USA Massachusetts Institute of Technology – Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution Joint Program in Oceanography and Applied Ocean Science and Engineering, 77 Massachusetts Avenue, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA
Guillaume Soulet
Affiliation:
Department of Geology and Geophysics, Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution, 266 Woods Hole Road, Woods Hole, MA 02543, USA
Prosper K Zigah
Affiliation:
Department of Geology and Geophysics, Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution, 266 Woods Hole Road, Woods Hole, MA 02543, USA
Ann P McNichol
Affiliation:
Department of Geology and Geophysics, Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution, 266 Woods Hole Road, Woods Hole, MA 02543, USA
*
*Corresponding author. Email: [email protected].
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We estimate the blank carbon mass over the course of a typical Ramped PyrOx (RPO) analysis (150–1000°C; 5°C×min–1) to be (3.7±0.6) μg C with an Fm value of 0.555±0.042 and a δ13C value of (–29.0±0.1) ‰ VPDB. Additionally, we provide equations for RPO Fm and δ13C blank corrections, including associated error propagation. By comparing RPO mass-weighted mean and independently measured bulk δ13C values for a compilation of environmental samples and standard reference materials (SRMs), we observe a small yet consistent 13C depletion within the RPO instrument (mean–bulk: μ=–0.8‰; ±1σ=0.9‰; n=66). In contrast, because they are fractionation-corrected by definition, mass-weighted mean Fm values accurately match bulk measurements (mean–bulk: μ=0.005; ±1σ=0.014; n=36). Lastly, we show there exists no significant intra-sample δ13C variability across carbonate SRM peaks, indicating minimal mass-dependent kinetic isotope fractionation during RPO analysis. These data are best explained by a difference in activation energy between 13C- and 12C-containing compounds (13–12∆E) of 0.3–1.8 J×mol–1, indicating that blank and mass-balance corrected RPO δ13C values accurately retain carbon source isotope signals to within 1–2‰.

Keywords

Ramped PyrOxblank assessmentkinetic fractionation
Type
Research Article
Information
Radiocarbon , Volume 59 , Issue 1 , February 2017 , pp. 179 - 193
Copyright
© 2017 by the Arizona Board of Regents on behalf of the University of Arizona 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

† Current address: Department of Geography, Durham University, South Road, Durham DH1 3LE, UK

References

Berner, U, Faber, E. 1996. Empirical carbon isotope/maturity relationships for gases from algal kerogens and terrigenous organic matter, based on dry, open-system pyrolysis. Organic Geochemistry 24(10–11):947–955.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bianchi, TS, Galy, VV, Rosenheim, BE, Shields, M, Cui, X, Van Metre, P. 2015. Paleoreconstruction of organic carbon inputs to an oxbow lake in the Mississippi River watershed: Effects of dam construction and land use change on regional inputs. Geophysical Research Letters 42:7983–7991.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boggs, PT, Rogers, JE. 1990. Orthogonal distance regression. Contemporary Mathematics 112:183–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Braun, RL, Burnham, AK. 1987. Analysis of chemical reaction kinetics using a distribution of activation energies and simpler models. Energy & Fuels 1:153–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chadwick, OA, Kelly, EF, Hotchkiss, SC, Vitousek, PM. 2007. Precontact vegetation and soil nutrient status in the shadow of Kohala Volcano, Hawaii. Geomorphology 89:70–83.Google Scholar
Cramer, B. 2004. Methane generation from coal during open system pyrolysis investigated by isotope specific, Gaussian distributed reaction kinetics. Organic Geochemistry 35:379–392.Google Scholar
Currie, LA, Kessler, JD. 2005. On the isolation of elemental carbon (EC) for micro-molar 14C accelerator mass spectrometry: Development of a hybrid reference material for 14C-EC accuracy assurance, and a critical evaluation of the thermal optical kinetic (TOK) EC isolation procedure. Atmospheric Physics and Chemistry 5:2833–2845.Google Scholar
Dieckmann, V. 2005. Modelling petroleum formation from heterogeneous source rocks: the influence of frequency factors on activation energy distribution and geological prediction. Marine and Petroleum Geology 22:375–390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fernandez, A, Santos, GM, Williams, EK, Pendergraft, MA, Vetter, L, Rosenheim, BE. 2014. Blank corrections for ramped pyrolysis radiocarbon dating of sedimentary and soil organic carbon. Analytical Chemistry 86:12085–12092.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Galimov, EM. 1988. Sources and mechanisms of formation of gaseous hydrocarbons in sedimentary rocks. Chemical Geology 71:77–95.Google Scholar
Galy, VV, France-Lanord, C, Lartiges, B. 2008. Loading and fate of particulate organic carbon from the Himalaya to the Ganga-Brahmaputra delta. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta 72:1767–1787.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kwart, H. 1982. Temperature dependence of the primary kinetic hydrogen isotope effect as a mechanistic criterion. Accounts of Chemical Research 15:401–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lopez-Capel, E, Abbott, GD, Thomas, KM, Manning, DAC. 2006. Coupling of thermal analysis with quadrupole mass spectrometry and isotope ratio mass spectrometry for simultaneous determination of evolved gases and their carbon isotopic composition. Journal of Analytical and Applied Pyrolysis 75:82–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lopez-Capel, E, Krull, ES, Bol, R, Manning, DAC. 2008. Influence of recent vegetation on labile and recalcitrant carbon soil pools in central Queensland, Australia: evidence from thermal analysis-quadrupole mass spectrometry-isotope ratio mass spectrometry. Rapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry 22:1751–1758.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McNichol, AP, Gagnon, AR, Jones, GA, Osborne, EA. 1992. Illumination of a black box: analysis of gas composition during graphite target preparation. Radiocarbon 34(3):321–329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McNichol, AP, Jones, GA, Hutton, DL, Gagnon, AR. 1994a. The rapid preparation of seawater ΣCO2 for radiocarbon analysis at the National Ocean Sciences AMS facility. Radiocarbon 36(2):237–246.Google Scholar
McNichol, AP, Osborne, EA, Gagnon, AR, Fry, B, Jones, GA. 1994b. TIC, TOC, DIC, DOC, PIC, POC–unique aspects in the preparation of oceanographic samples for 14C-AMS. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research B 92:162–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mook, WG, van der Plicht, J. 1999. Reporting 14C activities and concentrations. Radiocarbon 41(3):227–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nelder, JA, Mead, R. 1965. A simplex method for function minimization. The Computer Journal 7:308–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oliphant, TE. 2007. Python for scientific computing. Computing in Science Engineering 9:10–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pearson, A, McNichol, AP, Schneider, RJ, von Reden, KF, Zheng, Y. 1998. Microscale AMS 14C measurement at NOSAMS. Radiocarbon 40(1):61–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peters, KE. 1986. Guidelines for evaluating petroleum source rock using programmed pyrolysis. AAPG Bulletin 70(3):318–329.Google Scholar
Plante, AF, Fernández, JM, Leifeld, J. 2009. Application of thermal analysis techniques in soil science. Geoderma 153:1–10.Google Scholar
Plante, AF, Beaupré, SR, Roberts, ML, Baisden, T. 2013. Distribution of radiocarbon ages in soil organic matter by thermal fractionation. Radiocarbon 55(2–3):1077–1083.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reimer, PJ, Brown, TA, Reimer, RW. 2004. Discussion: reporting and calibration of post-bomb 14C data. Radiocarbon 46(3):1299–1304.Google Scholar
Rosenheim, BE, Galy, VV. 2012. Direct measurement of riverine particulate organic carbon age structure. Geophysical Research Letters 39:L19703.Google Scholar
Rosenheim, BE, Day, MB, Domack, E, Schrum, H, Benthien, A, Hayes, JM. 2008. Antarctic sediment chronology by programmed‐temperature pyrolysis: methodology and data treatment. Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems 9(4):Q04005.Google Scholar
Rosenheim, BE, Domack, EW, Santoro, JA, Gunter, M. 2013a. Improving Antarctic sediment 14C dating using ramped pyrolysis: an example from the Hugo Island Trough. Radiocarbon 55(1):115–126.Google Scholar
Rosenheim, BE, Roe, KM, Roberts, BJ, Kolker, AS, Allison, MA, Johannesson, KH. 2013b. River discharge influences on particulate organic carbon age structure in the Mississippi/Atchafalaya River system. Global Biogeochemical Cycles 27:154–166.Google Scholar
Rozanski, K, Stichler, W, Gonfiantini, R, Scott, EM, Beukens, RP, Kromer, B, van der Plicht, J. 1992. The IAEA 14C intercomparison exercise 1990. Radiocarbon 34(3):506–519.Google Scholar
Santos, GM, Southon, JR, Griffin, S, Beaupré, SR, Druffel, ER. 2007. Ultra small-mass AMS 14C sample preparation and analyses at KCCAMS/UCI Facility. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research B 259:293–302.Google Scholar
Schreiner, KM, Bianchi, TS, Rosenheim, BE. 2014. Evidence for permafrost thaw and transport from an Alaskan North Slope watershed. Geophysical Research Letters 41:3117–3126.Google Scholar
Shah Walter, S, Gagnon, AR, Roberts, M, McNichol, AP, Lardie Gaylord, MC, Klein, E. 2015. Ultra-small graphitization reactors for ultra-microscale 14C analysis at the National Ocean Sciences Accelerator Mass Spectrometry (NOSAMS) facility. Radiocarbon 57(1):109–122.Google Scholar
Stuiver, M, Polach, HA. 1977. Discussion: reporting of 14C data. Radiocarbon 19(3):355–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Subt, C, Fangman, KA, Wellner, JS, Rosenheim, BE. 2016. Sediment chronology in Antarctic deglacial sediments: reconciling organic carbon 14C ages to carbonate 14C ages using Ramped PyrOx. The Holocene 26(2):265–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Szidat, S, Jenk, TM, Gäggeler, HW, Synal, HA, Hajdas, I, Bonani, G, Saurer, M. 2004. THEODORE, a two-step heating system for the EC/OC determination of radiocarbon (14C) in the environment. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research B 223–224:829–836.Google Scholar
Tang, Y, Perry, JK, Jenden, PD, Schoell, M. 2000. Mathematical modeling of stable carbon isotope ratios in natural gases. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta 64(15):2673–2687.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tian, H, Xiao, XM, Wilkins, RWT, Li, XQ, Gan, HJ. 2007. Gas sources of the YN2 gas pool in the Tarim Basin—evidence from gas generation and methane carbon isotope fractionation kinetics of source rocks and crude oils. Marine and Petroleum Geology 24:29–41.Google Scholar
White, JE, Catallo, WJ, Legendre, BL. 2011. Biomass pyrolysis kinetics: a comparative critical review with relevant agricultural residue case studies. Journal of Analytical and Applied Pyrolysis 91:1–33.Google Scholar
Whiteside, JH, Eglinton, TI, Olsen, PE, Cornet, B, McDonald, NG, Huber, P. 2011. Pangean great lake paleoecology on the cusp of the end-Triassic extinction. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology 301:1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Hemingway supplementary material

Table S1

Download Hemingway supplementary material(File)
File 32.6 KB