Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T15:10:05.808Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

ANCIENT LOGBOATS IN LITHUANIA: NEW FINDS, WOOD TAXA AND CHRONOLOGY

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 July 2020

Gytis Piličiauskas Open the ORCID record for Gytis Piličiauskas [Opens in a new window] ,
Elena Pranckėnaitė ,
Kęstutis Peseckas ,
Jonas Mažeika  and
Simona Matuzevičiūtė
Gytis Piličiauskas*
Affiliation:
Lithuanian Institute of History, Kražių st. 5, Vilnius01108, Lithuania
Elena Pranckėnaitė
Affiliation:
The Institute of Baltic Region History and Archaeology, Klaipėda University, Herkaus Manto st. 84, 92294, Klaipėda, Lithuania
Kęstutis Peseckas
Affiliation:
Laboratory of Nuclear Geophysics and Radioecology, Nature Research Centre, Akademijos str. 2, 08412Vilnius, Lithuania
Jonas Mažeika
Affiliation:
Laboratory of Nuclear Geophysics and Radioecology, Nature Research Centre, Akademijos str. 2, 08412Vilnius, Lithuania
Simona Matuzevičiūtė
Affiliation:
National Museum of Lithuania, Arsenalo st. 1, 01143Vilnius, Lithuania
*
*Corresponding author. Email: [email protected].
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

More than 70 logboats are known in Lithuania and about half of them date before 1800 cal AD. This paper reviews these more ancient logboats, which were discovered in the beds of former or still existing lakes and rivers and present new radiocarbon (14C) dates and wood taxa identifications. Special attention is paid to the logboat found at Šventoji 58, which is at present the oldest 14C-dated (2895–2640 cal BC) logboat found East of the Baltic Sea. Most logboats from the pre-1800s period were 14C dated to medieval and early modern periods and they were made out of pine and oak wood. From a very scarce dataset available it seems that oak wood was introduced into logboat building by Neolithic people, who also brought new technologies in stone tool production. We also noted that 14C dating does not confirm the logboat typology suggested in earlier studies.

Keywords

chronologyLithuanialogboatswood taxa
Type
Research Article
Information
Radiocarbon , Volume 62 , Issue 5 , October 2020 , pp. 1299 - 1315
Check for updates
Copyright
© 2020 by the Arizona Board of Regents on behalf of the University of Arizona

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Andersen, SH. 1986. Mesolithic dugouts and paddles from Tybrind Vig, Denmark. Acta Archaeologica 57:87–106.Google Scholar
Arnold, B. 2002. Logboats from Europe and the CD-ROM, or a solution to the endless search for documents (2000 edn.). The International Journal of Nautical Archaeology 31(1):129–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baubonis, Z. 2000. Luotų, esančių Asvejos (Molėtų r.), Luokesaičio (Molėtų r.), Gelvanės (Širvintų r.) ir Jagomanto (Švencionių r.) ežeruose 2000 m. inventorizacijos ataskaita. Unpublished excavation report, file 3620. Vilnius: Archive of Lithuanian Institute of History.Google Scholar
Baubonis, Z, Kvedaravičius, M, Kraniauskas, R, Pranckėnaitė, E. 2009. Povandeniniai archeologiniai žvalgymai Rytų Lietuvos ežeruose ir upėse. Archeologiniai tyrinėjimai Lietuvoje 2008 metais: 522–524.Google Scholar
Berzinš, V. 2000. The conditions for travel and transport in the Stone Age. Muinasaja Teadus 8:27–48.Google Scholar
Brazaitis, D, Piličiauskas, G. 2005. Gludinti titnaginiai kirviai Lietuvoje. Lietuvos archeologija 29:71–118.Google Scholar
Bronk Ramsey, C. 2009. Bayesian analysis of radiocarbon dates. Radiocarbon 51(1):337–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Butrimas, A. 1993. Biržulio ir Lūksto valtys (laiveliai). Mūsų kraštas. Lietuvos kraštotyros draugijos leidinys 1(2):99–100.Google Scholar
Christensen, C. 1997. Boats and navigation in the Stone Age. In: Pedersen, L, Fischer, A, Aaby, B, editors. The Danish Storebælt since the Ice Age – man, sea, forest. København: A/S Storebælt Fixed Link. p. 282–294.Google Scholar
Erič, M. 2012. Poznomezolitski deblak iz Hotize. In: Gaspari A, Erič M, editors. Potopljena preteklost. Arheologija vodnih okolij in raziskovanje podvodne kulturne dediščine v Sloveniji. Zbornik ob 128-letnici Dežmanovih raziskav Ljubljanice na Vrhniki (1884-2012). Radovljica: Didakta. p. 405–408.Google Scholar
Erič, M. 2014. New reflections on the protection of World Heritage in the future: Global symbolic meaning of autochthonous and indigenous origins of water navigation. International Journal of Heritage in the Digital Era 3(4):597–612.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGrail, S. 1987. Ancient boats in north-west Europe. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Girininkas, A. 1994. Tyrinėjimai Kretuono apyežeryje. Archeologiniai tyrinėjimai Lietuvoje 1992 ir 1993 metais:11–14.Google Scholar
Gleiznienė, G, Matuzevičiūtė, S. 2012. Medinio luoto iš Lietuvos respublikos prezidentūros teritorijos restauravimas. Restauravimo metodika 6:27–32.Google Scholar
Fugazzola Delpino, MA, Mineo, M. 1995. La piroga neolitica del Lago di Bracciano (‘La Marmotta I’). Bullettino di Paletnologia Italiana 86:197–266.Google Scholar
Kashina, EA. 2017. A dugout from the Don River exhibited at the State Historical Museum, Moscow: Discovery and dating. Archaeology, Ethnology & Anthropology of Eurasia 45(1):76–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kashina, EA, Chairkina, NM. 2017. Wooden paddles from Trans-Urals and from eastern and western European peat-bog sites. Archaeology, Ethnology & Anthropology of Eurasia 45(2):97–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Katalynas, K, Luchtanienė, D. 1998. Tyrinėjimai Vilniuje, Reprezentacinių rūmų teritorijoje, 1996–1997 metais. Archeologiniai tyrinėjimai Lietuvoje 1992 ir 1993 metais: 382–386.Google Scholar
Klooß, S. 2014. They were fishing in the sea and coppicing the forest. Bericht der Römisch-Germanischen Kommission 92:251–274.Google Scholar
Klooss, S, Lübke, H. 2006. The Terminal Mesolithic and Early Neolithic Logboats of Stralsund-Mischwasserspeicher. In: Bockius R, editor. Between the seas. Transfer and exchange in nautical technology. Proceedings of the 11th International Symposium on Boat and Ship Archaeology (= RGZM-Tagungen 3). Mainz: Romisch-Germanisches Zentralmuseum. p. 97–105.Google Scholar
Kuncienė, O. 1975. Susisiekimo vandeniu priemonės Lietuvoje iki XIII a. MADA 2:51–59.Google Scholar
Lanting, JN. 2000. Dates for origin and diffusion of the European logboat. Palaeohistoria 39/40(1997–1998):627–650.Google Scholar
Martinalli, N, Cherkinsky, A. 2009. Absolute dating of monoxylous boats from Northern Italy. Radiocarbon 51(2):413–421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mathieson, I, Alpaslan-Roodenberg, S, Posth, C, et al. 2018. The genomic history of southeastern Europe. Nature 555:197–203.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mažeika, J, Petrošius, R, 1998. Archeologinių radinių radioanglies amžius. Lietuvos archeologija 15:473–483.Google Scholar
Okorokov, AV. 1995. Archaeological finds of ancient dugouts in Russia and the Ukraine. International Journal of Nautical Archaeology 24:33–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ossowski, W. 1999. Studia nad łodziami jednopiennymi z obszaru Polski, Prace Centralnego Muzeum Morskiego XI. Gdańsk: Marpress.Google Scholar
Ossowski, W. 2000. Some results of the study of longboats in Poland. In: Litwin J, editor. Down the river to the sea: proceedings of the 8th International Symposium on Boat and Ship Archaeology, Gdańsk 1997. ISBSA 8. Gdańsk: Polish Maritime Museum. p. 59–66.Google Scholar
Patton, JK. 2014. Considering the wet homelands of indigenous Massachusetts. Journal of Social Archaeology 14(1):87–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pazdur, A, Krapiec, M, Michczynski, A, Ossowski, W. 2001. Radiocarbon and dendrochronological dating of logboats from Poland. Radiocarbon 43(2A):403–415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perminas, K. 2005. Priešistoriniai luotai Lietuvoje. In: Kazakevičius, V. et al., editors. Praeities puslapiai: archeologija, kultūra, visuomenė. Klaipėda: Klaipėdos universiteto leidykla. p. 223–250.Google Scholar
Perminas, K. 2007. Dugouts from Lake Plateliai and the Cultural Landscape of their Sites. In: Sliužinskas R, editor. Baltijos regiono istorija ir kultūra: Lietuva ir Lenkija. Karinė istorija, archeologija, etnologija (Acta Historica Universitatis Klaipedensis XV). Klaipėda: Klaipėdos universitetas, Baltijos regiono istorijos ir archeologijos institutas. p. 127–133.Google Scholar
Perminas, K. 2008. Ežeriniai Lynežerio ir Marcinkonių apylinkių luotai. Liaudies kultūra 4(121):38–45.Google Scholar
Perminas, K. 2009. XVI-XX a. luotai iš dabartinių Lietuvos ir Latvijos teritorijų [dissertation]. Klaipėda, Vilnius: Klaipėdos universitetas.Google Scholar
Piličiauskas, G. 2016. Lietuvos pajūris subneolite ir neolite. Žemės ūkio pradžia. Lietuvos archeologija 42:25–103.Google Scholar
Piškinaitė-Kazlauskienė, L. 1998. Žvejybos istorijos apybraižos (XX a. 3-10 dešimtmečiai). Vilnius: Diemedžio leidykla.Google Scholar
Pranckėnaitė, E, Kraniauskas, R, Baubonis, Z. 2018. Povandeniniai žvalgymai Rytų Lietuvos ežeruose. Archeologiniai tyrinėjimai Lietuvoje 2017 metais: 685–687.Google Scholar
Reimer, PJ, Bard, E, Bayliss, A et al. 2013. IntCal13 and Marine13 radiocarbon age calibration curves 0–50,000 years cal BP. Radiocarbon 55:1869–1887.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rimantienė, R. 1979. Šventoji. Narvos kultūros gyvenvietės. Vilnius: Mokslas.Google Scholar
Rimantienė, R. 1980. Šventoji. Pamarių kultūros gyvenvietės. Vilnius: Mokslas.Google Scholar
Rimantienė, R. 1996. Šventosios 4-oji radimvietė. Lietuvos archeologija 14:5–79.Google Scholar
Rimantienė, R. 2005. Die Steinzeitfischer an der Ostseelagune in Litauen. Vilnius: Litauisches Nationalmuseum.Google Scholar
Šapaitė, A, Vedrickienė, L. 2008. Bačiūnų luotas prikeltas antram gyvenimui. Lietuvos muziejai 2008/4:43–44.Google Scholar
Schoch, W, Heller, I, Schweingruber, FH, Kienast, F. 2004. Wood anatomy of central European Species [WWW database]. Avaliable at: www.woodanatomy.ch.Google Scholar
Tassi, F, et al. 2017. Genome diversity in the Neolithic Globular Amphorae culture and the spread of Indo-European languages. Proceedings of the Royal Society B. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2017.1540.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vankina, LV. 1970. Torfyanikovaya Stoyanka Sarnate. Riga: Zinatne. In Russian.Google Scholar
Wazny, T. 2011. Dendro-provenancing between the Baltic Sea and the East Mediterranian. In: Fraiture, P, editor. Tree Rings, Art, Archaeology. Scientia Artis 7. Bruxelles: Institut Royal du Patrimoine. p. 81–87.Google Scholar
Wheeler, EA. 2011. InsideWood—a web resource for hardwood anatomy. IAWA Journal 32(2):199–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Žulkus, V. 1987. Žvalgomųjų povandeninių archeologinių tyrinėjimų Platelių ežere (Plungės r.) 1987 m. ataskaita. Unpublished excavation report, file 1326. Vilnius: Archive of Lithuanian Institute of History.Google Scholar
Žulkus, V. 1988. Radiniai Platelių apylinkėse ir ežere. Archeologiniai tyrinėjimai Lietuvoje 1986 ir 1987 metais: 187–190.Google Scholar