Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T20:04:07.519Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

14C-AMS TECHNOLOGY AND ITS APPLICATIONS TO AN OIL FIELD TRACER EXPERIMENT

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2022

Hongtao Shen*
Affiliation:
Guangxi Normal University, College of Physics and Technology, Guangxi Normal University, Guilin541004, China Guangxi Key Laboratory of Nuclear Physics and Technology, Guilin541004, China
Shulin Shi
Affiliation:
Guangxi Normal University, College of Physics and Technology, Guangxi Normal University, Guilin541004, China
Junsen Tang*
Affiliation:
Guangxi Normal University, College of Physics and Technology, Guangxi Normal University, Guilin541004, China
Mingli Qi
Affiliation:
Guangxi Normal University, College of Physics and Technology, Guangxi Normal University, Guilin541004, China
Siyu Wei
Affiliation:
Guangxi Normal University, College of Physics and Technology, Guangxi Normal University, Guilin541004, China
Kimikazu Sasa
Affiliation:
University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Ibaraki305-8577, Japan
Mingji Liu
Affiliation:
Guangxi Normal University, College of Physics and Technology, Guangxi Normal University, Guilin541004, China
Li Wang
Affiliation:
Guangxi Normal University, College of Physics and Technology, Guangxi Normal University, Guilin541004, China
Guofeng Zhang
Affiliation:
Guangxi Normal University, College of Physics and Technology, Guangxi Normal University, Guilin541004, China
Linjie Qi
Affiliation:
Guangxi Normal University, College of Physics and Technology, Guangxi Normal University, Guilin541004, China
Dingxiong Chen
Affiliation:
Guangxi Normal University, College of Physics and Technology, Guangxi Normal University, Guilin541004, China
Shanhua Gong
Affiliation:
Research Institute of Production Engineering and Technology, Zhongyuan Oilfield Company, SINOPEC, Puyang457001, China
Guofu Song
Affiliation:
Research Institute of Production Engineering and Technology, Zhongyuan Oilfield Company, SINOPEC, Puyang457001, China
Junyan Dong
Affiliation:
Research Institute of Production Engineering and Technology, Zhongyuan Oilfield Company, SINOPEC, Puyang457001, China
Ning Wang
Affiliation:
Guangxi Normal University, College of Physics and Technology, Guangxi Normal University, Guilin541004, China Guangxi Key Laboratory of Nuclear Physics and Technology, Guilin541004, China
Houbing Zhou
Affiliation:
Guangxi Normal University, College of Physics and Technology, Guangxi Normal University, Guilin541004, China Guangxi Key Laboratory of Nuclear Physics and Technology, Guilin541004, China
Ming He
Affiliation:
China Institute of Atomic Energy, Beijing102413, China
Qingzhang Zhao
Affiliation:
China Institute of Atomic Energy, Beijing102413, China
Mingjun Wei
Affiliation:
Research Institute of Production Engineering and Technology, Zhongyuan Oilfield Company, SINOPEC, Puyang457001, China
Yun He*
Affiliation:
Guangxi Normal University, College of Physics and Technology, Guangxi Normal University, Guilin541004, China Guangxi Key Laboratory of Nuclear Physics and Technology, Guilin541004, China
*
*Corresponding authors. Emails: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected].
*Corresponding authors. Emails: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected].
*Corresponding authors. Emails: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected].

Abstract

Many waterflooding oil fields, injecting water into an oil-bearing reservoir for pressure maintenance, are in their middle to late stages of development. To explore the geological conditions and improve oilfield recovery of the most important well group of the Hu 136 block, located on the border areas of three provinces (Henan, Shandong, and Hebei), Zhongyuan Oilfield, Sinopec, central China, a 14C cross-well tracer monitoring technology was developed and applied in monitoring the development status and recognize the heterogeneity of oil reservoirs. The tracer response in the production well was tracked, and the water drive speed, swept volume of the injection fluid were obtained. Finally, the reservoir heterogeneity characteristics, such as the dilution coefficient, porosity, permeability, and average pore-throat radius, were fitted according to the mathematical model of the heterogeneous multi-layer inter-well theory. The 14C-AMS technique developed in this work is expected to be a potential analytical method for evaluating underground reservoir characteristics and providing crucial scientific guidance for the mid to late oil field recovery process.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press for the Arizona Board of Regents on behalf of the University of Arizona

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

These authors contributed equally to this work.

References

REFERENCES

Al-Fattah, SM. 2020. Non-OPEC conventional oil: production decline, supply outlook and key implications. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering 189: 107049.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gao, H, Tian, X. 2009. Demonstration of water resources protection and utilization project in Puyang. Science & Technology Information 19:148149.Google Scholar
He, G. 1994. Reservoir physics. Beijing: Petroleum Industry Press.Google Scholar
He, M et al. 2019. A home-made 14C AMS system at CIAE. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research B 438:214217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Höök, M, Hirsch, R, Aleklett, K. 2009. Giant oil field decline rates and their influence on world oil production. Energy Policy 37(6):22622272 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hu, SY, Zhang, LH, Luo, JX, Luo, GS, He, J. 2006. Study on large pore path in sandstone reservoirs-review and prospect. Special Oil and Gas Reservoirs 13(6):10–14.Google Scholar
Lake, LW. 1989. Enhanced oil recovery. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Rahimpur, MR. 2004. A non-ideal rate-based model for industrial urea thermal hydrolyser. Chemical Engineering and Processing: Process Intensification 43(10):1299–1307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sahu, JN, Hussain, S, Weikap, BC. 2011. Studies on the hydrolysis of urea for production of ammonia and modeling for flow characterization in presence of stirring in a batch reactor using computational fluid dynamics. Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering 28(6):13801385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shen, H et al. 2019. Present status and application studies in GXNU-AMS Lab. The 8th East Asia Accelerator Mass Spectrometry Symposium, Nagoya, Japan.Google Scholar
Shook, GM, Forsmann, JH. 2005. Tracer interpretation using temporal moments on a spreadsheet. Idaho National Laboratory.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wei, SY. 2021. Study on Interwell tracer monitoring interpretation model in oil field [dissertation]. Guangxi Normal University.Google Scholar
Zemel, B. 1995. Tracers in the oil field. New York: Elsevier Science.Google Scholar
Zhong, T, Li, G, Liu, P, Shi, F. 2008. Evaluation of tourism climate comfort in Puyang City. Meteorological and Environmental Sciences 31:129130.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Shen et al. supplementary material

Tables S1-S2

Download Shen et al. supplementary material(File)
File 40.4 KB