Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T22:14:23.676Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

14C Dating to Study the Development of Soils in the Forest-Steppe of the Central Russian Upland as a Result of Bioclimatic Changes and Long-Term Cultivation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 May 2018

Yury Chendev ,
Aleksandr Aleksandrovskiy ,
Olga Khokhlova  and
Vadim Skripkin
Yury Chendev*
Affiliation:
Department of Natural Resource Management and Land Cadaster, Belgorod State University, Pobeda St. 85, Belgorod, 308015Russia
Aleksandr Aleksandrovskiy
Affiliation:
Institute of Geography, Russian Academy of Sciences, per. Staromonetnyi 29, Moscow, 119017Russia
Olga Khokhlova
Affiliation:
Institute of Physicochemical and Biological Problems of Soil Science, Russian Academy of Sciences, ul. Institutskaya 2, Pushchino, Moscow oblast, 142290Russia
Vadim Skripkin
Affiliation:
Kyiv Radiocarbon Laboratory, Palladin 34, Kiev, 03680Ukraine
*
*Corresponding author. Email: [email protected].
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Temporal changes in soils of forest landscapes of the forest-steppe zone—Haplic Luvisols and Greyzemic Phaeozems—under the impact of Holocene climate changes (natural factor) and long-term cultivation (anthropogenic factor) were studied on level interfluves of the Central Russian Upland. These soils were developed from covering loesslike loam of varying thickness. To study soil evolution under the impact of climate changes, soil chronosequences of archaeological sites—paleosols buried under ramparts of ancient settlements and background surface soils of adjacent areas—were analyzed. The time of the soil burying was determined via the 14C dating of charcoal from thin twigs sampled in the material of ramparts immediately above the surface of buried soils. According to 14C dates, the paleosols were buried in the interval from 2450±40 to 1150±110 BP. Before the Subatlantic period, these paleosols developed under grassland (steppe), which is proved by their properties typical of steppe soils and by the presence of paleokrotovinas—the features created by the burrowing activity of steppe animals (mole rats)—in the studied profiles. The 14C dates of the total organic carbon of humus in the dark gray filling of a paleokrotovina from a Phaeozem buried at the depth of 140–150 cm under the rampart of 1150±110 BP in age ranged from 6080±150 to 2810±60 BP. The evolution of steppe Chernozems into forest Phaeozems and Luvisols took place in the Late Holocene. The anthropogenic evolution of forest Luvisols and Phaeozems under the impact of long-term (more than 150–230 years) plowing was analyzed in the soil agrochronosequences that included background soils under native forest vegetation and their arable analogs with different durations of cultivation. It was concluded that this evolution is directed towards Chernozemic pedogenesis, i.e., it proceeds in the direction opposite to the natural trend of pedogenesis in the Late Holocene. This process takes place despite the traditional practice of limited application of organic fertilizers in arable farming in the studied region. A decrease in the mean residence time (MRT) of total organic carbon (TOC) in the old-arable soils is considered a consequence of the formation and accumulation of fresh humus material in the profiles of cultivated soils—one of the major processes in the transformation of arable forest soils into Chernozems. The accumulation of carbonates and an increase in their 14C age take place in the arable soils in comparison with their forest analogs. In the agrochronosequence from the Polyana site, the 14C age of carbonates at the depth of 170–180 cm reaches 8000±100, 8270±150, and 9150±100 BP under the forest, 100-year-old plowland, and 150-year-old plowland, respectively. This can be explained by the ascending migration of ancient carbonates from the parent material in suspensions. In the analogous Samarino agrochronosequence, the 14C age of carbonates from the depth of 90–100 cm comprised 6500±90, 7150±100, and 12,360±230 BP, respectively. Thus, the studied forest-steppe soils have a polygenetic nature specified by a complicated history of pedogenesis under the impact of both natural (climate-driven forest invasion into steppe) and anthropogenic (deforestation and land plowing) factors.

Keywords

14C datingChernozemsclimate changeforest-steppe zoneHoloceneLuvisolsPhaeozemssoil evolutionsoil plowing
Type
Soil
Information
Radiocarbon , Volume 60 , Issue 4: 2nd Radiocarbon in the Environment Conference Debrecen, Hungary, July 3–7, 2017 Part 1 of 2 , August 2018 , pp. 1185 - 1198
Copyright
© 2018 by the Arizona Board of Regents on behalf of the University of Arizona 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Aleksandrovskiy, AL. 1988. Soil evolution in Eastern Europe at the boundary between forest and steppe. In: Natural and Anthropogenic Evolution of Soils. Pushchino: Pushchino Research Center. 82–94 (in Russian).Google Scholar
Akhtyrtsev, BP. 1979. Gray Forest Soils of Central Russia. Voronezh: Voronezh State University Press (in Russian).Google Scholar
Bettis, EA, Benn, DW, Hajic, ER. 2008. Landscape evolution, alluvial architecture, environmental history, and the archaeological record of the Upper Missouri Valley. Geomorphology 101:362–377.Google Scholar
Bork, HR. 1983. Die Holozane relief- und Bodentwicklung in Lossgebieten. Catena (Supplement 3):1–93.Google Scholar
Buol, SW, Hole, FD, McCracken, RJ. 1973. Soil Genesis and Classification. Ames: Iowa State University Press.Google Scholar
Chendev, YuG. 2004. Natural Evolution of Soils in the Central Forest-Steppe in the Holocene. Belgorod: Belgorod State University Press (in Russian).Google Scholar
Chendev, YuG, Aleksandrovskii, AL. 2002. Soils and environment in the Voronezh River basin in the second half of the Holocene. Eurasian Soil Science 35(4):341–348.Google Scholar
Eckmeier, E, Gerlach, R, Gehrt, E. 2007. Pedogenesis of Chernozems in Central Europe—A review. Geoderma 139(3–4):288–299.Google Scholar
Fazle Rabbi, SM, Hua, Q, Daniel, H, Lockwood, PV, Wilson, BR, Young, IM. 2013. Mean residence time of soil organic carbon in aggregates under contrasting land uses based on radiocarbon measurements. Radiocarbon 55(1):127–139.Google Scholar
Gedymin, AV, Pobedintseva, IG. 1964. Influence of long-term cultivation on the properties of ordinary Chernozems. Pochvovedenie 5:35–46 (in Russian).Google Scholar
Gennadiev, AN. 1978. Analysis of soil-forming processes by the method of chronosequences in the Elbrus area. Pochvovedenie 12:33–43 (in Russian).Google Scholar
Gerlach, R, Fischer, P, Eckmeier, E, Hilgers, A. 2012. Buried dark soil horizons and archaeological features in the Neolithic settlement region of the Lower Rhine area, NW Germany: formation, geochemistry and chronostratigraphy. Quaternary International 265:191–204.Google Scholar
Hejcman, M, Součková, K, Krištuf, P, Peška, J. 2013. What questions can be answered by chemical analysis of recent and paleosols from the Bell Beaker barrow (2500–2200 BC), Central Moravia, Czech Republic? Quarternary International 316(6):179–189.Google Scholar
IUSS Working Group WRB. 2015. World Reference Base for Soil Resources 2014, Update 2015. International Soil Classification System for Naming Soils and Creating Legends for Soil Maps. World Soil Resources Reports No. 106. Rome: FAO.Google Scholar
Kachinskiy, NA. 1965. Soil Physics, Part 1. Moscow: Higher Education Publishing House. (in Russian).Google Scholar
Klimanov, VA, Serebryannaya, TA. 1986. Dynamics of vegetation and climate of the Central Russian Upland in the Holocene. Izvest. Akad. Nauk SSSR, Ser. Geogr 2:26–37 (in Russian).Google Scholar
Khokhlova, OS, Chendev, YuG, Myakshina, TN, Shishkov, VA. 2013. The pool of pedogenic carbon in the soils of different types and durations of use as croplands in the forest-steppe of the Central Russian Upland. Eurasian Soil Science 46(5):530–540.Google Scholar
Kozlovskii, FI. 2003. Evolution of arable soils as a subject of genetic-geographical soil science. In: Theory and Methods of the Study of Soil Cover. Moscow: GEOS. p 451–463 (in Russian).Google Scholar
Korzhinskii, SI. 1891. Northern boundary of chernozemic steppe region in the eastern part of European Russia in botanical-geographical and soil aspects. Tr. O-va Estestvoispyt. Imper. Kazan. University 22(6):175, p (in Russian).Google Scholar
Kristiansen, SM, Dalsgaard, K, Holst, MK, Aaby, B, Heinemeier, J. 2003. Dating of prehistoric burial mounds by 14C analysis of soil organic matter fractions. Radiocarbon 45(1):101–112.Google Scholar
Lorz, C, Saile, T. 2011. Anthropogenic pedogenesis of Chernozems in Germany?—A critical review. Quaternary International 243(2):273–279.Google Scholar
Molnar, M, Joo, K, Barczi, A, Szanto, Zs, Futo, I, Palcsu, L, Rinyu, L. 2004. Dating of total soil organic matter used in kurgan studies. Radiocarbon 46(1):413–419.Google Scholar
Pessenda, LCR, Gouveia, SEM, Aravena, R, Gomes, BM, Boulet, R, Ribeiro, AS. 1998. 14C dating and stable carbon isotopes of soil organic matter in forest-savanna boundary areas in the southern Brazilian Amazon region. Radiocarbon 40(2):1013–1022.Google Scholar
Pietsch, D. 2013. Krotovinas—soil archives of steppe landscape history. Catena 104:257–264.Google Scholar
Ruhe, RV, Schotles, WN. 1956. Ages and development of soil landscapes in relation to climatic and vegetational changes in Iowa. Soil Science Society of America Proceedings 20:264–273.Google Scholar
Rutberg, RL, Schimel, DS, Hajdas, I, Broecker, WS. 1996. The effect of tillage on soil organic matter using 14C: a case of study. Radiocarbon 38(2):209–217.Google Scholar
Serebryannaya, TA. 1992. Dynamics of the boundaries of central forest-steppe in the Holocene. In: Centennial Dynamics of Biogeocenoses. Proceedings, Conference in Memoriam of Academician V.N. Sukachev. Moscow: Nauka. p 54–71 (in Russian).Google Scholar
Serebryannaya, TA, Il’ves, AO. 1973. The last stage in the development of forest vegetation in the Central Russian Upland. Izv. Akad. Nauk SSSR, Ser. Geogr. 2:95–102 (in Russian).Google Scholar
Scharpenseel, HW, Becker-Heidmann, P. 1992. Twenty-five years of radiocarbon dating soils: paradigm of erring and learning. Radiocarbon 34(3):541–549.Google Scholar
Skripkin, VV, Kovaliukh, NN. 1998. Recent developments in the procedures used at the SSCER laboratory for the routine preparation of lithium carbide. Radiocarbon 40(2):211–214.Google Scholar
Taliev, VI. 1902. Man as a botanical and geographical factor. Nauch. Obozr 11:42–61 (in Russian).Google Scholar
Tyurin, IV. 1930. Genesis and classification of forest-steppe and forest soils. Uchen. Zap. Kazan. University 3–4:429–462 (in Russian).Google Scholar
Vorobieva, LA. 1998. Chemical Analysis of Soils. Moscow: Moscow University Press (in Russian).Google Scholar
Vyslouzilova, B, Ertlen, D, Sefrna, L, Novak, T, Viragh, K, Rue, M, Campaner, A, Dreslerova, D, Schwartz, D. 2015. Investigation of vegetation history of buried Chernozem soils using near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS). Quarternary International 365:203–211.Google Scholar