Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T08:32:25.264Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The 12,460-Year Hohenheim Oak and Pine Tree-Ring Chronology from Central Europe—A Unique Annual Record for Radiocarbon Calibration and Paleoenvironment Reconstructions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 July 2016

Michael Friedrich ,
Sabine Remmele ,
Bernd Kromer ,
Jutta Hofmann ,
Marco Spurk ,
Klaus Felix Kaiser ,
Christian Orcel  and
Manfred Küppers
Michael Friedrich
Affiliation:
Institute of Botany (210), Hohenheim University, D-70593 Stuttgart, Germany
Sabine Remmele
Affiliation:
Institute of Botany (210), Hohenheim University, D-70593 Stuttgart, Germany
Bernd Kromer
Affiliation:
Heidelberg Academy of Sciences, INF 229, D-69120 Heidelberg, Germany
Jutta Hofmann
Affiliation:
Institute of Botany (210), Hohenheim University, D-70593 Stuttgart, Germany
Marco Spurk
Affiliation:
Institute of Botany (210), Hohenheim University, D-70593 Stuttgart, Germany
Klaus Felix Kaiser
Affiliation:
Swiss Federal Research Institute WSL, CH-8903 Birmensdorf / Geographic Dept., University of Zürich, CH 8057 Zürich, Switzerland
Christian Orcel
Affiliation:
Laboratoire Romand de Dendrochronologie, CH-1510 Moudon, Switzerland
Manfred Küppers
Affiliation:
Institute of Botany (210), Hohenheim University, D-70593 Stuttgart, Germany
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The combined oak and pine tree-ring chronologies of Hohenheim University are the backbone of the Holocene radiocarbon calibration for central Europe. Here, we present the revised Holocene oak chronology (HOC) and the Preboreal pine chronology (PPC) with respect to revisions, critical links, and extensions. Since 1998, the HOC has been strengthened by new trees starting at 10,429 BP (8480 BC). Oaks affected by cockchafer have been identified and discarded from the chronology. The formerly floating PPC has been cross-matched dendrochronologically to the absolutely dated oak chronology, which revealed a difference of only 8 yr to the published 14C wiggle-match position used for IntCal98. The 2 parts of the PPC, which were linked tentatively at 11,250 BP, have been revised and strengthened by new trees, which enabled us to link both parts of the PPC dendrochronologically. Including the 8-yr shift of the oak-pine link, the older part of the PPC (pre-11,250 BP) needs to be shifted 70 yr to older ages with respect to the published data (Spurk 1998). The southern German part of the PPC now covers 2103 yr from 11,993–9891 BP (10,044–7942 BC). In addition, the PPC was extended significantly by new pine chronologies from other regions. A pine chronology from Avenches and Zürich, Switzerland, and another from the Younger Dryas forest of Cottbus, eastern Germany, could be crossdated and dendrochronologically matched to the PPC. The absolutely dated tree-ring chronology now extends back to 12,410 cal BP (10,461 BC). Therefore, the tree-ring-based 14C calibration now reaches back into the Central Younger Dryas. With respect to the Younger Dryas-Preboreal transition identified in the ring width of our pines at 11,590 BP, the absolute tree-ring chronology now covers the entire Holocene and 820 yr of the Younger Dryas.

Type
Articles
Information
Radiocarbon , Volume 46 , Issue 3: IntCal04: Calibration Issue, Guest Editor: PAULA J REIMER , 2004 , pp. 1111 - 1122
Copyright
Copyright © The Arizona Board of Regents on behalf of the University of Arizona 

References

Becker, B. 1982. Dendrochronologie und Paläoökologie subfossiler Baumstämme aus Flussablagerungen. Ein Beitrag zur nacheiszeitlichen Auenentwicklung im südlichen Mitteleuropa. In: Mitteilungen der Kommission für Quartärforschung der Österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften. Band 5.Google Scholar
Becker, B. 1983. Postglaziale Auwaldentwicklung im mittleren und oberen Maintal anhand dendrochronol-ogischer Untersuchungen subfossiler Baumstammablagerungen. Geologisches Jahrbuch A 71:45–59.Google Scholar
Becker, B. 1985. Die absolute chronologie der Pfahlbauten nördlich der Alpen im Jahrringkalender Mitteuropas. In: Becker, B, Billamboz, A, Egger, H, Gassmann, P, Orcel, A, Orcel, C, Ruoff, U, editors. Dendrochronologie in der Ur- und Frühgeschichte. Basel: Verlag Schweizerische Gesellschaft für Ur- und Frühgeschichte. p 8–28.Google Scholar
Becker, B. 1993. An 11,000-year German oak and pine dendrochronology for radiocarbon calibration. Radiocarbon 35(1):201–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chambers, FM, Lageard, JGA, Boswijk, G, Thomas, PA, Edwards, KJ, Hillam, J. 1997. Dating prehistoric bog-fires in northern England to calendar years by longdistance cross-matching of pine chronologies. Journal of Quaternary Science 12:253–6.3.0.CO;2-I>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friedrich, M, Hennig, H. 1996. A dendrodate for the Wehringen Iron Age wagon grave in relation to other recently obtained absolute dates for the Hallstatt period in southern Germany. Journal of European Archaeology 4:281–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friedrich, M, Kromer, B, Kaiser, KF, Spurk, M, Hughen, KA, Johnsen, SJ. 2001. High resolution climate signals in the Bølling/Allerød Interstadial (Greenland Interstadial 1) as reflected in European tree-ring chronologies compared to marine varves and ice-core records. Quaternary Science Reviews 20(11):1223–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friedrich, M, Kromer, B, Spurk, M, Hofmann, J, Kaiser, KF. 1999. Paleo-environment and radiocarbon calibration as derived from Late Glacial/Early Holocene tree-ring chronologies. Quarternary International 61:27–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hughen, KA, Southon, JR, Lehman, SJ, Overpeck, JT. 2000. Synchronous radiocarbon and climate shifts during the last deglaciation. Science 290:1951–4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hurni, J-P, Monnard, E, Orcel, C, Tercier, J. 1999. Exploitation dendrochronologique et analyses 14C. Mémoires de la Société Vaudoise des Sciences Naturelles 19(3):277–98.Google Scholar
Kaiser, KF. 1993. Beiträge zur Klimageschichte vom Hochglazial bis ins frühe Holozän, rekonstruiert mit Jahrringen und Molluskenschalen aus verschiedenen Vereisungsgebieten . Winterthur, Birmensdorf: Ziegler Druck- und Verlags-AG.Google Scholar
Kromer, B, Friedrich, M, Hughen, KA, Kaiser, KF, Remmele, S, Schaub, M, Talamo, S. 2004. Late Glacial 14C ages from a floating, 1382-ring pine chronology. Radiocarbon, this issue.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kromer, B, Spurk, M. 1998. Revision and tentative extension of the tree-ring based 14C calibration, 9200 to 11,855 cal BP. Radiocarbon 40(3):1117–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leuschner, H-H. 1992. Subfossil trees. In: Bartholin, TS, Berglund, BE, Eckstein, D, Schweingruber, FH, editors. Tree Rings and Environment. Proceedings of the International Dendrochronological Symposium, Ystad, South Sweden, 3–9 September 1990. Lund: Lund University, Department of Quaternary Geology. p 193–7.Google Scholar
Pilcher, JR, Baillie, MGL, Schmid, B, Becker, B. 1984. A 7,272-year tree-ring chronology for western Europe. Nature 312:150–2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reimer, PJ, Baillie, MGL, Bard, E, Bayliss, A, Beck, WJ, Bertrand, CJH, Blackwell, PG, Buck, CE, Burr, GS, Cutler, KB, Damon, PE, Edwards, RL, Fairbanks, RG, Friedrich, M, Guilderson, TP, Hughen, KA, Kromer, B, McCormac, G, Manning, S, Bronk Ramsey, C, Reimer, RW, Remmele, S, Southon, JR, Stuiver, M, Talamo, S, Taylor, FW, van der Plicht, J, Weyhenmeyer, CE. 2004. IntCal04 terrestrial radiocarbon age calibration, 0–26 cal kyr BP. Radiocarbon, this issue.Google Scholar
Spurk, M, Friedrich, M, Hofmann, J, Remmele, S, Frenzel, B, Leuschner, H-H, Kromer, B. 1998. Revisions and extensions of the Hohenheim oak and pine chronologies—new evidence about the timing of the Younger Dryas/Preboreal transition. Radiocarbon 40(3):1107–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spurk, M, Kromer, B, Peschke, P. 1999. Dendrochronologische, palynologische und Radiokarbon-Untersuchungen eines Waldes aus der Jüngeren Tundrenzeit. Naturwissenschaftliche Untersuchungen zum Weichselspätglazial in der Niederlausitz bei Cottbus (Land Brandenburg). Quartär 49/50:34–8.Google Scholar
Spurk, M, Leuschner, H-H, Baillie, MGL, Briffa, KR, Friedrich, M. 2002. Depositional frequency of German subfossil oaks: climatically and non-climatically induced fluctuations in the Holocene. Holocene 12(6): 707–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strasser, A, Weidmann, M, Hochhuli, PA. 1999. Sédimentation postglaciaire fluviatile et palustre près d'Avenches (Suisse): implications climatique. Bulletin de la Societé Fribourgeoise des Sciences Nataturelles 88:5–26.Google Scholar