No CrossRef data available.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 26 February 2016
The woman who demands assistance from her husband in her home is failing in her part of the marriage bargain, and the husband who gives it is losing his prestige as head of the house.
— Letter from ‘Mother’ of New Farm, Courier-Mail, 6 February 1939, p 14
The letter from ‘Mother’ in the Brisbane suburb of New Farm endorsed the assumed and actual centrality of unpaid work within the home for most white women in Queensland — especially for wives — in the interwar years. It accepted a division of labour in which men were defined primarily as breadwinners; by contrast, and despite female participation in the formal economy, the major role for women was that of wife and mother. This allocation of responsibilities was a fundamental component of the gender segregation which characterised work and the Queensland economy in this period.
1 Frances, Raelene, ‘Shifting Barriers: Twentieth Century Women's Labour Patterns’, in Kay Saunders and Raymond Evans (eds), Gender Relations in Australia: Domination and Negotiation (Sydney: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, 1992), 250–51.Google Scholar
2 The Queensland Mothers’ Book, rev. ed. (Brisbane: Home Secretary's Department, Brisbane, 1931), 14.Google Scholar
3 Australian Woman's Mirror, 23 February 1926: 21.Google Scholar
4 Fifty-fourth report of the Secretary of Public Instruction for the year 1929, Queensland Parliamentary Papers, vol. 1, 1930, 141.Google Scholar
5 Census of the Commonwealth of Australia, 1921, vol. 1, 510–11 and 1933, vol. 2, 1122–23; Australian Women's Weekly, 4 June 1938: 21.Google Scholar
6 Annual reports of the Director, State Children Department for the years 1919–1939, Queensland Parliamentary Papers, 1920–1940.Google Scholar
7 Courier-Mail, 13 February 1939: 13.Google Scholar
8 Australian Women's Weekly, 10 June 1933: 7.Google Scholar
9 Census of the Commonwealth of Australia, 1921, vol. 2, Statistician's Report, 346. The Census material on average numbers of children included only married women who were ‘enumerated with their husbands’, thus excluding wives whose husbands were absent on the date of the Census and mothers who did not conform to this category. The ABC of Queensland Statistics and Queensland Year Books indicate that about 5 per cent of births in interwar Queensland were ex-nuptial.Google Scholar
10 Queensland Bank Officer, September 1920: 18, Courier-Mail, 13 February 1939: 13. This letter was part of the debate over whether husbands should assist with housework.Google Scholar
11 Cilento, Raphael, ‘Observations on the White Working Population of Queensland’, Part 1, Health, 4(1) (1926): 10.Google Scholar
12 Cilento, ‘Observations’: 10.Google Scholar
13 Woman's Budget, 19 February 1921: 5.Google Scholar
14 Queensland Bank Officer, September 1920: 18.Google Scholar
15 Isbel, C.E., ‘Coorparoo Days Recalled’, Journal of the Royal Historical Society of Queensland, 9(4) (1972–73): 119.Google Scholar
16 Probert, Belinda, Working Life: Arguments About Work in Australian Society (Ringwood: Penguin, 1990), 2.Google Scholar
17 Council Letter (Journal of the QCWA), March 1931.Google Scholar
18 Woman's Budget, 14 May 1921, 5; North Queensland Guardian, 21 August 1937: 2.Google Scholar
19 Census of the Commonwealth of Australia, 1921, vol. 2, statistician's report, 355; and 1933, vol. 3, Statistician's Report, 84.Google Scholar
20 Australian Home Beautiful, 2 July 1928: 60.Google Scholar
21 Census of the Commonwealth of Australia, 1933, vol. 2, 1914–15.Google Scholar
22 Cilento, ‘Observations’: 11.Google Scholar
23 Courier-Mail, 13 February 1939: 13.Google Scholar
24 Census of the Commonwealth of Australia, 1921, vol. 1, 482; vol. 2, 1350–51, 1358–59; and 1933, vol. 2, 1114. These figures do not include persons who listed their usual occupation as domestic service but who were unemployed at the time of the Census.Google Scholar
25 Everylady's Journal, 1 December 1930: 489–90.Google Scholar
26 Johnston, W. Ross, A New Province? The Closer Settlement of Monto (Brisbane: Boolarong, 1982), 127.Google Scholar
27 Everylady's Journal, 1 October 1926: 301.Google Scholar
28 Brydon, M.H., ‘Women's Life in North Queensland’, Health, 1(6) (1925): 167; Queensland Country Life, 19 September 1935: 6.Google Scholar
29 Brydon, ‘Women's Life in North Queensland’: 167.Google Scholar
30 Census of the Commonwealth of Australia, 1933, vol. 3, Statistician's Report, 186, 200.Google Scholar
31 Cilento, ‘Observations’: 39.Google Scholar
32 Census of the Commonwealth of Australia, 1921, vol. 2, statistician's report, 285; Evidence presented to the Sugar Enquiry Board quoted in Council Letter, March 1931.Google Scholar
33 Council Letter, March 1931.Google Scholar
34 Game, Ann and Pringle, Rosemary, Gender at Work (Sydney: Allen & Unwin, 1983), 120; Duncan Ironmonger and Evelyn Sonius, ‘Household Productive Activities’, in Duncan Ironmonger (ed.), Households Work: Productive Activities, Women and Income in the Household Economy (Sydney: Allen & Unwin, 1989), 20.Google Scholar
35 Cilento, ‘Observations’: 8. A skillion kitchen was a kitchen located in a lean-to or a structure separate from the house.Google Scholar
36 Cilento, ‘Observations’: 10–13.Google Scholar