Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T01:57:46.607Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Fluvial Sedimentation in Response to Postglacial Uplift and Environmental Change, Missisquoi River, Vermont

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

G. Robert Brakenridge
Affiliation:
Department of Geological Sciences, Wright State University, Dayton, Ohio 45435 USA
Peter A. Thomas
Affiliation:
Department of Anthropology, University of Vermont, Burlington, Vermont 05405 USA
Laura E. Conkey
Affiliation:
Department of Geography, Dartmouth College, Hanover, New Hampshire 03755 USA
Jane C. Schiferle
Affiliation:
Department of Geological Sciences, Wright State University, Dayton, Ohio 45435 USA

Abstract

Three lithologically distinct alluvial units of Holocene age can be distinguished along trenched cross sections of the Missisquoi valley bottom. The oldest is of early Holocene age, and the associated floodplain had aggraded to nearly its present level by 8000 14C yr B.P. At that time, early Archaic projectile points were deposited in a fire hearth 50 cm below the surface. Abandonment of this floodplain was followed by the development of an A-E-Bt soil profile. Accumulation of a younger floodplain had begun by 6400 14C yr B.P. and local sedimentation persisted to ca. 500 14C yr B.P., as indicated by radiocarbon dates of buried woody debris (including large logs) and of charcoal. Alluvium of the modern floodplain began accreting after A.D. 1860 and contains machine-cut square nails, whiteware ceramics, and coal clinker. Previous locations of the river channel can be reconstructed from relict surfaces marked by paleosols, the preserved depositional stratigraphy, and the radiocarbon samples. Immediately after regression of the Champlain Sea from this part of the valley, and before 8000 14C yr B.P., the river incised late Fleistocene marine silts and clays at an average rate of at least 1 m/100 yr. After the interval of downcutting, episodic lateral migration became the dominant process, with the rate varying between 0 and 4 m/100 yr. The early Holocene incision was most likely a lagged response to postglacial crustal rebound, whereas strong soil development and floodplain stability between 8000 and 6400 14C yr B.P. may reflect an independently documented warmer, and perhaps drier, climate in New England at this time. Finally, the post-A.D. 1860 period of active floodplain sedimentation may have been a response to timber clear-cutting, row crop agriculture, and cattle and sheep grazing in the watershed.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
University of Washington

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Becker, B., Schirmer, W., (1977). Paleoecologic study of the Holocene Valley development of the river Main, Southern Germany. Boreas. 6, 303-321.Google Scholar
Brakenridge, G.R., (1980). Widespread episodes of stream erosion during the Holocene and their climatic cause. Nature (London). 283, 655-656.Google Scholar
Brakenridge, G.R., (1981). Late Quaternary floodplain sedimentation along the Pomme de Terre River, southern Missouri. Quaternary Research. 15, 62-76.Google Scholar
Brakenridge, G.R., (1983). Late Quaternary floodplain sedimentation along the Pomme de Terre River, southern Missouri. Part II. Notes on sedimentology and pedogenesis. Geologisches Jahrbuch, Series A. 71, 265-283.Google Scholar
Brakenridge, G.R., (1984). Alluvial stratigraphy and radiocarbon dating along the Duck River, central Tennessee: Implications regarding floodplain origin. Geological Society of America Bulletin. 95, 9-25.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brakenridge, G.R., (1985). Rate estimates for lateral bedrock erosion based on radiocarbon ages, Duck River, Tennessee. Geology. 13, 111-114.Google Scholar
Brakenridge, G.R., Floodplain stratigraphy and flood regime. Baker, V.R., Kochel, C., Patton, P., (1988). Flood Geomorphology. Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
Connally, C.G., Deglacial history of western Vermont. Larson, G.J., Stone, B.D., (1982). Late Wisconsinan Glaciation of New England. Kendall-Hunt, Dubuque, IA.Google Scholar
Davis, M.B., (1981). Outbreaks of forest pathogens in Quaternary history. Proceedings of the Fourth International Palynological Conference. Vol. 3, 1976-1977, Lucknow, India.Google Scholar
Davis, M.B., (1983). Holocene vegetation history of the eastern United States. Wright, H.E., Late Quaternary Environments of the United States. Volume 2 Univ. of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, The Holocene.Google Scholar
Folk, R.L., (1974). Petrology of Sedimentary Rocks. Hemphill Press, Austin, TX.Google Scholar
Freeman-Lynd, R.P., Hutchinson, D.R., Folger, D.W., Wiley, B.H., Hewitt, J., (1980). The origin and distribution of subbottom sediment in southern Lake Champlain. Quaternary Research. 14, 224-239.Google Scholar
Hutchinson, D.R., Ferrebee, W.M., Knebel, H.J., Wold, R.J., Isachsen, Y.W., (1981). The sedimentary framework of the southern basin of Lake George, New York. Quaternary Research. 15, 44-61.Google Scholar
Knox, J.C., (1985). Responses of floods to Holocene climatic changes in the Upper Mississippi Valley. Quaternary Research. 23, 287-300.Google Scholar
Schirmer, W., (1982). Criteria for the differentiation of later Quaternary river terraces. Quaternary Studies in Poland. 4, 199-204.Google Scholar
Schirmer, W., (1983). Die talentwicklung an Main und Regnitz seit dem Hochwürm. Geologisches Jahrbuch, Series A. 71, 11-43.Google Scholar
Thomas, P.A., Dillon, R.S., (1983). Intensive archeological evaluation for selected prehistoric sites within the Highgate Falls hydroelectric project area and Prehistoric Archeological district. University of Vermont, Department of Anthropology Report. 44.Google Scholar
Tillmans, W., (1983). Zur verbreitung petrographie und stratigraphie des Monheimer Hoensandes im Westlicher Vorreis. Zeitschrift für Geomorphologie. 27, 93-104.Google Scholar