Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T01:39:17.043Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Can pollution bias peatland paleoclimate reconstruction?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

Richard J. Payne ,
Edward A.D. Mitchell ,
Hung Nguyen-Viet  and
Daniel Gilbert
Richard J. Payne*
Affiliation:
School of Science and the Environment, Manchester Metropolitan University, Chester Street, Manchester M1 5GD, UK Laboratoire de Chrono-environnement UMR UFC/CNRS 6249 USC INRA Université de Franche-Comté, Pôle Universitaire du Pays de Montbéliard, 4 place Tharradin, BP 71427 25 211 Montbéliard cedex, France
Edward A.D. Mitchell
Affiliation:
Laboratory of Soil Biology, Institute of Biology, University of Neuchâtel, Rue Emile-Argand 11, CH-2000 Neuchâtel, Switzerland
Hung Nguyen-Viet
Affiliation:
Department of Environmental Health, Hanoi School of Public Health, 138 Giang Vo, Hanoi, Vietnam Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, Socinstrasse 57, P.O. Box, 4002 Basel, Switzerland University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland Swiss Federal Institute of Aquatic Science and Technology (EAWAG), Sandec, Department of Water and Sanitation in Developing Countries, Dübendorf, Switzerland
Daniel Gilbert
Affiliation:
Laboratoire de Chrono-environnement UMR UFC/CNRS 6249 USC INRA Université de Franche-Comté, Pôle Universitaire du Pays de Montbéliard, 4 place Tharradin, BP 71427 25 211 Montbéliard cedex, France
*
⁎Corresponding author at: School of Science and the Environment, Manchester Metropolitan University, Chester Street, Manchester M1 5GD, UK. Email Address:[email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Peatland testate amoebae are widely used to reconstruct paleohydrological/climatic changes, but many species are also known to respond to pollutants. Peatlands around the world have been exposed to anthropogenic and intermittent natural pollution through the late Holocene. This raises the question: can pollution lead to changes in the testate amoeba paleoecological record that could be erroneously interpreted as a climatic change? To address this issue we applied testate amoeba transfer functions to the results of experiments adding pollutants (N, P, S, Pb, O3) to peatlands and similar ecosystems. We found a significant effect in only one case, an experiment in which N and P were added, suggesting that pollution-induced biases are limited. However, we caution researchers to be aware of this possibility when interpreting paleoecological records. Studies characterising the paleoecological response to pollution allow pollution impacts to be tracked and distinguished from climate change.

Keywords

ClimateHoloceneTestate amoebaeNitrogenPhosphorusOzoneSulphurLeadTransfer functionBiological proxy
Type
Short Paper
Information
Quaternary Research , Volume 78 , Issue 2 , September 2012 , pp. 170 - 173
Copyright
University of Washington

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Augustine, D.J., and Frank, D.A. Effects of migratory grazers on spatial heterogeneity of soil nitrogen properties in a grassland ecosystem. Ecology 82, (2001). 3149–3162.Google Scholar
Barber, K.E., and Langdon, P.G. What drives the peat-based palaeoclimate record? A critical test using multi-proxy climate records from northern Britain. Quaternary Science Reviews 26, (2007). 3318–3327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blackford, J.J. Palaeoclimatic records from peat bogs. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 15, (2000). 193–198.Google Scholar
Boelman, N.T., Stieglitz, M., Rueth, H.M., Sommerkorn, M., Griffin, K.L., Shaver, G.R., and Gamon, J.A. Response of NDVI, biomass, and ecosystem gas exchange to long-term warming and fertilization in wet sedge tundra. Oecologia 135, (2003). 414–421.Google Scholar
Carter, D.O., Yellowlees, D., and Tibbett, M. Cadaver decomposition in terrestrial ecosystems. Naturwissenschaften 94, (2007). 12–24.Google Scholar
Chambers, F.M., and Charman, D.J. Holocene environmental change: contributions from the peatland archive. The Holocene 14, (2004). 1–6.Google Scholar
Chambers, F.M., Booth, R.K., De Vleeschouwer, F., Lamentowicz, M., Le Roux, G., Mauquoy, D., Nichols, J.E., and van Geel, B. Development and refinement of proxy–climate indicators from peats. Quaternary International 268, (2012). 21–33.Google Scholar
Charman, D.J. Biostratigraphic and palaeoenvironmental applications of testate amoebae. Quaternary Science Reviews 20, (2001). 1753–1764.Google Scholar
Charman, D.J., Blundell, A. ACCROTELM members A new-European testate amoebae transfer function for palaeohydrological reconstruction on ombrotrophic peatlands. Journal of Quaternary Science 22, (2007). 209–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crutzen, P.J. Geology of mankind. Nature 415, (2002). 23 Google Scholar
Dentener, F. 36 others Nitrogen and sulfur deposition on regional and global scales: a multimodel evaluation. Global Biogeochemical Cycles 20, (2006). GB4003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilbert, D., Amblard, C., Bourdier, G., and Francez, A.-J. Short-term effect of nitrogen enrichment on the microbial communities of a peatland. Hydrobiologia 373, 374 (1998). 111–119.Google Scholar
Holtgrieve, G.W., Schindler, D.E., Hobbs, W.O., Leavitt, P.R., Ward, E.J., Bunting, L., Chen, G.J., Finney, B.P., Gregory-Eaves, I., Holmgren, S., Lisac, M.J., Lisi, P.J., Nydick, K., Rogers, L.A., Saros, J.E., Selbie, D.T., Shapley, M.D., Walsh, P.B., and Wolfe, A.P. A coherent signature of anthropogenic nitrogen deposition to remote watersheds of the northern hemisphere. Science 334, (2011). 1545–1548.Google Scholar
Hughes, P.D., Lomas-Clarke, S.H., Schulz, J., and Barber, K.E. Decline and localized extinction of a major raised bog species across the British Isles: evidence for associated land-use intensification. The Holocene 18, (2007). 1033–1043.Google Scholar
Jonson, J.E., Bartnicki, J., Olendrzynski, K., Jakobsen, H.A., and Berge, E. EMEP Eulerian model for atmospheric transport and deposition of nitrogen species over Europe. Environmental Pollution 102, (1998). 289–298.Google Scholar
Juggins, S. C2 user guide. Software for Ecological and Palaeoecological Data Analysis and Visualisation. (2003). University of Newcastle, Newcastle Upon Tyne.Google Scholar
Lamentowicz, M., Lamentowicz, Ł., van der Knaap, W.O., Gąbka, M., and Mitchell, E.A.D. Contrasting species-environment relationships in communities of testate amoebae, bryophytes and vascular plants along the fen–bog gradient. Microbial Ecology 59, (2010). 499–510.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lee, J.A. Unintentional experiments with terrestrial ecosystems: ecological effects of sulphur and nitrogen pollutants. Journal of Ecology 86, (1998). 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Line, J.M., ter Braak, C.J.F., and Briks, H.J.B. WACALIB version 3.3 — a computer program to reconstruct environmental variables from fossil assemblages by weighted averaging and to derive sample specific errors of prediction. Journal of Paleolimnology 10, (1994). 147–152.Google Scholar
Martínez-Cortizas, A., Pontevedra-Pombal, X., García-Rodejal, E., Nóvoa-Muñoz, J.Z., and Shotyk, W. Mercury in a Spanish peat bog: archive of climate change and atmospheric metal deposition. Science 284, (1999). 939–942.Google Scholar
Mitchell, E.A.D. Response of testate amoebae (Protozoa) to N and P fertilization in an Arctic wet sedge tundra. Arctic, Antarctic, and Alpine Research 36, (2004). 77–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mitchell, E.A.D., and Gilbert, D. Vertical micro-distribution and response to nitrogen deposition of testate amoebae in Sphagnum . Journal of Eukaryotic Microbiology 51, (2004). 480–490.Google Scholar
Mitchell, E.A.D., Buttler, A.J., Warner, B.G., and Gobat, J.M. Ecology of testate amoebae (Protozoa: Rhizopoda) in Sphagnum peatlands in the Jura mountains, Switzerland and France. Ecoscience 6, (1999). 565–576.Google Scholar
Mitchell, E.A,.D., Charman, D.J., and Warner, B.G. Testate amoebae analysis in ecological and paleoecological studies of wetlands: past, present and future. Biodiversity and Conservation 17, (2008). 2115–2137.Google Scholar
Nguyen-Viet, H., Bernard, N., Mitchell, E.A.D., Badot, P.M., and Gilbert, D. Effect of lead pollution on testate amoebae communities living in Sphagnum fallax: an experimental study. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety 69, (2008). 130–138.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Payne, R.J. Testate amoeba response to acid deposition in a Scottish peatland. Aquatic Ecology 44, (2010). 373–385.Google Scholar
Payne, R.J., Kishaba, K., Blackford, J.J., and Mitchell, E.A.D. The ecology of testate amoebae in southcentral Alaskan peatlands: building transfer function models for palaeoenvironmental inference. The Holocene 16, (2006). 403–414.Google Scholar
Payne, R.J., Charman, D.J., and Gauci, V. The impact of simulated sulfate deposition on peatland testate amoebae. Microbial Ecology 59, (2010). 76–83.Google Scholar
Payne, R.J., Thompson, A., Field, C., Standen, V., and Caporn, S.J.M. Impact of simulated nitrogen pollution on heathland microfauna, mesofauna and plants. European Journal of Soil Biology 49, (2012). 73–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shotyk, W., Weiss, D., Appleby, P.G., Cheburkin, A.K., Frei, R., Gloor, M., Kramers, J.D., Reese, S., and van der Knaap, W.O. History of atmospheric lead deposition since 12,370 14C yr BP from a peat bog, Jura Mountains, Switzerland. Science 281, (1998). 1635–1640.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, M.A. Tree rings and air pollution: a case study of Pinus monophylla growing in east-central Nevada. Environmental Pollution A 26, (1981). 251–266.Google Scholar
UNECE Empirical Critical Loads and Dose Response Relationships. (2010). UNECE, Geneva.Google Scholar
Wilson, R., and Elling, W. Temporal instability in tree-growth/climate response in the Lower Bavarian Forest region: implications for dendroclimatic reconstruction. Trees — Structure and Function 18, (2004). 19–28.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Payne et al. Supplementary Material

Supplementary Material

Download Payne et al. Supplementary Material(File)
File 53.8 KB