Single-stranded nucleic acid (ssNA) binding proteins must both stably protect ssNA transiently exposed during replication and other NA transactions, and also rapidly reorganize and dissociate to allow further NA processing. How these seemingly opposing functions can coexist has been recently elucidated by optical tweezers (OT) experiments that isolate and manipulate single long ssNA molecules to measure conformation in real time. The effective length of an ssNA substrate held at fixed tension is altered upon protein binding, enabling quantification of both the structure and kinetics of protein–NA interactions. When proteins exhibit multiple binding states, however, OT measurements may produce difficult to analyze signals including non-monotonic response to free protein concentration and convolution of multiple fundamental rates. In this review we compare single-molecule experiments with three proteins of vastly different structure and origin that exhibit similar ssNA interactions. These results are consistent with a general model in which protein oligomers containing multiple binding interfaces switch conformations to adjust protein:NA stoichiometry. These characteristics allow a finite number of proteins to protect long ssNA regions by maximizing protein–ssNA contacts while also providing a pathway with reduced energetic barriers to reorganization and eventual protein displacement when these ssNA regions are diminished.

The molecular mechanism of olfaction, namely, how we smell with limited olfactory receptors to recognize exceedingly diverse and large numbers of scents remains unknown despite the recent advances in chemistry, chemical, structural, and molecular biology. Olfactory receptors are notoriously difficult to study because they are fully embedded in the cell membrane. After decades of efforts and significant funding, there are only three olfactory receptor structures known. To understand olfaction, we carried out the structural bioinformatic study of six human olfactory receptors including OR51E1, OR51E2, OR52cs, OR1A1, OR1A2, TAAR9, and their AlphaFold3 predicted water-soluble QTY variants with odorants. We applied the QTY code to replace leucine (L) with glutamine (Q), isoleucine (I) and valine (V) with threonine (T), and phenylalanine (F) with tyrosine (Y) only in the transmembrane helices. Therefore, these QTY variants become water-soluble. We also present the superimposed structures of native olfactory receptors and their water-soluble QTY variants. The superimposed structures show remarkable similarity with RMSDs between 0.441 and 1.275 Å despite significant changes to the protein sequence of the transmembrane domains (43.03%–50.31%). We also show the differences in hydrophobicity surfaces between the native olfactory receptors and their QTY variants. Furthermore, we also used AlphaFold3 and molecular dynamics to study the odorant octanoate with OR1A2 and spermidine with TAAR9. Our bioinformatics studies provide insight into the differences between the hydrophobic helices and hydrophilic helices, and will likely further stimulate designs of water-soluble integral transmembrane proteins and other aggregated proteins.

DNA unzipping by nanopore translocation has implications in diverse contexts, from polymer physics to single-molecule manipulation to DNA–enzyme interactions in biological systems. Here we use molecular dynamics simulations and a coarse-grained model of DNA to address the nanopore unzipping of DNA filaments that are knotted. This previously unaddressed problem is motivated by the fact that DNA knots inevitably occur in isolated equilibrated filaments and in vivo. We study how different types of tight knots in the DNA segment just outside the pore impact unzipping at different driving forces. We establish three main results. First, knots do not significantly affect the unzipping process at low forces. However, knotted DNAs unzip more slowly and heterogeneously than unknotted ones at high forces. Finally, we observe that the microscopic origin of the hindrance typically involves two concurrent causes: the topological friction of the DNA chain sliding along its knotted contour and the additional friction originating from the entanglement with the newly unzipped DNA. The results reveal a previously unsuspected complexity of the interplay of DNA topology and unzipping, which should be relevant for interpreting nanopore-based single-molecule unzipping experiments and improving the modeling of DNA transactions in vivo.