Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T21:21:17.257Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Synchrotron and Inverse Compton Processes in X-Ray Clusters of Galaxies

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 April 2016

N.V. Vidal
N.V. Vidal*
Affiliation:
Mount Stromlo and Siding Spring Observatory, Research School of Physical Sciences, Australian National University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The third UHURU catalogue of X-ray sources lists 64 sources at galactic latitudes higher than 20°, many of which have been identified with galaxies and clusters of galaxies. One of the best criteria for identifying a cluster of galaxies with an X-ray source is the extended nature of the X-ray source. Table I is a compilation of all clusters of galaxies known to be within the boundaries of X-ray error boxes. Not all have measured X-ray angular sizes (see column 3). Since the southern sky has been inspected too (Vidal 1975a), we believe that this list may represent a complete sample (down to the sensitivity of the UHURU satellite and the completeness of the Abell catalogue and the southern survey). Column 1 gives the optical identification, column 2 the 3U designation, column 3 the X-ray angular radius, column 4 the radio spectral index (see below), column 5 the redshift (corrected for galactic rotation) and column 6 the X-ray luminosities assuming the Hubble law. Numbers in parentheses give the references for the entries. When no such references are given, the data have been taken from Kellogg et al. (1973) and Bancall (1974).

Type
Contributions
Information
Publications of the Astronomical Society of Australia , Volume 2 , Issue 6 , October 1975 , pp. 327 - 329
Copyright
Copyright © Astronomical Society of Australia 1975

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bancall, N.K., Astrophys. J., 193, 529 (1974).Google Scholar
Bridle, A.H., and Feldman, P.A., Nature, 235, 168 (1972).Google Scholar
Bui-Van, A., Hurley, K., and Vedrenne, G., Astrophys. J., 188, 217 (1974).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Costain, C.H., Bridle, A.H., and Feldman, P.A., Astrophys. J.(Lett.), 175, L13 (1972).Google Scholar
Dixon, R.S., Astrophys. J. (Suppl.), 20, 180 (1970).Google Scholar
Harris, D.E., and Romanishin, W., Astrophys. J., 188, 209 (1974).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kellogg, E., Murray, S., Giacconi, R., Tananbaum, H., and Gursky, H., Astrophys. J. (Lett.), 185, L13 (1973).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kellogg, E., and Murray, S., Astrophys. J. (Lett.), 193, L57 (1974).Google Scholar
Mills, B.Y., Slee, O.B., and Hill, E.R., Aust. J. Phys., 11, 360 (1958).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Owen, F.N., Astrophys. J. (Lett.), 189, L55 (1974).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slee, O.B., and Higgins, C.S., Aust. J. Phys. Astrophys. Suppl., No. 27 (1973).Google Scholar
Vidal, N.V., ‘Clusters of galaxies within X-ray error boxes in the southern sky’, submitted to Publ. Astron. Soc. Pac.(1975a).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vidal, N.V., ‘A radio source and cluster of galaxies in 3U 1252-28’, submitted to Astron. Astrophys. (1975b).Google Scholar
Vidal, N.V., and Peterson, B.A., Astrophys. J. (Lett.), 196, L95 (1975).CrossRefGoogle Scholar