Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T04:16:07.011Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

s-Process Enriched Evolved Binaries in the Galaxy and the Magellanic Clouds

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 March 2024

Meghna Menon*
Affiliation:
School of Mathematical and Physical Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW, Australia Astrophysics and Space Technologies Research Centre, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW, Australia
Devika Kamath
Affiliation:
School of Mathematical and Physical Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW, Australia Astrophysics and Space Technologies Research Centre, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW, Australia INAF, Observatory of Rome, Monte Porzio Catone (RM), Italy
Maksym Mohorian
Affiliation:
School of Mathematical and Physical Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW, Australia Astrophysics and Space Technologies Research Centre, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW, Australia
Hans Van Winckel
Affiliation:
Instituut voor Sterrenkunde, K.U.Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
Paolo Ventura
Affiliation:
INAF, Observatory of Rome, Monte Porzio Catone (RM), Italy
*
Corresponding author: Meghna Menon; Email: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Post-asymptotic giant branch stars (post-AGB) in binary systems, with typical orbital periods between $\sim\!100$ to $\sim$1 000 days, result from a poorly understood interaction that terminates their precursory AGB phase. The majority of these binaries display a photospheric anomaly called ‘chemical depletion’, thought to arise from an interaction between the circumbinary disc and the post-AGB star, leading to the reaccretion of pure gas onto the star, devoid of refractory elements due to dust formation. In this paper, we focus on a subset of chemically peculiar binary post-AGBs in the Galaxy and the Magellanic Clouds (MCs). Our detailed stellar parameter and chemical abundance analysis utilising high-resolution optical spectra from VLT+UVES revealed that our targets span a $T_{\rm eff}$ of 4 900–7 250 K and [Fe/H] of −0.5 - −1.57 dex. Interestingly, these targets exhibit a carbon ([C/Fe] ranging from 0.5 - 1.0 dex, dependant on metallicity) and s-process enrichment ($\textrm{[s/Fe]}\,\geq\!1$dex) contrary to the commonly observed chemical depletion pattern. Using spectral energy distribution (SED) fitting and period–luminosity–colour (PLC) relation methods, we determine the luminosity of the targets (2 700–8 300 $\rm L_{\odot}$), which enables confirmation of their evolutionary phase and estimation of initial masses (as a function of metallicity) (1–2.5 $\textrm{M}_{\odot}$). In conjunction with predictions from dedicated ATON stellar evolutionary models, our results indicate a predominant intrinsic enrichment of carbon and s-process elements in our binary post-AGB targets. We qualitatively rule out extrinsic enrichment and inherited s-process enrichment from the host galaxy as plausible explanations for the observed overabundances. Our chemically peculiar subset of intrinsic carbon and s-process enriched binary post-AGBs also hints at potential variation in the efficiency of chemical depletion between stars with C-rich and O-rich circumbinary disc chemistries. However, critical observational studies of circumbinary disc chemistry, along with specific condensation temperature estimates in C-rich environments, are necessary to address gaps in our current understanding of disc-binary interactions inducing chemical depletion in binary post-AGB systems.

Type
Research Article
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Astronomical Society of Australia

1. Introduction

Standard stellar evolutionary models, describing the evolution of low- and intermediate-mass (LIM, 1–8 $\textrm{M}_{\odot}$ ) single stars, predict the occurrence of the slow neutron capture process (s-process) during their Asymptotic Giant Branch (AGB) phase (see Busso et al. Reference Busso, Gallino, Lambert, Travaglio and Smith2001; Herwig Reference Herwig2005; Karakas & Lattanzio Reference Karakas and Lattanzio2014). The s-process results in the production of approximately half of the elements heavier than iron (see Gallino et al. Reference Gallino1998; Käppeler et al. Reference Käppeler, Gallino, Bisterzo and Aoki2011; Kobayashi et al. Reference Kobayashi, Karakas and Lugaro2020). The other half is thought to be due to the rapid neutron capture process (r-process) happening in massive stars ( $\gt \!8{\,\textrm{M}_{\odot}}$ (see Wanajo et al. Reference Wanajo, Janka and Müller2011; Kajino et al. Reference Kajino2019). Recent investigations suggest the existence of additional nucleosynthetic processes such as the intermediate neutron capture process (i-process, see Choplin et al. Reference Choplin, Siess and Goriely2021, Reference Choplin, Goriely and Siess2022, Reference Choplin, Siess and Goriely2023), contributing to the production of heavy elements in low-mass (1-3 $\textrm{M}_{\odot}$ ) AGB stars. The validity of these predictions has been observationally verified through studies of AGB stars (e.g. Abia et al. Reference Abia2002; Jonsell et al. Reference Jonsell2006; Straniero et al. Reference Straniero, Cristallo and Piersanti2014; Cseh et al. Reference Cseh2019; Shetye et al. Reference Shetye2020) and post-AGB stars (e.g. Van Winckel & Reyniers Reference Van Winckel and Reyniers2000; Reyniers & Van Winckel Reference Reyniers and Van Winckel2003; Kamath et al. Reference Kamath, Wood and Van Winckel2014, Reference Kamath, Wood and Van Winckel2015).

Post-AGB stars serve as superior tracers of AGB nucleosynthesis and dredge-up compared to AGB stars. (see Van Winckel Reference Van Winckel2003; Kamath Reference Kamath2020; Kamath & Winckel Reference Kamath and Winckel2022, and references therein). Notably, their higher photospheric temperatures ( $\sim$ 3 000 K to $\sim$ 30 000 K) compared to their preceding AGB phase ( $\sim\!2\,000$ K to $\sim\!4\,000$ K) ensure that the optical spectra of post-AGB stars allow for the detection of atomic transitions of a wide range of elements from CNO up to the heaviest s-process elements, well beyond the Ba peak (e.g. Van Winckel & Reyniers Reference Van Winckel and Reyniers2000; De Smedt et al. Reference De Smedt2012, Reference De Smedt2016, and references therein).

Post-AGB stars exhibit a distinctive infrared (IR) excess, indicative of their dusty circumstellar environment (Van Winckel Reference Van Winckel2003). Detailed investigations of the spectral energy distribution (SED) in optically bright post-AGB stars have revealed two main categories based on the nature of their IR excess: ‘shell-source’ and ‘disc-source’ (Van Winckel Reference Van Winckel2003; Gezer et al. Reference Gezer2015; Manick et al. Reference Manick, Van Winckel, Kamath, Sekaran and Kolenberg2018, and references therein). The shell-sources represent single post-AGB stars with a distinctive double-peaked SED. The first peak (near-IR) corresponds to the photospheric component, while the second peak (mid-IR) characterises a detached and expanding shell of cold dust–an AGB dust shell remnant. However, the disc-sources display a broad IR excess, commencing in the near-IR region, indicating the existence of a stable compact dusty disc (see Gezer et al. Reference Gezer2015, for more details on SED classifications). Observational studies have now firmly established that the presence of the stable compact disc (circumbinary disc) around the disc-sources is attributed to their binary nature (e.g. Van Winckel et al. Reference Van Winckel2009; Oomen et al. Reference Oomen2018; Kluska et al. Reference Kluska2022).

Observational studies of post-AGB stars in the Galaxy (e.g. Van Winckel & Reyniers Reference Van Winckel and Reyniers2000; Rao et al. Reference Rao, Giridhar and Lambert2012; De Smedt et al. Reference De Smedt, Van Winckel, Kamath and Wood2015; Kamath et al. Reference Kamath2022) and the Magellanic Clouds (MCs) (e.g. Kamath et al. Reference Kamath, Wood and Van Winckel2014, Reference Kamath, Wood and Van Winckel2015) have shown that they are far more chemically diverse than anticipated. Typically, low-mass single post-AGB stars are carbon and s-process enriched, a reflection of the nucleosynthetic processes that occur during and prior to their AGB phase (eg Reyniers & Van Winckel Reference Reyniers and Van Winckel2003). Notably, some single post-AGB stars (shell-sources) stand out as the most s-process enriched objects known to date (e.g. Reyniers et al. Reference Reyniers, Van Winckel, Gallino and Straniero2004; De Smedt et al. Reference De Smedt2012, in the Galaxy and the MCs, respectively). By and large, theoretical single-star low-mass AGB models are in agreement with observations (e.g. van Aarle et al. Reference van Aarle2011; De Smedt et al. Reference De Smedt2014, Reference De Smedt, Van Winckel, Kamath and Wood2015, Reference De Smedt2016). However, a study by Kamath et al. (Reference Kamath2017) reported a subset of luminous single post-AGB stars (one in the Small Magellanic Cloud (SMC) and two in the Galaxy) that exhibited neither traces of carbon enhancements nor s-process elements, suggesting a likely failure of the third dredge-up (TDU). Further expanding on this, a recent investigation by Kamath et al. (Reference Kamath2022) categorised single post-AGB stars with similar atmospheric parameters into two groups: those displaying s-process enrichment and those exhibiting no s-process enrichment.

Additionally, the majority of the post-AGB stars in binary systems (disc-sources) exhibit a chemical anomaly in their photosphere known as ‘chemical depletion’ (see Oomen et al. Reference Oomen2018; Kamath & Van Winckel Reference Kamath and Van Winckel2019, and references therein). This phenomenon arises from the interaction between the binary post-AGB star and the surrounding circumbinary disc (disc-binary interaction). Their photospheric abundance pattern resembles the gas phase of the interstellar medium (ISM), with volatile elements like Zn and S maintaining their initial abundances, while refractory elements, including s-process elements, are notably underabundant, making them extrinsically metal-poor.

In this paper, we focus on a subset of chemically peculiar post-AGB disc-sources that show carbon and s-process enrichment in their photospheric chemical composition, contrary to the commonly observed photospheric chemical depletion typically observed in disc-sources. We present a detailed atmospheric parameter and chemical abundance analysis of J005107.19-734133.3 (hereafter referred to as J005107), which represents the first known post-AGB disc-source in the SMC with an s-process enrichment. The s-process enrichment of this star was initially identified in the SMC survey by Kamath et al. (Reference Kamath, Wood and Van Winckel2014). In addition, we incorporate two previously recognised s-process-enriched post-AGB disc-sources: MACHO 47.2496.8 in the Large Magellanic Cloud (LMC) (Reyniers et al. Reference Reyniers2007) and HD 158616 in our Galaxy (De Smedt et al. Reference De Smedt2016). This provides an overview of carbon and s-process enriched binary post-AGB stars across both the Galaxy and the MCs. The unusual s-process enrichment in these stars suggests that the disc-binary interaction did not induce a photospheric chemical depletion. Through this study, we aim to understand the efficiency of chemical depletion in these systems and the effects of binarity on their peculiar chemical composition. We also investigate the underlying mechanism responsible for this chemical peculiarity.

This paper is structured as follows: Section 2, presents an overview of the targets in this study, providing detailed information on the photometric and spectroscopic data associated with each target. In Section 3, we provide a detailed description of our spectral analysis, to derive the atmospheric parameters and chemical abundances of the target stars. In Section 4, we detail SED fitting, luminosity derivation, and initial mass estimation of the targets. Finally, in Section 5, we investigate the chemical peculiarity of our targets and their underlying mechanism by comparing the observationally derived chemical abundances with theoretical predictions from the ATON evolutionary models (Ventura et al. Reference Ventura, Zeppieri, Mazzitelli and D’Antona1998).

2. Targets and observations

The target sample for this study consists of three chemically peculiar objects previously classified as post-AGB stars, that have a ‘disc-type’ SED (see Fig. 6) and lie within the ‘disc box’ of Gezer et al. (Reference Gezer2015) (see Fig. 1). The three targets are J005107 from the SMC (Kamath et al. Reference Kamath, Wood and Van Winckel2014), MACHO 47.2496.8 from the LMC (Reyniers & Cuypers Reference Reyniers and Cuypers2005), and HD 158616 (De Smedt et al. Reference De Smedt2016) from the Galaxy. We note that HD 158616 is a confirmed binary according to orbital parameter studies conducted by Oomen et al. (Reference Oomen2018). With regards to J005107 and MACHO 47.2496.8, taking into account a combination of their SED characteristics and pulsation features (as detailed below for each of the targets), we conclude that these two stars also reside in binary systems.

Figure 1. The WISE colour-colour diagram for the sample stars along with the stars studied in Gezer et al. (Reference Gezer2015) is depicted here. The different types of SED characteristics among the post-AGB stars are represented here with different symbols and colours. The Non-IR box represents the non-dusty stars that show no IR excess in their SEDs. The sample stars are numbered according to their position in Table 1 for reference.

In Table 1, we present our target sample including their other names and two sets of stellar parameters. The stellar parameters under ‘This Study’ represent the spectroscopically derived atmospheric parameters in this study. The stellar parameters under ‘Literature’ represent the spectroscopically determined atmospheric parameters from previous Literature analysis.

Table 1. Target sample along with two sets of stellar parameters. The final column lists the references to the previous literature analysis.

Notes: The stellar parameters under “This study” represent the spectroscopically determined atmospheric parameters obtained using the Python wrapper of iSpec (E-iSpec) (see section 3) whereas the stellar parameters under the title “Literature” represent the spectroscopically determined atmospheric parameters from the Literature analysis. Note that the low-resolution spectral analysis of J005107.19-734133.3 did not provide an estimated $\xi_{\rm t}$ value. Detailed information on the tabulated information can be found in the individual studies in column ‘Ref’. The column ‘Ref.’ indicates the individual study: 1 - Kamath et al. (Reference Kamath, Wood and Van Winckel2014), 2 - Reyniers et al. (Reference Reyniers2007), 3 - De Smedt et al. (Reference De Smedt2016).

Figure 2. The phased LCs of the RV Tauri targets J005107 (left) and MACHO 47.2496.8 (right). The fundamental pulsation period used to phase the LC of each target is mentioned in the text. The LCs are scattered due to their semi-regular nature; they usually show considerable variations from cycle to cycle. This behaviour is typically more pronounced for the longer-period RV Tauri stars. The photometric data for J005107 and MACHO 47.2496.8 have been sourced from the latest OGLE IV database of Type II Cepheids (Soszyński et al. Reference Soszyński2018).

In the following paragraphs, we discuss the individual targets of our study in detail.

J005107 has been classified as a post-AGB star and an RV Tauri pulsator in the photometric study conducted by Manick et al. (Reference Manick, Van Winckel, Kamath, Sekaran and Kolenberg2018). Additionally, Manick et al. (Reference Manick, Van Winckel, Kamath, Sekaran and Kolenberg2018) categorised J005107 as an RVa type due to the lack of prominent long-term variability, based on its OGLE III light curve (LC). The fundamental period of this star is approximately 39.67 days according to the latest OGLE IV database, (Soszyński et al. Reference Soszyński2018). In Fig. 2 (left), we present the LC of J005107 from the latest data release: OGLE IV. Furthermore, Manick et al. (Reference Manick, Van Winckel, Kamath, Sekaran and Kolenberg2018) also identified J005107 as a disc-source due to the presence of a characteristic IR excess in its SED (see Fig. 6), consistent with the presence of a circumbinary disc, which is typical in binary post-AGB stars. Notably, the prominent Ba II features in the low-resolution optical AAOmega spectra presented in Kamath et al. (Reference Kamath, Wood and Van Winckel2014) recognised J005107 as the first s-process enriched RV Tauri star in the SMC.

MACHO 47.2496.8 was initially classified both as a post-AGB star and as an RV Tauri pulsator in the MACHO Project: LMC Variable Star Inventory VII, conducted by Alcock et al. (Reference Alcock1998) on optically bright post-AGB stars in the LMC. Additionally, Manick et al. (Reference Manick, Van Winckel, Kamath, Sekaran and Kolenberg2018) classified MACHO 47.2496.8 as an RVa type, based on its OGLE III LC. The fundamental period of this star is approximately 56.48 days according to the latest OGLE IV database (Soszyński et al. Reference Soszyński2018). In Fig. 2 (right), we present the LC of MACHO 47.2496.8 from the latest data release: OGLE IV. Manick et al. (Reference Manick, Van Winckel, Kamath, Sekaran and Kolenberg2018) also identified MACHO 47.2496.8 as a disc-source due to the presence of a characteristic IR excess in its SED. In a series of low-resolution spectra described by Pollard & Evans (Reference Pollard and Evans2000), MACHO 47.2496.8 exhibited strong C2 bands and Ba II features, leading to its identification as the first carbon- and s-process-enriched RV Tauri star. This classification was further confirmed by a subsequent high-resolution spectral analysis by Reyniers et al. (Reference Reyniers2007).

HD 158616 has been classified as an optically bright post-AGB star with a carbon enrichment, as determined by the spectroscopic study of Van Winckel (Reference Van Winckel1997). Additionally, the high-resolution spectroscopic studies by Rao et al. (Reference Rao, Giridhar and Lambert2012) and De Smedt et al. (Reference De Smedt2016) established HD 158616 as the first post-AGB star rich in s-process elements discovered to be in a spectroscopic binary. HD 158616 is confirmed to be a binary star with an orbital period of 365.0 days, and additional orbital properties can be found in Oomen et al. (Reference Oomen2018). De Smedt et al. (Reference De Smedt2016) also identified this star as a disc-source due to a characteristic IR excess in its SED.

The SED fitting of the target stars is detailed in Section 4.1.

2.1 Photometric data

To construct the SEDs in Section 4.1, we collected the photometric data from the Vizier database (Ochsenbein et al. Reference Ochsenbein, Bauer and Marcout2000). Photometry at optical and near-IR wavelengths characterises the photospheric emission of the post-AGB star. Subsequently, the post-AGB photosphere is fitted using these data points (see Section 4.1). The most significant photometry bands we used at these wavelengths are the UBVRI Johnson-Cousins bands (Bessell Reference Bessell1990). For one of the targets, we also used photometry from Geneva (Rufener Reference Rufener1999) and SDSS (Blanton et al. Reference Blanton2017). Emission at longer wavelengths is dominated by low-temperature emission from the dusty disc. Therefore, photometry at mid- and far-IR wavelengths defines the circumstellar environment. To characterise this we use the photometric data from the 2MASS All-Sky Catalog of Point Sources (Cutri et al. Reference Cutri2003), the WISE All-Sky Data catalogue (Cutri et al. Reference Cutri2012), the AKARI/IRC mid-IR all-sky survey (Ishihara et al. Reference Ishihara2010), and the IRAS catalogue of Point Sources (Helou & Walker Reference Helou and Walker1988). The photometric magnitudes of all the objects covering the optical, near-IR, and mid-IR bands are presented in Table 2. As these stars are pulsating, multiple measurements for magnitude values within the same photometric bands are available. Hence, we provide the mean value of each measurement in Table 2. We refer to the Appendix A of Oomen et al. (Reference Oomen2018) for the list of the most common catalogues used.

Table 2. Photometric data of the targets. See text for full details.

Notes: The RA and DEC coordinates are given for the J2000 epoch. Null magnitudes are listed as 99.999.

Fig. 6 shows the SEDs of all the targets in our sample. As mentioned in Section 2, the SEDs of our target stars are of ‘disc-type’.

2.2 Spectroscopic observations and data reduction

The high-resolution optical spectra of the three targets: J005107, MACHO 47.2496.8, and HD 158616 were taken from the Ultraviolet and Visual Echelle Spectrograph (UVES, Dekker et al. Reference Dekker, D’Odorico, Kaufer, Delabre, Kotzlowski, Iye and Moorwood2000), which is the echelle spectrograph mounted on the 8 m UT2 Kueyen Telescope of the Very Large Telescope (VLT) array at the Paranal Observatory of European Southern Observatory (ESO) in Chile, aiming to obtain comprehensive data on a large sample of post-AGB objects. The dichroic beam-splitter was used to get maximum wavelength coverage resulting in a wavelength coverage from approximately 3 280 Å to 4 560 Å for the blue arm of UVES, and from approximately 4 726 Å to 5 800 Å and 5 817 Å to 6 810 Å for the lower and upper part of the red arm of the UVES CCD chip, respectively. There are small spectral gaps between 4 560 Å and 4 726 Å and between 5 800 Å and 5 817 Å due to the spatial gap between the three UVES CCDs. Each wavelength range is observed separately with a specific exposure time. The resolving power of the UVES spectra varies between $\sim$ 60 000 and $\sim$ 65 000. In Fig. 3, two spectral snippets are presented, illustrating the quality of the spectral data and highlighting the identification of certain s-process elements in the target stars.

Table 3 gives the log of the observations, the spectral intervals covered and the signal-to-noise (S/N) ratio for each object. In general, the S/N ratio is lower at blue wavelengths. We note that the echelle data does not have a consistent S/N because it depends on the blaze function. The S/N is higher at the blaze wavelengths, where the spectrograph works most efficiently, compared to other parts of the spectrum. The ‘References’ column points to the literature of the previous high-resolution studies.

Figure 3. Comparison of the normalised and radial velocity corrected spectra of all target stars. The spectra have been shifted in flux for clarity. Red and black vertical lines mark the positions of s-process elements (and also carbon) and non-s-process elements, respectively. For more information, see the text.

In the following paragraphs, we only discuss the spectral reduction, normalisation, radial velocity correction, and weighted average merging of J005107 in detail. Similar steps of the other two targets: MACHO 47.2496.8 and HD 158616 are explained in detail by Reyniers et al. (Reference Reyniers2007) and De Smedt et al. (Reference De Smedt2016), respectively.

The UVES spectral reduction of the raw data of J005107 was performed using the UVES reduction pipeline from EsoReflex on the default optimal settings. The EsoReflex software allows the user to choose from a variety of pipelines that correspond to the various telescopes available at ESO. The reduction process involves the standard steps of extracting frames, determining wavelength calibration and applying this scale to flat-field divided data. As part of the reduction, cosmic clipping was also taken into account.

The normalisation of the reduced spectrum was done by fitting in small spectral windows with fifth-order polynomials through interactively defined continuum points. We note that normalisation is the most delicate step in the reduction procedure, especially in the blue part of the spectrum, where the spectrum is so crowded that the continuum is rarely reached. The most significant source of uncertainty for the abundances calculated from lines in this region is the continuum location. Three observations were taken for J005107 with an exposure time of 3 005 s for each UVES arm. Since the third observation (OB3) of J005107 was taken after 19 days (see Table 3) from observation one (OB1) and observation two (OB2) and considering the target to be an RV Tauri pulsator, the phase of OB3 is different from that of OB1 and OB2. Hence, we decided to treat the OB3 as an independent spectrum for the rest of our analysis. However, the OB3 spectra had minimal lines to be useful for both atmospheric parameter analysis as well as abundance derivation. Therefore, we chose to use only OB1 and OB2 for the rest of our analysis.

Table 3. Observational logs of the target stars. The references for previous high-resolution spectroscopic studies utilising the spectra presented in this table are provided.

Notes: The exposure times of UVES spectra are split into four categories: exposure times for the Blue arm, Red Lower arm, Red Upper arm or all three arms; the latter is indicated with ‘All’. The wavelength coverage for the ‘Blue’ UVES arm is from approximately 3 280 to 4 530 Å and the ‘RedL’ and ‘RedU’ UVES arms are from approximately 4 780 to 5 770 Å and from 5 800 to 6 810 Å, respectively.

$^{(1,2)}$ The log details are for Observation one (OB1) and Observation two (OB2) together (see text for details on OB1, OB2, and OB3).

$^{(3)}$ The log details are for Observation three (OB3).

References: a – Reyniers et al. (Reference Reyniers2007), b – De Smedt et al. (Reference De Smedt2016).

To determine the radial velocity of J005107, several well-identified atomic lines in the spectrum were fitted with a Gaussian curve to find their centre wavelength. The Doppler shift equation was used to compute the shifted velocity. This yields a heliocentric radial velocity of $v=160\,\pm\,$ 8 km s $^{-1}$ for OB1 and OB2, which is precise enough for line identification purposes. This is also in good agreement with the radial velocity value $v=187.5\pm4.3$ km s $^{-1}$ estimated by Kamath et al. (Reference Kamath, Wood and Van Winckel2014) using the low-resolution spectra. Furthermore, the velocity of J005107 validates the membership of the SMC, with the heliocentric radial velocity of the SMC being $\sim$ 160 km s $^{-1}$ (Richter et al. Reference Richter, Tammann and Huchtmeier1987).

Once all three spectra (Blue, RedL, and RedU) of OB1 and OB2 were normalised and radial velocity corrected, a weighted mean average merging was performed, thereby obtaining a single final spectrum, which was used to perform a detailed spectral analyses of J005107. A significant portion of the Blue spectrum (wavelength range 3 280–4 560 Å) has a S/N ratio that is too low to be useful for a precise spectral abundance analysis; as a result, these wavelength ranges are not used for the spectral analyses of J005107.

3. Spectroscopic analysis

We performed a systematic spectral analysis for all our target stars, which included: (a) precise estimation of atmospheric parameters: effective temperature ( $T_{\rm eff}$ ), surface gravity ( $\log g$ ), metallicity ([Fe/H]), and microturbulant velocity ( $\xi_{\rm t}$ ) and (b) chemical abundance derivation for all identifiable elements from the final prepared spectrum of each star. The atmospheric parameter determination, as well as the abundance analysis, are carried out using E-iSpec, our own $Python-$ based semi-automated spectral analysis tool for optical and NIR spectra, serving as a wrapper for iSpec (Blanco-Cuaresma et al. Reference Blanco-Cuaresma, Soubiran, Heiter and Jofré2014; Blanco-Cuaresma Reference Blanco-Cuaresma2019). E-iSpec offers enhanced capabilities for determining atmospheric parameters, elemental abundances, and isotopic ratios in evolved stars with complex atmospheres, utilising 1D local thermal equilibrium (LTE) model atmospheres, MOOG radiative transfer code (Sneden Reference Sneden1973), and comprehensive line lists. A detailed description of E-iSpec and our spectral analysis procedure is presented in Mohorian et al. (Reference Mohorian2024).

In brief, there are two modules in E-iSpec: one for determining atmospheric parameters (using the equivalent width (EW) method, see Section 3.1) and the other for determining abundances (using EW and synthetic spectral fitting (SSF), see Section 3.2). For the spectral analyses, the latest LTE model atmospheres, ATLAS9 (Castelli & Kurucz Reference Castelli, Kurucz, Piskunov, Weiss and Gray2003) or MARCS (Gustafsson et al. Reference Gustafsson2008), chosen depending on the $T_{\rm eff}$ of the star, were used in combination with the LTE abundance calculation routine MOOG (version July 2009) by Sneden (Reference Sneden1973). The model atmospheres were uniquely determined by the $T_{\rm eff}$ , $\log g$ , [Fe/H] and $\xi_{\rm t}$ . Line lists from the Vienna Atomic Line Database (VALD) (Kupka et al. Reference Kupka, Piskunov, Ryabchikova, Stempels and Weiss1999) with a range of 3 000–11 000 Å were used to identify the spectral lines of the target stars. This covers the full wavelength coverage of UVES spectra and allows for identifying spectral lines of about 160 ions ranging from He (Z = 2) up to U (Z = 92).

We note that the atmospheric parameters and chemical abundances of all our targets were derived aiming at isolated, unblended and non-saturated lines, the identification of which was challenging due to the small-amplitude pulsations and pulsation-driven shocks commonly observed in RV Tauri pulsating stars (Reyniers et al. Reference Reyniers2007). We avoided spectral noise by using lines with EW greater than 5 mÅ. Additionally, we avoided lines with EW greater than 150 mÅ since they are saturated. We note that non-LTE effects were not taken into account for our analysis.

In the following subsections, we briefly describe our spectral analyses: atmospheric parameter determination (see Section 3.1) and derivation of chemical abundances (see Section 3.2).

3.1 Atmospheric parameter determination

We derived the atmospheric parameters of all the target stars using Fe I and Fe II lines (see Section 3 for more details on line selection). Fe was chosen due to its large number of unblended lines, covering a broad range of excitation potential (EP). The EWs were calculated for each line using an iterative procedure in which the theoretical EWs of individual lines were compared to the calculated EWs. The atmospheric parameter determination method is outlined below.

The effective temperature ( $T_{\rm eff}$ ) was estimated using excitation analysis, wherein the abundances derived from Fe I lines are imposed to be independent of their EP. An accurate derivation of $T_{\rm eff}$ is promoted by the wide range in EP (0.5–5 eV) and the sufficiently large number of lines. The surface gravity (log g) is determined using ionisation analyses, imposing the abundances to be independent of the lines being from neutral or ionised Fe. The microturbulent velocity ( $\xi_{\rm t}$ ) was derived by imposing the independence of the abundance derived from individual Fe lines of the reduced equivalent width (RW). Concerning the error estimation for atmospheric parameters, they are determined from the covariance matrix generated by the non-linear least-squares fitting algorithm in E-iSpec.

We note that the atmospheric parameter analysis can be verified using other species like Ti or Cr, provided there is a substantial number of lines for certain species. However, due to a large number of blends, the majority of the elements only have less than three useful lines to perform the analysis.

The results of the atmospheric parameter analysis of our targets are presented in Table 1 and discussed in Section 3.3.

3.2 Abundance analysis

We derived chemical abundances using both the EW method and the SSF technique – which are modules of E-iSpec. In the EW method, observed EWs were compared with predictions from theoretical model atmospheres (ATLAS9 Castelli & Kurucz Reference Castelli, Kurucz, Piskunov, Weiss and Gray2003 or MARCS Gustafsson et al. Reference Gustafsson2008), involving an iterative adjustment of assumed abundances until observed and predicted EWs converged, yielding best-fit abundance values. The SSF technique involved comparing observed stellar spectra with synthetic spectra generated by theoretical model atmospheres, employing chi-square fitting to iteratively refine model parameters and derive precise chemical abundances.

We note that the lines used for the abundance derivation are as per the criteria mentioned in Section 3. The complete linelists of the target stars are provided as online supporting material.

The uncertainties associated with the derived abundances are determined using the procedure outlined by Deroo et al. (Reference Deroo, Reyniers, van Winckel, Goriely and Siess2005). E-iSpec provides the errors of the derived abundances only as standard deviations of the measured values ( $\sigma_{\rm |121|}$ ). However, the total error $\sigma_{\rm tot}$ is the quadratic sum of $\sigma_{\rm |121|}$ , uncertainties in abundances due to atmospheric parameters and the [Fe/H] error. To determine the sensitivity of the abundances to the stellar parameters, the abundances were recalculated changing $T_{\rm eff}$ , $\log g$ , and $\xi_{\rm t}$ with their calculated error (see Table 1 for atmospheric parameter errors). We impose a $\sigma_{\rm |121|}$ of 0.20 dex for all the ions for which only one line was available. The chosen uncertainty of 0.2 dex corresponds to the allowed standard deviation for the line-to-line scatter, indicating the range within which all individual line abundances are expected to lie.

The results of the abundance analysis of our targets are presented in Tables 4 and A1 and discussed in Section 3.3.

Table 4. Spectroscopically determined abundance results for J005107.

Notes: The ions that were detected and their corresponding atomic number (Z) are listed in columns 1 and 2, respectively. The solar abundances ( $\log\varepsilon_{\odot}$ ) in column 3 are retrieved from Asplund et al. (Reference Asplund, Grevesse, Sauval and Scott2009). N represents the number of lines used for each ion, [X/Fe] is the element-over-iron ratio, $\sigma_{\rm tot}$ is the total uncertainty on [X/Fe], $\log\varepsilon$ is the derived abundance, and $\sigma_{\rm |121|}$ is the line-to-line scatter. We impose a $\sigma_{\rm |121|}$ of 0.20 dex for all ions for which only one line is available for the abundance determination.

Figure 4. Spectroscopically derived abundances of J005107. The error bars represent the total uncertainties $\sigma_{\rm tot}$ . Some elements are labelled for reference. The black colour data points represent CNO elements, the blue represents Fe peak elements, the magenta represents Zn and S, and the red represents s-process elements.

3.3 Results of spectroscopic analysis: Atmospheric parameters and chemical abundances

In this section, we present the results of the spectral analyses of J005107. We note that this study marks the first high-resolution spectral analyses of J005107. However, for MACHO 47.2496.8 and HD 158616 similar high-resolution spectral analyses have been previously carried out by Reyniers et al. (Reference Reyniers2007) and De Smedt et al. (Reference De Smedt2016), respectively. For benchmarking our methodology (i.e. the E-iSpec Code) we repeated the spectral analyses for these two objects (see Appendix A for the final results). Since the derived atmospheric parameters and abundances of MACHO 47.2496.8 and HD 158616 align closely with values reported in the literature (refer to Tables 1 and A1), we opted to adopt the literature values of both atmospheric parameters and abundances for the rest of our analysis.

The various atmospheric parameters of J005107 are displayed in Table 1, under the title ‘This study’. The atmospheric parameters of J005107 clearly fall within the range of typical post-AGB parameter values.

Table 4 presents the final derived abundances for different elements of J005107. Unfortunately, all Ba lines were severely saturated (see Fig. 3 at 6 141.7324 Å), making it impossible to accurately determine the abundance of one of the significant s-process species. Except for the species where all observable lines turned out to be blended, the other s-process elemental abundances were derived from isolated single lines. We list the elements by their atomic number (Z), the solar abundances ( $\log\varepsilon_{\odot}$ ) retrieved from Asplund et al. (Reference Asplund, Grevesse, Sauval and Scott2009), the number of lines identified for each element (N), the element-over-iron ratio ([X/Fe]), the total uncertainty on [X/Fe] ( $\sigma_{\rm tot}$ ), the determined abundance ( $\log\varepsilon$ ), and the line-to-line scatter ( $\sigma_{\rm |121|}$ ). Although the abundances of several useful elements for nucleosynthesis studies could not be determined, Table 4 still provides quantified abundances of a range of s-process elements. See Section 3 for details on atmospheric parameters and derived abundance uncertainties.

Combining the results of both atmospheric parameter analysis and abundance derivation, we interpret the characteristics of J005107. J005107 is an F-type star ( $T_{\rm eff}$ = $5\,764\pm85$ K) with a low surface gravity ( $\log g$ = $0.21\pm0.10$ dex) and an iron abundance ([Fe/H] = $-1.57\pm0.10$ ). The iron abundance of J005107 is low compared to the mean metallicity of the SMC [Fe/H] = −0.7 dex (Luck et al. Reference Luck, Moffett and Barnes1998). This categorises J005107 as a low-metallicity star, which is commonly recognised as an astrophysical production site producing heavy s-process elements provided the TDU occurs (Bisterzo et al. Reference Bisterzo, Gallino, Straniero, Cristallo and Käppeler2010). Fig. 4 shows the abundance distribution ([X/Fe]) for J005107 as a function of atomic number (Z). From the abundance plot, it is clear that J005107 is strongly enriched in s-process elements with an [s/Fe] = $1.52\pm0.20$ dex. Moreover, it also has a carbon enrichment with [C/Fe] = $1.09\pm0.21$ dex. However, we note that owing to the observed blending in the single available carbon line (located at 4 817.373 Å as detailed in the linelist), accurately determining the carbon abundance posed a significant challenge.

4. Photometric analysis

In this section, we present details on the SED fitting (Section 4.1) and the luminosity derivation (Section 4.2) of our target stars.

4.1 SED fitting

Most of our targets are RV Tauri pulsators that often show large amplitude pulsations that can go up to several magnitudes in V. One of the greatest challenges in fitting the SEDs of these stars is that these pulsations cause a scatter in the photometric data points. Therefore reddening is difficult to determine. To overcome this issue, it is crucial to have full coverage of all photometric bands in the same pulsation phase. However, since the same pulsation phase data is unavailable, we have utilised all the accessible photometric data points (see Section 2.1) to construct the SEDs. We determined the SED of all the targets of this study in a strictly homogeneous way, as explained below.

We adopted the same approach described in Kluska et al. (Reference Kluska2022) and Kamath et al. (Reference Kamath2022) to construct all the SEDs in this study. In summary, we began by determining the total line-of-sight reddening or extinction parameter ( $E(B-V)$ ) by minimising the difference between the optical fluxes and the reddened photospheric models. The total reddening includes both interstellar and circumstellar reddening. We assume that the total reddening in the line of sight has the wavelength dependency of the ISM extinction law (Cardelli et al. Reference Cardelli, Clayton and Mathis1989) with Rv = 3.1. The extinction law in the circumstellar environment likely differs from the interstellar extinction law. However, investigating this aspect falls outside the scope of our current study. For the atmospheric models, we used the appropriate Kurucz atmospheric models (Castelli & Kurucz Reference Castelli, Kurucz, Piskunov, Weiss and Gray2003), the parameters of which were taken from the spectroscopic analysis presented in Section 3.1 (see Table 1). We interpolated in the $\chi^2$ landscape between the models centred around the spectroscopically determined parameters and applied ranges of $\Delta T_{\rm eff}$ $\pm 500$ K, $\Delta\log g$ $\pm 0.5$ dex, $\Delta\textrm{[Fe/H]}$ $\pm 0.5$ dex (see Fig. 5). The SEDs of our three target stars are presented in Fig. 6.

Figure 5. An example of $\chi^2$ plot of J005107 to obtain the reddening parameter $E(B-V)$ after the parameter grid search. This plot illustrates the correlation between $T_{\rm eff}$ and $E(B-V)$ of the targets.

4.2 Luminosity determination

Accurately determining the luminosities of post-AGB stars and combining them with their effective temperatures ( $T_{\rm eff}$ ) allows us to investigate their positions in the Hertzsprung-Russell (HR) diagram. This helps us better understand the evolutionary stage of the target post-AGB objects. However, accurately deriving the luminosities of post-AGB stars remains a significant challenge due to multiple factors. These include the impact of reddening–both circumstellar and interstellar–on observational photometric data, along with complexities arising from variability, particularly for the RV Tauri pulsators. Moreover, concerning binary post-AGB stars with orbital periods ranging from 100 to 700 days, systematic errors in parallax determination affect distances and consequently, luminosities (Kamath et al. Reference Kamath2022). This issue arises because Gaia EDR3 does not account for the orbital motion of binaries, often resulting in an underestimation of parallax. Consequently, this oversight impacts the derived distances and the luminosities of these stars (Pourbaix Reference Pourbaix2019).

To estimate the luminosity of our targets, it is imperative to address the limitations above. We, therefore, use two methods discussed in the following subsections, that is, the SED fit ( $\rm L_{SED}$ ) (Section 4.2.1) and the period–luminosity–colour (PLC) relation ( $\rm L_{PLC}$ ) (Section 4.2.2). We find $\rm L_{PLC}$ to offer greater precision and reliability when compared to $\rm L_{SED}$ . This preference arises due to significant variations in $T_{\rm eff}$ across the pulsation cycle in our target stars, which are RV Tauri pulsators (see Section 2). These fluctuations also lead to notable changes in the model fitting of stellar atmospheres (illustrated by the red lines in Fig. 6). Additionally, as mentioned above, for stars in binary systems, the uncertainties in distances obtained from parallax measurements are markedly influenced by binary orbital motion, which adds to the uncertainties in $\rm L_{SED}$ .

4.2.1 Deriving the luminosity using SED

The bolometric luminosities ( $\rm L_{SED}$ ) of the targets were derived by integrating the flux under the dereddened photospheric SED model (see Section 4.1). To achieve this, we assumed an average distance of $62.1 \pm 1.9$ kpc to the SMC (Graczyk et al. Reference Graczyk2012) and $49.97 \pm 1$ kpc to the LMC (Walker Reference Walker2012; Pietrzyński et al. Reference Pietrzyński2013), respectively. For our Galactic target HD 158616, we utilised the more precise Bailer-Jones geometric distances (i.e. $z_{\rm BJ}$ ) and their associated upper and lower limits ( $z_{\rm BJU}$ and $z_{\rm BJL}$ , respectively) from the study by Bailer-Jones et al. (Reference Bailer-Jones, Rybizki, Fouesneau, Demleitner and Andrae2021). The geometric distances were determined using Gaia EDR3 parallaxes, incorporating a direction-dependent prior distance. Throughout this computation, we assumed that the flux emitted by the stars is radiated isotropically. The derived SED luminosities ( $\rm L_{SED}$ ) along with their corresponding upper and lower limits ( $\Delta$ $\rm L_{SED}$ ) for the targets are presented in Col. 3 and 4 of Table 5, respectively. To calculate these upper and lower limits for the SED luminosities ( $\Delta$ $\rm L_{SED}$ ), we utilised the corresponding upper and lower limits of the reddening values, as derived and outlined in Col 7 of Table 5.

Figure 6. SEDs of J005107 (top left), MACHO 47.2496.8 (top right), and HD 158616 (bottom). The data points represent the dereddened photometry. The red line represents the best-fitting scaled model atmosphere (see text for details).

4.2.2 Deriving the luminosity using PLC relation

One of the greatest benefits of type II Cepheids is that their pulsations can be used to determine their luminosities due to the correlation between their pulsational periods and luminosities. Unlike the previous SED fitting method (see Section 4.2.1), this approach does not rely on distance dependencies, providing a valuable advantage for accurate luminosity derivation.

Many post-AGB stars, specifically RV Tauri stars exhibit strong radial pulsations because they are located in the long-period segment of the type II Cepheid instability strip. The radial modes of these stars can be directly linked to their physical sizes. By incorporating a colour or temperature factor, one can establish a connection between the star’s luminosity and its pulsation period. This relationship is referred to as the PLC relation, as shown in studies by Alcock et al. (Reference Alcock1998) and Ripepi et al. (Reference Ripepi2015).

Table 5. Luminosities of the targets derived using the SED fitting method and PLC relation method.

Notes: $P_0$ is the fundamental pulsation period of the RV Tauri targets and are shown in Col. 2. The luminosities derived from SED along with their corresponding upper and lower limits are displayed in Col. 3 and 4, respectively. Similarly, the luminosities obtained using the PLC relation along with their corresponding upper and lower limits are displayed in Col. 5 and 6, respectively. Note that the target HD 158616 does not have luminosity derived from the PLC relation as it is not an RV Tauri star. The reddening derived from the SED model along with their corresponding upper and lower limits are shown in Col. 7, and the SED type of the targets are presented in Col. 8 (see text for details).

Figure 7. The reddening-free Wesenheit index plotted with the log ( $P_0$ ) of the RV Tauri stars in the LMC and SMC from Soszyński et al. (Reference Soszyński2015, Reference Soszyński2017). Note: We excluded stars from the analysis if their standard deviation exceeded $1\sigma$ of the fit.

We determined the luminosities of the two RV Tauri stars: J005107 and MACHO 47.2496.8, by adopting the PLC relation calibration method as established by Manick et al. (Reference Manick, Van Winckel, Kamath, Sekaran and Kolenberg2018). The PLC relation was calibrated separately for the LMC and SMC stars using the photometric data in the latest OGLE IV database (Soszyński et al. Reference Soszyński2018). This relation uses the colour-corrected V-band magnitude known as the Wesenheit index (WI) (Ngeow & Kanbur Reference Ngeow and Kanbur2005) and is given by

(1) \begin{equation} M_{bol,WI} = m\cdot \log\!(P_0)+c-\mu +BC+2.55(V-I)_0\end{equation}

where $P_0$ is the observed fundamental pulsation period in days, m is the slope and c is the intercept of the linear regression in the Wesenheit plane (see Fig. 7). We obtained $m = -3.59$ and c = 18.79 for the LMC and $m = -2.45$ and c = 17.45 for SMC, respectively. $\mu$ is the distance modulus for the LMC and SMC and have values of 18.49 (Walker Reference Walker2012; Pietrzyński et al. Reference Pietrzyński2013) and 18.965 (Graczyk et al. Reference Graczyk2012), respectively. The value BC is the bolometric correction for each star computed using the relation between BC and effective temperature provided by Flower (Reference Flower1996). The intrinsic colour $(V-I)_0$ of each star in the SMC and LMC is calculated using the reddening $E(V-I)$ and the observed colour $(V-I)$ . The reddening $E(V-I)$ is determined by the conversion of the total reddening $E(B-V)$ derived from the SED (see Section 4.2.1) using the conversion equation by Tammann et al. (Reference Tammann, Sandage and Reindl2003) and Haschke et al. (Reference Haschke, Grebel and Duffau2011).

(2) \begin{equation} E(V-I) = 1.38 E(B-V)\end{equation}

The derived PLC luminosities ( $\rm L_{PLC}$ ) along with their corresponding upper and lower limits ( $\Delta$ $\rm L_{PLC}$ ) of the RV Tauri targets are displayed in Col. 5 and 6 of Table 5, respectively. To calculate these upper and lower limits for the PLC luminosities ( $\Delta$ $\rm L_{PLC}$ ), we utilise the corresponding upper and lower limits of the reddening values, as outlined in Col 7 of Table 5, and also incorporate the error propagation values obtained through the PLC calibration fit.

We once again note that $\rm L_{PLC}$ offers greater precision and reliability when compared to $\rm L_{SED}$ , as detailed in the last paragraph of Section 4.2. However, for HD 158616 we had to consider $\rm L_{SED}$ as there is no $\rm L_{PLC}$ (this is not an RV Tauri star).

The luminosities of the target stars are presented in Table 5, and the derived luminosities fall within the typical post-AGB luminosity range. Consequently, we investigate the chemical peculiarities of the target stars, within the context of the post-AGB evolutionary phase.

4.3 Initial mass estimates

The evolution of LIM stars during the post-He-burning life is characterised by the gradual increase in the luminosity, in turn, related to the growth of the mass of the degenerate core, due to the continuous flux of H-free matter, favoured by the CNO nuclear activity. As far as AGB stars are concerned, a classic relation between core mass and luminosity was found by Paczyński (Reference Paczyński1971). As stars with different masses evolve through the AGB with different core masses, the luminosity of AGB stars serves as a reliable indicator of the mass of the progenitor. On the chemical side, the surface composition is exposed to changes during the AGB lifetime, primarily connected to the occurrence of several TDU events, which raise the surface carbon, and potentially lead to the formation of carbon stars (Iben Reference Iben1974). The increase in the surface carbon takes place in parallel with the growth of the core mass (hence of the luminosity) and is accompanied by the surface s-process enrichment. Based on these reasons, the combined knowledge of the luminosity and the surface chemical composition can be tentatively used to identify the progenitors of the sources considered and the evolutionary stage when the AGB evolution was halted, and the contraction to the post-AGB phase began.

Table 6. Overview of the $T_{\rm eff}$ , metallicity, [C/Fe], s-process indices, C/O ratio, and initial mass of our target stars.

Notes: $T_{\rm eff}$ , [Fe/H], [C/Fe], [s/Fe], and C/O of MACHO 47.2496.8 and HD 158616 are taken from the high-resolution spectroscopic analysis conducted by Reyniers et al. (Reference Reyniers2007) and De Smedt et al. (Reference De Smedt2016), respectively.

Although an accurate abundance derivation for carbon ([C/Fe]) is absent for MACHO,47.2496.8, it is still categorised as a carbon enriched object due to its high C/O and carbon isotopic ratio, as indicated by Reyniers et al. (Reference Reyniers2007). The C/O ratio for J005107 should be treated as a lower limit as the precise determination of carbon was not feasible (see Section 3.3).

The C/O ratio for MACHO 47.2496.8 is a lower limit, as the precise determination of carbon and oxygen abundances was not feasible (see Reyniers et al. (Reference Reyniers2007) for additional details).

In this section, we use ATON code for stellar evolution modelling (Ventura et al. Reference Ventura, Zeppieri, Mazzitelli and D’Antona1998) to estimate the mass of the progenitors of our target stars and their formation epoch. While the ATON evolutionary models are designed for single AGB stars, we explore the potential of employing these single AGB models to characterise the chemical composition of our binary post-AGB target stars, based on the assumption that the photospheric chemical abundance pattern observed in binary post-AGB stars is a reflection of the AGB nucleosynthesis that occurred before the termination of the AGB phase due to the binary interaction. By comparing our observations with predictions from the ATON stellar evolution models, we can indeed confirm whether binary interactions impact the stellar chemical composition. We used evolutionary tracks with an initial metallicity of Z = 0.001 for J005107 and MACHO 47.2496.8, and Z = 0.004 for HD 158616. The observationally derived values of [C/Fe], [s/Fe], and C/O, along with the corresponding initial mass range as determined in this section, are presented in Table 6. Note that the initial mass range indicated here refers to the mass at the beginning of the AGB.

In Fig. 8 we show the AGB evolution of stars of different mass and metallicity $Z=0.001$ , in the (surface) $\rm C/O$ vs. luminosity plane. This is similar to the plane used by Kamath et al. (Reference Kamath2023) to interpret the sample of Galactic AGBs presented in Kamath et al. (Reference Kamath2022). The single evolutionary sequences run towards the right upper part of the plane, as both luminosity and the surface $\rm C/O$ increase as a consequence of the growth in the core mass and of the effects of TDU. The role of the initial mass is seen in the largest $\rm C/O$ reached, which is seen to be higher the larger the initial mass of the star, as higher mass stars experience more TDU events than their lower mass counterparts, thus reach higher carbon mass fractions in the surface regions (Dell’Agli et al. Reference Dell’Agli2015). The $\rm 2.5\;M_{\odot}$ model star partly escapes from this trend, as the surface carbon enrichment is less efficient in stars with mass close to the threshold to experience hot bottom burning (Dell’Agli et al. Reference Dell’Agli2015). We also note that the luminosity at which a given value of $\rm C/O$ is reached is sensitive to the initial mass of the star. This is particularly evident for $\textrm{M} > 1.5\;\textrm{M}_{\odot}$ (see Fig. 8), above the threshold mass to start helium burning under quiescent conditions; indeed all the stars undergoing the helium flash develop cores of similar mass. Thus they start the AGB phase with similar luminosities (Ventura et al. Reference Ventura2021).

Figure 8. AGB evolution of stars of different mass and metallicity $\rm Z=0.001$ , in the $\rm C/O$ vs. luminosity plane. The target stars J005107 and MACHO 47.2496.8 are marked. See text for more details.

The dashed horizontal line in Fig. 8 refers to J005107. It is located in correspondence with the lower limit for the surface $\textrm{C/O}\sim\!0.58$ , while the width indicates the luminosity $\rm L_{PLC}$ along with the upper and lower limits $\Delta$ $\rm L_{PLC}$ (see Table 5). Unfortunately, the latter quantity is very large, of the order of $\rm 5\,000\;L_{\odot}$ , thus preventing a tight derivation of the mass of the progenitor. The comparison with the evolutionary tracks shows compatibility with progenitors of 1–2 $\textrm{M}_{\odot}$ , corresponding to the formation epoch from 1 to 3 Gyr ago. This explanation holds provided that the luminosity is above $\rm 4\,000\;L_{\odot}$ . Taking into account the recommended value of the base luminosity $\rm 2\,868\;L_{\odot}$ (see Table 5) poses severe problems in the interpretation of this source, because, as shown in Fig. 8, no occurrence of TDU events is expected according to the results based on standard stellar evolution modelling in the low-luminosity domain. A possible explanation, similar to the one proposed by Kamath et al. (Reference Kamath2023) to interpret a few low-luminosity sources in the sample by Kamath et al. (Reference Kamath2022), is that J005107 descends from a low-mass (0.8–1 $\textrm{M}_{\odot}$ ) progenitor, which is currently contracting to the blue after losing the external envelope, before the start of the thermal pulses phase. The carbon and s-process enrichment would be favoured by the occurrence of deep mixing during the helium flash, similarly to the mechanism invoked by Schwab (Reference Schwab2020) to explain the presence of lithium-rich clump stars. A further possibility is that J005107 suffered a late thermal pulse after the beginning of the post-AGB contraction (Iben Reference Iben1984) so that it is nowadays re-expanding to the red, at a luminosity significantly lower than that characterising the contraction phase. Examples of such an evolution are shown in Bloecker (Reference Bloecker1995) (see Fig. 14) and Tosi et al. (Reference Tosi2022) (see Fig. 3).

The grey-shaded region in Fig. 8 refers to MACHO 47.2496.8, based on the lower limit of $\sim$ 2 of the surface $\rm C/O$ (Reyniers et al. Reference Reyniers2007) and the luminosity $\rm L_{PLC}$ range reported in Table 5. We find consistency with the predictions from AGB modelling only if the luminosity is close to the upper limit given in Table 5, as no carbon enrichment is expected at lower luminosities. According to this interpretation MACHO 47.2496.8 descends from a progenitor of mass in the 0.8–1 $\textrm{M}_{\odot}$ range, which left the AGB after one or two thermal pulses after the C-star stage was reached. We once again note that the values indicated above refer to the mass at the beginning of the AGB. If we consider a typical mass loss during the ascending of the red giant branch of $\rm \sim 0.2\;M_{\odot}$ , we deduce that the progenitor mass was in the 1–1.2 $\textrm{M}_{\odot}$ range, which corresponds to an age range for MACHO 47.2496.8 of 3–6 Gyr.

To study HD 158616 we use the $Z=0.004$ tracks published in Kamath et al. (Reference Kamath2023). The luminosity range reported in Table 5 rule out very low-mass progenitors, thus shifting the attention to $\textrm{M} > 1.5\;\textrm{M}_{\odot}$ stars. In Fig. 9, we show the time variation of the luminosity and the surface $\rm C/O$ of a $\rm 2.5\;M_{\odot}$ model star of $Z=0.004$ . The grey-shaded region indicates the evolutionary phase during which both the luminosity and the $\rm C/O=0.94\pm0.22$ (De Smedt et al. Reference De Smedt2016) are consistent with those derived from the observations. Based on these results, we propose that HD 158616 descends from a $\rm 2.5\;M_{\odot}$ progenitor, formed around half Gyr ago, which left the AGB after experiencing a few thermal pulses, two out of which after the first TDU event. The estimated mass interval for the progenitor is pretty narrow in this case since the initial mass vs luminosity trend is very tight in the $\textrm{M} > 2\;M_{\odot}$ domain (see Fig. 8).

Figure 9. Time variation of the luminosity and the surface $\rm C/O$ of a $\rm 2.5\;M_{\odot}$ model star of $Z=0.004$ . The grey-shaded region indicates the evolutionary phase of HD 158616 during which both the luminosity and the C/O are consistent with those derived from the observations. See text for more details.

5. Discussion

In the following subsections, we employ the obtained stellar parameters, chemical abundances, derived luminosities, and initial masses to explore the chemical peculiarity of our target stars (Section 5.1). We also investigate whether the observed s-process enrichment of our targets has an extrinsic or intrinsic nature (see Section 5.2).

5.1 Investigating the chemical peculiarity of targets

We compared the chemical compositions of our target stars to appropriate binary post-AGB stars and single post-AGB stars with similar stellar parameters: $T_{\rm eff}$ , $\log g$ , and [Fe/H] (see Fig. 10 legends). This comparative analysis is aimed at discerning whether there exists a composite signature reflecting both chemical depletion, commonly observed in binary post-AGB stars, and s-process enrichment, typically seen in low-mass single post-AGB stars. Identifying both chemical patterns concurrently might suggest the likelihood of s-process enrichment, consequently leading to the observed chemical depletion pattern.

Figure 10. Comparison plots illustrating the abundance pattern in terms of element over hydrogen ([X/H]) ratios as a function of condensation temperature ( $T_{\rm condensation}$ ) (taken from Lodders Reference Lodders2003) of the target stars with post-AGB binary stars and post-AGB single stars from the literature that have similar stellar parameters. The stellar parameters along with other necessary parameters are provided in the legend. To distinguish between the different elements, we continue to use the same colour coding and symbols as before. The black colour data points represent CNO elements, the blue represents Fe peak elements, the magenta represents Zn and S, and the red represents s-process elements.Left: [X/H] Vs $T_{\rm condensation}$ of target stars. Middle: [X/H] Vs $T_{\rm condensation}$ of post-AGB binary stars from Kamath & Van Winckel (Reference Kamath and Van Winckel2019), Gielen et al. (Reference Gielen2009), and Waelkens et al. (Reference Waelkens, Van Winckel, Trams and Waters1992) with similar stellar parameters of the target sample in the respective left panel. Right: [X/H] Vs $T_{\rm condensation}$ of post-AGB single stars from De Smedt et al. (Reference De Smedt2016) that has similar stellar parameters of the target sample in the respective left panel.

To investigate any hidden signatures of chemical depletion in our targets, we make use of the ratio [Zn/Ti] (see Kamath & Van Winckel (Reference Kamath and Van Winckel2019)). Since Ti is likely to be more strongly depleted than Zn, [Zn/Ti] is an ideal indicator of chemical depletion in O-rich environments. We note that the abundance of CNO elements may undergo changes as a result of prior AGB nucleosynthesis and dredge-up. Consequently, understanding the true effect of depletion on these elements poses a challenge and falls outside the scope of this study. Our analysis mainly focuses on examining the effect of depletion on the refractory elements.

Fig. 10 shows the abundance of the element over hydrogen ([X/H]) as a function of the equilibrium condensation temperature ( $T_{\rm condensation}$ ) for a solar photospheric composition, which is oxygen-rich, (taken from Lodders Reference Lodders2003) for the individual target stars (left panels) and their comparison binary stars (middle panels) and their comparison single stars (right panels). The stellar parameters ( $T_{\rm eff}$ , $\log g$ , and [Fe/H]), luminosities, [Zn/Ti], [s/Fe] and C/O for each of the stars are listed in their respective legends.

For J005107 we use J050304.9-684024.7 (Kamath & Van Winckel Reference Kamath and Van Winckel2019) as our comparison binary post-AGB star and IRAS 22272+5435 (De Smedt et al. Reference De Smedt2016) as our comparison single post-AGB star. For MACHO 47.2496.8 we use J051418.1-691234.9 (Gielen et al. Reference Gielen2009) as our comparison binary post-AGB star and IRAS 05113+1347 (De Smedt et al. Reference De Smedt2016) as our comparison single post-AGB star. For HD 158616 we use HD 44179 (Waelkens et al. Reference Waelkens, Van Winckel, Trams and Waters1992) as our comparison binary post-AGB star and IRAS 07134+1005 (De Smedt et al. Reference De Smedt2016) as our comparison single post-AGB star.

From Fig. 10, it becomes evident that the chemical patterns of our targets align consistently with their comparison single post-AGB stars (as expected for post-TDU objects), indicating that our targets show notable enrichment in s-process elements with no signs of chemical depletion unlike their comparison binary post-AGB stars. The value of $\textrm{[Zn/Ti]}\,<\!0.5$ for our target stars (see legends of Fig. 10) further confirms the absence of a photospheric chemical depletion. Therefore, we dismiss the possibility of an s-process enrichment following a chemical depletion.

Figure 11. Wise colour-colour diagram for the target stars along with the stars studied in Kluska et al. (Reference Kluska2022). The dashed black lines represent the boundaries between the different categories defined in Kluska et al. (Reference Kluska2022). The targets of this study are given in magenta colour and are numbered according to their position in Table 1 for reference.

As mentioned in Section 1, the chemical depletion pattern observed in binary post-AGB stars with circumbinary discs is attributed primarily to the disc-binary system interaction. Since our target stars do not show the expected signatures of chemical depletion, it appears that the disc-binary interaction inducing chemical depletion failed in our systems. To explain this anomaly, it is worth noting that the majority of the binary post-AGB stars that display photospheric chemical depletion have a photospheric chemical composition that reflects a $\textrm{C/O}\,<\!1$ dex (the majority having a $\textrm{C/O}\,\lessapprox\!0.6$ ) and circumbinary disc chemistry that is O-rich (see Gielen et al. Reference Gielen2011; Gallardo Cava Reference Gallardo Cava2023; Maas et al. Reference Maas, Van Winckel and Lloyd Evans2005, and references therein). Accordingly, the condensation temperatures typically utilised (as also in this study, as mentioned above) are based on a solar photospheric composition characterised by an O-rich nature (Lodders Reference Lodders2003). However, our target stars display a photospheric chemical composition that is enhanced in carbon with $\textrm{C/O}\,>\!1$ dex, [C/Fe] ranging between 0.5–1.0 dex (dependant on metallicity) and s-process elements with $\textrm{[s/Fe]}\,>\!1$ dex. This points to a possibility of the circumbinary disc around our target stars possessing a C-rich dust chemistry rather than the atypical O-rich dust chemistry. Unfortunately, we do not have observations of the circumstellar disc chemistry of our target stars to verify their C-rich nature. However, it is well known that the mechanisms governing processes such as molecular formation and dust condensation are likely to exhibit significant differences (Dell’Agli et al. Reference Dell’Agli2021) resulting in likely variations to chemical depletion efficiencies in C-rich environments when compared to O-rich environments. Consequently, dust condensation temperatures based on an O-rich disc composition, as used in this study, will not be suitable for our targets. To fully grasp the impact of C-rich circumstellar chemistry on chemical depletion in binary post-AGB stars, we would also need condensation temperatures specific to a C-rich environment. Unfortunately, these estimates are not currently available, making the qualitative investigation of this aspect outside the scope of our study.

To examine potential variations in the disc morphologies of the circumbinary discs around our target stars, we utilise the colour-colour diagram as introduced by Kluska et al. (Reference Kluska2022), which is based on the characteristics of the IR excess. This approach aids in identifying the circumbinary disc-type associated with our targets. Fig. 11 displays the IR colour-colour diagram of the target stars along with the stars studied in Kluska et al. (Reference Kluska2022). J005107 and HD 1586161 exhibit a ‘full-disc’ model. This implies continuous dust extension from the dust sublimation radius to the outer edge. In contrast, MACHO 47.2496.8 features a ‘transition-disc’ model, indicating a lack of dust within a radius significantly larger than the theoretical dust sublimation radius (for further insights, refer to Kluska et al. Reference Kluska2022). These observations clarify that the circumbinary disc of our target stars closely resembles that of depleted binary post-AGB stars, presenting either as a full-disc or a transition-disc. Therefore, there is no apparent deviation in the circumbinary disc morphology or characteristics from the typical traits observed in a binary post-AGB star. This indicates that the observed chemical peculiarity of the target stars is not attributed to their disc structure.

5.2 Extrinsic or intrinsic enrichment?

The observed enrichment in s-process (and carbon) elements within our target stars is likely to be due to three possibilities: (1) extrinsically from the binary companion, (2) intrinsically through nucleosynthesis processes occurring within the star during its AGB phase, and (3) from the host galaxy, through intrinsic enrichment from the chemical composition of the ISM from which the star originated. We investigate each of these possibilities in detail.

Extrinsic enrichment: Observational investigations of low-mass binary stars, such as Barium stars and Carbon-Enhanced Metal-Poor (CEMP) stars, indicate that the observed carbon and s-process enrichment in their photospheres results from interactions with their evolved companions (AGB or white dwarf (WD)) (e.g. Jorissen et al. Reference Jorissen2019; Escorza & De Rosa Reference Escorza and De Rosa2023; Goswami & Goswami Reference Goswami and Goswami2023). The companion star, having undergone or undergoing AGB nucleosynthesis, transfers carbon and s-process elements to the photosphere of these stars, making them extrinsically enriched. We investigated a similar possibility for our targets. However, previous studies of Galactic binary post-AGB stars (see, e.g. Oomen et al. Reference Oomen2018) show that most of these stars do not have a dim WD as a companion. We present some of the arguments favouring this hypothesis below.

The first is a statistical argument. It is supported by the robust analysis of the companion mass ( $\textrm{M}_2$ ) distribution conducted by Oomen et al. (Reference Oomen2018). From their analysis, it was found that the companion mass distribution function (see Figure 4 of Oomen et al. Reference Oomen2018) peaks at $\sim\!1{\,\textrm{M}_{\odot}}$ . To explore the possibility of a WD companion population, Oomen et al. (Reference Oomen2018) fitted a double Gaussian profile to the mass distribution. However, this adjustment did not result in a better fit, and the mass distribution shifted towards higher masses rather than peaking at lower masses comparable to WDs. Consequently, they refrained from incorporating the WD population into the mass distribution. Additionally, data from the Gaia DR2 catalogue indicates that the observed distribution of WD mass peaks at $0.6{\,\textrm{M}_{\odot}}$ (Jiménez-Esteban et al. Reference Jiménez-Esteban2018). Therefore, the cumulative mass-function distribution fit by Oomen et al. (Reference Oomen2018) does not convincingly support the possibility that the majority of the binary post-AGB stars have a WD companion as the mass distribution of companion masses does not have a peak around $0.6{\,\textrm{M}_{\odot}}$ .

The second is an observational argument. The majority of the binary post-AGB systems have jets launched from their circum-companion (e.g. Bollen et al. Reference Bollen, Van Winckel and Kamath2017, Reference Bollen, Kamath, Van Winckel, De Marco and Wardle2021, Reference Bollen2022). The velocities of these jets can be used to constrain the nature of the jet-launching object, that is, the companion in these binary systems. The velocity of these jets ranges from $\sim\!150$ to 400 km s $^{-1}$ (Bollen et al. Reference Bollen, Kamath, Van Winckel, De Marco and Wardle2021, Reference Bollen2022). The escape velocity of a WD ( $\sim$ 5 000 km s $^{-1}$ ) is about one order of magnitude larger than the jet velocities determined for the post-AGB binary systems. On the other hand, the jet velocities from the binary post-AGB system are all around the escape velocity of MS stars ( $\sim$ 100 to 1 000 km s $^{-1}$ ). This suggests that the companion of the majority of the binary post-AGB stars are MS.

The third argument is based on the observations of binary post-AGB stars by Oomen et al. (Reference Oomen2018), where they did not detect any symbiotic activities in the spectra. This lack of symbiotic activities, when considered alongside the two aforementioned points, serves as an additional indication supporting the absence of a compact object, such as a WD, within the binary system.

All the above-mentioned arguments are, therefore, a strong indication that the companions in the majority of the binary post-AGB systems are likely to be MS stars rather than WDs. With regard to the targets in our study, the absence of orbital parameter data for two targets (J005107 and MACHO 47.2496.8) limits the extent of our argumentation. However, the confirmed binary star HD 158616 in our study has a detected mass function of 0.022 $\textrm{M}_{\odot}$ , which translates to a companion mass of 0.26 $\textrm{M}_{\odot}$ assuming a mass of 0.6 $\textrm{M}_{\odot}$ for the primary star and an inclination of 75 degrees (too small companion mass to be a WD at 75 degrees inclination) (see Oomen et al. Reference Oomen2018). As the LC is not affected by variable reddening, the inclination may be larger, leading to an even higher companion mass. Additionally, HD 158616 has an orbital period of $363.3$ days, which means that the full orbital phase coverage is difficult to obtain given the observations are always covering the same phase. Yet we have accumulated enough data to show that the jets as observed in this object ( $\sim$ 150 km s $^{-1}$ ) do not trace the escape velocity of a WD but that of a MS star (see Fig. C1). Therefore, based on HD158616, and extrapolating the arguments observed for the majority of the binary post-AGB stars to our sample objects where orbital data is unavailable, we can conclude that extrinsic enrichment is highly unlikely for our targets.

Intrinsic enrichment: To investigate the possibility of intrinsic enrichment, we used ATON code for stellar evolution modelling (Ventura et al. Reference Ventura, Zeppieri, Mazzitelli and D’Antona1998) to trace the nucleosynthetic history of our target stars (see Section 4.3 for more details). We once again note that while the ATON evolutionary models are designed for single AGB stars, we explore the potential of employing these models to predict $\rm C/O$ for each of the target stars (as tracers of TDU). We then compared the theoretically predicted C/O with the observed $\rm C/O$ of our target stars. The results from the models predict that our target stars have experienced thermal pulses during their AGB phase (see Figs. 8 and 9, respectively). For J005107, this result is explained using the upper limit luminosity range $\rm L_{PLC}$ (see Table 5). We note that the observed O abundance of J005107 ( $\textrm{[O/Fe]}\ = 1.06\pm0.21$ dex) is also mainly intrinsic and influenced by the dredge-up in the prior AGB phase. During the TDU, even if the C enrichment is the most outstanding consequence, some O enrichment occurs too. Especially in the metal-poor domain, the increase in [O/Fe] is relevant due to the low oxygen content of the gas from which the star was formed. Concerning the $Z = 0.001$ models used in this paper for J005107 (see Section 4.3), we find that the largest increase in [O/Fe] is achieved during the evolution of the 2.5 $\textrm{M}_{\odot}$ model star, for which [O/Fe] increases by 0.9 dex. For lower initial masses we still find O enrichment, down to 0.2 dex for the stars of initial mass around 0.9 $\textrm{M}_{\odot}$ .

Consequently, the above arguments show the likely occurrence of AGB nucleosynthesis and hence strongly suggest the likelihood of an intrinsic carbon and s-process enrichment of our targets (see Section 4.3 for more details).

Inherited enrichment from the host galaxy: We also investigated whether the observed s-process enrichment of the target stars originated from the initial chemical composition of the ISM from which it was formed. To assess this, we compared the local initial s-process abundances of the SMC, LMC, and the Galaxy. The initial s-process abundances of the SMC were determined by comparing the s-process abundances of SMC red giant stars (Mucciarelli et al. Reference Mucciarelli2023). For the LMC, initial s-process abundances were derived from the s-process abundances of LMC field red giant stars (Van der Swaelmen et al. Reference Van der Swaelmen, Hill, Primas and Cole2013, and references therein). In the case of the Galaxy, the initial s-process abundances were determined by comparing the s-process abundances of F and G dwarfs within the Galactic discs, as reported by Simmerer et al. (Reference Simmerer2004), Bensby et al. (Reference Bensby, Feltzing, Lundström and Ilyin2005), Brewer & Carney (Reference Brewer and Carney2006), and Reddy et al. (Reference Reddy, Tomkin, Lambert and Prieto2003, Reference Reddy, Lambert and Prieto2006). Based on the above comparisons, it becomes evident that the standard enrichment of s-process elements in the SMC, LMC, and the Galaxy is typically $\sim\,$ [s/Fe] $\,\leq\!0.5$ dex. V453 Oph, a post-AGB star in the Galaxy, exhibits a mild s-process enrichment which is attributed to the initial inherited s-process enrichment from the Galaxy (Deroo et al. Reference Deroo, Reyniers, van Winckel, Goriely and Siess2005). Drawing insights from the abundance analysis of V453 Oph (Deroo et al. Reference Deroo, Reyniers, van Winckel, Goriely and Siess2005), we conclude that the mild s-process enrichment of the order of $\textrm{[s/Fe]}\ = 0.50\pm0.21$ dex can reflect the inherited s-process abundance of the Galaxy at its birthplace, rather than being a result of its internal nucleosynthesis (see Appendix B for additional details regarding V453 Oph). Additionally, it is worth noting that, unlike our targets, V453 Oph exhibits a very metal-poor composition, with $\textrm{[Fe/H]}\ = -2.23\pm0.12$ dex, where the inherited galactic enrichments are typically more prominent. Consequently, for our post-AGB target stars, the impact of inherited galactic enrichment (i.e. a maximum of $\sim\,$ [s/Fe] $\,\leq\!0.5$ dex) cannot solely explain the strong s-process enrichment observed (i.e. $\textrm{[s/Fe]}\,\gtrapprox\!1$ dex).

Therefore, the above arguments point to the possibility that the observed carbon and s-process enrichment of our target stars is most likely intrinsic in nature. This implies that the observed carbon and s-process enrichment is likely to be a result of the AGB nucleosynthesis that occurred before the termination of the AGB phase via binary interaction. However, what remains unclear is that unlike the majority of binary post-AGB which display a disc-binary driven photospheric chemical depletion, our target star’s chemical depletion seems to have failed, causing retention of the signature of the nucleosynthesis that occurred during and before the AGB evolution of these objects.

6. Summary and conclusions

In this study, we present detailed stellar parameter and chemical abundance studies of a subset of chemically peculiar binary post-AGB stars (disc-sources) in the Galaxy and the MCs that exhibit a carbon and s-process enrichment in their photospheric chemical composition, contrary to the commonly observed photospheric chemical depletion typically observed in binary post-AGB stars.

Our investigation into the carbon and s-process enrichment observed in our target stars has provided valuable insights. By considering extrinsic, intrinsic, and inherited galactic enrichment scenarios, we have effectively ruled out extrinsic and inherited galactic s-process enrichment as explanations for the observed overabundance of carbon and s-process elements in our target stars.

Based on our observationally derived stellar parameters and chemical abundances combined with predictions from dedicated ATON stellar evolutionary models (Ventura et al., Reference Ventura, Zeppieri, Mazzitelli and D’Antona1998), we propose that the carbon and s-process enrichment in our target stars is predominantly intrinsic in nature. Our target stars display an abundance pattern consistent with expectations for a post-TDU system (as depicted in Fig. 10) with $\textrm{C/O}\,>\!1$ dex, [C/Fe] ranging between 0.5 - 1.0 dex and $\textrm{[s/Fe]}\,>\!1$ dex. This photospheric chemical composition suggests the presence of a circumstellar disc with C-rich chemistry. The differences in molecular formation and dust condensation processes that occur in C-rich versus O-rich circumstellar environments (atypical of the majority of binary post-AGB stars displaying photospheric chemical depletion) strongly indicate potential variations in chemical depletion efficiencies. Furthermore, the standard dust condensation temperatures, based on O-rich compositions, are not suitable for our analysis. However, the absence of observations regarding the circumstellar dust chemistry of our targets, coupled with the lack of condensation temperature estimates specific to C-rich environments, limits our ability to confirm this hypothesis.

Conducting observational studies on the circumbinary disc chemistry of our target stars, especially in comparison to other binary post-AGB stars displaying chemical depletion, is crucial. This effort will uncover potential peculiarities in our target stars and address gaps in our current understanding of the disc-binary interaction that leads to varying efficiencies and/or the lack of chemical depletion in binary post-AGB systems.

Supplementary material

The supplementary material for this article can be found at https://doi.org/10.1017/pasa.2024.19

Data availability statement

The data underlying this article is made available online.

Acknowledgement

MM acknowledges the financial support provided by the International Macquarie Research Excellence Scholarship (iMQRES) programme for the duration of this research. MM, DK, and MM also acknowledge the ARC Centre of Excellence for All Sky Astrophysics in 3 Dimensions (ASTRO 3D). PV acknowledges the support received from the PRIN INAF 2019 grant ObFu 1.05.01.85.14 (‘Building up the halo: chemodynamical tagging in the age of large surveys’, PI. S. Lucatello). HVW acknowledges support from the Research Council, KU Leuven under grant number C14/17/082. This study is based on observations collected with the Very Large Telescope at the ESO Paranal Observatory (Chile) of program numbers 099.D-0536, 074.D-0619, and 094.D-0067.

Appendix A. Spectroscopic Analysis of MACHO 47.2496.8 and HD 158616

We performed a similar atmospheric parameter analysis and abundance analysis as described in Sections 3.1 and 3.2, respectively, for MACHO 47.2496.8 and HD 158616.

The results of the atmospheric parameters are presented in Table 1 under the title ‘This study’. The results of the abundance analysis are presented in Table A1. We note that since the derived atmospheric parameters and abundances of MACHO 47.2496.8 and HD 158616 align closely with values reported in the literature (see Table 1 for atmospheric parameter details and Table A1 for abundance details), we opted to adopt the literature values of both atmospheric parameters and abundances for the rest of our analysis.

Table A1. Spectroscopically determined abundance results for MACHO 47.2496.8 and HD 158616 along with their literature values.

Notes: The detected ions and their corresponding atomic number (Z) are listed in columns 1 and 2, respectively. [X/Fe] is the element-over-iron ratio along with the total uncertainty (see Section 3.2 for more details on error estimations). The abundances in italics are derived using the SSF method. The literature values are taken from De Smedt et al. (Reference De Smedt2016) and Reyniers et al. (Reference Reyniers2007), respectively.

Appendix B. Target details of V453 Oph

V453 Oph has been classified as a post-AGB star based on its high luminosity (Rao et al. Reference Rao, Giridhar and Lambert2011), determined using the PLC relation of RV Tauri variables in the LMC as established by Alcock et al. (Reference Alcock1998). It has also been identified as an RV Tauri pulsator with a fundamental pulsation period of 40.52 days and a spectral type Fp, based on the Combined General Catalogue of Variable Stars survey by Kholopov et al. (Reference Kholopov1999). Additionally, Pollard et al. (Reference Pollard, Cottrell, Kilmartin and Gilmore1996) categorised V453 Oph as an RVa type based on its reasonably regular LC variations (see Fig. B2). The high-resolution spectroscopic study conducted by Deroo et al. (Reference Deroo, Reyniers, van Winckel, Goriely and Siess2005) recognised V453 Oph as the first s-process enriched but carbon-deficient RV Tauri star in the Galaxy. However, the SED of this star does not exhibit any IR excess, leading to its position in the Non-IR box (see Fig. B1). Drawing insights from the abundance analysis and metal-poor nature ([Fe/H] = $-2.23\pm0.12$ dex) of V453 Oph (Deroo et al. Reference Deroo, Reyniers, van Winckel, Goriely and Siess2005), we conclude that the mild s-process enrichment ( $\textrm{[s/Fe]}\ = 0.50\pm0.21$ dex) of V453 Oph reflects the intrinsic local s-process enrichment of the Galaxy at its birthplace.

Figure B1. SED of V453 Oph. The data points represent the dereddened photometry. The red line represents the best-fitting scaled model atmosphere (see Section 4.1 for details).

Figure B2. The phased LC of the V453 Oph. The fundamental pulsation period used to phase the LC is 40.52 days. The LCs are scattered due to their semi-regular nature; they usually show considerable variations from cycle to cycle. This behaviour is typically more pronounced for the longer-period RV Tauri stars. The photometric data for V453 Oph is taken from ASAS-SN Variable Stars Database II (Shappee et al. Reference Shappee2014; Jayasinghe et al. Reference Jayasinghe2019).

Appendix C. Dynamic Spectra of HD 158616

Figure C1. The dynamic spectra for the $H\alpha$ line of HD 158616. The spectra are shown as a function of the orbital phase (see Bollen et al. Reference Bollen, Kamath, Van Winckel, De Marco and Wardle2021, for details).

References

Abia, C., et al. 2002, ApJ, 579, 817Google Scholar
Alcock, C., et al. 1998, AJ, 115, 1921Google Scholar
Asplund, M., Grevesse, N., Sauval, A. J., & Scott, P. 2009, ARA&A, 47, 481CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bailer-Jones, C. A. L., Rybizki, J., Fouesneau, M., Demleitner, M., & Andrae, R. 2021, AJ, 161, 147CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bensby, T., Feltzing, S., Lundström, I., & Ilyin, I. 2005, A&A, 433, 185CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bessell, M. S. 1990, PASAP, 102, 1181Google Scholar
Bisterzo, S., Gallino, R., Straniero, O., Cristallo, S., & Käppeler, F. 2010, MNRAS, 404, 1529Google Scholar
Blanco-Cuaresma, S. 2019, MNRAS, 486, 2075Google Scholar
Blanco-Cuaresma, S., Soubiran, C., Heiter, U., & Jofré, P. 2014, A&A, 569, A111Google Scholar
Blanton, M. R., et al. 2017, AJ, 154, 28Google Scholar
Bloecker, T. 1995, A&A, 299, 755Google Scholar
Bollen, D., et al. 2022, A&A, 666, A40Google Scholar
Bollen, D., Kamath, D., Van Winckel, H., De Marco, O., & Wardle, M. 2021, MNRAS, 502, 445Google Scholar
Bollen, D., Van Winckel, H., & Kamath, D. 2017, A&A, 607, A60Google Scholar
Brewer, M.-M., & Carney, B. W. 2006, AJ, 131, 431CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Busso, M., Gallino, R., Lambert, D. L., Travaglio, C., & Smith, V. V. 2001, ApJ, 557, 802Google Scholar
Cardelli, J. A., Clayton, G. C., & Mathis, J. S. 1989, ApJ, 345, 245Google Scholar
Castelli, F., & Kurucz, R. L. 2003, in IAU Symposium, Vol. 210, Modelling of Stellar Atmospheres, ed. Piskunov, N., Weiss, W. W., & Gray, D. F., 20PGoogle Scholar
Choplin, A., Goriely, S., & Siess, L. 2022, A&A, 667, L13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Choplin, A., Siess, L., & Goriely, S. 2021, A&A, 648, A119CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Choplin, A., Siess, L., & Goriely, S. 2023, in European Physical Journal Web of Conferences, Vol. 279, European Physical Journal Web of Conferences, 07001 Google Scholar
Cseh, B., et al. 2019, IAU Symposium, 343, 89Google Scholar
Cutri, R. M., et al. 2003, VizieR Online Data Catalog, II/246Google Scholar
Cutri, R. M., et al. 2012, Explanatory Supplement to the WISE All-Sky Data Release Products, Explanatory Supplement to the WISE All-Sky Data Release ProductsGoogle Scholar
De Smedt, K., et al. 2014, A&A, 563, L5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Smedt, K., et al. 2012, A&A, 541, A67Google Scholar
De Smedt, K., et al. 2016, A&A, 587, A6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Smedt, K., Van Winckel, H., Kamath, D., & Wood, P. R. 2015, A&A, 583, A56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dekker, H., D’Odorico, S., Kaufer, A., Delabre, B., & Kotzlowski, H. 2000, in Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, Vol. 4008, Optical and IR Telescope Instrumentation and Detectors, ed. Iye, M., & Moorwood, A. F., 534Google Scholar
Dell’Agli, F., et al. 2015, MNRAS, 447, 2992Google Scholar
Dell’Agli, F., et al. 2021, MNRAS, 502, L35Google Scholar
Deroo, P., Reyniers, M., van Winckel, H., Goriely, S., & Siess, L. 2005, A&A, 438, 987Google Scholar
Escorza, A., & De Rosa, R. J. 2023, A&A, 671, A97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flower, P. J. 1996, ApJ, 469, 355Google Scholar
Gallardo Cava, I. 2023, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2311.08034 Google Scholar
Gallino, R., et al. 1998, ApJ, 497, 388CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gezer, I., et al. 2015, MNRAS, 453, 133Google Scholar
Gielen, C., et al. 2009, A&A, 508, 1391Google Scholar
Gielen, C., et al. 2011, A&A, 533, A99CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goswami, P. P., & Goswami, A. 2023, AJ, 165, 154CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Graczyk, D., et al. 2012, PIAU, 8, 222Google Scholar
Gustafsson, B., et al. 2008, A&A, 486, 951Google Scholar
Haschke, R., Grebel, E. K., & Duffau, S. 2011, AJ, 141, 158CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Helou, G., & Walker, D. W. eds. 1988, Infrared Astronomical Satellite (IRAS) Catalogs and Atlases. Volume 7: The Small Scale Structure Catalog, Vol. 7Google Scholar
Herwig, F. 2005, ARA&A, 43, 435Google Scholar
Iben, I., Jr. 1974, ARA&A, 12, 215Google Scholar
Iben, I., Jr. 1984, ApJ, 277, 333CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ishihara, D., et al. 2010, A&A, 514, A1Google Scholar
Jayasinghe, T., et al. 2019, MNRAS, 486, 1907Google Scholar
Jiménez-Esteban, F. M., et al. 2018, MNRAS, 480, 4505Google Scholar
Jonsell, K., et al. 2006, A&A, 451, 651Google Scholar
Jorissen, A., et al. 2019, A&A, 626, A127Google Scholar
Kajino, T., et al. 2019, PPNP, 107, 109Google Scholar
Kamath, D. 2020, J. A&A, 41, 42Google Scholar
Kamath, D., et al. 2023, MNRAS, 519, 2169Google Scholar
Kamath, D., & Van Winckel, H. 2019, MNRAS, 486, 3524Google Scholar
Kamath, D., et al. 2022, ApJL, 927, L13Google Scholar
Kamath, D., et al. 2017, ApJ, 836, 15Google Scholar
Kamath, D., & Winckel, H. V. 2022, Universe, 8, 233Google Scholar
Kamath, D., Wood, P. R., & Van Winckel, H. 2014, MNRAS, 439, 2211Google Scholar
Kamath, D., Wood, P. R., & Van Winckel, H. 2015, MNRAS, 454, 1468Google Scholar
Käppeler, F., Gallino, R., Bisterzo, S., & Aoki, W. 2011, RvMP, 83, 157Google Scholar
Karakas, A. I., & Lattanzio, J. C. 2014, PASA, 31, e030CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kholopov, P. N., et al. 1999, VizieR Online Data Catalog, II/214AGoogle Scholar
Kluska, J., et al. 2022, A&A, 658, A36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kobayashi, C., Karakas, A. I., & Lugaro, M. 2020, ApJ, 900, 179Google Scholar
Kupka, F., Piskunov, N., Ryabchikova, T. A., Stempels, H. C., & Weiss, W. W. 1999, AASS, 138, 119Google Scholar
Lodders, K. 2003, ApJ, 591, 1220Google Scholar
Luck, R. E., Moffett, T. J., Barnes, III, T. G., & Gieren, W. P. 1998, AJ, 115, 605CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maas, T., Van Winckel, H., & Lloyd Evans, T. 2005, A&A, 429, 297Google Scholar
Manick, R., Van Winckel, H., Kamath, D., Sekaran, S., & Kolenberg, K. 2018, A&A, 618, A21Google Scholar
Mohorian, M., et al. 2024, MNRAS, e-prints, arXiv:2403.09999.Google Scholar
Mucciarelli, A., et al. 2023, A&A, 671, A124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ngeow, C.-C., & Kanbur, S. M. 2005, MNRAS, 360, 1033Google Scholar
Ochsenbein, F., Bauer, P., & Marcout, J. 2000, A&AS, 143, 23Google Scholar
Oomen, G.-M., et al. 2018, A&A, 620, A85Google Scholar
Paczyński, B. 1971, A&A, 21, 417Google Scholar
Pietrzyński, G., et al. 2013, Natur, 495, 76Google Scholar
Pollard, K. R., Cottrell, P. L., Kilmartin, P. M., & Gilmore, A. C. 1996, MNRAS, 279, 949Google Scholar
Pollard, K. R., & Evans, T. L. 2000, AJ, 120, 3098CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pourbaix, D. 2019, MmSAI, 90, 318Google Scholar
Rao, S. S., Giridhar, S., & Lambert, D. L. 2011, MNRAS, 419, 1254CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rao, S. S., Giridhar, S., & Lambert, D. L. 2012, MNRAS, 419, 1254Google Scholar
Reddy, B. E., Lambert, D. L., & Prieto, C. A. 2006, MNRAS, 367, 1329Google Scholar
Reddy, B. E., Tomkin, J., Lambert, D. L., & Prieto, C. A. 2003, MNRAS, 340, 304Google Scholar
Reyniers, M., et al. 2007, A&A, 461, 641Google Scholar
Reyniers, M., & Cuypers, J. 2005, A&A, 432, 595Google Scholar
Reyniers, M., & Van Winckel, H. 2003, A&A, 408, L33Google Scholar
Reyniers, M., Van Winckel, H., Gallino, R., & Straniero, O. 2004, A&A, 417, 269Google Scholar
Richter, O. G., Tammann, G. A., & Huchtmeier, W. K. 1987, A&A, 171, 33Google Scholar
Ripepi, V., et al. 2015, MNRAS, 446, 3034Google Scholar
Rufener, F. 1999, VizieR Online Data Catalog, II/169/Google Scholar
Schwab, J. 2020, ApJl, 901, L18Google Scholar
Shappee, B. J., et al. 2014, ApJ, 788, 48Google Scholar
Shetye, S., et al. 2020, A&A, 635, L6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simmerer, J., et al. 2004, ApJ, 617, 1091CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sneden, C. 1973, PhD thesisGoogle Scholar
Soszyński, I., et al. 2015, A&A, 65, 297CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Soszyński, I., et al. 2017, A&A, 67, 103Google Scholar
Soszyński, I., et al. 2018, A&A, 68, 89Google Scholar
Straniero, O., Cristallo, S., & Piersanti, L. 2014, ApJ, 785, 77Google Scholar
Tammann, G. A., Sandage, A., & Reindl, B. 2003, A&A, 404, 423CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tosi, S., et al. 2022, A&A, 668, A22Google Scholar
van Aarle, E., et al. 2011, A&A, 530, A90+Google Scholar
Van der Swaelmen, M., Hill, V., Primas, F., & Cole, A. A. 2013, A&A, 560, A44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Winckel, H. 1997, A&A, 319, 561Google Scholar
Van Winckel, H. 2003, ARA&A, 41, 391Google Scholar
Van Winckel, H., & Reyniers, M. 2000, A&A, 354, 135Google Scholar
Van Winckel, H. et al. 2009, A&A, 505, 1221Google Scholar
Ventura, P., Zeppieri, A., Mazzitelli, I., & D’Antona, F. 1998, A&A, 334, 953Google Scholar
Ventura, P., et al. 2021, A&A, 655, A6Google Scholar
Waelkens, C., Van Winckel, H., Trams, N. R., & Waters, L. B. F. M. 1992, A&A, 256, L15Google Scholar
Walker, A. R. 2012, Ap&AS, 341, 43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wanajo, S., Janka, H.-T., & Müller, B. 2011, ApJl, 726, L15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Figure 0

Figure 1. The WISE colour-colour diagram for the sample stars along with the stars studied in Gezer et al. (2015) is depicted here. The different types of SED characteristics among the post-AGB stars are represented here with different symbols and colours. The Non-IR box represents the non-dusty stars that show no IR excess in their SEDs. The sample stars are numbered according to their position in Table 1 for reference.

Figure 1

Table 1. Target sample along with two sets of stellar parameters. The final column lists the references to the previous literature analysis.

Figure 2

Figure 2. The phased LCs of the RV Tauri targets J005107 (left) and MACHO 47.2496.8 (right). The fundamental pulsation period used to phase the LC of each target is mentioned in the text. The LCs are scattered due to their semi-regular nature; they usually show considerable variations from cycle to cycle. This behaviour is typically more pronounced for the longer-period RV Tauri stars. The photometric data for J005107 and MACHO 47.2496.8 have been sourced from the latest OGLE IV database of Type II Cepheids (Soszyński et al. 2018).

Figure 3

Table 2. Photometric data of the targets. See text for full details.

Figure 4

Figure 3. Comparison of the normalised and radial velocity corrected spectra of all target stars. The spectra have been shifted in flux for clarity. Red and black vertical lines mark the positions of s-process elements (and also carbon) and non-s-process elements, respectively. For more information, see the text.

Figure 5

Table 3. Observational logs of the target stars. The references for previous high-resolution spectroscopic studies utilising the spectra presented in this table are provided.

Figure 6

Table 4. Spectroscopically determined abundance results for J005107.

Figure 7

Figure 4. Spectroscopically derived abundances of J005107. The error bars represent the total uncertainties $\sigma_{\rm tot}$. Some elements are labelled for reference. The black colour data points represent CNO elements, the blue represents Fe peak elements, the magenta represents Zn and S, and the red represents s-process elements.

Figure 8

Figure 5. An example of $\chi^2$ plot of J005107 to obtain the reddening parameter $E(B-V)$ after the parameter grid search. This plot illustrates the correlation between $T_{\rm eff}$ and $E(B-V)$ of the targets.

Figure 9

Figure 6. SEDs of J005107 (top left), MACHO 47.2496.8 (top right), and HD 158616 (bottom). The data points represent the dereddened photometry. The red line represents the best-fitting scaled model atmosphere (see text for details).

Figure 10

Table 5. Luminosities of the targets derived using the SED fitting method and PLC relation method.

Figure 11

Figure 7. The reddening-free Wesenheit index plotted with the log ($P_0$) of the RV Tauri stars in the LMC and SMC from Soszyński et al. (2015, 2017). Note: We excluded stars from the analysis if their standard deviation exceeded $1\sigma$ of the fit.

Figure 12

Table 6. Overview of the $T_{\rm eff}$, metallicity, [C/Fe], s-process indices, C/O ratio, and initial mass of our target stars.

Figure 13

Figure 8. AGB evolution of stars of different mass and metallicity $\rm Z=0.001$, in the $\rm C/O$ vs. luminosity plane. The target stars J005107 and MACHO 47.2496.8 are marked. See text for more details.

Figure 14

Figure 9. Time variation of the luminosity and the surface $\rm C/O$ of a $\rm 2.5\;M_{\odot}$ model star of $Z=0.004$. The grey-shaded region indicates the evolutionary phase of HD 158616 during which both the luminosity and the C/O are consistent with those derived from the observations. See text for more details.

Figure 15

Figure 10. Comparison plots illustrating the abundance pattern in terms of element over hydrogen ([X/H]) ratios as a function of condensation temperature ($T_{\rm condensation}$) (taken from Lodders 2003) of the target stars with post-AGB binary stars and post-AGB single stars from the literature that have similar stellar parameters. The stellar parameters along with other necessary parameters are provided in the legend. To distinguish between the different elements, we continue to use the same colour coding and symbols as before. The black colour data points represent CNO elements, the blue represents Fe peak elements, the magenta represents Zn and S, and the red represents s-process elements.Left: [X/H] Vs $T_{\rm condensation}$ of target stars. Middle: [X/H] Vs $T_{\rm condensation}$ of post-AGB binary stars from Kamath & Van Winckel (2019), Gielen et al. (2009), and Waelkens et al. (1992) with similar stellar parameters of the target sample in the respective left panel. Right: [X/H] Vs $T_{\rm condensation}$ of post-AGB single stars from De Smedt et al. (2016) that has similar stellar parameters of the target sample in the respective left panel.

Figure 16

Figure 11. Wise colour-colour diagram for the target stars along with the stars studied in Kluska et al. (2022). The dashed black lines represent the boundaries between the different categories defined in Kluska et al. (2022). The targets of this study are given in magenta colour and are numbered according to their position in Table 1 for reference.

Figure 17

Table A1. Spectroscopically determined abundance results for MACHO 47.2496.8 and HD 158616 along with their literature values.

Figure 18

Figure B1. SED of V453 Oph. The data points represent the dereddened photometry. The red line represents the best-fitting scaled model atmosphere (see Section 4.1 for details).

Figure 19

Figure B2. The phased LC of the V453 Oph. The fundamental pulsation period used to phase the LC is 40.52 days. The LCs are scattered due to their semi-regular nature; they usually show considerable variations from cycle to cycle. This behaviour is typically more pronounced for the longer-period RV Tauri stars. The photometric data for V453 Oph is taken from ASAS-SN Variable Stars Database II (Shappee et al. 2014; Jayasinghe et al. 2019).

Figure 20

Figure C1. The dynamic spectra for the $H\alpha$ line of HD 158616. The spectra are shown as a function of the orbital phase (see Bollen et al. 2021, for details).

Supplementary material: File

Menon et al. supplementary material

Menon et al. supplementary material
Download Menon et al. supplementary material(File)
File 112 KB