Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-09T02:13:48.078Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

On Directions from which Cosmic Rays may Reach Earth Satellites

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 April 2016

J.E. Humble*
Affiliation:
Physics Department, University of Tasmania

Extract

It is easy to feel, on an intuitive basis, that primary cosmic rays of at least some energy range will be able to reach a satellite in earth-orbit from all directions above the local geometric horizon and from essentially no directions below the horizon. This argument suggests that directional cosmic ray detectors on board satellites may safely assume that the only particles received from earthward directions must be splash or albedo particles from the atmosphere, and that any equipment liable to possible radiation damage should be preferentially located on the earthward side of the satellite. In actual fact primary cosmic rays can have quite sharply curved trajectories in the magnetosphere, thereby enabling some particles to gain access to a satellite from a range of directions below the local geometric horizon. The present work presents recent quantitative results on this matter.

Type
Contributions
Copyright
Copyright © Astronomical Society of Australia 1983

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Humble, J.E., Smart, D.F., and Shea, M.A., 17th International Cosmic Ray Conference, Conference Papers, 10, 270 (198).Google Scholar
Humble, J.E., Smart, D.F., and Shea, M.A., 18th International Cosmic Ray Conference, Conference Papers, in press (1983).Google Scholar
IAGA Division 1 Study Group, J. Geophys. Res., 81, 5163 (1976).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peddie, N.W., J. Geomag. Geoelec, 34, 6, 309 (1982).Google Scholar
Shea, M.A., Smart, D.F., and McCracken, K.G., J. Geophys. Res., 70, 4117 (1965).CrossRefGoogle Scholar