Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T08:27:30.372Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A New Globular Cluster in the Area of VVVX

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 June 2018

E. Bica
Affiliation:
Departamento de Astronomia, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Avenida Bento Gonçalves, 9500 – Agronomia, Porto Alegre – RS, 91509-900, Brazil
D. Minniti
Affiliation:
Instituto Milenio de Astrofisica, Santiago, Chile Vatican Observatory, V00120 Vatican City State, Italy Departamento de Fisica, Facultad de Ciencias Exactas, Universidad Andrés Bello, Av. Fernandez Concha 700, Las Condes, Santiago, Chile
C. Bonatto*
Affiliation:
Departamento de Astronomia, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Avenida Bento Gonçalves, 9500 – Agronomia, Porto Alegre – RS, 91509-900, Brazil
M. Hempel
Affiliation:
Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Instituto de Astrofisica, Av. Vicuña Mackenna 4860, Santiago, Chile
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We communicate the discovery of a new globular cluster in the Galaxy that was first detected on WISE/2MASS images and is now confirmed with VVVX photometry. It is a Palomar-like cluster projected at ℓ = 359.15°, b = 5.73°, and may be related to the bulge. We derive an absolute magnitude of MV ≈ −3.3, thus being an underluminous globular cluster. Our analyses provide a reddening of E(BV) = 1.08 ± 0.18 and a distance to the Sun d = 6.3 ± 1 kpc, which implies a current position in the bulge volume. The estimated metallicity is [Fe/H] = −1.5 ± 0.25. It adds to the recently discovered faint globular cluster (Minniti 22) and candidates found with VVV, building up expectations of ≈50 globular clusters yet to be discovered in the bulge. We also communicate the discovery of an old open cluster in the same VVVX tile as the globular cluster. The VVVX photometry provided E(BV) = 0.62 ± 0.1, d = 7.6 ± 1 kpc, and an age of 1.5 ± 0.3 Gyr. With a height from the plane of ≈0.8 kpc, it adds to nine Gyr-class clusters recently discovered within 0.8 ⩽ Z ⩽ 2.2 kpc, as recently probed in the single VVV tile b201. We suggest that these findings may be disclosing the thick disk at the bulge, which so far has no open cluster counterpart, and hardly any individual star. Thus, the VVV and VVVX surveys are opening new windows for follow-up studies, to employ present and future generations of large aperture telescopes.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Astronomical Society of Australia 2018 

1 INTRODUCTION

Globular clusters (GCs) are fossils that allow one to retrieve information about the formation phase of galaxies and their early evolution (e.g. Minniti Reference Minniti1996, Côté Reference Côté1999, Brodie & Strader Reference Brodie and Strader2006, Ortolani et al. Reference Ortolani, Barbuy, Momany, Saviane, Bica, Jilkova, Salerno and Jungwiert2011). Any new GC detected is welcome to improve the statistics of parameters such as metallicity and position distributions in the bulge and halo subsystems (Bica, Ortolani, & Barbuy, Reference Bica, Ortolani and Barbuy2016). Some inner bulge GCs might be dynamically trapped in the bar (Rossi et al. Reference Rossi, Ortolani, Barbuy, Bica and Bonfanti2015).

The ESO–VVV survey is becoming a fundamental tool to put to the test previous scenarios for the bulge formation, and open doors to new ideas and constraints on the GC populations in the Milky Way. Minniti et al. (Reference Minniti2017b) showed that VVV photometry settled the GC nature of FSR 1716 (Froebrich, Scholz, & Raftery, Reference Froebrich, Scholz and Raftery2007). This was achieved by means of analyses of RR Lyrae and colour–magnitude diagrams (CMDs). Harris (Reference Harris2010) compiled 157 GCs in the Galaxy and, by decontaminating halo intruders, Bica et al. (Reference Bica, Ortolani and Barbuy2016) compiled 43 bona fide GCs in the bulge. These numbers are expected to increase in the near future. More recently, Minniti et al. (Reference Minniti2017c) discovered a GC and many candidates in the bulge with VVV, which as rule are fainter, looser, less populated, and crowded in dense central bulge and disk fields, as compared to classical GCs. The current census of GCs in the Milky Way is now close to 200, and new estimates for missing ones, especially based on the recent VVV and halo surveys such as the Dark Energy Survey (DES) (e.g. Luque et al. Reference Luque2017) can amount to 100 undetected GCs. About half of them might still be lurking in the bulge (Minniti et al. Reference Minniti2017c).

VVV contributions are also producing new constraints and insights on the old central disk that permeates and possibly embraces the bulge. Recently, Ivanov et al. (Reference Ivanov, Piatti, Beamín, Minniti, Borissova, Kurtev, Hempel and Saito2017) deep-stacked images of a single edge VVV tile, and detected 9-Gyr-old open clusters (OCs). Their heights above the plane are about 1 kpc, and their total number can be speculated to be hundreds or more, considering all the VVV and VVVX tiles.

The present work communicates the discoveries of a GC and an old OC that are new pieces of evidence that help better understand the bulge and central disk subsystems in the Galaxy. In Section 2, we present the VVVX observations and the analysis methods. In Section 3, we analyse the new GC, and in Section 4, the new OC. Finally, in Section 5, we provide discussions and concluding remarks.

2 TARGETS, OBSERVATIONS, AND METHODS

The new GC is located at the Galactic coordinates ℓ = 359.15°, b = 5.73°, and equatorial ones α = 17h21m45s, δ = −26°32′41″. It is projected near the edge of the central bulge (Barbuy, Bica, & Ortolani Reference Barbuy, Bica and Ortolani1998) and well within the extended bulge (Bica et al. Reference Bica, Ortolani and Barbuy2016). We suggest the use of Camargo 1102 (Cmg 1102 for short) as designation. It is important to emphasise the efforts and circumstances that led to the present findings. Cmg 1102, was discovered in a survey of WISE and 2MASS images along the Milky Way disk that provided 1 089 clusters and candidates in two lists (Camargo, Bica, & Bonatto, Reference Camargo, Bica and Bonatto2016a). Most are embedded clusters (ECs). Some of these entries and later additions are ECs at relatively high Galactic latitudes, and revealed for the first time star formation in halo clouds (Camargo et al. Reference Camargo, Bica and Bonatto2016a; Camargo, Bica, & Bonatto Reference Camargo, Bica and Bonatto2016b). All together, these studies amount to 1 101 objects. Cmg 1102 was first analysed with 2MASS photometry that suggested a GC. Finally, the deep near-IR images provided by the VVVX in the present work were necessary to settle the GC nature.

In Figure 1, we show a VVVX J, H, and K s Red Green Blue (RGB) composite image of Cmg 1102. It is a prominent cluster, however not as a classical populous GC. It can be seen in the optical (DSS). Cmg 1102 resembles the faint GCs detected on Palomar plates, first listed more than half a century ago (Abell Reference Abell1955; Kinman & Rosino Reference Kinman and Rosino1962).

Figure 1. VVVX image (JHK s RGB composition) of the new GC Cmg 1102. Size 5 arcmin × 5 arcmin. East to the left, north to the top.

The new old OC is projected towards ℓ = 359.50°, b = 5.80°, or α = 17h22m22s and δ = −26°12′52″. We suggest the use of Bica 7 as the cluster designation (Bc 7 for conciseness). Bica 1 through 6 are previous OC findings (e.g. Bica, Bonatto, & Dutra Reference Bica, Bonatto and Dutra2003), so designated in DAML02 (Dias et al. Reference Dias, Alessi, Moitinho and Lepine2014). Bc 7 is part of a 20-yr survey of clusters and candidates mostly carried out on DSS, 2MASS, and WISE images by one of us (E.B.). The resulting survey (with more than 10 000 entries), together with a general cluster and candidate catalogue that is deep, updated, cross-identified, and with chronologically ordered designations. This general catalogue ensures that the two present clusters are discoveries, will be soon available. We show in Figure 2 a VVVX J, H, and K s RGB composite image of Bc 7, where the bright star is HD 157094, a foreground K0V star according to SIMBAD.

Figure 2. Same as Figure 1 for the new OC Bc 7. The bright star near the centre is a foreground K star.

2.1. VVVX data

We employ Cambridge Astronomical Survey Unit (CASU) photometry from the VVVX extended survey. The CASU photometry is currently the standard calibration, which is readily available and suitable for our work. We note that there has not yet been PSF photometry made for VVVX fields. This is an on-going work, that requires a much longer time because VVVX is a massive dataset.

Both clusters in the present study are located in tile b0463, at the northern boundary of the VVV survey, in terms of Galactic coordinates. The data were acquired with the VIRCAM camera at the VISTA 4-m telescope at the ESO Paranal Observatory. Likewise previous data, they were reduced at the CASU with the VIRCAM pipeline. The observations, calibrations, and photometry follow the standard VVV procedure (see Saito et al. Reference Saito2012; Minniti et al. Reference Minniti2017b, and references therein).

2.2. Analysis methods

We analysed CMDs and cluster structure in order to establish the two objects as star clusters and their nature, by determining astrophysical parameters. We use the VVVX J (1.253 μm), H (1.662 μm) and K s (2.159 μm) bands with magnitudes and errors, along with their positions. Below, we briefly describe the employed methods written by one of us (C.B.). With respect to the previous routines applied to many OCs, OCs, and ECs (e.g. Bonatto & Bica Reference Bonatto and Bica2010), now C.B. developed automated isochrone fits. More details are in Oliveira, Bica, & Bonatto (Reference Oliveira, Bica and Bonatto2018).

To reveal the intrinsic morphology of the CMDs, we employ the algorithm for statistical field-star decontamination in Bonatto & Bica (Reference Bonatto and Bica2007) to the input photometry. It has been widely used (e.g. Camargo et al. Reference Camargo, Bica and Bonatto2016a, Reference Camargo, Bica and Bonatto2016b) in the study of star clusters of all ages, and sitting on a wide range of background densities. In summary, the routine builds Hess diagrams both for the target region and field stars. The intrinsic Hess diagram corresponds to the subtraction of the latter two.

The astrophysical parameters are derived from the decontaminated photometry following the methods in Lima et al. (Reference Lima, Bica, Bonatto and Saito2014) (and references therein). We now use the upgraded PARSEC (Bressan et al. Reference Bressan, Marigo, Girardi, Salasnich, Dal Cero, Rubele and Nanni2012) isochrone database convolved to the VVV bands. The output parameters are the total cluster mass M tot (with a mass extrapolation to low mass member stars), age, apparent, and absolute distance moduli, as well as the colour excess E(BV). Throughout the new analyses, we work with the Hess representation of the observed and theoretical CMDs, to compare them.

A star cluster structure can be represented by its stellar radial density profile (RDP). It is applied in what we call a colour-magnitude filter in the CMD, to isolate the stars with high probability of being cluster members. It creates an intrinsic stellar RDP and enhances its contrast relative to the background. The RDP is constructed from star counts in concentric rings, divided by the corresponding area, providing the surface stellar density. In the present study, we use the single-band Gaia catalogue (Gaia Collaboration et al. 2016) for its depth and resolution.

3 THE NEW GC CMG 1102 IN THE VVVX TILE B0463

The present clusters are very contaminated by their dense fields. Thus, here we use Gaia photometry (G band, λeff = 6418.68AA, ωeff = 3580AA) to build the RDP because it minimises crowding effects. We present in Figure 3, Gaia RDPs of Cmg 1102, including those for magnitude cutoffs for G < 18, G < 16, and G < 14. Clearly, when brighter stars are considered, the RDP shows an overdensity (R ⩽ 2 arcmin) with increasing contrast with respect to the background. Considering fluctuations, the overdensity may reach an extension of ~5 arcmin from the cluster centre. This profile guided our cluster extractions for the CMD constructions.

Figure 3. Cmg 1102: RDPs built with Gaia G filter photometry with different thresholds (see inset).

Figure 4 illustrates the decontamination procedure. The total extracted field CMD is subtracted of an equal area outer field, generating the cluster intrinsic sequences.

Figure 4. Cmg 1102: Field-star decontamination. Top: all stars within 2 arcmin; middle: field-stars sampled outside the cluster; bottom: decontaminated CMD.

Figure 5 shows the best isochrone fit (Section 2.2) to the decontaminated CMD of Cmg 1102. This fit leads to an age of ≈13.5 Gyr, the reddening value E(BV) = 1.05 ± 0.30, a metallicity of Z ≈ 0.03Z ([Fe/H] ≈ −1.5 for a solar [α/Fe]) and a distance from the Sun d ≈ 6.4 ± 0.4 kpc. The total stellar mass (assuming a Kroupa mass function extrapolation to stars of mass 0.1M) results in ≈6800M and an absolute V magnitude M V ≈ −3.3. Given the photometric depth of VVVX, the observed mass in the CMD amounts to just ≈200M, but these are the main contributors to the cluster light. However, we note that dynamical effects may have depleted the primordial stellar mass. Thus, our estimate is an upper limit.

Figure 5. Cmg 1102: Isochrone fit to the decontaminated CMD. The best result corresponds to Age = 13.5 Gyr, Z = 0.03Z, d = 6.3 kpc, and M = 3.7 × 103M.

We also compare the decontaminated CMD with mean loci of the nearby GCs M 4 ([Fe/H] = −1.16) and NGC 6397 ([Fe/H] = −2.02) built with 2MASS photometry. The metallicities are from Harris (Reference Harris2010). We obtained these mean loci from their 2MASS CMDs, which are not saturated and reach faint sequences overlapping the VVV data. The horizontal branch morphology is consistent with the derived metallicity. The superposition of the mean loci (Figure 6) suggest a red HB component at J ≈ 14, and the possibility of a blue HB component. The mean-loci solutions imply a distance from the Sun within 6.1–7.0 kpc, in good agreement with the isochrone fit result. Given the low content of bright giants, and the possible differential reddening effects, we conclude that its metallicity is compatible with [Fe/H] ≈ −1.5 ± 0.25, this within the range between NGC 6397 and M 4. This value and uncertainty would imply either a halo intruder in the Bulge or an intrinsic metal-poor Bulge GC (Bica et al. Reference Bica, Ortolani and Barbuy2016).

Figure 6. Cmg 1102: Mean-locus of the GCs NGC 6397 ([Fe/H] = −2.02) and M 4 ([Fe/H] = −1.16) superimposed on the decontaminated CMD. For NGC 6397, we applied ΔE(JK S) = +0.52 and Δ(mM)J = +3.0, resulting in d = 6.1 kpc. For M 4, the values are ΔE(JK S) = +0.27 and Δ(mM)J = +3.0, resulting in d = 7 kpc.

We show in Figure 7 proper motions (from Gaia DR2—Gaia Collaboration, 2018) for the Cmg 1102 and the comparison field. For consistency with the RDP shown in Figure 3, the analysis is limited to stars brighter than G = 14. Although the number of member stars is low, there appears to be a more restricted distribution. Cmg 1102 is probably dissolving into the field (e.g. Minniti et al. Reference Minniti2017c).

Figure 7. Cmg 1102: Gaia DR2 proper motions. The Hess map shows the PM distribution of the surrounding sky (20 arcmin − 30 arcmin). Blue symbols are for the stars within 3 arcmin.

The derived Galactocentric coordinates are X GC = −1.04 kpc, Y GC = −0.10 kpc, and Z GC = 0.70 kpc, (adopting X = −8.0 kpc). At ℓ = 359.15°, this GC seems to soar above the Galactic centre at a height of ≈700 pc, in the bulge volume.

With M V ≈ −3.3, Cmg 1102 is fainter than typical bulge Palomar clusters like Pal 6 (M V ≈ −6.79, Pal 7 (IC 1276) −6.67, Pal 8 −5.51, Pal 9 (NGC 6717)-5.56, and Pal 11 −6.92, and comparable to the low-mass GC AL 3 (Harris Reference Harris2010). On the other hand, Cmg 1102 is more luminous than the faint halo clusters (Luque et al. Reference Luque2017 and references therein).

One interesting possibility is, in the case of being a bulge member, Cmg 1102 should be an example of a new class of low-luminosity GCs in that component. Such faint candidates—probably the remains of larger clusters that are being evaporated or disrupted in the bulge are being disclosed (e.g. Minniti et al. Reference Minniti, Alonso-García, Braga, Contreras Ramos, Hempel, Palma, Pullen and Saito2017a, Reference Minniti2017b, Reference Minniti2017c).

We note that the GC NGC 6355 is located ≈12 arcmin northwards of Cmg 1102. Unlike Cmg 1102, NGC 6355 has a significant PM difference with respect to the bulge/central disk (Figure 8). The results imply that the two clusters are not kinematically related.

Figure 8. Same as Figure 7 but for the nearby projected GC NGC 6355.

4 THE NEW OLD OC BC 7 IN THE SAME VVVX TILE B0463

We show in Figure 9 the RDP of Bc 7, which shows an excess with observed radial extent of R ≈ 2 arcmin.

Figure 9. Same as Figure 3 for Bc 7. We employ the constraint G < 14 for the Gaia photometry that best describes the cluster stellar distribution.

Near the centre of Bc 7 is projected the bright near infrared star HD 157094 (HIP 84996), with J = 5.156, JH = 0.908 and JK s = 0.990, as given in SIMBAD. In the optical, it is also quite bright (V = 8.09) which explains why this relatively bright cluster has been so far overlooked. This is a similar case to the Siriusly cluster that was found with Gaia, having been hidden in most previous searches by the Sirius glare (Koposov, Belokurov, & Torrealba Reference Koposov, Belokurov and Torrealba2017).

The field-star decontamination for Bc 7 is illustrated in Figure 11, where the intrinsic sequences suggest an old OC.

In order to shed light on this issue, we show the Gaia DR2 proper motions for Bc 7 and comparison field in Figure 10. HD 157094 is a high PM star (SIMBAD) that is outside the cluster/field distribution and an outlier with respect to the field, which confirms that it is a foreground star. Bc 7 has PMs similar to the field, thus possibly co-moving.

Figure 10. Same as Figure 7 for Bc 7, but for stars with G < 17. Cluster stars are extracted within 1 arcmin.

Figure 11. Same as Figure 4 for Bc 7.

In Figure 12, we superimpose the isochrone solution (Section 2.2) on the intrinsic cluster CMD. The turnoff is barely attained, but the RGB, including some SGB and Clump stars constrained the solution. We obtained the following parameters: age ≈1.5 Gyr, reddening E(BV) ≈ 0.6 ± 0.1, distance from the Sun ≈7.6 ± 1.0 kpc, Z/Z ≈ 1.4 ± 0.4 ([Fe/H] ≈ 0.13, for Solar alpha ratios). Finally, the total stellar mass is ≈2500M, the observed mass is ≈470M, and M V ≈ −4.0.

Figure 12. Bc 7: Isochrone fit to the decontaminated CMD.

5 DISCUSSION AND CONCLUDING REMARKS

We communicate the discovery of a new GC in the Galaxy, and a new old OC as well. These objects were first detected in WISE and 2MASS images, while VVVX photometry in the tile b0463 settled their natures.

Both appear to be new pieces of evidence of a more detailed perspective of the bulge and central disk. Ivanov et al. (Reference Ivanov, Piatti, Beamín, Minniti, Borissova, Kurtev, Hempel and Saito2017), with deep-stacked images of the VVV tile b201, found nine old OCs nearly in front and behind the Galactic centre with heights from the plane of about 1 kpc. This fact, together with the present cluster Bc 7 with a resulting height of ≈0.8 kpc, may suggest the first detection of thick disk clusters about the bulge. Deep follow-up studies are necessary to further test this scenario.

Bica et al. (Reference Bica, Ortolani and Barbuy2016) derived a bulge population of 43 GCs, by decontaminating halo intruders. They further indicated 10 candidates from previous VVV lists. More recently, many faint GC candidates were disclosed by Minniti et al. (Reference Minniti2017c) in the bulge with VVV. Minniti et al. (Reference Minniti, Alonso-García, Braga, Contreras Ramos, Hempel, Palma, Pullen and Saito2017a) count nearly 200 GCs and candidates in the Galaxy. They further estimate about 100 more yet to be discovered, half of them in the bulge. A new picture of the bulge and the old central disk is emerging. The new GCs can alleviate the specific GC frequency deficit of the Milky Way with respect to M31 (van den Bergh Reference van den Bergh2010), which persists to date, with M 31 having 361 GCs (Caldwell & Romanowsky Reference Caldwell and Romanowsky2016). VVV is presently having a major impact on the Galactic GC census, as VVVX also certainly will, from the present results. We emphasise the need of larger telescopes of the present and future generations for follow-up studies.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We thank an anonymous referee for important comments and suggestions. We thank Dr D. Camargo for communicating us the coordinates of the GC candidate. We acknowledge data from the ESO Public Survey program ID 179.B-2002 taken with the VISTA telescope, and products from the Cambridge Astronomical Survey Unit (CASU). Support for this work was provided by the BASAL Center for Astrophysics and Associated Technologies (CATA) through grant PFB-06, and by the Ministry for the Economy, Development and Tourism, Programa Iniciativa Cientifica Milenio grant IC120009, awarded to the Millennium Institute of Astrophysics (MAS). D. M. acknowledges support from FONDECYT Regular grant No. 1170121. M. H. also acknowledges support from BASAL CATA through grant PFB-06. C.B. and E.B. also acknowledge support from CNPq/Brazil. This research is based on observations collected at the European Organisation from Astronomical Research in the Southern Hemisphere under ESO programs.

References

REFERENCES

Abell, G. O. 1955, PASP, 67, 25810.1086/1268151955PASP...67..258AGoogle Scholar
Barbuy, B., Bica, E., & Ortolani, S. 1998, A&A, 333, 1171998A&A...333..117BGoogle Scholar
Bica, E., Bonatto, C., & Dutra, C. M. 2003, A&A, 405, 99110.1051/0004-6361:200307002003A&A...405..991BGoogle Scholar
Bica, E., Ortolani, S., & Barbuy, B. 2016, PASA, 33, e02810.1017/pasa.2015.472016PASA...33...28BCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bonatto, C., & Bica, E. 2007, MNRAS, 377, 130110.1111/j.1365-2966.2007.11691.x2007MNRAS.377.1301BGoogle Scholar
Bonatto, C., & Bica, E. 2010, MNRAS, 407, 172810.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.17000.x2010MNRAS.407.1728BGoogle Scholar
Bressan, A., Marigo, P., Girardi, L., Salasnich, B., Dal Cero, C., Rubele, S., & Nanni, A. 2012, MNRAS, 427, 12710.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.21948.x2012MNRAS.427..127BGoogle Scholar
Brodie, J. P., & Strader, J. 2006, ARA&A, 44, 19310.1146/annurev.astro.44.051905.0924412006ARA&A..44..193BGoogle Scholar
Caldwell, N., & Romanowsky, A. J. 2016, ApJ, 824, 4210.3847/0004-637X/824/1/422016ApJ...824...42CGoogle Scholar
Camargo, D., Bica, E., & Bonatto, C. 2016a, MNRAS, 455, 312610.1093/mnras/stv25172016MNRAS.455.3126CCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Camargo, D., Bica, E., & Bonatto, C. 2016b, A&A, 593, A9510.1051/0004-6361/2016287102016A&A...593A..95CGoogle Scholar
Côté, P. 1999, AJ, 118, 40610.1086/3009301999AJ....118..406CCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dias, W. S., Alessi, B. S., Moitinho, A., & Lepine, J. R. D. 2014, VizieR Online Data Catalog, 12014yCat....102022DGoogle Scholar
Froebrich, D., Scholz, A., & Raftery, C. L. 2007, MNRAS, 374, 39910.1111/j.1365-2966.2006.11148.x2007MNRAS.374..399FCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gaia Collaboration et al. 2016, A&A, 595, A210.1051/0004-6361/2016295122016A&A...595A...2GGoogle Scholar
Harris, W. E. 2010, preprint (arXiv:1012.3224)2010arXiv1012.3224HGoogle Scholar
Ivanov, V. D., Piatti, A. E., Beamín, J.-C., Minniti, D., Borissova, J., Kurtev, R., Hempel, M., & Saito, R. K. 2017, A&A, 600, A11210.1051/0004-6361/2016301792017A&A...600A.112IGoogle Scholar
Kinman, T. D., & Rosino, L. 1962, PASP, 74, 49910.1086/1278641962PASP...74..499KCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koposov, S. E., Belokurov, V., & Torrealba, G. 2017, MNRAS, 470, 270210.1093/mnras/stx11822017MNRAS.470.2702KCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lima, E. F., Bica, E., Bonatto, C., & Saito, R. K. 2014, A&A, 568, A1610.1051/0004-6361/2013230502014A&A...568A..16LGoogle Scholar
Luque, E., et al. 2017, MNRAS, 468, 9710.1093/mnras/stx4052017MNRAS.468...97LCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Minniti, D. 1996, ApJ, 459, 17510.1086/1768791996ApJ...459..175MGoogle Scholar
Minniti, D., Alonso-García, J., Braga, V., Contreras Ramos, R., Hempel, M., Palma, T., Pullen, J., & Saito, R. K. 2017a, RNAAS, 1, 1610.3847/2515-5172/aa9ab72017RNAAS...1...16MGoogle Scholar
Minniti, D., et al. 2017b, ApJ, 838, L1410.3847/2041-8213/838/1/L142017ApJ...838L..14MGoogle Scholar
Minniti, D., et al. 2017c, ApJ, 849, L2410.3847/2041-8213/aa95b82017ApJ...849L..24MCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oliveira, P. R. A., Bica, E., & Bonatto, C. 2018, MNRAS, 476, 84210.1093/mnras/sty2542018MNRAS.476..842OGoogle Scholar
Ortolani, S., Barbuy, B., Momany, Y., Saviane, I., Bica, E., Jilkova, L., Salerno, G. M., & Jungwiert, B. 2011, ApJ, 737, 3110.1088/0004-637X/737/1/312011ApJ...737...31OGoogle Scholar
Rossi, L. J., Ortolani, S., Barbuy, B., Bica, E., & Bonfanti, A. 2015, MNRAS, 450, 327010.1093/mnras/stv7482015MNRAS.450.3270RCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saito, R. K., et al. 2012, A&A, 537, A10710.1051/0004-6361/2011184072012A&A...537A.107SGoogle Scholar
van den Bergh, S. 2010, AJ, 140, 104310.1088/0004-6256/140/4/10432010AJ....140.1043VGoogle Scholar
Figure 0

Figure 1. VVVX image (JHKs RGB composition) of the new GC Cmg 1102. Size 5 arcmin × 5 arcmin. East to the left, north to the top.

Figure 1

Figure 2. Same as Figure 1 for the new OC Bc 7. The bright star near the centre is a foreground K star.

Figure 2

Figure 3. Cmg 1102: RDPs built with Gaia G filter photometry with different thresholds (see inset).

Figure 3

Figure 4. Cmg 1102: Field-star decontamination. Top: all stars within 2 arcmin; middle: field-stars sampled outside the cluster; bottom: decontaminated CMD.

Figure 4

Figure 5. Cmg 1102: Isochrone fit to the decontaminated CMD. The best result corresponds to Age = 13.5 Gyr, Z = 0.03Z, d = 6.3 kpc, and M = 3.7 × 103M.

Figure 5

Figure 6. Cmg 1102: Mean-locus of the GCs NGC 6397 ([Fe/H] = −2.02) and M 4 ([Fe/H] = −1.16) superimposed on the decontaminated CMD. For NGC 6397, we applied ΔE(JKS) = +0.52 and Δ(mM)J = +3.0, resulting in d = 6.1 kpc. For M 4, the values are ΔE(JKS) = +0.27 and Δ(mM)J = +3.0, resulting in d = 7 kpc.

Figure 6

Figure 7. Cmg 1102: Gaia DR2 proper motions. The Hess map shows the PM distribution of the surrounding sky (20 arcmin − 30 arcmin). Blue symbols are for the stars within 3 arcmin.

Figure 7

Figure 8. Same as Figure 7 but for the nearby projected GC NGC 6355.

Figure 8

Figure 9. Same as Figure 3 for Bc 7. We employ the constraint G < 14 for the Gaia photometry that best describes the cluster stellar distribution.

Figure 9

Figure 10. Same as Figure 7 for Bc 7, but for stars with G < 17. Cluster stars are extracted within 1 arcmin.

Figure 10

Figure 11. Same as Figure 4 for Bc 7.

Figure 11

Figure 12. Bc 7: Isochrone fit to the decontaminated CMD.