Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-06T10:11:54.386Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Metallurgy Beyond Iron

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 March 2013

Isabella Gallino*
Affiliation:
Saarland University, Chair for Metallic Materials, Campus C6.3, 66123 Saarbruecken, Germany
Ralf Busch
Affiliation:
Saarland University, Chair for Metallic Materials, Campus C6.3, 66123 Saarbruecken, Germany
*
DCorresponding author. Email: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Metallurgy is one of the oldest sciences. Its history can be traced back to 6000 BCE with the discovery of Gold, and each new discovery — Copper, Silver, Lead, Tin, Iron and Mercury — marked the beginning of a new era of civilization. Currently there are 86 known metals, but until the end of the 17th century, only 12 of these were known. Steel (Fe–C alloy) was discovered in the 11th century BCE; however, it took until 1709 CE before we mastered the smelting of pig-iron by using coke instead of charcoal and started the industrial revolution. The metallurgy of nowadays is mainly about discovering better materials with superior properties to fulfil the increasing demand of the global market. Promising are the Glassy Metals or Bulk Metallic Glasses (BMGs) — discovered at first in the late 50s at the California Institute of Technology — which are several times stronger than the best industrial steels and 10-times springier. The unusual structure that lacks crystalline grains makes BMGs so promising. They have a liquid-like structure that means they melt at lower temperatures, can be moulded nearly as easily as plastics, and can be shaped into features just 10 nm across. The best BMG formers are based on Zr, Pd, Pt, Ca, Au and, recently discovered, also Fe. They have typically three to five components with large atomic size mismatch and a composition close to a deep eutectic. Packing in such liquids is very dense, with a low content of free volume, resulting in viscosities that are several orders of magnitude higher than in pure metal melts.

Type
Foreword
Copyright
Copyright © Astronomical Society of Australia 2009

References

Angell, C. A., 1995, Sci, 267, 1924 Google Scholar
Asbhy, M. F., 1999, Materials Selection in Mechanical Design (2nd ed.; Butterworth Heinemann)Google Scholar
Bakke, E., Busch, R. & Johnson, W. L., 1995, ApPhL, 67, 3260 Google Scholar
Busch, R., Schroers, J. & Wang, W. H., 2007, MRSBu, 32, 620 Google Scholar
Busch, R., Kim, Y. J. & Johnson, W. L., 1995, JAP, 77, 4039 Google Scholar
Busch, R., Kim, Y. J., Johnson, W. L., Rulison, A. J., Rhim, W. K. & Isheim, D., 1995, ApPhL, 66, 3111 Google Scholar
Busch, R., Bakke, E. & Johnson, W. L., 1998, AcMat, 46, 4725 Google Scholar
Busch, R., 2000, JOM, 52, 39 Google Scholar
Chen, H. S. & Turnbull, D., 1968, JChPh, 48, 2560 Google Scholar
Ehmler, H., Heesemann, A., Rätzke, K., Faupel, F. & Geyer, U., 1998, PhRvL, 80, 4919 Google Scholar
Geyer, U., Schneider, S., Johnson, W. L., Qiu, Y., Tombrello, T. A. & Macht, M. P., 1995, PhRvL, 75, 2364 Google Scholar
Greer, A. L. & Ma, E., 2007, MRSBu, 32, 611 Google Scholar
Iida, T. & Guthrie, R. I. L., 1988, The Physical Properties of Liquid Metals (Oxford: Claredon)Google Scholar
Inoue, A., Zhang, T. & Masumoto, T., 1991, MatTr, 31, 425 Google Scholar
Inoue, A., Kato, A., Zhang, T. & Masumoto, T., 1991, MatTr, 32, 609 Google Scholar
Johnson, W. L., 1999, MRSBu, 24, 42 Google Scholar
Kim, Y. J., Busch, R., Johnson, W. L., Rulison, A. J. & Rhim, W. K., 1996, ApPhL, 68, 1057 Google Scholar
Klement, W., Willens, R. & Duwez, P., 1960, Natur, 187, 869 Google Scholar
Li, L. L., Schroers, J. & Wu, Y., 2003, PhRvL, 91, 265502 Google Scholar
Masuhr, A., Waniuk, T. A., Busch, R. & Johnson, W. L., 1999, PhRvL, 82, 2290 Google Scholar
Mukherjee, S., Schroers, J., Rhim, W. K. & Johnson, W. L., 2005, PhRvL, 92, 245501 Google Scholar
Peker, A. & Johnson, W. L., 1993, ApPhL, 63, 2342 Google Scholar
Ponnambalam, V., Poon, S. J., Shiflet, G. J., Keppens, V. M., Taylor, R. & Petculescu, G., 2003, ApPhL, 83, 1131 Google Scholar
Schroers, J., Wu, Y., Busch, R. & Johnson, W. L., 2001, AcMat, 49, 2773 Google Scholar
Shadowspeaker, L. & Busch, R., 2004, ApPhL, 85, 2508 Google Scholar
Tang, X.-P., Geyer, U., Busch, R., Johnson, W. L. & Wu, Y., 1999, Natur, 402, 11 Google Scholar
Tsao, S. S. & Spaepen, F., 1985, AcMet, 33, 1355 Google Scholar
Volkert, C. A. & Spaepen, F., 1989 AcMet, 37, 1355 Google Scholar
Way, C., Wadhwa, P. & Busch, R., 2007, AcMat, 55, 2977 Google Scholar
Wenwer, F., Knorr, K., Macht, M. P. & Mehrer, H., 1997, Defect and Diffusion Forum, 143–147, 831 Google Scholar
Wilde, G., Görler, G. P., Willnecker, R. & Dietz, G., 1994, ApPhL, 65, 397 Google Scholar
Zhang, T., Inoue, A. & Masumoto, T., 1991, MatTr, 32, 1005 Google Scholar