1 INTRODUCTION
Improvement in telescope detection limits, technical evolution of detectors, and emergence of huge databases of observational data resulted in more careful spectral classification of objects and provision of new spectral subclasses. Walborn et al. (Reference Walborn, Sota, Maíz Apellániz, Alfaro, Morrell, Barba, Arias and Gamen2010) proposed to introduce a new subclass Ofc to denote O-stars with comparable intensity of CIII λλ4647, 4650, 4652 and NIII λλ4634, 4640, 4642 lines. This phenomenon is often observed at spectral type O5 at all luminosity classes, but preferentially in some associations or clusters and not the others (Walborn et al. Reference Walborn, Sota, Maíz Apellániz, Alfaro, Morrell, Barba, Arias and Gamen2010). For today, 18 Galactic O-stars are classified as Ofc.
Although Ofc class was introduced recently, CNO dichotomy is well known among O-stars (Walborn et al. Reference Walborn, Morrell, Howarth, Crowther, Lennon, Massey and Arias2004; Walborn Reference Walborn2003, Reference Walborn1976 and references therein). Anticorrelations of N versus C and O and correlations with He/H have encouraged interpretations in terms of mixing of CNO-cycled material into the atmospheres and winds of massive stars. The mixing depends on the rotation rate and increases at low metallicity (Maeder & Meynet Reference Maeder and Meynet2010). But are Ofc stars related to CNO dichotomy only? With the advent of the Ofc class of stars the following questions arose:
-
– Whether it is related only to the CNO-cycle and mixing processes in the star itself or it arises under the influence of a general dynamical evolution of clusters or associations?
-
– How does multiplicity of objects influence the excess of carbon?
-
– Are there differences between the physical parameters of Ofc stars and Of stars?
-
– How should an Ofc star evolve further?
To obtain more data and to estimate more parameters of Ofc stars are important steps for better understanding of the nature of these objects.
Cyg OB2 #11Footnote 1 is one of the Galactic supergiants located near the northern border of the Cyg OB2 (VI Cygni) association. This association was first noticed more than half a century ago by Münch and Morgan (Reference Münch and Morgan1953). It still attracts the attention of researchers due to the large number of O-stars and extremely high, heterogeneous interstellar reddening. Star #11 was immediately recognised as a member of the association (Münch and Morgan Reference Münch and Morgan1953). The first spectroscopy of the brightest stars belonging to Cyg OB2 (including #11) was performed by Johnson & Morgan (Reference Johnson and Morgan1954). They classified Cyg OB2 #11 as O6f. Later Walborn (Reference Walborn1973) classified the star as O5If+ using spectrograms obtained at Kitt Peak National Observatory. Massey & Thompson (Reference Massey and Thompson1991) performed its CCD photometry in three (U, B, V) bands. Cyg OB2 #11 is included in their catalogue under number 734 (MT91 734). Stellar magnitude in V band is V = 10.03mag (Massey & Thompson Reference Massey and Thompson1991). As of now, Cyg OB2 #11 is classified as O5.5Ifc (Walborn et al. Reference Walborn, Sota, Maíz Apellániz, Alfaro, Morrell, Barba, Arias and Gamen2010; Sota et al. Reference Sota, Maíz Apellániz, Walborn, Alfaro, Barbá, Morrell, Gamen and Arias2011). Kobulnicky et al. (Reference Kobulnicky2012) found that Cyg OB2 #11 is a single-lined spectroscopic binary (SB1 type).
The spectrum of Cyg OB2 #11 was modelled previously by several groups. Initially, by means of numerical modelling Herrero et al. (Reference Herrero, Corral, Villamariz and Martin1999) determined the parameters of Cyg OB2 #11 (effective temperature, luminosity, logg and helium abundance). They compared the spectral line profiles of H, He I, and He II with the line profiles synthesised for a large set of non-local thermodynamic equilibrium (NLTE) plane-parallel, hydrostatic model atmospheres. Herrero et al. (Reference Herrero, Puls, Corral, Kudritzki and Villamariz2001) measured terminal velocity of the wind employing resonance lines in the ultraviolet range. Then Cyg OB2 #11 was modelled by Herrero et al. (Reference Herrero, Puls and Najarro2002) using the fastwind (Santolaya-Rey, Puls, & Herrero Reference Santolaya-Rey, Puls and Herrero1997; Puls Reference Puls, Urbaneja, Venero, Repolust, Springmann, Jokuthy and Mokiem2005) code. In that work the mass-loss rate and velocity law in the stellar wind have been determined. Finally, Mokiem et al. (Reference Mokiem, de Koter, Puls, Herrero, Najarro and Villamariz2005) for the first time applied the automated fitting method and clarified the physical parameters of Cyg OB2 #11. It is worth noting that the mass-loss rate was determined by Herrero et al. (Reference Herrero, Puls and Najarro2002) and Mokiem et al. (Reference Mokiem, de Koter, Puls, Herrero, Najarro and Villamariz2005) without taking clumping into account. Inhomogeneities in the winds of the stars were studied in the article Puls et al. (Reference Puls, Markova, Scuderi, Stanghellini, Taranova, Burnley and Howarth2006). Based on a simultaneous modelling of Hα, infrared, millimetre, and radio observations authors concluded that clumping is three to six times stronger in the lower wind, where Hα forms, compared with the outer wind, where the radio continuum originates.
In the next section, we describe the observational data and their processing. In Section 3 we will tell about the construction of the model, discuss the results, and compare them with previous works. Section 4 is devoted to determination of chemical composition of the atmosphere of Cyg OB2 #11, while Section 5 shows locations of Cyg OB2 #11 on the different diagrams. The search for companions of Cyg OB2 #11 is described in Section 6. The conclusions are presented in Section 7.
2 OBSERVATIONAL DATA
We have combined spectra of Cyg OB2 #11 from the archives of 4.2-m William Herschel Telescope (WHT)Footnote 2 with new data obtained on the 1.5-m Russian–Turkish telescope (RTT150). Archival spectra were obtained with the ISIS (the Intermediate dispersion Spectrograph and Imaging System) instrument of the WHT in July 1995 and in September 1998. R600B and R1200R gratings were used for observations. The spectral ranges are 4000–4800 ÅÅ and 6350–6750 ÅÅ, and spectral resolutions are ~ 3 Å and ~ 1.5 Å, correspondingly. Detailed description of these data can be found in paper by Walborn & Howarth (Reference Walborn and Howarth2000). We processed the data using standard procedures for a long-slit spectroscopy.
Echelle spectrum of Cyg OB2 #11 was obtained in November 2012 with the TFOSC (TUBITAK Faint Object Spectrograph and Camera) instrument, installed in the Cassegrain focus of RTT150. The spectral resolution is λ/Δλ = 2500 and spectral range is 4200–8000 ÅÅ. dech software package was used for the data reduction and analysis (Galazutdinov Reference Galazutdinov1996). dech package includes all the standard stages of echelle data reduction process. Methods of observations and data reduction are the same as described by us in the paper (Maryeva & Zhuchkov Reference Maryeva and Zhuchkov2012). Besides, investigated object was observed in February 2013 on the same instrument with comparable integration time and image quality. Total exposure time was 80 min in both cases. No significant differences were found between the spectra obtained in 2012 and 2013 at an interval of 80 d. In the overall spectrum the signal-to-noise ratio per sampling element is S/N = 100 in the blue part (5000 Å) and 200 in the red part (7000 Å).
Moreover we have performed observations on the 6-m telescope of Special Astrophysical Observatory (SAO) with the speckle interferometer during December 2012 to look for close components at distances 0.02 − 4arcsec. These observations are described in more detail in Section 6.
We investigated the object in the UV range using the spectra obtained by the Hubble Space Telescope (HST) with the space telescope imaging spectrograph (STIS) and published by Herrero et al. (Reference Herrero, Puls, Corral, Kudritzki and Villamariz2001). These data were taken from the Multimission Archive at STScI (MAST)Footnote 3 . The spectral range of these data is 1150 − 1700 ÅÅ, and the spectral resolution is λ/Δλ ~ 1000 − 1500, S/N = 19.
3 MODELLING
In our work atmospheric parameters of Cyg OB2 #11 are determined using both ultraviolet and optical data simultaneously. We have used the cmfgen atmospheric modelling code (Hillier & Miller Reference Hillier and Miller1998). This code solves radiative transfer equation for objects with spherically symmetric extended outflows using either the Sobolev approximation or the full comoving-frame solution of the radiative transfer equation. cmfgen incorporates line blanketing, the effect of Auger ionisation, and clumping. Every model is defined by a hydrostatic stellar radius R
*, luminosity L
*, mass-loss rate
$\dot{M}$
, filling factor f, wind terminal velocity v
∞, stellar mass M, and by the abundances Zi
of included elementary species. Although in fastwind ions of different chemical elements are taken into account, fastwind models computed by Herrero et al. (Reference Herrero, Puls and Najarro2002); Mokiem et al. (Reference Mokiem, de Koter, Puls, Herrero, Najarro and Villamariz2005) assumed a solar mix of metals, and therefore could not be used to determine the chemical composition of stellar atmosphere. As a result, in our work we for the first time determine the chemical abundance of the atmosphere of Cyg OB2 #11.
In the previous studies the absolute magnitude (Mv) and bolometric corrections (BCv) were employed to estimate the luminosity. Numerous tabulations of BCv and Mv for OI 5 existing in the literature sometimes differ significantly. For example, the absolute magnitude of Cyg OB2 #11 in the work of Massey & Thompson (Reference Massey and Thompson1991) is Mv = −6.9mag, in articles of Mokiem et al. (Reference Mokiem, de Koter, Puls, Herrero, Najarro and Villamariz2005) and Herrero et al. (Reference Herrero, Corral, Villamariz and Martin1999) it is Mv = −6.51mag, while in Puls et al. (Reference Puls, Markova, Scuderi, Stanghellini, Taranova, Burnley and Howarth2006) Mv = −6.67mag. At the same time, the absolute magnitude of O5 I class stars is Mv = −6.33mag, according to calculations of Martins, Schaerer, and Hillier (Reference Martins, Schaerer and Hillier2005), the same value as assumed by Kiminki et al. (Reference Kiminki2007) for Cyg OB2 #11. We will use other method of determining the luminosity. To accurately determine the luminosity of the object, the magnitudes of the star were calculated in the U, B, V, and R filters from the model spectra and compared with observations. In order to obtain the magnitudes for the model spectra, we first recomputed the fluxes for the distance to the Cyg OB2 association (1.5 kpc according to Kiminki et al. (Reference Kiminki2007); Mel’nik & Dambis (Reference Mel’Nik and Dambis2009)). The resulting fluxes were corrected for the interstellar extinction. The value of the interstellar extinction Av = 5.4 also was taken from Kiminki et al. (Reference Kiminki2007). After this, the calculated spectra were convolved with the transmission curves of the standard U, B, V, and R filters. Thus, we have calculated the grid of models with different luminosities and compared them with observations to derive the luminosity of the object.
A recent study by Kobulnicky et al. (Reference Kobulnicky2012) has shown that Cyg OB2 #11 is a single-lined spectroscopic binary (SB1 type). Therefore, we decided to model Cyg OB2 #11 as a single object. To determine the parameters of the Cyg OB2 #11 atmosphere we chose the model most resembling the observational spectrum from the calculated grid of models of O-stars (Maryeva & Zhuchkov Reference Maryeva and Zhuchkov2012; Maryeva, Klochkova, & Chentsov Reference Maryeva, Klochkova and Chentsov2013a) and then started to refine the parameters of this model. We determined the effective temperature using the lines of He II λ4541.59, 5411.52 Å and He I λ4471.5, 5875.66 Å, as well as the lines of nitrogen NIII λλ4634.0, 4640.6 Å and weak absorptions of NIV λλ5200.60, 5204.28 Å. In the spectrum Cyg OB2 #11 there are no lines of NV λλ4604.16, 4620.5 Å that indicates that
$T_{\text{eff}}$
is below 40 000 K.
The non-clumped mass-loss rate (
${\dot{M}}_{\text{uncl}}$
) is related to the clumped (
${\dot{M}}_{\text{cl}}$
) by the relation
$\dot{M}_{\text{uncl}}=\dot{M}_{\text{cl}}/\sqrt{f_{\infty}}$
, where f
∞ is the volume filling factor at infinity. We investigated the effect of clumping on intensities of lines. We have stopped at a value f
∞ = 0.08 which well describes resonance lines of silicon SiIV λλ1393.75, 1402.77 Å, and H
α line.
Figures 1 and 2 present the comparison of the observed spectrum of Cyg OB2 #11 with the best model in the optical and the ultraviolet region. For comparison, Table 1 gives the parameters of Cyg OB2 #11 derived by Herrero et al. (Reference Herrero, Puls and Najarro2002) and Mokiem et al. (Reference Mokiem, de Koter, Puls, Herrero, Najarro and Villamariz2005). The temperature difference is within error limits. Obvious difference in the luminosity is due to the difference in estimations of distance to the star. In the previous works distance modulus is suggested to be equal to 11.2 ± 0.1, which corresponds to ≈ 1.7kpc. In the present work, as stated above, we assume that the distance is 1.5kpc (Mel’nik & Dambis Reference Mel’Nik and Dambis2009).
Table 1. Atmospheric parameters of Cyg OB2 #11, derived in this work – (1) and in the works of Herrero et al. (Reference Herrero, Puls and Najarro2002) – (2) and Mokiem et al. (Reference Mokiem, de Koter, Puls, Herrero, Najarro and Villamariz2005) – (3).
Figure 1. Comparison of the observed spectrum (the black line) with the model (the red line). The top panel shows data obtained by the Hubble Space Telescope, while the bottom panel shows data obtained by the 4.2-m William Herschel Telescope.
Figure 2. Comparison of the profiles of selected lines with the best model spectra. The black line shows the observed profile, and the red line, the model.
Most probably the differences in the mass-loss rate are due to taking clumping into account in our computations. Puls et al. (Reference Puls, Markova, Scuderi, Stanghellini, Taranova, Burnley and Howarth2006) also have measured the mass-loss rate taking clumping into account. They determined that mass-loss rate is
$\dot{M}_{\text{cl}}=(5\pm 0.5)$
· 10− 6M⊙yr− 1 and f = 1 for the region where H
α is formed. Therefore
$\dot{M}_{\text{cl}}$
equal to
$\dot{M}_{\text{uncl}}$
in this region. And our value of unclumped mass-loss rate is consistent with estimation Puls et al. (Reference Puls, Markova, Scuderi, Stanghellini, Taranova, Burnley and Howarth2006).
β is the exponent in the velocity law describing the increase of velocity with radius. With the decrease of β the depths of absorption lines vary and the widths of He II 4685.7 and H α wings increase. In our calculations we stopped at β = 1.3 ± 0.1. This value is higher than the value of the β parameter obtained for Cyg OB2 #11 before (Table 1), but it is comparable to the β parameters found for other O-class stars using cmfgen (Table 3).
4 CHEMICAL COMPOSITION
Calculated abundances of the basic elements are given in Table 2. During the modelling we had difficulties with the description of He II 4685.7 line. This line is sensitive to changes in temperature and in wind conditions – clumping and mass-loss rate. At the outset of the modelling we supposed that NHe/NH = 0.2 (by number). We determined effective temperature through the He II to He I ratio and the mass-loss rate through NIII λλ4634.0, 4640.6 Å and CIII λλ4647, 4650, 4652 Å lines, as well as H α and H β lines in the way so H α is in emission and H β in absorption, and as a result we got very strong He II 4685.7 line. To decrease the intensity of this line we have significantly reduced the mass fraction of helium in the model down to 16 − 28 %, which is 0.05 − 0.1 fraction by number of atoms. Herrero et al. (Reference Herrero, Puls and Najarro2002) determined the abundance of helium as 0.09 (the He abundance by number of particles relative to H plus He). Our estimate agrees with this value within our error limits. The relatively minor He enhancement is consistent with characteristic of Ofc spectral class (Walborn & Howarth Reference Walborn and Howarth2000).
Table 2. The abundances of chemical elements are given in the logarithmic scale relative hydrogen – log(Nel/NH) + 12, where
$N_{\text{el}}$
is the abundance of a given element by number.
The solar abundances are taken from Grevesse et al. (Reference Grevesse, Asplund and Sauval2005).
Determination of carbon fraction in atmospheres of O-stars is a very important and difficult task. The surface chemical composition depends on the star’s rotation rate, metallicity, and mass. Surface chemical abundances are key to understand the physical processes controlling the evolution of massive stars. In optical range there are CIV λλ5801.3, 5812 Å, CIII λλ4647, 4650, 4652 Å, and CIII λ5696 Å lines. But Martins & Hillier (Reference Martins and Hillier2012) do not recommend to use the lines of CIII λλ4647, 4650, 4652 Å and CIII λ5696 Å to determine the carbon abundance, because they are sensitive to logg, effective temperature, mass-loss rate, as well as to the inclusion of other ions in calculations, for example FeIV, FeV, SIV (Martins & Hillier Reference Martins and Hillier2012). To determine the carbon abundance in the atmosphere the ultraviolet line CIII λ1247 Å also may be used (Martins & Hillier Reference Martins and Hillier2012). But, as can be seen in Figure 1, C III 1247 is masked by strong N V emission so it cannot be used for abundance analysis. We determined the carbon abundance in a spectrum of Cyg OB2 #11 using lines CIV λλ5801.3, 5812 Å and CIII λ1175 Å (Figures 1 and 2) and we got ε(C) = 12 + log[NC/NH] = 8.5 ± 0.09. Solar abundance of C is 8.39 ± 0.05 (Grevesse, Asplund, & Sauval Reference Grevesse, Asplund and Sauval2005), so within the errors, the carbon abundance is solar.
We estimated the nitrogen abundance primarily by emission lines of NIII λλ4634.0, 4640.6 Å and weak absorption of NIV λλ5200.60, 5204.28 Å. These lines are considered ideal for determining the nitrogen abundance (Bouret et al. Reference Bouret, Hillier, Lanz and Fullerton2012). OIII λ5592.25 Å line is well distinguishable in the spectrum of the object. It has been used to estimate the oxygen abundance.
In addition to lines of five basis elements H, He, C, N, and O, lines of silicon and sulfur are present in the spectrum of Cyg OB2 #11. We determined the abundance of silicon using weak absorption SiIV λλ4629.85, 4655.49 Å and emission SiIV λλ6667.57, 6701.21 Å lines. But we were not able to reproduce the doublet of SiIV λλ1393.75, 1402.77 Å lines merging into the strong line with P Cyg profile. This doublet increases with decreasing temperature, but we cannot further decrease the temperature, because emission lines of He I lines appear then in optical range, for example, He I λ4921.94 Å, which is not in the spectrum of the object. Silicon doublet SiIV λλ1393.75, 1402.77 Å is also sensitive to the silicon abundance. But to get it, the silicon abundance in atmosphere of Cyg OB2 #11 should be seven times greater than solar one, which would significantly boost the SiIV optical lines that are also not observed in object spectrum.
We did not use FeV and FeVI lines to determine the iron abundance in the atmosphere of Cyg OB2 #11 because there are too many Fe lines in ultraviolet region and these lines are blended into wide bands at low spectral resolution. We used an indirect method instead. The resonance doublet of SiIV λλ1393.75, 1402.77 Å is sensitive to many factors, including Fe abundance. It becomes weaker when iron content in the atmosphere increases (see Figure 3). We found that the SiIV λλ1393.75, 1402.77 Å lines in the spectrum of Cyg OB2 #11 may be described if we significantly reduce (down to 0.37 XFe⊙ ) the abundance of iron in the object atmosphere.
Figure 3. The variation of the Si IV λλ1393.75, 1402.77 Å, C IV λλ1548.2, 1550.8 Å, and He II 4685.7 line profile depending on the iron abundance. Black line shows the model with Fe*/Fe⊙ = 0.37, cherry – Fe*/Fe⊙ = 1.5, red – Fe*/Fe⊙ = 3.7, orange – Fe*/Fe⊙ = 6.7, green – Fe*/Fe⊙ = 14.8, and blue – Fe*/Fe⊙ = 24.3.
5 LOCATIONS OF Cyg OB2 #11 ON THE HERTZSPRUNG–RUSSELL DIAGRAM
In Table 3 the parameters of Cyg OB2 #11 are compared with the parameters of other O-stars of similar spectral classes. Figure 4 shows the locations of these stars on the Hertzsprung–Russell diagram as well as evolutionary tracks and isochrones from the Geneva database (Ekström et al. Reference Ekström2012), constructed using the online calculatorFootnote 4 . The evolutionary tracks and isochrones are computed taking into account the effects of rotation. The rotation rate is vini /vcrit = 0.4. It can be seen that Cyg OB2 #11 is closest to star HD163758 (O6 I(n)fp) and HD210839 (O6.5 If) and it is sufficiently far from two other O(fc) stars Cyg OB2 #8 C and Cyg OB2 #8 A that are also marked on the diagram. The figure shows that the object lies between the isochrones corresponding to 4 and 5 Myr and the mass of the object is 40–60 M⊙. Chentsov et al. (Reference Chentsov, Klochkova, Panchuk, Yushkin and Nasonov2013) spectroscopically confirmed age differences for stars which are located in different parts of Cyg OB2. Stars located at north part of the association are older than all other objcts in the Cyg OB2. Their ages are about 5 Myr (Chentsov et al. Reference Chentsov, Klochkova, Panchuk, Yushkin and Nasonov2013). The results of our numerical simulations support this conclusion and are consistent with the hypothesis of cascade star formation in the association Cyg OB2 (Maryeva, Klochkova, & Chentsov Reference Maryeva, Klochkova and Chentsov2013b).
Table 3. Comparison of the atmospheric parameters of Cyg OB2 #11 with parameters of other O-stars.
*Spectral classes are listed according to Sota et al. (Reference Sota, Maíz Apellániz, Walborn, Alfaro, Barbá, Morrell, Gamen and Arias2011) catalogue.
a –Najarro, Hanson, & Puls (Reference Najarro, Hanson and Puls2011), b – Bouret et al. (Reference Bouret, Hillier, Lanz and Fullerton2012), c – Borissova et al. (Reference Borissova2012).
$V \text{sin} I$
for Cyg OB2 #11 are taken from Herrero et al. (Reference Herrero, Puls, Corral, Kudritzki and Villamariz2001).
Figure 4. The location of Cyg OB2 #11 in the Hertzsprung–Russell diagram (marked with the red circle with error bars). For comparison the stars of similar spectral class are shown. Blue points with error bars show stars listed in Table 3. Triangles are ‘normal’ O4-6 supergiants belonging to Arches cluster, diamonds are ‘extreme’ O4-6 If+ belonging to Arches cluster. These data were taken from Martins et al. (Reference Martins, Hillier, Paumard, Eisenhauer, Ott and Genzel2008). The solid horizontal lines represent the mass tracks for stellar masses 120, 85, 60, and 40 M⊙. The vertical solid lines represent stellar isochrones. The evolution tracks and the stellar isochrones are taken from the Geneva library.
Figure 5 shows the change of hydrogen mass fraction with age. According to this diagram the mass of Cyg OB2 #11 is 60 M⊙. The figure shows that the object, like HD15570, is on the early part of its evolution track unlike stars HD163758 (O6.5 If) and HD210839 (O6 I(n)fp). It should be noted that although strong CIII lines are observed in the spectra of HD15570 and HD14947, they are weaker than the NIII lines, and these stars are not Ofc stars (Walborn et al. Reference Walborn, Sota, Maíz Apellániz, Alfaro, Morrell, Barba, Arias and Gamen2010).
Figure 5. Hydrogen mass-fraction as a function of luminosity. Cyg OB2 #11 are marked with the red circle with error bars. Locations of O4-6 and O4-6 If+ supergiants belonging to Arches cluster are marked by triangles. Solid lines show evolution tracks from Geneva library.
Consider the location of Cyg OB2 #11 on the diagram of carbon mass-fraction as function of nitrogen mass-fraction (Figure 6). This figure shows the evolutionary tracks for stars with masses of 40 M⊙, 60 M⊙, and 85 M⊙, computed in 2013 (Ekström et al. Reference Ekström2012). Maeder et al. (Reference Maeder, Meynet, Ekstrom and Georgy2009) write that N/C ratio is sensitive to many parameters such as the age of the star, metallicity, rotation velocity, magnetic field. Evolutionary tracks computed in 2013 are below the tracks designed in 2003 for the same stellar masses (Meynet & Maeder Reference Meynet and Maeder2003). Cyg OB2 #11 is located above the evolutionary tracks. While considering the carbon abundance there are some objects on this diagram similar to Cyg OB2 #11, but as Figure 6 shows, the nitrogen abundance in this object is lower than that of other O4-6 supergiants. The abundance ε(N) = 8.28 ± 0.03 obtained by us is lower than one for ‘normal’ O4-6 supergiants. Also, it is lower than the nitrogen abundance in other supergiant belonging to Cyg OB2, Cyg OB2 #7 (O3If*, ε(N) = 8.65 ± 0.05; Maryeva et al. Reference Maryeva, Klochkova and Chentsov2013a). Walborn et al. (Reference Walborn, Lennon, Heap, Lindler, Smith, Evans and Parker2000) suggested the hypothesis that the morphologically normal majority of OB supergiants may be nitrogen enhanced, while the OBC minority have normal CNO abundances and the OBN class displays more extreme degrees of processed material mixed into the atmospheres. In general, our result is consistent with the hypothesis. Based on the calculations we conclude that nitrogen abundance in OBC stars can be up to two times greater than solar.
Figure 6. Carbon mass-fraction as function of nitrogen mass-fraction, as predicted by Geneva model with the rotation rate
$V_{\text{rot}}/V_{\text{crit}}=0.4$
. Solid line is for 40 M⊙, dashed for 60 M⊙, dotted for 85 M⊙. Unnamed triangles mark positions of O4-6 and O4-6 If+ supergiants belonging to Arches cluster.
6 SEARCH FOR THE BINARY COMPANION OF Cyg OB2 #11
As mentioned above, Cyg OB2 #11 is a SB1 binary star (Kobulnicky et al. Reference Kobulnicky2012), with period of 72.43 ± 0.07 d and e = 0.5 ± 0.06. It is known that the fraction of binary and multiple stars among young early-type objects is about 80% or more, that is more than twice above that for old low-mass stars. Moreover, most probable multiplicity of a newly forming stellar system is 2 − 3 (Goodwin & Kroupa Reference Goodwin and Kroupa2005). Thus, even among the field stars the fraction of the triples and systems of higher multiplicity is approximately 0.25 of the total number of binaries. All this makes it reasonable to search for the companions of objects like Cyg OB2 #11. The search for companions of Cyg OB2 #11 was already performed by Maíz Apellániz (Reference Maíz Apellániz2010). Maíz Apellániz (Reference Maíz Apellániz2010) has not found companions in the range of separations of 0.1 − 14arcsec and the magnitude differences lower than 8mag.
So, we performed observations on 6-m Russian BTA telescope with the speckle interferometer, mounted in the primary focus. This device allows to raise the angular resolution up to the diffraction limit which is 0.02 arcsec for BTA.
Observations with speckle interferometer based on electron multiplying charge-coupled device (EMCCD; Maksimov et al. Reference Maximov, Balega, Dyachenko, Malogolovets, Rastegaev and Semernikov2009) were carried out in the visual spectral range with filters having central wavelengths of 5500 and 8000 Å and pass-band halfwidths of 200 and 1000 Å, respectively. We estimated the atmospheric seeing from the full width at half maximum averaged over a sequence of speckle frames for a stellar image, and found it to be about 2arcsec.
2000 frames of speckle images were accumulated in each series, with single frame exposure of 20 ms. Methods of reduction of speckle interferometric data from BTA is described in the articles Maksimov et al. (Reference Maximov, Balega, Dyachenko, Malogolovets, Rastegaev and Semernikov2009); Balega et al. (Reference Balega, Balega, Hofmann, Maksimov, Pluzhnik, Schertl, Shkhagosheva and Weigelt2002). Method of the companion detection is based on analysis of the power spectrum averaged over sequence of speckle interferograms. We report the non-detection of components within separation range of 0.02 − 4arcsec and with magnitude difference less than 6mag at given wavelengths. Indeed, Cyg OB2 #11 is extremely bright, so, the chance to find a companion that is 250 times weaker is little (but not zero!). Let us mention the fact that at Cyg OB2 #11’s distance (1.51 kpc according to Kiminki et al. (Reference Kiminki2007)), 0.02 arcsec separation corresponds to 30 AU. So, there is no wide component in this system. And to fill the gap between the direct components detection at the largest telescopes diffraction limit and ability to detect SB, we need to improve angular resolution down to at least 0.001 arcsec. The search may be continued in IR range when the instrumental opportunities of high Δmag detection will be improved.
7 RESULTS
In this work we investigated the atmosphere of O5Ifc supergiant Cyg OB2 #11 using the medium-resolution spectra, obtained at RTT150 and WHT, and archival UV data. We have applied non-LTE cmfgen code for modelling of the atmosphere and determined its physical parameters and chemical composition. Parameters of Cyg OB2 #11 are similar to the ones of other O4-6 supergiants. The position on the Hertzsprung–Russell diagram corresponds to the mass of star about 50 M⊙ and age about 4.5 Myr. Our estimation of age is consistent with ages of other stars located at north part of Cyg OB2.
We found that in the atmosphere of stars He/H ≈ 0.1 and nitrogen abundance is lower than that for other ‘normal’ O stars (ε(N) = 8.28 ± 0.03), while the carbon abundance is solar. Overall, our modelling confirms the hypothesis suggested by Walborn (Reference Walborn1976); Walborn et al. (Reference Walborn, Lennon, Heap, Lindler, Smith, Evans and Parker2000), that OBC supergiants have normal CNO abundances and anomalies in N versus C, O correlate with the He abundance (Walborn & Howarth Reference Walborn and Howarth2000). In the spectrum of Cyg OB2 #11 there are lines of silicon and sulphur, which were used for estimating the abundances of these elements, as results ε(Si) = 7.81 ± 0.07 and ε(S) = 6.54 ± 0.06.
The speckle interferometry performed on the Russian 6-m BTA telescope does not reveal any binary companion in the range of separations of 0.02 − 4arcsec and with magnitude differences less than 6mag.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
We would like to thank John D. Hillier for his great code cmfgen. Likewise, we thank Nolan Walborn for valuable discussions and for providing the data obtained at WHT. We would like to thank the anonymous referee for valuable comments. We used the data from the Multimission Archive at STScl (MAST), the CASU Astronomical Data Centre, SIMBAD database, and database of stellar evolution group at the Geneva Observatory. The study was supported by the Russian Foundation for Basic Research (project nos. 14-02-31247, 12-07-00739, 12-02-00185-a, 13-02-00419-a, and 12-02-97006-r-povolzhye-a). The observations at the 6-m telescope are supported by the Ministry of Education and Science of Russian Federation (state contract no. 14.518.11.7070). Olga Maryeva thanks the grant of Dynasty Foundation.
