Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T20:28:28.822Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

High-Level Magnetic Activity on a Low-Mass Close Binary: GSC 02038-0293

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2013

H. A. Dal ,
E. Sipahi  and
O. Özdarcan
H. A. Dal*
Affiliation:
Department of Astronomy and Space Sciences, University of Ege, Bornova, 35100 İzmir, Turkey
E. Sipahi
Affiliation:
Department of Astronomy and Space Sciences, University of Ege, Bornova, 35100 İzmir, Turkey
O. Özdarcan
Affiliation:
Department of Astronomy and Space Sciences, University of Ege, Bornova, 35100 İzmir, Turkey
*
BCorresponding author. Email: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Taking into account results obtained from light-curve analysis and out-of-eclipse analyses, we discuss the nature of GSC 02038-00293 and also its magnetic activity behaviour.We obtained light curves of the system during observing seasons 2007, 2008 and 2011. We obtained its secondary minimum clearly in I-band observations in 2008 for the first time. Analysing this light curve, we found the physical parameters of the components. The light-curve analysis indicates that the possible mass ratio of the system is 0.35. We obtained the remaining V-band light curves, extracting the eclipses. We modelled these remaining curves using the SPOTMODEL program and found possible spot configurations of the magnetically active component for each observing season. The models demonstrated that there are two active longitudes for the active component. The models reveal that both active longitudes migrate in the direction of decreasing longitude. We also examined the light curves in out-of-eclipse phases with respect to minimum and maximum brightness, amplitude, etc. The amplitude of the curves during out-of-eclipse phases varies in a sinusoidal way with a period of ∼8.9 yr; the mean brightness of the system is dramatically decreasing. The phases of the deeper minimum during out-of-eclipse periods exhibit a migration toward decreasing phase.

Keywords

stars: activitybinaries: eclipsingstars: individual: GSC 02038-0293stars: low-massstarspots
Type
Regular Papers
Information
Publications of the Astronomical Society of Australia , Volume 29 , Issue 2 , 2012 , pp. 150 - 160
Copyright
Copyright © Astronomical Society of Australia 2012

References

Berdyugina, S. V., 2006, IAUJD, 8E, 64Google Scholar
Bernhard, K. & Frank, P., 2006, IBVS, 5719, 1Google Scholar
Bopp, B. W. & Evans, D. S., 1973, MNRAS, 164, 343CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bopp, B. W. & Fekel, F. Jr, 1977, AJ, 82, 490CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Browning, M. K., 2011, in IAU Symp. Vol. 271, Astrophysical Dynamics: From Stars to Galaxies, ed. Brummell, N. H., Brun, A. S., Miesch, M. S. & Ponty, Y. (Cambridge: CUP), 69Google Scholar
Casagrande, L., Flynn, C. & Bessell, M., 2008, MNRAS, 389, 585CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dal, H. A. & Evren, S., 2011, PASJ, 63, 427CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dawson, B. & Trapp, R. G., 2004, Basic and Clinical Biostatistics (New York: McGraw-Hill), 61Google Scholar
Dragomir, D., Roy, P. & Rutledge, R. E., 2007, AJ, 133, 2495CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fernandez, J. M., et al. , 2009, ApJ, 701, 764CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frank, P. & Bernhard, K., 2007, OEJV, 71, 1Google Scholar
Friedemann, C. & Gürtler, J., 1975, AN, 296, 125Google Scholar
Gershberg, R. E., Katsova, M. M., Lovkaya, M. N., Terebizh, A. V. & Shakhovskaya, N. I., 1999, A&AS, 139, 555Google Scholar
Hardie, R. H., 1962, in Astronomical Techniques, ed. Hiltner, W. A. (Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press), 178Google Scholar
Korhonen, H. & Elstner, D., 2005, A&A, 440, 1161Google Scholar
Korhonen, H. & Järvinen, S. P., 2007, in IAU Symp. Vol. 240, Binary Stars as Critical Tools & Tests in Contemporary Astrophysics, ed. Hartkopf, W. I., Guinan, E. F. & Harmanec, P. (Cambridge: CUP), 453Google Scholar
Korhonen, H., Vida, K., Husarik, M., Mahajan, S., Szczygiel, D. & Oláh, K., 2010, AN, 331, 772Google Scholar
Kraus, A. L., Tucker, R. A., Thompson, M. I., Craine, E. R. & Hillenbrand, L. A., 2011, ApJ, 728, 48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kron, G. E., 1952, ApJ, 115, 301CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kunkel, W. E., 1975, in IAU Symp. Vol. 67, Variable Stars and Stellar Evolution, ed. Sherwood, V. E. & Plaut, L. (Dordrecht: Reidel), 15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Landolt, A. U., 1983, AJ, 88, 439CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Landolt, A. U., 1992, AJ, 104, 340CrossRefGoogle Scholar
López-Morales, M., 2007, ApJ, 660, 732CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lucy, L. B., 1967, ZA, 65, 89Google Scholar
Morales, J. C., Ribas, I. & Jordi, C., 2008, A&A, 478, 507Google Scholar
Morales, J. C., Gallardo, J., Ribas, I., Jordi, C., Baraffe, I. & Chabrier, G., 2010, ApJ, 718, 502CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Motulsky, H., 2007, GraphPad Prism 5: Statistics Guide (San Diego: GraphPad Software), 94Google Scholar
Norton, A. J., et al. , 2007, A&A, 467, 785Google Scholar
Oláh, K., Korhonen, H., Kövári, Zs., Forgács-Dajka, E. & Strassmeier, K. G., 2006, A&A, 452, 303Google Scholar
Pojmánski, G., 1997, AcA, 47, 467Google Scholar
Prša, A. & Zwitter, T., 2005, ApJ, 628, 426CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ribárik, G., 2002, Occasional Technical Notes from Konkoly Observatory No. 12, available at http://www.konkoly.hu/staff/ribarik/SML/Google Scholar
Ribárik, G., Oláh, K. & Strassmeier, K. G., 2003, AN, 324, 202Google Scholar
Rodonó, M., 1986, NASSP, 492, 409Google Scholar
Rucinski, S. M., 1969, AcA, 19, 245Google Scholar
Siess, L., Dufour, E. & Forestini, M., 2000, A&A, 358, 593Google Scholar
Sipahi, E., Dal, H. A. & Özdarcan, O., 2009, IBVS, 5904Google Scholar
Thomas, J. H. & Weiss, N. O., 2008, in Sunspots and Starspots, Cambridge Astrophysics Series 46, 1st edition, ed. King, A., Lin, D., Maran, S. & Ward, J. M. (New York: CUP), 181Google Scholar
Tokunaga, A. T., 2000, in Allen's Astrophysical Quantities, 4th edition, ed. Cox, A. N. (Berlin: Springer), 143Google Scholar
Torres, C. A. O. & Ferraz Mello, S., 1973, A&A, 27, 231Google Scholar
Torres, G., Andersen, J. & Giménez, A., 2010, A&ARv, 18, 67Google Scholar
van Hamme, W., 1993, AJ, 106, 2096CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Voges, W., et al. , 1999, A&A, 349, 389Google Scholar
Vogt, S. S., 1975, ApJ, 199, 418CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, R. E., 1990, ApJ, 356, 613CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, R. E. & Devinney, E. J., 1971, ApJ, 166, 605CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woźniak, P. R., et al. , 2004, AJ, 127, 2436CrossRefGoogle Scholar