Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T18:14:39.230Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Gravitational Lensing of Millisecond Pulsars

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 April 2016

Mark A. Walker*
Affiliation:
Research Centre for Theoretical Astrophysics, University of Sydney, NSW 2006, [email protected]

Abstract

Gravitational lensing can significantly magnify the images of astrophysical sources, but only if the source lies within the Einstein ring of the lens. In consequence the chance of any Galactic star magnifying a more distant source is extremely small—much less than one in a million. However, the extra light travel time (‘Shapiro delay’) introduced by the presence of a lens can be large even when there is negligible effect on the image magnification, and as the relative positions of source and lens change so does the delay. In this paper we quantify these changes and the corresponding influence on apparent timing properties of pulsars. While the total Shapiro delay can be large, it is the temporal variations in this quantity which are measurable with pulsar timing. We find that the magnitude of the expected delay variations is too small to be detectable except during strong lensing events, which are extremely rare. Even in the case of a high-velocity pulsar in the Galactic Plane, the stochastic Shapiro delay is typically expected not to have a substantial influence on the timing properties. In consequence the viability of a pulsar-based time standard is not adversely affected by gravitational lensing.

Type
Instruments, Techniques and Basic Measurements
Copyright
Copyright © Astronomical Society of Australia 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Binney, J., & Tremaine, S. 1987, Galactic Dynamics (Princeton: Princeton Univ. Press)Google Scholar
Foster, R. S., & Backer, D. C. 1990, ApJ, 361, 300 Google Scholar
Johnston, S., Walker, M. A., van Kerkwijk, M. H., Lyne, A. G., & D’Amico, N. 1995, MNRAS, 274, L43 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaspi, V. M., Taylor, J. H., & Ryba, M. F. 1994, ApJ, 428, 713 Google Scholar
Larchenko, T. I., & Doroshenko, O. V. 1995, AA, 297, 607 Google Scholar
Ohnishi, K., Hosokawa, M., Fukushima, T., & Takeuti, M. 1995, ApJ, 448, 271 Google Scholar
Shapiro, I. I. 1964, Phys. Rev. Lett., 13, 789 Google Scholar
Weinberg, S. 1972, Gravitation and Cosmology (New York:Wiley)Google Scholar
Wex, N., Gil, J., & Sendyk, M. 1996, AA, in pressGoogle Scholar