Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-s2hrs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-09T19:37:17.105Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Effect of a Radome on Submillimeter Site-Testing Measurements

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 March 2013

Paolo G. Calisse
Paolo G. Calisse*
Affiliation:
School of Physics, University of New South Wales, Sydney NSW 2052, Australia
*
CE-mail: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

We evaluate the effect that radome transparency has on atmospheric opacity measurements performed by the skydip technique. We show that, except at rather high opacities, it is not sufficient to ignore losses in the radome (or ‘window’) during the data analysis and then subtract them from the derived atmospheric opacity. Perhaps surprisingly, unless radome transparency is correctly modelled, the atmosphere will appear to have a minimum opacity that is many times greater that the radome losses. Our conclusion is that some previous site studies may have significantly underestimated the quality of the best submilli-metre sites, and that the difference between these sites and poorer sites may be much greater than currently believed. We also show that part of the residual 857-GHz opacity at the best sites, currently ascribed to ‘dry-air opacity’, can in fact be just an artefact caused by not properly modelling the radome during the data analysis.

Keywords

atmospheric effectsinstruments: miscellaneoussite testingsubmillimeter
Type
Research Article
Information
Publications of the Astronomical Society of Australia , Volume 21 , Issue 3 , 2004 , pp. 252 - 255
Copyright
Copyright © Astronomical Society of Australia 2004

References

Calisse, P. G., Ashley, M. C. B., Burton, M. G., Storey, J. W. V., Radford, S., & Peterson, J. 2004, PASA, 21, 256 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chamberlin, R. A. 2001, JGR, 106, 20 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chamberlin, R. A., & Bally, J. 1994, ApOpt, 33, 1095 Google Scholar
Chamberlin, R. A., Lane, A. P., & Stark, A. A. 1997, ApJ, 476, 428 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Zafra, R. L. 1995, in Proc. Intern. School of Physics Enrico Fermi 124, Diagnostic Tools in Atmospheric Physics, eds. G. Fiocco, & G. Visconti (Varenna: Società Italiana di Fisica), 23 Google Scholar
Dicke, R. H., Beringer, R., Kyhl, R. L., & Vane, A. B. 1946, PhRv, 70, 340 Google Scholar
Dragovan, M., Stark, A. A., Pernic, R., & Pomerantz, M. A. 1990, ApOpt, 29, 463 Google Scholar
Lane, A. P. 1998, in Astrophysics in Antarctica, eds. R. Landsberg, & G. Novak (Chicago: ASP), 289 Google Scholar
Matsuo, H., Sakamoto, A., & Matsushita, S. 1998, in Advanced Technology MMW, Radio, and Terahertz Telescopes 3357, ed. T. G. Phillips, Proc. SPIE, 626 Google Scholar
Pardo, J. R., Serabyn, E., & Cernicharo, J. 2001, JQSRT, 68, 419 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Radford, S. J. E. 2002, in Site Characterization for mm/submm Astronomy, eds. Z. B. J. Vernin, & C. Munoz-Tunon (Chicago: ASP), 148 Google Scholar
Radford, S. J. E., & Holdaway, M. A. 1998, in Advanced Technology MMW, Radio, and Terahertz Telescopes 3357, ed. T. G. Phillips, Proc. SPIE, 486 Google Scholar
Rohlfs, K., & Wilson, T. L. 1996, Tools of Radio Astronomy, 2nd ed (Berlin: Springer)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ulich, B. L., & Haas, R. W. 1976, ApJ, 30, 247 Google Scholar