Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T22:11:14.350Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A CCD Hα Survey of Nearby Southern Spiral Galaxies

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 April 2016

Stuart D. Ryder  and
Michael A. Dopita
Stuart D. Ryder
Affiliation:
Mount Stromlo and Siding Spring Observatories, Private Bag, Weston ACT 2611
Michael A. Dopita
Affiliation:
Mount Stromlo and Siding Spring Observatories, Private Bag, Weston ACT 2611
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Some initial results of a flux-calibrated CCD Hα imaging program of bright, nearby southern spiral galaxies are presented. Very few southern hemisphere spiral galaxies have ever been completely imaged in Hα, let alone with a CCD. This survey (which mainly uses the MSSSO 1.0-m reflector with an f/3.5 focal reducer) will, when combined with spectrophotometry of the H II regions thus revealed, allow us to trace the chemical evolution of each galaxy. Furthermore, since the absolute Hα flux is a reliable measure of the high-mass star formation rate in a galaxy, such observational data will permit us to test the predictions of the various star formation theories.

Type
Extragalactic
Information
Publications of the Astronomical Society of Australia , Volume 9 , Issue 1 , 1991 , pp. 89 - 90
Copyright
Copyright © Astronomical Society of Australia 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Blifford, I. H., 1966, Appl. Opt., 5, 105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burstein, D. and Heiles, C., 1984, Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser., 54, 33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dopita, M. A. and Hart, J. A., 1976, Proc. Astron. Soc. Aust., 3, 35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hodge, P. W. and Kennicutt, R. C., 1983a, Astron. J., 88, 296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hodge, P. W., Kennicutt, R.C. and Lee, M. G., 1988, Publ. Astron. Soc. Pac., 100, 917.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hodge, P. W., Lee, M. G. and Kennicutt, R.C., Publ. Astron. Soc. Pac., 101, 32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hodge, P. W., Lee, M. G. and Kennicutt, R. C., 1989b, Publ. Astron. Soc. Pac., 101, 640.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hodge, P. W. and Lee, M. G., 1990, Publ. Astron. Soc. Pac., 102, 26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kennicutt, R. C., 1983, Astrophys. J., 272, 54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kennicutt, R. C., 1984, Astrophys. J., 287, 116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kennicutt, R. C., Edgar, B. K. and Hodge, P. W., 1989, Astrophys. J., 337, 761.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lynds, B. T., 1974, Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser., 28, 391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meatheringham, S. J. and Dopita, M. A., 1990, Astrophys. J., submitted.Google Scholar
Tully, R.B., 1988, Nearby Galaxies Catalogue, Cambridge UP.Google Scholar
de Vaucouleurs, G. and Freeman, K. C., 1972, Vistas in Astronomy, 14, ed. Beer, A., Pergamon Press, p. 163.Google Scholar