Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T22:03:21.935Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

An Observed Correlation between the Flux Densities of Extended Hard X-ray and Microwave Solar Bursts

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 April 2016

R. T. Stewart  and
G. J. Nelson
R. T. Stewart
Affiliation:
Division of Radiophysici, CSIRO, Sydney
G. J. Nelson
Affiliation:
Division of Radiophysici, CSIRO, Sydney
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Crannell et al. (1978) have reported an observed correlation between the time profiles and flux densities of impulsive hard X-ray and microwave solar bursts. We report here on a significant correlation between the flux density of extended bursts of hard X-rays and micowaves. These extended events follow after impulsive bursts and last much longer (see e.g. Fig. 1, Frost and Dennis 1971). However, as extended bursts only occur during very large flares the number of cases available for study is small. The significance of our observations follows from the suggestion of Wild et al. (1963) that the extended bursts are evidence for a second-phase acceleration process in the corona. We show that the observed characteristics of these extended microwave bursts (viz. a rather flat spectrum below a turnover frequency which is independent of intensity) can be explained by gyro-synchrotron radiation from the same population of energetic (E ≈ 100 keV) electrons as those emitting (thin-target) X-ray bremsstrahlung. A detailed source model is discussed in a companion paper (Nelson and Stewart 1979 — Paper B).

Type
Contributions
Information
Publications of the Astronomical Society of Australia , Volume 3 , Issue 6 , 1979 , pp. 390 - 392
Copyright
Copyright © Astronomical Society of Australia 1979

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Castelli, J.P., Air Force Cambridge Research Laboratories Geophys. Space Data Bull., 9, No. 3, 77 (1972).Google Scholar
Cline, T.L., Holt, S.S., and Hones, E.W. Jr., J. Geophys. Res., 73, 434 (1968).Google Scholar
Crannell, C.J., Frost, K.J., Matzler, C., Ohki, K., and Saba, J.L., Astrophys. J., 223, 620 (1978).Google Scholar
Croom, D.L., and Harris, L.D.J., UAG Report 28(1), 210 World Data Center A for Solar Terrestrial Physics (Ed. Helen E. Coffey) (NOAA) (1973).Google Scholar
Enome, S., and Tanaka, H., In Solar Magnetic Fields (Proc. IAU Symp. No. 43) (Ed. Howard, R.) (Dordrecht, Reidel), p. 413 (1971).Google Scholar
Frost, K.J., Astrophys. J., 158, L159 (1969).Google Scholar
Frost, K.J., and Dennis, B.R., Astrophys. J., 165, 655 (1971).Google Scholar
Holt, S.S., and Ramaty, R., Solar Phys., 8, 119 (1969).Google Scholar
Hoyng, P., Brown, J.C., and Van Beek, H.F., Solar Phys., 48, 197 (1976).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hudson, H.S., In High Energy Phenomena on the Sun, (Proc. Symp. held NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, Maryland, 28- 30 Sept. 1972) (Eds. Ramaty, R. and Stone, R.G.), p. 207 (1972).Google Scholar
Hudson, H.S., Astrophys. J., 224, 235 (1978).Google Scholar
Hudson, H.S., Lin., R.P., and Stewart, R.T., (in preparation) (1979).Google Scholar
Hurley, K., and Duprat, G., Solar Phys., 52, 107 (1977).Google Scholar
Nelson, G.J., and Stewart, R.T., Proc. Astron. Soc. Aust. 3, 392 (1979).Google Scholar
Ramaty, R., Astrophys. J., 158, 753 (1969).Google Scholar
Ramaty, R., and Petrosian, V., SUIPR Report 465 (Institution for Plasma Research Stanford University) (1972).Google Scholar
Takakura, T., Solar Phys., 26, 151 (1972).Google Scholar
Yamashita, F., Mitobe, A., and Isobe, T., J. Radio Res. Lab. Japan, 21, 106, 303 (1974).Google Scholar
Wild, J.P., Smerd, S.F., and Weiss, A.A., Annu. Rev. Astron. Astrophys., I, 291 (1963).Google Scholar