Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T09:29:45.538Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Theoretical Studies of Star Formation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 April 2016

J. J. Monaghan*
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, Monash University

Extract

There are two major difficulties associated with theoretical studies of star formation. The first of these is that the dominant physical process or processes leading to star formation have not been identified. The second is that realistic calculations at an appropriate level of accuracy have been impossible to carry out. The result has been that only minor advances have been made on the early work of Jeans (1929) and Hoyle (1953). Much greater progress can be expected in the next few years both because observations of infra-red sources have given us much more information about the site of star formation, and because access to the current generation of very fast computers is becoming more common.

Type
Invited Papers
Copyright
Copyright © Astronomical Society of Australia 1983

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bodenheimer, P., Tohline, J. E., and Black, D. C., Astrophys. J., 242, 209 (1980).Google Scholar
Bonnor, W. B., Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc., 116, 351 (1956).Google Scholar
Ebert, R., Z. f. Astrophys., 37, 217 (1955).Google Scholar
Elmegreen, B. G., and Lada, C. J., Astrophys. J., 214, 725 (1977).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, N. J. II, 1979 I.A.U. Symposium 87. P.1, D. Reidel Pub. Co.Google Scholar
Field, G. B., Astrophys. J., 142, 531 (1965).Google Scholar
Gingold, R. A., and Monaghan, J. J., Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc., 197, 461 (1981).Google Scholar
Gingold, R. A., and Monaghan, J. J., Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. In Press (1983).Google Scholar
Hoyle, J. H., Astronomy and Cosmogony, 1929, p. 245, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Larson, R. B., Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc., 145, 271 (1969).Google Scholar
Lattanzio, J., Proc Astron. Soc. Aust., 5, 232 (1983).Google Scholar
Low, C., and Lynden-Bell, D., Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc., 177, 376 (1976).Google Scholar
Lucy, L. B., and Ricco, E., Astron. J., 84, 401 (1978).Google Scholar
Manchester, R. N., Astrophys. J., 188, 637 (1974).Google Scholar
McKee, C. F., and Ostriker, Astrophys. J., 218, 148 (1979).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mouschovias, T. Ch., Protostars and Planets, p. 209.Google Scholar
Mouschovias, T. Ch., Astrophys. J., 192, 37 (1974).Google Scholar
Mouschovias, T. Ch., Astrophys. J., 207, 141 (1976).Google Scholar
Mouschovias, T. Ch., in Protostars and Planets, 1980, p. 209, ed. Geherels, T., Univ. of Arizona Press.Google Scholar
Norman, C., and Silk, J., 1979 I.A.U. Symposium 87, p. 137, D. Reidel Pub. Co.Google Scholar
Phillips, G. J., Proc. Astron. Soc Aust., 4, 371 (1982).Google Scholar
Phillips, G. J., Proc. Astron. Soc. Aust., 5, (1983).Google Scholar
Prentice, A. J. R., Proc Astron. Soc. Aust., 5, (1983).Google Scholar
Reddish, V. C., Stellar Formation, 1978, Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
Rees, M. J., Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc., 176, 483 (1976).Google Scholar
Scalo, J. M., Protostars and Planets, 1980, p. 265, ed. Geherels, T., Univ. of Arizona Press.Google Scholar
Scott, E. H., and Black, D. C., Astrophys. J., 239, 166 (1980).Google Scholar
Stahler, S. W., Shu, F. J., and Taam, R. E., Astrophys. J., 241, 637 (1980).Google Scholar
Tenorio-Tagle, G., Astron. Astrophys. J., 71, 59 (1979).Google Scholar
Winkler, K. H., and Newman, M. J., Astr phys. J., 237, 201 (1980).Google Scholar
Woodward, P. R., Astrophys. J., 195, 61 (1975).Google Scholar
Woodward, P. R., Astrophys. J., 207, 484 (1976).Google Scholar
Wright, W. E., 1973. Ph.D. Thesis, California Inst, of Tech.Google Scholar
Yorke, H. W., Bodenheimer, P., and Tenorio-Tagle, G., Astron. Astrophys., 108, 25 (1982).Google Scholar