Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-4rdpn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T03:37:44.803Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Search for the Optical Counterpart of Centaurus X-3

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 April 2016

B. A. Peterson
B. A. Peterson*
Affiliation:
Mount Stromlo and Siding Spring Observatories, The Australian National University, Canberra
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Centaurus X-3 was first observed by Chodil et al. in the energy range 2-9.5 Kev in 1967. Subsequent observations by Cooke and Pounds in the energy range 1-12 Kev snowed that the source was variable. Periodic X-ray pulses from Centaurus X-3 in the energy range 1-20 Kev have been discovered by Giacconi et al. They found that 70% of the X-ray energy was emitted in a pulse during 30% of a cycle. The length of the cycle is about 4.84 sec, but it was found to change by ~0.1% in a few days and by ~1% in three months. The X-ray data locate the source at 11h21.8m -60°25.8′ (1950) with an error of ±5′ arc.

Type
Contributions
Information
Publications of the Astronomical Society of Australia , Volume 2 , Issue 2 , March 1972 , pp. 110
Copyright
Copyright © Astronomical Society of Australia 1972

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Chodil, G., Mark, H., Rodrigues, R., Seward, F., Swift, C. D., Hiltner, W. A., Wallerstein, G. and Mannery, E. J., Phys. Rev. Letters, 19, 681 (1967).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2 Cooke, B. A. and Pounds, K. A., Nature Phys. Sci., 229, 144 (1971).Google Scholar
3 Giacconi, R., Gursky, H., Kellogg, E., Schreir, E. and Tananbaum, H., Astrophys. J. Letters, 167, L67 (1971).Google Scholar
4 Giacconi, R. (private communication).Google Scholar
5 Elliot, J. L., Horowitz, P., Liller, W., Papalolios, C. and Veverka, J., Astrophys. J. Letters, 168, L95 (1971).Google Scholar