Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T05:02:37.831Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The influence of stimulus deviance and novelty on the P300 and Novelty P3

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 January 2003

ABRAHAM GOLDSTEIN
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, Bar-Ilan University, Ramat Gan, Israel
KEVIN M. SPENCER
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School/VA Boston Healthcare System, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
EMANUEL DONCHIN
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology and Beckman Institute, University of Illinois at Urbana–Champaign, Champaign, Illinois, USA
Get access

Abstract

This study examined the relationship between ERP components elicited by deviant stimuli by disentangling the P300 and Novelty P3 components, using spatiotemporal principal components analysis and a dense electrode array. The three-tone paradigm was used and the pitch attributes of the tones were systematically manipulated so as to map the amplitude of the ERP components on the stimulus context. A comparison was made between the components elicited by events in the three-stimulus, classical oddball, and novelty oddball paradigms. Responses to deviant stimuli consisted of independent and dissociable ERP components in the 400–600-ms time range: A parietal component (P300) that was larger for targets than rare nontargets and was affected by the difficulty of discrimination, a fronto-central component (Novelty P3) that was larger for novel tones and for rare nontargets in the difficult discrimination condition, and an additional anterior negative component responded similarly to all types of deviant stimuli.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
2002 Society for Psychophysiological Research

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)