Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T11:16:39.487Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Effects of the presentation of false heart-rate feedback on the performance of two common heartbeat-detection tasks

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 November 2002

GEOFFREY C. PHILLIPS
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of Southern Mississippi, Hattiesburg, USA
GARY E. JONES
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of Southern Mississippi, Hattiesburg, USA
ERIC J. RIEGER
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of Southern Mississippi, Hattiesburg, USA
JEFFRY B. SNELL
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of Southern Mississippi, Hattiesburg, USA
Get access

Abstract

Research has indicated that performance on heartbeat counting tasks may be influenced by beliefs about heart rate. Sixty male subjects were administered the Schandry heartbeat counting task after viewing fast, slow, or no heart rate feedback. Subjects were also administered the Whitehead signal-detection type task. Results indicated that subjects who received fast or no heartbeat feedback performed better on the Schandry task than subjects who received slow feedback. Feedback presentation did not affect performance on the Whitehead task. These results suggest that the Schandry task is influenced by external variables (expectations, beliefs) beyond pure awareness of “discrete” visceral sensations and, thus, may not be as powerful a method for determining awareness of individual heartbeats as some other paradigms.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 1999 Society for Psychophysiological Research

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)