Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T18:52:54.981Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effects of task complexity in young and old adults: Reaction time and P300 latency are not always dissociated

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 1999

FREN T.Y. SMULDERS ,
J. LEON KENEMANS ,
WOUTER F. SCHMIDT  and
ALBERT KOK
FREN T.Y. SMULDERS
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands Department of Psychology, Maastricht University, The Netherlands
J. LEON KENEMANS
Affiliation:
Department of Psychopharmacology, University of Utrecht, The Netherlands
WOUTER F. SCHMIDT
Affiliation:
TNO Human Factors Research Institute, Soesterberg, The Netherlands
ALBERT KOK
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Get access

Abstract

Twelve young and 11 elderly men (mean ages 21.1 and 70.1) performed a choice-reaction time (RT) task in which stimulus degradation and stimulus–response (S-R) compatibility were manipulated. The extant literature has suggested that the effects of age on RT are usually augmented (multiplicative) in more difficult task conditions, but also that the effects of age on the latency of the P300 component of the event-related brain potential (ERP) are constant (additive). The results indicated that the effects of age on RT were enhanced in more difficult conditions, whether the difficulty consisted of stimulus degradation or S-R incompatibility. However, the effects of age on P300 latency were enlarged as the stimuli were degraded, but not if the S-R mapping was incompatible. Thus, it appears that task content determines if effects of age on P300 latency are additive or multiplicative. A simple model is proposed that produces the obtained pattern of effects.

Keywords

Age differencesReaction timeP300Event-related potentialStimulus–response compatibilityStimulus degradation
Type
Research Article
Information
Psychophysiology , Volume 36 , Issue 1 , January 1999 , pp. 118 - 125
Copyright
1999 Society for Psychophysiological Research

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)