Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T06:54:26.510Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Differentiation of deception using pupillary responses as an index of cognitive processing

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 March 2001

DAPHNE P. DIONISIO
Affiliation:
San Diego State University, San Diego, USA
ERIC GRANHOLM
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry, University of California, San Diego, VA San Diego Healthcare Center, San Diego, USA
WILLIAM A. HILLIX
Affiliation:
San Diego State University, San Diego, USA
WILLIAM F. PERRINE
Affiliation:
San Diego State University, San Diego, USA
Get access

Abstract

The deception literature has predominantly focused on detection of guilty individuals using electrodermal measures. Little research has examined other psychophysiological measures or the mechanisms underlying deception. Therefore, the present study examined pupillary responses in a differentiation-of-deception paradigm. Twenty-four undergraduate participants answered the same questions twice, once truthfully and once deceptively, while pupillary responses were recorded. Questions were based on recently learned (episodic) information from scenarios or on general (semantic) knowledge from long-term memory. Task-evoked pupil dilation was significantly greater when participants confabulated responses than when they told the truth for both episodic and semantic memory questions. Previous research has demonstrated that pupil size increases with increased cognitive processing load. The present study suggested that generating deceptive recall was associated with increased pupil size and required greater cognitive processing than truthful recall.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
2001 Society for Psychophysiological Research

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)