Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T00:40:53.494Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

ERP differences in visual attention processing between attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder and control boys in the absence of performance differences

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 May 2000

FRINI KARAYANIDIS
Affiliation:
Cognitive Psychophysiology and Neuropsychiatry Laboratory, Department of Psychiatry, Sainte-Justine Hospital, University of Montreal, Quebec, Canada Department of Psychology, University of Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia
PHILIPPE ROBAEY
Affiliation:
Cognitive Psychophysiology and Neuropsychiatry Laboratory, Department of Psychiatry, Sainte-Justine Hospital, University of Montreal, Quebec, Canada
MICHELLE BOURASSA
Affiliation:
Cognitive Psychophysiology and Neuropsychiatry Laboratory, Department of Psychiatry, Sainte-Justine Hospital, University of Montreal, Quebec, Canada
DAVID DE KONING
Affiliation:
TALO bv, Bussum, The Netherlands
GUY GEOFFROY
Affiliation:
Department of Paediatrics, Service of Neurology, Sainte-Justine Hospital, University of Montreal, Quebec, Canada
GILLES PELLETIER
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry, Sainte-Justine Hospital, University of Montreal, Quebec, Canada
Get access

Abstract

Event-related potentials (ERPs) were recorded during a visual two-choice reaction time (RT) task in attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and control boys selected using strict inclusion and exclusion criteria. No group differences were found in mean RT and correct responses. Although early occipital ERPs were not affected in the ADHD group, the peak latency of early anterior ERPs (N1, P1, N2) was significantly delayed. ADHD showed a larger effect of stimulus type on the frontal negativity (N530) and the posterior late negativity (nSW) and a smaller effect of stimulus type on anterior N2 and posterior P3b amplitude. The development of N530 and P450 amplitude across blocks of five trials was analyzed using orthogonal polynomial trend analysis of variance software. In the control group, P450 amplitude to “frequent” stimuli reduced across blocks. In the ADHD group, N530 amplitude increased for “rare” stimuli across blocks. It is suggested that the ADHD group showed a lack of automatization of the categorization process with increasing time on task for which they compensated by controlled attentional processes.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 2000 Society for Psychophysiological Research

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)