Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-b95js Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-08T10:21:40.291Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Susan E. Embretson and Scott L. Hershberger (Eds.). The new rules of measurement: What every psychologist and educator should know. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 263 pp., 1999, ISBN 0-8058-2860-5.

Review products

Susan E. Embretson and Scott L. Hershberger (Eds.). The new rules of measurement: What every psychologist and educator should know. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 263 pp., 1999, ISBN 0-8058-2860-5.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2025

Gideon Mellenbergh*
Affiliation:
University of Amsterdam

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Review
Copyright
Copyright © 2001 The Psychometric Society

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Fischer, G.H., Spada, H. (1973). Die psychometrischen Grundlagen des Rorschachtests und der Holtzman Inkblot Technique [The psychometric foundations of the Rorschach test and the Holtzman Inkblot technique], Bern: Huber.Google Scholar
Heinen, T. (1996). Latent class and discrete latent trait models:Similarities and differences. Thousands Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Macready, G.B., Dayton, C.M. (1980). The nature and use of state mastery models. Applied Psychological Measurement, 4, 493516.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDonald, R.P. (1999). Test theory: A unified approach. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Mellenbergh, G.J. (1994). Generalized linear item response theory. Psychological Bulletin, 115, 300307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mokken, R.J. (1971). A theory and procedure of scale analysis with applications in political research. New York & Berlin: De Gruyter, Mouton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar