No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Susan E. Embretson and Scott L. Hershberger (Eds.). The new rules of measurement: What every psychologist and educator should know. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 263 pp., 1999, ISBN 0-8058-2860-5.
Review products
Susan E. Embretson and Scott L. Hershberger (Eds.). The new rules of measurement: What every psychologist and educator should know. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 263 pp., 1999, ISBN 0-8058-2860-5.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 01 January 2025
Abstract
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Review
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © 2001 The Psychometric Society
References
Fischer, G.H., Spada, H. (1973). Die psychometrischen Grundlagen des Rorschachtests und der Holtzman Inkblot Technique [The psychometric foundations of the Rorschach test and the Holtzman Inkblot technique], Bern: Huber.Google Scholar
Heinen, T. (1996). Latent class and discrete latent trait models:Similarities and differences. Thousands Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Macready, G.B., Dayton, C.M. (1980). The nature and use of state mastery models. Applied Psychological Measurement, 4, 493–516.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mellenbergh, G.J. (1994). Generalized linear item response theory. Psychological Bulletin, 115, 300–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mokken, R.J. (1971). A theory and procedure of scale analysis with applications in political research. New York & Berlin: De Gruyter, Mouton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar