Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-v2bm5 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-08T10:03:53.954Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Studies in the Learning Function

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2025

L. E. Wiley  and
A. M. Wiley
L. E. Wiley
Affiliation:
Ohio Wesleyan University
A. M. Wiley
Affiliation:
Ohio Wesleyan University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The error function of the theoretical learning curve developed by Thurstone has been fitted to maze data from rats that have been subjected to cerebral cortical insult. There is a high degree of relationship between the number of errors necessary to complete learning as predicted from the curve and the experimental measure of learning, total-errors-minus-errors-first-trial. The procedure provides a method of analysis for individual learning records and it may be used to shorten the training period. The goodness of fit indicates that the underlying logic of the learning curve is plausible.

Type
Original Paper
Information
Psychometrika , Volume 2 , Issue 1 , March 1937 , pp. 1 - 19
Copyright
Copyright © 1937 The Psychometric Society

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

A grant-in-aid from the National Research Council has made the present analysis possible. We are indebted to Professor L. L. Thurstone for aid and encouragement.

References

Lashley, K. S.and Wiley, L. E. “Studies of cerebral function in learning. IX. Mass action in relation to the number of elements in the problem to be learned;” J. Comp. Neur., v. 57, 1933, no. 1, Feb. 15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thurstone, L. L. The learning function. Journal of General Psychology, 1930, 3, 469–493.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thurstone, L. L. The error function in maze learning. Journal of General Psychology, 1933, 9, 288–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar