Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-g4j75 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-08T09:32:30.650Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Scale Analysis and the Measurement of Social Attitudes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2025

Allen L. Edwards  and
Franklin P. Kilpatrick
Allen L. Edwards
Affiliation:
The University of Washington
Franklin P. Kilpatrick
Affiliation:
The University of Washington
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper discusses and compares the methods of attitude scale construction of Thurstone (method of equal-appearing intervals), Likert (method of summated ratings), and Guttman (method of scale analysis), with special emphasis on the latter as one of the most recent and significant contributions to the field. Despite a certain lack of methodological precision, scale analysis provides a means of evaluating the uni-dimensionality of a set of items. If the criteria for uni-dimensionality are met, the interpretation of rank-order scores is made unambiguous, and efficiency of prediction from the set of items is maximized. The Guttman technique, however, provides no satisfactory means of selecting the original set of items for scale analysis. Preliminary studies indicated that both the Likert and the Thurstone methods tend to select scalable sets of items and that their functions in this respect are complementary. A method of combining the Likert and Thurstone methods in order to yield a highly scalable set of items is outlined. Sets of 14 items selected by the method have, in the two cases where the technique has been tried, yielded very satisfactory scalability.

Type
Original Paper
Information
Psychometrika , Volume 13 , Issue 2 , June 1948 , pp. 99 - 114
Copyright
Copyright © 1948 The Psychometric Society

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adamic, L. A nation of nations, New York: Harpers, 1945.Google Scholar
Drake, St. C., & Cayton, H. R. Black metropolis, New York: Harcourt, Brace & Co., 1945.Google Scholar
Edwards, A. L., & Kenney, K. C. A comparison of the Thurstone and Likert techniques of attitude scale construction. J. appl. Psychol., 1946, 30, 72–83.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Edwards, A. L. A critique of “neutral” items in attitude scales constructed by the method of equal appearing intervals. Psychol. Rev., 1946, 53, 159–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edwards, A. L. On Guttman's scale analysis. Educ. psychol. Meas. In press.Google Scholar
Edwards, A. L. & Kilpatrick, F. P.The scale-discrimination method for measuring social attitudes. J. appl. Psychol. In press.Google Scholar
Ferguson, L. W. A study of the Likert technique of attitude scale construction. J. soc. Psychol., 1941, 13, 51–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Festinger, L. The treatment of qualitative data by “scale analysis.”. Psychol. Bull., 1941, 44, 149–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guttman, L. A basis for scaling qualitative data. Amer. sociol. Rev., 1944, 9, 139–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guttman, L., & Suchman, E. A. Intensity and a zero point for attitude analysis. Amer. sociol. Rev., 1947, 12, 57–67.Google Scholar
Guttman, L. The desire of enlisted men for post-war full-time schooling: an example of a scale. Research Branch, Information and Education Division, Army Service Forces, Survey 63-E.Google Scholar
Guttman, L. Questions and answers about scale analysis. Research Branch, Information and Education Division, Army Service Forces, Report D-2, 1945.Google Scholar
Guttman, L. The Cornell technique for scale and intensity analysis. Mimeographed, 1946.Google Scholar
Guttman, L. On Festinger's evaluation of scale analysis. Psychol. Bull., 1947, 44, 451–465.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Likert, R. Technique for the measurement of attitudes. Arch. Psychol., 1932, No. 140, 55 pp.Google Scholar
Thurstone, L. L. & Chave, E. J. The measurement of attitude, Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press, 1929.Google Scholar
Thurstone, L. L. & Peterson, R. C. Scale for the measurement of attitude toward capital punishment: Form A, Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press, 1931.Google Scholar
Thurstone, L. L. Scale for the measurement of attitude toward communism: Form B, Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press, 1931.Google Scholar