Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-cphqk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-08T09:26:50.215Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

S. Guo & M.W. Fraser (2010). Propensity Score Analysis: Statistical Methods and Applications. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications. 370+xviii pp. US$64.95. ISBN 978-1-4129-5356-6

Review products

S. Guo & M.W. Fraser (2010). Propensity Score Analysis: Statistical Methods and Applications. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications. 370+xviii pp. US$64.95. ISBN 978-1-4129-5356-6

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2025

Peter M. Steiner
Peter M. Steiner*
Affiliation:
Northwestern University
*
[email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Book Review
Information
Psychometrika , Volume 75 , Issue 4 , December 2010 , pp. 775 - 777
Copyright
Copyright © 2010 The Psychometric Society

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Heckman, J.J. (2005). The scientific model of causality. Sociological Methodology, 35, 1–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heckman, J.J., Ichimura, H., Todd, P.E. (1998). Matching as an econometric evaluation estimator. Review of Economic Studies, 65, 261–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holland, P.W. (1986). Statistics and causal inference. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 81, 945–970.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morgan, S.L., Winship, C. (2007). Counterfactuals and causal inference: methods and principles for social research, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rässler, S. (2002). Statistical matching: a frequentist theory, practical applications and alternative Bayesian approaches, New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robins, J.M., Rotnitzky, A. (1995). Semiparametric efficiency in multivariate regression models with missing data. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 90, 122–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenbaum, P.R. (2002). Observational studies, (2nd ed.). New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rubin, D.B. (2006). Matched sampling for causal effects, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rubin, D.B. (2007). The design versus the analysis of observational studies for causal effects: Parallels with the design of randomized trials. Statistics in Medicine, 26, 20–36.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schafer, J.L., Kang, J. (2008). Average causal effects from non-randomized studies: a practical guide and simulated example. Psychological Methods, 13(4), 279–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shah, B.R., Laupacis, A., Hux, J.E., Austin, P.C. (2005). Propensity score methods gave similar results to traditional regression modeling in observational studies: a systematic review. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 58, 550–559.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stürmer, T., Joshi, M., Glynn, R.J., Avorn, J., Rothman, K.J., Schneeweiss, S. (2006). A review of the application of propensity score methods yielded increasing use, advantages in specific settings, but not substantially different estimates compared with conventional multivariable methods. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 59, 437–447.CrossRefGoogle Scholar