Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-kw2vx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-08T10:28:38.340Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Revised Law of Comparative Judgment

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2025

William P. Harris
William P. Harris*
Affiliation:
Lincoln Laboratory Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In contrast to Thurstone's Law of Comparative Judgment, a model in which a comparison pair and its complement are assumed to give rise to two different distributions of differences is considered. The consequences of this revised model on scaling problems is developed.

Type
Original Paper
Information
Psychometrika , Volume 22 , Issue 2 , June 1957 , pp. 189 - 198
Copyright
Copyright © 1957 Psychometric Society

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

The research in this article was supported jointly by the Army, Navy, and Air Force under contract with the Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

References

Edwards, A. L. The scaling of stimuli by the method of successive intervals. J. appl. Psychol., 1952, 36, 118–122CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Green, B. F. Attitude measurement. In Lindzey, G. (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (pp. 335–369). Cambridge 42, Mass.: Addison-Wesley Publishing Co., 1954Google Scholar
Gulliksen, H. A least squares solution for paired comparisons with incomplete data. Psychometrika, 1956, 21, 125–134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mosteller, F. Remarks on the method of paired comparisons: I. The least squares solution assuming equal standard deviations and equal correlations. Psychometrika, 1951, 16, 3–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mosteller, F. Remarks on the method of paired comparisons. II. A test of significance for paired comparisions when equal standard deviations and equal correlations are assumed. Psychometrika, 1951, 16, 207–218CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saffir, M. A. A comparative study of scales constructed by three psychophysical methods. Psychometrika, 1937, 2, 179–198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thurstone, L. L. Psychophysical analysis. Amer. J. Psychol., 1927, 38, 368–389CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Torgerson, W. S. A law of categorical judgment. In Clark, L. S. (Eds.), Consumer behavior (pp. 92–94). New York: New York Univ. Press, 1954Google Scholar