Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-5r2nc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-08T09:36:20.170Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Reliability Formulas that do not Assume Experimental Independence

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2025

Louis Guttman*
Affiliation:
The Israel Institute of Applied Social Research

Abstract

Tautologies are established for the reliability coefficient ρ2t of the sum of n part scores. It is not assumed that the part scores are experimentally independent of each other nor that the parts are equivalent to each other. The tautologies show the exact role played by experimental dependence and nonequivalence of parts, respectively, in the reliability of the sum. The formal algebra is appropriate to reliability in the sense of repeated trials of the same test, as well as in the sense of a universe of parallel tests, although the empirical meanings are different. Emphasis is on practical formulas that require information from only a single experiment (or test). These can take the form only of lower bounds to ρ2t, four of which are developed.

Type
Original Paper
Copyright
Copyright © 1953 The Psychometric Society

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Cronbach, Lee J., and Warrington, W. G. Time-limit tests: estimating their reliability and degree of speeding. Psychometrika, 1951, 16, 167187.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gulliksen, Harold. Theory of mental tests, New York: Wiley, 1950.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guttman, Louis. A basis for analyzing test-retest reliability. Psychometrika, 1945, 10, 255282.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Guttman, Louis. A special review of Gulliksen's Theory of mental tests. Psychometrika, 1953, 18, 123130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guttman, Louis. The reliability of speeded or noncompleted tests. (In preparation).Google Scholar