Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-f46jp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-08T09:47:05.676Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Paul E. Meehl. Why Summaries of Research on Psychological Theories are often Uninterpretable. Psychological Reports, Monograph Supplement 1-V66, 1990, 195-244, 50 pp. $ 3.00.

Review products

Paul E. Meehl. Why Summaries of Research on Psychological Theories are often Uninterpretable. Psychological Reports, Monograph Supplement 1-V66, 1990, 195-244, 50 pp. $ 3.00.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2025

Adri Smaling
Adri Smaling*
Affiliation:
University for Humanist Studies, Utrecht, The Netherlands
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Reviews
Information
Psychometrika , Volume 57 , Issue 3 , September 1992 , pp. 451 - 454
Copyright
Copyright © 1992 The Psychometric Society

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Cohen, J. (1962). The statistical power of abnormal-social psychological research: A review. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 65, 145–153.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cronbach, L. J. (1975). Beyond the two disciplines of scientific psychology. American Psychologist, 30, 116–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cronbach, L. J., Meehl, P. E. (1955). Construct validity in psychological tests. Psychological Bulletin, 52, 281–302.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gergen, K. J. (1980). Towards intellectual audacity in social psychology. In Gilmour, R., Duck, S. (Eds.), The development of social psychology (pp. 239–270). London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Gergen, K. J. (1982). Toward transformation in social psychology, New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gergen, K. J., Davis, K. E. (1985). The social construction of the person, New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M. (1984). Qualitative data analysis. A source-book of new methods, Beverly Hills: Sage.Google Scholar
Morrison, D. E., Henkel, R. E. (1970). The significance test controversy, Chicago: Aldine.Google Scholar
Mos, L. P., Boodt, C. P. et al. (1990). Hermeneutics of explanation: Or, if science is theoretical why isn't psychology?. In Baker, Wm. J. et al. (Eds.), Recet trends in theoretical psychology (pp. 71–84). New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nickles, Th. (1980). Scientific discovery, logic and rationality, Dordrecht/Boston: Reidel.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Searle, J. R. (1991). Intentionalistic explanations in the social sciences. Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 21(3), 332–344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strauss, A., Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research. Grounded theory, procedures and techniques, Newbury Park: Sage.Google Scholar
Terwee, S. J. S. (1990). Hermeneutics in psychology and psychoanalysis, New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tesch, R. (1990). Qualitative research. Analysis types & software tools, New York: The Falmer Press.Google Scholar