Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-grxwn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-08T09:35:40.288Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

On the Number of Factors

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2025

Quinn McNemar
Quinn McNemar*
Affiliation:
Stanford University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A proposed criterion for the number of factors is developed on the basis of the similarity between a factorial residual and the partial correlation coefficient; something is known concerning the sampling error of the latter. Instead of computing the residuals as partials, a formula is presented for adjusting the standard deviation of the distribution of residuals so as to approximate the S.D. of the residuals as partial correlations. The criterion requires that factors be extracted until the adjusted S.D. reaches or falls below 1/√N. When tried out on six samples drawn from six universes of known factorial description, the criterion indicated the correct number of factors each time. The requisites of situations adequate for such empirical checks are discussed.

Type
Original Paper
Information
Psychometrika , Volume 7 , Issue 1 , February 1942 , pp. 9 - 18
Copyright
Copyright © 1942 The Psychometric Society

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Blakey, R. A re-analysis of a test of the theory of two factors. Psychometrika, 1940, 5, 121–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, W., and Stephenson, W. A test of the theory of two factors. Brit. J. Psychol., 1933, 23, 352–370.Google Scholar
Coombs, C. H. A criterion for significant common factor variance. (Unpublished)Google Scholar
Kelley, T. L. Statistical method, New York: Macmillan, 1923.Google Scholar
Mosier, C. I. Influence of chance error on simple structure, etc.. Psychometrika, 1939, 4, 33–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thurstone, L. L. Primary mental abilities. Psychometric Monograph No. 1, 1938.Google Scholar
Wright, R. E. A factor analysis of the original Stanford-Binet scale. Psychometrika, 1939, 4, 209–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar